Judges to rule on Palestinian group's legal action over Israel military exports
A Palestinian human rights group will discover on Monday whether it has won a legal challenge against the Government over decisions related to exports of military equipment to Israel amid the conflict in Gaza.
Al-Haq is taking legal action against the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) over its decision to continue licensing exports of components for F-35 fighter jets.
In September last year, the Government suspended export licences for weapons and military equipment following a review of Israel's compliance with international humanitarian law in the conflict.
But an exemption was made for some licences related to parts for F-35s, with lawyers for Al-Haq telling the High Court in May that this 'carve-out' was unlawful and 'gives rise to a significant risk of facilitating crime'.
The DBT is defending the challenge, with its barristers telling a four-day hearing in London that the carve-out is 'consistent with the rules of international law' and that suspending the licences would negatively impact a wider international programme.
Lord Justice Males and Mrs Justice Steyn are due to hand down their ruling at 10.30am on Monday.
At the hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice, Raza Husain KC, for Al-Haq, said the case came 'against the backdrop of human calamity' in Gaza, describing the conflict as a 'live-streamed genocide'.
In written submissions, he said that the Government misunderstood relevant parts of the Geneva Conventions when there was a clear risk that the parts might be used to commit or facilitate violations of international humanitarian law by Israel.
F-35s are part of an international defence programme which produces and maintains the fighter jets, with the UK contributing components for both assembly lines and an international pool.
An earlier hearing in the case was told that the decision to 'carve out' licences related to F-35 components followed advice from Defence Secretary John Healey, who said a suspension would impact the 'whole F-35 programme' and have a 'profound impact on international peace and security'.
In written submissions for the May hearing, Sir James Eadie KC, for the Government, said that this 'provided justification to take exceptional measures to avoid these impacts and was consistent with the UK's domestic and international legal obligations'.
He continued that some of Al-Haq's criticisms 'are not based on a balanced appreciation of the facts' and did not consider 'the true depth and range of the information-gathering and analysis' by the Government when it made the decision.
Charities Oxfam and Amnesty International, as well as Human Rights Watch, all intervened in the case.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Iranian hackers 'may still conduct malicious cyber activity,' US agencies warn
Iranian-affiliated cyber actors and hacktivist groups "may still conduct malicious cyber activity," according to a joint bulletin from U.S. law enforcement agencies. "Based on the current geopolitical environment, Iranian-affiliated cyber actors may target U.S. devices and networks for near-term cyber operations," the bulletin from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), FBI, NSA and Defense Department says. "Defense Industrial Base (DIB) companies, particularly those possessing holdings or relationships with Israeli research and defense firms, are at increased risk. Hacktivists and Iranian-government-affiliated actors routinely target poorly secured U.S. networks and internet-connected devices for disruptive cyberattacks," according to the bulletin. MORE: With July 4 just days away, US law enforcement on high alert for Iran retaliation All of this comes after Israel and Iran "declared ceasefire and ongoing negotiations towards a permanent solution," according to the alert. "Over the past several months, Iranian-aligned hacktivists have increasingly conducted website defacements and leaks of sensitive information exfiltrated from victims," the alert says. "These hacktivists are likely to significantly increase distributed denial of service (DDoS) campaigns against U.S. and Israeli websites due to recent events." The alert says that it hasn't just been over the past few months that Iranian cyber actors have been active. The agencies point to numerous instances in 2023 and 2024 when the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) compromised Israeli-backed technology, and after the start of the conflict between Hamas and Israel, IRGC-backed actors carried out cyber attacks as a form of protest. MORE: Trump blurts out expletive as he lashes out at Israel and Iran over ceasefire "Activities like website defacements, leakage of sensitive information, and distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) campaigns against U.S. websites have been common attack methods in the past," the alert says. In a statement, the agencies say they haven't seen any malicious activity, but are issuing the warning for critical infrastructure organizations to be on alert. "We strongly urge organizations to review our joint fact sheet and implement recommended actions to strengthen our collective defense against this potential cyber activity," the statement says.
CNN
21 minutes ago
- CNN
Iranian hackers could target American defense companies working in Israel, US agencies warn
US defense companies doing business in Israel are at increased risk of cyberattacks from Iran despite an Israel-Iran ceasefire, American cybersecurity and defense agencies warned Monday. 'Based on the current geopolitical environment, Iranian-affiliated cyber actors may target U.S. devices and networks for near-term cyber operations,' said the advisory from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, FBI, National Security Agency and the Department of Defense Cyber Crime Center. US defense contractors, 'particularly those possessing holdings or relationships with Israeli research and defense firms, are at increased risk,' the agencies said. Iran and Israel have for years conducted intense cyber operations against each other. US officials are increasingly concerned that US organizations with ties to Israel could be caught in the crosshairs. Iran was allegedly behind destructive cyberattacks in 2023 against organizations in the Israeli education and technology sectors. Earlier this month, a pro-Israel hacking group stole $90 million from Iran's largest cryptocurrency exchange, claiming it was revenge against the IRGC. After the US military dropped massive bombs on Iranian nuclear sites over a week ago, US critical infrastructure such as hospitals and water plants have been on high alert for any Iranian retaliation in cyberspace. There haven't been any high-impact Iranian hacks of US organizations reported yet, but Iran's history of aggressive and unpredictable cyber operations has senior US officials paying close attention. CNN has requested comment on the new US advisory from Iran's permanent mission to the United Nations. After the Hamas terrorist attack on Israel in October 2023, hackers linked with Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps scanned the internet for Israeli-made industrial software installed at water plants and other facilities across the US, according to US officials. The global hacking campaign included dozens of US victims in the water, energy, food and beverage and health sectors, the new advisory says. That alleged pro-Iranian hacking spree, which did not take advanced skill and exploited weak US defenses, affected people who never expected to be the target of someone allegedly sitting in Tehran. In one case, the hackers forced a water utility in a small town outside of Pittsburgh to operate pump stations manually. 'That was maybe the furthest thing from my mind,' Robert J. Bible, the general manager of the Municipal Water Authority of Aliquippa, told CNN in November 2023, referring to being caught up in cyberattacks related to the Israel-Gaza war. 'Especially for a community. We only serve 15,000 people. You wouldn't put two and two together.' An overriding goal of Iranian hacking operations is psychological, according to experts. The hackers use online personas to exaggerate their exploits, and they have aggressively tried to get journalists to write about their activity. Those personas have been active online in recent days, claiming successful cyberattacks on a variety of targets after Israel attacked Iran more than two weeks ago. 'If it's there, and vulnerable, they have a higher likelihood of targeting it,' one US official, who was monitoring potential Iranian hacking threats to critical infrastructure, previously told CNN
Miami Herald
27 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Iran's Supreme Leader Challenges Trump
A fierce war of words has erupted between Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and U.S. President Donald Trump following recent U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. On his official X account, Khamenei accused Trump of "exaggerating in order to cover up and conceal the truth," directly responding to Trump's claim that the U.S. had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear sites. The post also pushed back against Trump's earlier boast that he spared the ayatollah's life during the recent Iran-Israel conflict. Separately, Trump declared on Truth Social that he is offering Iran "nothing" and is refusing to engage with Iranian officials, signaling a hardening U.S. stance. The escalating online clash raises concerns about the risk of renewed conflict between Washington and Tehran. Newsweek has reached out the State Department and Iran's foreign ministry for comment. The sharp exchange follows a 12-day Israel-Iran war that ended under a fragile U.S.-brokered ceasefire. During the conflict, the U.S. carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites-an unprecedented escalation that has fueled uncertainty. Within both Washington and Tehran, officials remain divided on the strikes' effectiveness. Some U.S. leaders say the damage was severe, while others express doubts. Iran publicly minimizes the impact but also faces internal debate. Khamenei fired back against Trump, accusing him of "exaggerating in order to cover up and conceal the truth." The post, written in Farsi on his official X account, directly responded to Trump's earlier social media message boasting about sparing Khamenei's life during the Iran-Israel conflict. Khamenei added, "Anyone hearing those remarks could sense that behind the surface, there was another reality. They failed to achieve anything." This social media war escalated after Khamenei's defiant video statement on Thursday, in which he declared Tehran had dealt the U.S. a "severe slap" and claimed Israel would have been "completely destroyed" without American intervention. Trump's retort came quickly, asserting that he knew the ayatollah's location and stopped U.S. or Israeli forces from "terminating" him, while also claiming credit for preventing an even greater Israeli attack on Iran. Central to this bitter exchange are U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities during the conflict-a major escalation that both sides debate fiercely. While some U.S. officials say the strikes significantly weakened Iran's nuclear program, others are less certain. Iran publicly downplays the damage, though internal assessments remain unclear. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has also said stated that the U.S. and Israeli airstrikes inflicted serious damage on Iran's nuclear sites. On Monday, President Trump intensified his rhetoric, declaring on Truth Social that he is not offering Iran "anything" and is "not even talking" to Iranian officials following the U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. He dismissed the 2015 nuclear deal, accusing former President Barack Obama of paying billions to Tehran under the "stupid road to a Nuclear Weapon JCPOA," and criticized the agreement as a failed and costly mistake. Trump had previously withdrawn the U.S. from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2018, citing Iran's nuclear ambitions and regional activities as justification for ending U.S. participation. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on X: "The US president exaggerated what happened in an unusual way, revealing that he needed to do so... They failed to achieve anything and are exaggerating in order to cover up and conceal the truth." President Donald Trump on Truth Social: "I knew EXACTLY where he was sheltered... I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH, and he does not have to say, 'THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP!'" The fragile Iran-Israel ceasefire holds, but the sharp exchange between Trump and Khamenei is a sign of the risk of renewed conflict. Diplomatic efforts have stalled. Mixed U.S. intelligence on the strikes' effectiveness adds uncertainty. Related Articles The Tension Between Trump, Israel and Iran - Last Week in Your WordsIran Issues Safety Warning to Nuclear InspectorsTrump Denies Making Iran Offer, TalksIran Issues Fatwa Against Donald Trump: 'Enemy of God' 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
