CNMI Senate mulls bill to house Guam inmates
CNMI Department of Corrections
Photo:
RNZ Pacific / Mark Rabago
A proposed bill to establish a corrections compact between the Commonwelath of Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) and Guam is gaining momentum.
Officials are emphasising that the agreement would primarily ease overcrowding in Guam's strained correctional facilities, while strengthening regional ties between the two island territories.
They say it will also help the CNMI - not only its Department of Corrections (DOC) - financially.
Senator Manny Gregory Castro said Senate Bill 24-24 currently is in committee and a public hearing to get the community's sentiments on the measure will be scheduled soon.
"My bill is a compact. Which allows for resource sharing, it's not exclusively about housing Guam inmates at DOC," he also clarified.
At a Senate hearing last March, DOC commissioner Anthony Torres said SB 24-24 offers a solution for Guam, whose corrections department is currently operating well beyond its intended capacity.
"Guam is looking at transferring inmates as far away as Arizona, which is a 14-hour flight away.
"Instead, we are only 30 minutes away-and we have the space. Those long flights and then less coordination could be avoided.
"We have the opportunity to step in and offer them the help they so desperately need only 30 minutes away. Now, I want to reassure you that we will do this responsibly."
Under the compact, non-violent, voluntary inmates from Guam could be housed at the CNMI's DOC facilities, which currently have hundreds of unused beds.
The plan would relieve pressure on Guam's overcrowded jails without compromising the safety of the CNMI, Torres said.
Strict screening would ensure that only exemplary, low-risk inmates are eligible for transfer, and the CNMI would retain full discretion to refuse any individuals who do not meet established standards.
"Currently, our Department of Corrections has empty beds.
"This may seem like a small detail, but it represents a significant resource that we can tap into. Many facilities across the region and across the nation are grappling with overcrowding"
By partnering with the CNMI, Guam would save significant transportation and operational costs compared to shipping inmates to distant mainland facilities.
Additionally, keeping inmates closer to their families would help support rehabilitation and reintegration efforts.
"This is about providing a responsible, regional solution that benefits Guam first and foremost," Torres said. "It's better for the inmates, better for their families, and better for public safety."
Corrections Capt. Marvin Seman, a veteran correctional officer with nearly 20 years of service, also highlighted the regional benefits.
"Guam desperately needs relief," Seman said. "This compact would provide them a closer, safer option instead of sending their people thousands of miles away."
While the compact would bring much-needed revenue to the CNMI's DOC to fund officer salaries, training programs, and facility upgrades, speakers at the hearing stressed that Guam's immediate need for housing relief is the driving force behind the proposal.
Businessman and former police and Corrections commissioner Clyde Norita praised the plan, noting that Guam's overcrowding problem is already urgent.
"They're overcapacity, it's a fact," Norita said. "We have the resources and proximity to help them."
Victoria Deleon Guerrero, a DOC employee who initially had reservations about the idea, also voiced support after learning more.
"This isn't about bringing problems here," she said. "It's about being good neighbors and providing real solutions for a problem that's hurting both our islands."
Ultimately, Torres said the DOC has a lot to gain if Castro's bill is passed by the CNMI Legislature and signed into law.
He said the revenue generated from this compact "is a lifeline".
"By leveraging and utilising our excess capacity, we can generate revenue that will help us enhance our rehabilitation programs, creating successful paths for inmates to reintegrate into society.
"But beyond that, this revenue will also allow us to invest and take care of the very people who make our system function smoothly and care for inmates.
"Our dedicated correctional staff, the men and women of the Northern Mariana Islands DOC, all of them behind me, we're here in support.
"These dedicated individuals who work under demanding conditions, facing challenges, most of you in here and out in the community can hardly imagine."
Torres said CNMI taxpayers provide vital resources for rehabilitation and invest in the people who keep our system running, which ultimately benefits our CNMI residents.
"Together, let's seize this opportunity to not just transform our correctional facilities, but to uplift our entire community.
"Let us be the leaders who make a lasting impact, who can champion both rehabilitation and respect for those who serve us."
