logo
As Trump goes to G7 summit, other world leaders aim to show they're not intimidated

As Trump goes to G7 summit, other world leaders aim to show they're not intimidated

Time of India15 hours ago

US President Donald Trump has long bet that he can scare allies into submission -- a gamble that is increasingly being tested ahead of the
Group of Seven
summit beginning on Monday in Canada.
He has threatened stiff tariffs in the belief that other nations would crumple. He has mused about taking over Canada and Greenland. He has suggested he will not honour NATO's obligations to defend partners under attack. And he has used Oval Office meetings to try to intimidate the leaders of Ukraine and South Africa.
But many world leaders see fewer reasons to be cowed by Trump, even as they recognise the risks if he followed through on his threats. They believe he will ultimately back down -- since many of his plans could inflict harm on the US -- or that he can simply be charmed and flattered into cooperating.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Hiep Thanh: Unsold Furniture Liquidation 2024 (Prices May Surprise You)
Unsold Furniture | Search Ads
Learn More
Undo
"Many leaders still seem intimidated by Trump, but increasingly they are catching on to his pattern of bullying," said Jeremy Shapiro, research director at the European Council on Foreign Relations. "In places as diverse as Canada, Iran, China and the EU, we are seeing increasing signs that leaders now recognise that Trump is afraid of anything resembling a fair fight. And so they are increasingly willing to stand up to him."
In the 22 instances in which Trump has publicly threatened military action since his first term, the US only used force twice, according to a May analysis by Shapiro.
Live Events
World leaders feel comfortable standing up to Trump
Ahead of the G7 summit, there are already signs of subtle pushback against Trump from fellow leaders in the group. French President Emmanuel Macron planned to visit Greenland over the weekend in a show of European solidarity. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has said the US is no longer the "predominant" force in the world after Trump's tariffs created fissures in a decades-long partnership between the US and its northern neighbour.
"We stood shoulder to shoulder with the Americans throughout the Cold War and in the decades that followed, as the United States played a predominant role on the world stage," Carney said this past week in French. "Today, that predominance is a thing of the past."
The new prime minister added that with the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, the US became the global hegemon, a position of authority undermined by Trump's transactional nature that puts little emphasis on defending democratic values or the rule of law.
"Now the United States is beginning to monetise its hegemony: charging for access to its markets and reducing its relative contributions to our collective security," Carney said.
Israel's attack on Iran has added a new wrinkle to the global picture as the summit leaders gather to tackle some of the world's thorniest problems.
A senior Canadian official said it was decided early on that the G7 will not be issuing a joint communique as it has at past summits -- an indication of how hard it can be to get Trump on the same page with other world leaders. The White House said individual leader statements will be issued on the issues being discussed.
Speaking last month at a conference in Singapore, Macron called France a "friend and an ally of the United States" but pushed back against Trump's desire to dominate what other countries do. Macron said efforts to force other nations to choose between the US and China would lead to the breakdown of the global order put in place after World War II.
"We want to cooperate, but we do not want to be instructed on a daily basis what is allowed, what is not allowed, and how our life will change because of the decision of a single person," Macron said.
Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba pushed back against Trump's agenda of levying higher tariffs on imported goods, arguing it would hurt economic growth. The Japanese leader specifically called Trump ahead of the summit to confirm their plans to talk on the sidelines, which is a greater focus for Japan than the summit itself.
"I called him as I also wanted to congratulate (him on) his birthday, though one day earlier," Ishiba said.
Trump cares about being tough, but G7 is a chance to reset relations
Senator Jeanne Shaheen, D-NH, the ranking member of the Foreign Relations Committee, said the summit was an opportunity for Trump to "mend" relationships with other countries so China would be unable to exploit differences among the G7.
She said other foreign leaders are "not intimidated" by Trump's actions, which could be driving them away from tighter commitments with the US.
"The conversations that I have had with those leaders suggest that they think that the partnership with the United States has been really important, but they also understand that there are other opportunities," Shaheen said.
The White House did not respond to emailed questions for this story.
Many leaders feel more confident that they can sidestep Trump's threats
Having originally made his reputation in real estate and hospitality, Trump has taken kindly to certain foreign visitors, such as UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni.
Starmer has sought to keep Trump in line with Europe in supporting Ukraine and NATO instead of brokering any truces that would favour Russia. He has echoed the president's language about NATO members spending more on defence. But in his Oval Office visit, Starmer also pleased Trump by delivering an invite for a state visit from King Charles III.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pentagon dismisses 'pizza index' in connection with Israel's attack on Iran, says they have 'sushi, sandwiches, coffee'
Pentagon dismisses 'pizza index' in connection with Israel's attack on Iran, says they have 'sushi, sandwiches, coffee'

Time of India

time17 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Pentagon dismisses 'pizza index' in connection with Israel's attack on Iran, says they have 'sushi, sandwiches, coffee'

Pentagon dismisses pizza index report of June 13 when Israel attacked Iran and said they don't need to order pizza from outside. A Pentagon spokesperson reacted to the Pizza delivery index of June 13 when Israel launched military attacks in Iran and said they do not need to order pizza as there are many pizza options inside Pentagon and also they have sushi, sandwiches, donuts, etc. So, in a bizarre tracking, a surge in pizza orders around the Pentagon was noticed when the attack took place. "Nearly all pizza establishments near the Pentagon have experienced a HUGE surge in activity," the X account of Pentagon Pizza Report said. The account's post included screenshots of Google data showing the popularity of pizza joints in Washington, D.C. Domino's, District Pizza Palace and We, the Pizza were all dramatically above what was typical for that time of the day. The Pentagon Pizza Report also said a gay bar close to the Pentagon had "abnormally low traffic for a Thursday night" as Israeli strikes were underway. How are pizza orders linked to major geopolitical events The Pentagon Pizza Index, also known as the Pentagon Pizza Meter, is a quirky, unofficial theory suggesting that surges in pizza or takeout food orders to government buildings like the Pentagon, White House, or CIA can signal impending major geopolitical events or crises. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo The idea is that when government officials and staff work late into the night on urgent matters—such as military operations, coups, or international conflicts—they order quick, convenient food like pizza to sustain long hours in the office. The concept traces back to the Cold War, when Soviet intelligence reportedly monitored food delivery patterns to U.S. government buildings as a form of open-source intelligence (OSINT), dubbed 'Pizzint' (Pizza Intelligence). According to The Guardian, deliveries of pizzas to the Pentagon doubled immediately before the 1989 US invasion of Panama and the 1991 Kuwait liberation campaign called Operation Desert Storm. The Takeout, a food and culture site, reported in January that while there are a number of eateries in the Pentagon—where almost 30,000 people work each day, according to Arlington National Cemetery Tours—it doesn't have its own pizzeria. Pentagon dismissed the spike reported this time and said they have plenty of pizza options inside and the timeline set out by the Pentagon Pizza Report did not align with the events, Newsweek reported.

The Donland deal: How Pakistan got Trump's attention again
The Donland deal: How Pakistan got Trump's attention again

Economic Times

time27 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

The Donland deal: How Pakistan got Trump's attention again

ET Online Pakistan has entered Donald Trump's mind and occupied some head space by doing what it does best - please, pamper and satisfy all needs of the moment, be it delivering terrorists or minerals. Like it or not, Pakistan is in the room, if not at the table, even as Trump and Modi will bump into each other at the ongoing G7 Summit at Kananaskis, Canada. It anticipated contours of Trump's second coming better, adjusted its posture, made the right offers and made them early. The effort is bolstered by more than 10 different lobbying firms working the system, including one headed by Trump's former bodyguard Keith Schiller.A unique quirk: Trump seems to like generals in uniform. Be sure he's thinking of army chief Asim Munir and not Shehbaz Sharif when he talks of Pakistan's 'great leaders' in his frequent remembrances of the India-Pak ceasefire he 'crafted'. A detail: contrary to reports in the hyper media, Munir was not invited to attend the parade to celebrate 250 years of the US army. India is struggling to adjust to a presidency that is less institutional, less structured and less focused. It's about getting the Kremlinology right, the sophisticated art of reading cryptic and crypto signals, and flying close to the sons (even Barron Trump). Outrage - however satisfying - will not help get over the Trump hump. Nor would cancelling defence orders in a fit of pique and losing the long game. Better to use the relationship to build capacity. It's good to remember that US-Pak relations were factored in when India decided to strengthen relations with Washington back in the day and negotiate the nuclear deal. They have remained a reality even though New Delhi thought it had put Pakistan in the diplomatic isolation ward. It kept bouncing back with American and British help and a permanent cadre of sympathetic bureaucrats, including retired ambassadors, in both capitals. Official India learnt to deal with the pain even if IT cell warriors and rabid TV anchors didn' says an analyst, the question remains the same: 'Does India want to - or will it - give Pakistan a veto on US- India ties?' The answer from New Delhi so far seems to be 'no' even as anger rises and political pain grows. Pakistan will do anything to please Trump and Sons. India will Pakistan's play. Over the past few years, with the Afghanistan war over and US interest waning, the army-ISI combine realised that Pakistan was no longer a frontline state. Joe Biden paid little attention and never dialled Islamabad. As American focus moved to the Indo-Pacific and rivalry with China, Pakistan knew it wasn't going to be part of the Quad, although it made some half-hearted elite understood they couldn't vie with India. But they were 'happy just to be heard and not be considered irrelevant'. The militablishment went back to the original drawing board - counterterrorism cooperation - to keep parts of the US government engaged. The easiest doors to open were at the State Department and was dismissive of Pakistan. But note that his administration approved $450 mn to 'sustain' Pakistan's F-16 fleet, including engine hardware upgrades and classified software support. The package was said to be for counterterrorism operations. In a replay, Trump approved $397 mn in February for the same fleet, despite announcing a wide freeze on foreign aid. He made an the background, Rawalpindi slowly took control of Pakistan's China policy from the politicians and worked to dispel the notion the country was (completely) in Beijing's camp. Americans wanted to believe the myth for their own reasons. For the Pakistan army, maintaining ties to America, enjoying the free military training and keeping tabs on Pentagon's thinking have always been priorities. To say nothing of serving as an important window for China in to the point, Pakistani generals never let US Centcom lose sight of the fact that their country was/is always available as a strategic staging area for US operations. Which brings us to the present. Munir and Centcom commander Michael Kurilla go back a long way. Both assumed their current positions in 2022 and have hosted each other more than shouldn't be a surprise that last week, the American general called Pakistan 'a phenomenal partner' in the fight against IS-Khorasan. Kurilla clearly thinks the military partnership with Pakistan can, and should, exist separately from the one with was the first person Munir called to say that the Abbey Gate bomber Mohammad Sharifullah, a.k.a. Jaffar, had been caught. He then requested that the message be passed on to the president. Result: a special mention in Trump's address to so it will go. Until it won't. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. How a nudge from Cyrus Mistry helped TCS unlock a USD1 billion opportunity Operation Sindoor, Turkey, Bangladesh played out as India hosted global airlines after 42 years Benchmarked with BSE 1000, this index fund will diversify your bets. But at a cost. How individual bankruptcy law can halt suicides by failed businessmen Explainer: The RBI's LAF corridor and its role in rate transmission Stock picks of the week: 5 stocks with consistent score improvement and return potential of more than 32% in 1 year Defence stocks: Black & white, and many shades of grey. 10 stocks with an upside potential of up to 30% Stock Radar: 40% drop from highs! Swiggy stocks make a rounding bottom pattern; time to buy the dip?

Iran Israel Airstrikes: Will US join war? Here's what Trump said and who can mediate to resolve conflict
Iran Israel Airstrikes: Will US join war? Here's what Trump said and who can mediate to resolve conflict

Economic Times

time27 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Iran Israel Airstrikes: Will US join war? Here's what Trump said and who can mediate to resolve conflict

Donald Trump said the US was not behind Israel's recent strike on Iran but warned of a strong military response if Iran targets American assets. Trump expressed interest in peace talks, mentioned Putin as a possible mediator, and referenced past success in global negotiations to urge for a resolution. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US Denies Role in Latest Strike Mediation by Russia Iran Retaliates Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Iran Requests US Condemnation Israel Warns Iranian Civilians Past Negotiations Car Bombs Explosion FAQs US President Donald Trump addressed the conflict between Israel and Iran in a recent interview with Rachel Scott of ABC News. He said the US did not take part in Israel's military strike on Iran but "it's possible we could get involved." However, he warned that any attack on US forces by Iran would result in a severe response. Trump also mentioned potential diplomatic efforts to resolve the ongoing Trump stated the US had no involvement in Israel's attack on Iran. The attack took place overnight. Trump made this statement on Truth Social. He warned that if Iran targets the US in any way, the American military would respond with full an interview with ABC News, Trump said Russian President Vladimir Putin offered to mediate the conflict. Trump said he was open to that idea. The conversation between Trump and Putin occurred over a phone launched missile attacks following Israel's operation named 'Rising Lion.' Reports say at least 10 people died, including two children. Over 200 people were injured. One strike in Bat Yam killed at least six Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi asked the US to condemn Israel's attacks on Iranian nuclear sites . He said Iran does not want to escalate the war. He claimed the strikes were acts of warned residents living near nuclear facilities to evacuate. An Israeli spokesperson said that staying near such sites could be dangerous. The message was shared through social media mentioned past negotiations that involved Iran. Talks broke down in early June. He said Iran and Israel can still reach an agreement. He compared this situation to past efforts involving India and Sunday, car bombs exploded near government buildings in Tehran. Iran blamed Israel for the attack. He emphasized the goal is to remove threats, not destroy Donald Trump said the US did not take part in the recent Israeli strike on Trump said peace is possible and suggested Russia could help mediate the talks.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store