Historic ship Tui on fire near Paihia's Waitangi Bridge
Historic ship The Tui on fire in Paihia.
Photo:
Supplied
A historic ship is on fire by the Waitangi Bridge in Paihia.
The Tui is a three-masted sailing ship that has been a feature of the Waitangi waterfront since the late Kelly Tarlton bought the historic vessel and used it to house his finds from a lifetime of exploring shipwrecks.
It has recently changed ownership and Kerikeri-based TriOceans marine research institute had
started restoring the vessel
for use as a community space and marine education facility.
Four fire crews are fighting the blaze after Fire and Emergency received multiple calls about it after 4am.
"The timber ship is fully on fire and is already significantly damaged."
Fire and Emergency believe the fire to be suspicious.
The Tui.
Photo:
RNZ / Peter de Graaf
A witness told
Morning Report
the ship had been let go in the past few years and it was a bit of an eyesore but the community had good news when it had been sold.
"I think they'd delivered $15,000 worth of materials in there yesterday and now she's gone up in flames."
Derek Gerritsen from Big Fish Bay of Island said the top deck was on fire and the whole back of the ship was burnt out when he was at the scene.
"She's fully engulfed in flames," he said.
"I don't think there'll be much left of it."
There were already rumours going around the community about the suspicious nature of the fire, he said.
No one was on board the ship overnight.
"The fire is generating some smoke around Paihia and Waitangi and people are advised to avoid the area and keep windows shut," Fire and Emergency says.
It was not yet known how the fire started.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Warning to illegal rubbish dumpers: new rules could lead to crack-down
Clearing up the worst dumping spots costs Heretaunga-Hastings ratepayers more than $100,000 a year, councillor Wendy Schollum says, and she wants councils to have better enforcement options (file photo). Photo: Supplied/ Hastings District Council Fly-tippers illegally dumping rubbish could be in for a shock if new laws are passed making it easier for councils to prosecute them, and to crack down on them using clues such as old car registration plates or names on letters or mail. The government has proposed revisions to the Waste Minimisation Act 2008 (WMA) and the Litter Act 1979 (the Litter Act), including giving authorities more flexibility to help them crack down on illegal dumping. Hastings District Councillor Wendy Schollum told Checkpoint that illegal rubbish dumping was an ongoing issue in the community, but the council was currently limited in its ability to do much about the fly-tippers. Annually, picking up litter in Heretaunga-Hastings cost well over $100,000, council staff had told her - "and that was only in hot-spot areas, so that wasn't even across the whole district," she said. Wendy Schollum Photo: Supplied via LDR "We estimated that if we were to try and clear every space of litter, it would cost in excess of over $1 million." The types of rubbish being dumped in the area varied from everday litter, to households worth of rubbish, including whiteware and mattresses. "It's actually quite outrageous some of the stuff that gets left," Schollum said. Hastings District Council was not alone in the problem, but critics say it is difficult to hold offenders to account under laws written in the 70s, with offenders basically needing to be caught in the act. "When I first was elected onto council back in 2017, right from then until now, littering and dumping has been the number one issue with ratepayers in our area," Schollum said. But at the moment, even with overwhelming evidence, the council often could not do much in response, she said: "Unless someone was literally standing there watching the person do it at the time, under the current law, there is so little we can do." A consultation document on the law changes also noted the problem: The current Waste Minimisation Act "provides limited CME [compliance, monitoring and enforcement] powers. Prosecution is the main means to address non-compliance, with maximum fines of $100,00 for all main offences at a central government level, [and] $20,000 for a breach of bylaws." But in effect that meant: "For ... offences [other than non-payment of the levy] prosecution through the courts is the only enforcement option, which is limiting because prosecution can be a disproportionate regulatory response to non-compliance, [and] if non-compliance falls below the prosecution threshold, no consequences can arise from breach of the WMA." Schollum said the current loophole leaves ratepayers footing the bill for fly-tippers. "In an area like Heretaunga, where they've been hit by Cyclone Gabrielle and we're reeling from recovery costs, our ratepayers don't need to be paying for what is frankly laziness." She believes the problem was caused by bad attitudes, rather than issues affording dump fees. "Often people contact me and say, 'well, if you reduce the dump fees, people wouldn't litter'. The reality is that if that were the case, we would see in areas where it's cheaper or free to dispose of rubbish that there would be no illegal dumping at all and that's just not the case. "The evidence overwhelmingly points to the fact it's about attitudes." Under the proposed