If passed, the CNMI-Guam corrections compact would allow the CNMI to assist Guam, while also improving its own corrections system through added resources.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Misleading Description Of Land Sought For Controversial Dam Project Breached Standards
Press Release – Broadcasting Standards Authority The BSA has ordered local broadcaster Central FM to publish a statement summarising the decision. A radio discussion describing conservation land sought for a controversial Hawke's Bay dam project as 'only stewardship land' breached the accuracy standard, the Broadcasting Standards Authority has found. The Authority has upheld a complaint about an item on Central FM's Cockies Hour in which host Steve Wyn-Harris interviewed the Chair of the Tukituki Water Security Project (TWSP) after the project was included on the then Fast-track Approvals Bill's list of projects released in October 2024. The BSA agreed the description of the 22 hectares of Department of Conservation (DOC) land needed for the project as 'only stewardship land', when some 93% of it has conservation park status, was a material inaccuracy which the broadcaster did not make reasonable efforts to avoid. The Authority also found the broadcaster failed to correct the error within a reasonable period after being put on notice. It has ordered local broadcaster Central FM to publish a statement summarising the decision. The land discussed in the 8 October 2024 broadcast was the subject of a deal between DOC and Hawke's Bay Regional Council for a proposed land swap which would have enabled flooding of the land for what was then known as the Ruataniwha dam project. The project stalled in 2017 after the proposed land swap was halted by a Supreme Court decision finding the Minister of Conservation had inappropriately revoked the conservation park status of relevant land. Some 20% of the more than nine-minute Cockies Hour item was devoted to the Supreme Court decision and the status and nature of the land, which is still needed for the dam to go ahead. During the interview, the land was incorrectly referred to six times by the TWSP Chair and the show's host. The BSA noted the controversial nature of the dam project within the local community and the publicity around the Supreme Court's 2017 decision. 'We would have expected the broadcaster to have some understanding of the decision, and the significance of the land's status. 'The broadcast created a misleading impression about the land needed for the project as being stewardship land and having inferior conservation values. This undermined the public interest in the story as the audience did not have the benefit of being informed about the true status of the DOC land, to enable them to reach their own informed opinions. 'We therefore concluded the broadcast had the potential to cause harm which outweighed the broadcaster's freedom of expression and is significant enough to warrant our intervention.' The full decision can be seen on the BSA website here:
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
BSA Upholds Complaint Against Central FM Re. Incorrect Labelling Of DoC Conservation Land As ‘Stewardship Land'
Press Release – Wise Water Use Wise Water Use Hawkes Bay spokesperson, Dr Trevor Le Lievre, says the finding raises a credibility issue for Mr Petersen, and is questioning his capacity to manage the build of the estimated-$500 million Ruataniwha dam v.2. The Broadcasting Standards Authority has upheld a complaint against Central FM regarding an interview with Mike Petersen, spokesperson for Ruataniwha v.2, where 22 ha. of DoC conservation land was inaccurately labelled as 'stewardship land'. The damning Broadcasting Standards Authority (BSA) decision, released today, found that Mike Petersen, lead proponent for Ruataniwha dam v.2, inaccurately labelled the 22 ha. DoC-owned land needed to build Ruataniwha v.2 as 'stewardship land', when in fact it comprises 93% conservation land. Wise Water Use Hawkes Bay spokesperson, Dr Trevor Le Lievre, says the finding raises a credibility issue for Mr Petersen, and is questioning his capacity to manage the build of the estimated-$500 million Ruataniwha dam v.2. The BSA found that Petersen '…made two definitive statements that it was not conservation land' on Central FM Radio, Waipukurau, in an interview held on 8 October last year with station part-owner and fellow dam-proponent, Steve Wyn Harris: [1] The BSA found: 'The Authority agreed the description of the 22 hectares of Department of Conservation land needed for the dam project as 'only stewardship land', when approximately 93% of it has 'conservation park status', was a material inaccuracy which the broadcaster had not made reasonable efforts to avoid.'[summary]; and 'The broadcast created a misleading impression about the 22 hectares of DOC land needed for the project as being 'stewardship' land and having inferior conservation values'. [para. 25] 'Mr Petersen is asking the community to trust him to build a $500 million dam, yet can't even correctly identify the status of the DoC land needed to build the dam. This begs the serious question as to what else Mr Petersen has got wrong?' said Le Lievre, adding: 'alarm bills should be ringing loudly for potential investors. 