changes, evidence like addressed mail left in dumped rubbish could be used to identify dumpers and fine them. (file photo) Photo: Supplied/Gisborne District Council The consultation document also suggests a new tiered compliance system, with different penalties for different levels of offence. This could range from small infringements where a warning might be suitable, for example for "illegal plastic bag use" or minor littering, through to mid-range offences where the most severe consequences were not suitable, up to the most severe consequences, for behaviour like "high-harm illegal dumping". Schollum said tiered enforcement options would be helpful to the council: "If someone threw their takeaway container out their car window, they're not going to be met with the same sort of penalty as someone who dumps a whole house ... worth of rubbish [in] the community area. "This is about councils finally being able to pursue repeat offenders and stop communities having to pay for the cost of laziness, but only with reasonable evidence." The revisions could also distinguish between individuals and larger entities committing offences, and define offences and maximum fees, penalties and prosecution. Schollum said despite enthusiasm from the community to help in clearing the litter, other frustrating barriers have stood in the way. "Some of the worst hit areas are actually NZTA managed lands, and at the moment, because of health and safety rules with NZTA we can't even arrange community clean ups on their land." Even though these set backs have limited community clean ups, Schollum said it should not be the community's job in the first place. "We shouldn't be having to look at the ambulance at the bottom of the cliff solution, which is the community spending their money and time trying to clean up other people's mess. We need to stop the dumping and the littering in the first place." Other changes in the proposal include adjusting how local councils are allocated funds to dispose of waste, widening what councils can use the funds for and clarifying who is responsible for what. Consultation for the potential law changes closed on 1 June, the Ministry for the Environment website said. Next, the submissions will be considered, and from there Cabinet could decide to create an amendment bill, which could be introduced to Parliament to pursue changing the existing law. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
How All Whites 'act and behave' on field to be tested
Players of both teams (Michael Boxall and Bill Tuiloma) argue during the New Zealand All Whites v Qatar friendly football match in Austria, 2023. Photo: PHOTOSPORT Nearly two years ago to the day, All White Michael Boxall was central to a moment that captured the attention of football players around the world and the sports global governing body. On 20 June, 2023, the All Whites refused to take the field for the second half of a friendly game against Qatar after Boxall was allegedly racially abused by an opposition player late in the first half. The referee took no action on the field and New Zealand Football believed the All Whites had done the right thing by abandoning the game at half-time. It was a situation the All Whites had not faced before. Boxall said he moved on "pretty quickly" from the incident and does not look back at it. A "non-issue", he said. Just another thing that happened during an international career that began 14 years ago and involves tales of disruptive tactics by opposition fans and 50 hour travel days, amongst the winning moments such as his goal for the All Whites in March. Boxall could add more memories at his first Football World Cup next year. The centre-back, who captains his club side Minnesota United in Major League Soccer and has worn the armband for the All Whites, said despite his experience, he was not the loudest voice in the lockeroom. "I've never really been one of the more vocal people but if something needs to be said I won't shy away," he said. Boxall has played 55 times for the All Whites and tentatively said that some of his younger New Zealand team mates look to him as a leader. New Zealand captain Michael Boxall leads the All Whites team out against Mexico in 2024. Photo: © Photosport Ltd 2024 "Because this is such a good group and we have so many players who also lead at their own clubs, that it's not often that things need to be said. When things are going right it's any easy group to be a part of because everyone 99 times out of 100 does the right thing. "In the upcoming few months, we're going to come up against some top opposition and be in some tough circumstances where we will look to players like Chris Wood and, perhaps players will look to myself as well. We will have to do a bit more than just lead by example and kind of steer the ship a little bit, but we'll cross those bridges when we reach them." The All Whites are competing in the Canadian Shield against the higher ranked Côte d'Ivoire (world number 41) in Toronto on Sunday followed by world number 25 Ukraine on Wednesday. It is part of NZF's push to get the All Whites playing against nations from each confederation in the build up to the world cup. "Over the last few years, we've kind of carved out an identity and how we want to play and how we want to act and behave on the field and I think against the the island teams when we're qualifying for the world cup it's easy to show those attributes. "But then when you're really in the fire against top 40, top 20 teams, which we'll be facing the next week, it's when we'll really be tested so if we can carry on those attributes in to these games against world class opposition then that'll be the true test of where we stand and what we need to work on heading into the 2026 world cup." Part of what Boxall said he liked about international football was witnessing how the game was treated by fans in countries where the round ball was most popular. Michael Boxall takes a header for the All Whites. Photo: PhotoSport "I think back to when we were in Peru, the fun and games that they would play, they wouldn't allow our plane to land in Peru so we had to stopover in Chile for three hours landed at 1am, there's no cars on the highway and they give us a police escort going 20km an hour just to screw up our whole travel day. "The night before the game they've got people letting off fireworks outside our hotel every hour starting at 2am. "It upsets your preparation but it's just an eye-opening experience to how other nations treat this game and how big it is around the world." Boxall could expect a warmer welcome in the USA, Canada or Mexico next year, when the three countries share the hosting of the world cup. He has been a mainstay in the MLS with Minnesota having an option to extend his contract next season and is confident his performances will keep him in All Whites coach Darren Bazeley's thoughts for the global event. "Ticking on eight or nine years at the club, playing almost pretty much week in week out I'd say as long as I can keep myself at the my current level and stay healthy, then I don't see a whole lot changing in the near future." Given his base in the American midwest, getting into the current All Whites camp for the Canadian Shield games in Toronto was one of the shorter travel days he has encountered. "Just a two hour flight for me and a one hour time difference was a stark contrast to the March window, where I had a few missed flights and connections gone awry, so it ended up being like a 50 hour travel day. So this was much better received." The trip to Norway in October will be a bit longer but again it is all part of build up over the next few international windows that will include different nations. "[It's] really just to open our eyes to the way those teams play, and then once the draw happens, then we can narrow down and really refine our preparation for who will be facing at the World Cup." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
7 hours ago
- RNZ News
Proposed punishment for Te Pāti Māori MPs for Treaty Principles haka stands
Parliament has confirmed the unprecedented punishments proposed for Te Pāti Māori MPs who performed a haka in protest against the Treaty Principles Bill. Te Pāti Māori co-leaders Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi will be suspended for 21 days, and MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke suspended for seven days, taking effect immediately. Opposition parties tried to reject the recommendation, but did not have the numbers to vote it down. The heated debate to consider the proposed punishment came to an end just before Parliament was due to rise. Waititi moved to close the debate and no party disagreed, ending the possibility of it carrying on in the next sitting week. Leader of the House Chris Bishop - the only National MP who spoke - kicked off the debate earlier in the afternoon saying it was "regrettable" some MPs did not vote on the Budget two weeks ago. Bishop had called a vote ahead of Budget Day to suspend the privileges report debate to ensure the Te Pāti Māori MPs could take part in the Budget, but not all of them turned up. The debate was robust and rowdy with both the deputy speaker Barbara Kuriger and temporary speaker Tangi Utikare repeatedly having to ask MPs to quieten down. From left Rawiri Waititi, Hana Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke and Debbie Ngarewa-Packer. Photo: RNZ/Mark Papalii Tākuta Ferris spoke first for Te Pāti Māori saying the haka was a "signal of humanity" and a "raw human connection". He said Māori had faced acts of violence for too long and would not be silenced by "ignorance or bigotry". "Is this really us in 2025, Aotearoa New Zealand?" he asked the House. "Everyone can see the racism." He said the Privileges Committee's recommendations were not without precedent, noting the fact Labour MP Peeni Henare, who also participated in the haka, didn't face suspension. MP Tākuta Ferris spoke for Te Pāti Māori. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Henare attended the committee and apologised, which contributed to his lesser sanction. MP Parmjeet Parmar - a member of the Committee - was first to speak on behalf of ACT, and referenced the hand gesture - or "finger gun" - that Te Pāti Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer made in the direction of ACT MPs during the haka. Parmar told the House debate could be used to disagree on ideas and issues, and there wasn't a place for intimidating physical gestures. Greens co-leader Marama Davidson said New Zealand's Parliament could lead the world in terms of involving the indigenous people. She said the Green Party strongly rejected the committee's recommendations and proposed their amendment of removing suspensions, and asked the Te Pāti Māori MPs be censured instead. Davidson said The House had evolved in the past - such as the inclusion of sign language and breast-feeding in The House. She said the Greens were challenging the rules, and did not need an apology from Te Pāti Māori. Winston Peters called Te Pāti Māori "a bunch of extremists". Photo: RNZ/Samuel Rillstone NZ First leader Winston Peters said Te Pāti Māori and the Green Party speeches so far showed "no sincerity, saying countless haka had taken place in Parliament but only after first consulting the Speaker. "They told the media they were going to do it, but they didn't tell the Speaker did they? "The Māori party are a bunch of extremists," Peters said, "New Zealand has had enough of them". Peters was made to apologise after taking aim at Waititi, calling him "the one in the cowboy hat" with "scribbles on his face". He continued afterward, describing Waititi as possessing "anti western values". Labour's Willie Jackson congratulated Te Pāti Māori for the "greatest exhibition of our culture in The House in my lifetime". Jackson said the Treaty bill was a great threat, and was met by a great haka performance. He was glad the ACT Party was intimidated, saying that was the whole point of doing the haka. He also called for a bit of compromise from Te Pāti Māori - encouraging them to say sorry - but reiterated Labour's view the sanctions were out of proportion with past indiscretions in the House. Chlöe Swarbrick said the prime minister was personally responsible if the proposed sanctions went ahead. Photo: RNZ/Samuel Rillstone Greens co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick said the debate "would be a joke if it wasn't so serious". "Get an absolute grip", she said to the House, arguing the prime minister "is personally responsible" if The House proceeds with the committee's proposed sanctions. She accused National's James Meager of "pointing a finger gun" at her - the same gesture coalition MPs had criticised Ngarewa-Packer for during her haka - the Speaker accepted he had not intended to, Swarbrick said it was an example where the interpretation can be in the eye of the beholder. She said if the government could "pick a punishment out of thin air" that was "not a democracy", putting New Zealand in very dangerous territory. An emotional Maipi-Clarke said she had been silent on the issue for a long time, the party's voices in haka having sent shockwaves around the world. She questioned whether that was why the MPs were being punished. "Since when did being proud of your culture make you racist?" "We will never be silenced, and we will never be lost," she said, calling the Treaty Principles bill was a "dishonourable vote". She had apologised to the Speaker and accepted the consequence laid down on the day, but refused to apologise. She listed other incidents in Parliament that resulted in no punishment. Maipi-Clarke called for the Treaty of Waitangi to be recognised in the Constitution Act, and for MPs to be required to honour it by law. "The pathway forward has never been so clear," she said. ACT's Nicole McKee said there were excuses being made for "bad behaviour", that The House was for making laws and having discussions, and "this is not about the haka, this is about process". She told The House she had heard no good ideas from the Te Pāti Māori, who she said resorted to intimidation when they did not get their way, but the MPs needed to "grow up" and learn to debate issues. She hoped 21 days would give them plenty of time to think about their behaviour. Labour MP and former Speaker Adrian Rurawhe started by saying there are "no winners in this debate", and it was clear to him it was the government, not the Parliament, handing out the punishments. He said the proposed sanctions set a precedent for future penalties, and governments may use it as a way to punish opposition, imploring National to think twice. He also said an apology from Te Pāti Māori would "go a long way", saying they had a "huge opportunity" to have a legacy in The House, but it was their choice - and while many would agree with the party there were rules and "you can't have it both ways". Rawiri Waititi speaking to the media after the Privileges Committee debate. Photo: RNZ/Mark Papalii Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi said there had been many instances of misinterpretations of the haka in The House and said it was unclear why they were being punished, "is it about the haka... is about the gun gestures?" "Not one committee member has explained to us where 21 days came from," he said. Waititi took aim at Peters over his comments targeting his hat and "scribbles" on his face. He said the haka was an elevation of indigenous voice and the proposed punishment was a "warning shot from the colonial state that cannot stomach" defiance. Waititi said that throughout history when Māori did not play ball, the "coloniser government" reached for extreme sanctions, ending with a plea to voters: "make this a one-term government, enrol, vote". He brought out a noose to represent Māori wrongfully put to death in the past, saying "interpretation is a feeling, it is not a fact ... you've traded a noose for legislation". Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