'Mike Petersen is selling the public a story about Ruataniwha v.2: a story about economic prosperity to be shared by all, about a solution to our depleted aquifer and rivers, and about restoring our water quality, and dealing with the vagaries of climate change: has anyone fact checked the story?' Wise Water Use is now questioning other statements made by Petersen: 'A number of statements have been made by Mr Petersen as part of the Ruataniwha v.2 story. We believe that in light of this recent ruling Mr Petersen now needs to provide evidence to back those statements,' said Le Lievre, who cited several unsubstantiated claims: 'This is a commercial project …we are not seeking public investment into this project at all' [2] Mike Petersen recently petitioned local lines company, Centralines, for money to develop another feasibility case for the dam, and received a commitment of $100,000. Wise Water Use argues this money is coming out of the pockets of CHB power consumers; The dam promoters are also wanting the public to pick up the cost of so-called 'environmental flows' which would allocate 20 Mm3 water annually for release down the main Tukituki River stem. [3] Wise Water Use calculates that should this cost fall to Regional Council ratepayers it would entail an average 10% rates increase and is running a petition asking the Regional Council to state publicly they won't assume the cost. 'There is a hydro generation component in the project as well, which appeals to those seeking green investment.' [4] Wise Water Use points out that there have never been any detailed plan for hydro generation presented in any public reports on the dam, nor other public forum, and that such a proposal doesn't stack up financially, and argues this is an attempt to greenwash the project by Mr Petersen. 'The proposal is completely different in focus and intent from the original Ruataniwha project, despite sharing the original project's site on the Makaroro river.' [5] Wise Water Use says that the renamed 'Tukituki Water Security Project' is no different to the Ruataniwha dam v.1: it would use exactly the same engineering design, rely on the same consents to take water, be located on the same part of the Makaroro River, still need the 22 ha. of DoC conservation land, and would remain an industrial-scale irrigation dam. 'Mike Petersen is fronting a $500 million dam project, which with associated on-farm infrastructure costs would cost more than $1 billion dollars. His inability to get the status of the DoC conservation land correct brings into question every other unsupported statement he has made in support of Ruataniwha v.2, and undermines the very viability of the project,' finished Le Lievre.
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Misleading Description Of Land Sought For Controversial Dam Project Breached Standards
Press Release – Broadcasting Standards Authority The BSA has ordered local broadcaster Central FM to publish a statement summarising the decision. A radio discussion describing conservation land sought for a controversial Hawke's Bay dam project as 'only stewardship land' breached the accuracy standard, the Broadcasting Standards Authority has found. The Authority has upheld a complaint about an item on Central FM's Cockies Hour in which host Steve Wyn-Harris interviewed the Chair of the Tukituki Water Security Project (TWSP) after the project was included on the then Fast-track Approvals Bill's list of projects released in October 2024. The BSA agreed the description of the 22 hectares of Department of Conservation (DOC) land needed for the project as 'only stewardship land', when some 93% of it has conservation park status, was a material inaccuracy which the broadcaster did not make reasonable efforts to avoid. The Authority also found the broadcaster failed to correct the error within a reasonable period after being put on notice. It has ordered local broadcaster Central FM to publish a statement summarising the decision. The land discussed in the 8 October 2024 broadcast was the subject of a deal between DOC and Hawke's Bay Regional Council for a proposed land swap which would have enabled flooding of the land for what was then known as the Ruataniwha dam project. The project stalled in 2017 after the proposed land swap was halted by a Supreme Court decision finding the Minister of Conservation had inappropriately revoked the conservation park status of relevant land. Some 20% of the more than nine-minute Cockies Hour item was devoted to the Supreme Court decision and the status and nature of the land, which is still needed for the dam to go ahead. During the interview, the land was incorrectly referred to six times by the TWSP Chair and the show's host. The BSA noted the controversial nature of the dam project within the local community and the publicity around the Supreme Court's 2017 decision. 'We would have expected the broadcaster to have some understanding of the decision, and the significance of the land's status. 'The broadcast created a misleading impression about the land needed for the project as being stewardship land and having inferior conservation values. This undermined the public interest in the story as the audience did not have the benefit of being informed about the true status of the DOC land, to enable them to reach their own informed opinions. 'We therefore concluded the broadcast had the potential to cause harm which outweighed the broadcaster's freedom of expression and is significant enough to warrant our intervention.' The full decision can be seen on the BSA website here:
