logo
Trump's pledge to lift Syrian sanctions faces a complex road

Trump's pledge to lift Syrian sanctions faces a complex road

Miami Herald16-05-2025

U.S. President Donald Trump says he's ready to ease sanctions on Syria. He won't be able to do it quickly.
The American leader sat down with Syrian counterpart Ahmed Al-Sharaa in Riyadh on Wednesday - the first meeting between heads of the two countries in 25 years - after unexpectedly saying he would drop all sanctions against the war-ravaged country and even look to normalize relations.
The move was seen as a highlight of Trump's trip to the Arabian Peninsula this week, but actual implementation will be a protracted and thorny challenge. The White House made clear it's not a one-way street, saying the president urged Sharaa to take steps in return, including cooperation in combating terrorism and getting rid of all foreign fighters in Syria, and agreeing to ties with Israel.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio will have to wade through layers of strict restrictions imposed on Syria over the past 45 years, covering everything from finance to energy. He met with his counterpart Asaad Al-Shaibani on Thursday in the Turkish coastal city of Antalya on the sidelines of a North Atlantic Council gathering.
Turkey's Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan and his aides sat in on the meeting, according to video released by Syria's official news agency. Ankara, which shares the longest border with Syria and maintains troops in the country, is a crucial backer and partner of the current government in Damascus. It supported the rebels who fought the previous regime.
For starters, Trump plans to seek a 180-day waiver to sanctions imposed by Congress, with the longer-term goal being to remove the restrictions entirely, Rubio told reporters right after the Antalya meeting. Just before Syria's longtime leader, Bashar Assad, was overthrown in December, the U.S. renewed the 2019 Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act, which penalizes almost anyone who does business with Syria.
"Ultimately, if we make enough progress, we'd like to see the law repealed," Rubio said. "We're not there yet. That's premature. We want to start with the initial waiver, which will allow foreign partners who wanted to flow in aid to begin to do so without running the risk of sanctions."
Earlier this year, the State Department demanded Sharaa's government show progress on a list of critical issues as a precondition for lifting sanctions. They included the items shared by Trump with Sharaa in Riyadh.
In tandem and as a stopgap measure, the U.S. plans to issue general licenses covering a broad swath of the economy in the coming weeks, according to a Treasury official who asked not to be identified discussing private deliberations. General licenses allow for certain types of business transactions without requiring companies to apply for explicit permission.
Trump can lift sanctions issued by executive order but some, like the Caesar Act, will need a vote in Congress to be repealed, according to Caroline Rose, a Syria expert and research director at the Washington-based New Lines Institute.
"The road ahead with sanctions relief will be long and complicated," she said. "There are still many skeptics to Syria normalization and sanctions relief, particularly among Republican Party members."
Another issue is that Sharaa, Shaibani and many other members of the present Syrian government are former commanders of an Al-Qaeda-affiliated group implicated by the United Nations Security Council in war atrocities. Sharaa, who previously ran an Islamist protostate in northwest Syria, overthrew Assad in December after a rebel offensive.
"There's a lot that needs to be done, including by the Syrian administration," Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan told reporters Wednesday. "Syria won't be alone - the kingdom and the rest of our international partners will be at the forefront of those supporting this effort and economic rebirth."
One immediate boost for Sharaa's government will come from Qatar, which has U.S. backing to begin dispersing almost $30 million a month for civil servant salaries, according to two people involved in finalizing the arrangement.
That will provide at least a start for the new Syrian administration, which is faced with an economy devastated by more than a decade of war and in need of as much as $400 billion for rebuilding costs, according to the Carnegie Endowment for International peace.
"We welcome all investors: children of the nation inside and outside, our Arab and Turkish brothers and friends from around the world," Sharaa said in a speech on Wednesday night.
Supporters of Sharaa inside and out of Syria, including Saudi Arabia, see Trump's move as a brave decision that isolates extremists within the Syrian leader's Sunni Islamist-dominated administration. Some were involved in massacring hundreds of civilians from a minority sect in March in the country's coastal region following an attack on Sharaa's forces, according to Mazen Darwish, one of Syria's most prominent human rights activists.
The move by Trump also helps further exclude Iran, Assad's main patron, and ensure China doesn't make significant inroads. Investment opportunities will instead fall to regional powers friendly to the U.S. such as Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.
"The main concern in the business community has been that we don't want to be seen working with what has been designated as a terrorist government by the West," said Majd Abbar, a Dubai-based Syrian-American information-technology executive, who has lobbied officials in Washington to lift sanctions and met with Sharaa multiple times.
"Now that these sanctions will be lifted, everyone is going to jump on board to invest in Syria," he said. "It's practically a white canvas - there's nothing there."
Syria, which is technically still at war with Israel, has been under myriad U.S. sanctions since its 1979 designation by Washington as a state sponsor of terrorism.
Relations thawed in the 1990s when Damascus joined the U.S.-led coalition that ousted Saddam Hussein from Kuwait and engaged in peace talks with Israel. But after replacing his father in 2000, Assad deepened ties with Iran and was accused by the U.S. of supporting the insurgency in Iraq following the 2003 U.S.-led invasion.
That triggered additional sanctions by Washington, and further rounds followed from 2011 when Assad mounted a brutal crackdown against his opponents, spawning a decade-long conflict that killed almost 500,000 people and displaced millions more.
Before Trump's announcement, many in his administration, such as Sebastian Gorka, were strongly opposed to removing sanctions or dealing with Sharaa, seeing him as a committed jihadist who is masking his real intentions. Gorka and others point to the fact Sharaa joined Al-Qaeda in Iraq after Hussein's toppling to fight and kill Americans as well as Iraqis associated with the post-Hussein order.
At their meeting in Riyadh, Trump urged Sharaa to take certain steps, according to a White House readout of the conversation, which was attended by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Those include the deportation of Palestinian militants and other extremists from Syria, and helping with the effort to prevent the resurgence of Islamic State.
Israel was quick to intervene militarily in Syria after Assad's ouster, launching a series of airstrikes on arms-storage sites and extending its occupied land in Syria's southwest. It also stepped in to defend the Druze community after violent clashes between the minority group and government forces.
The country's attitude toward Syria "is more skeptical, we are approaching matters in a slower manner," Danny Danon, Israel's ambassador to the United Nations, told Army Radio on Thursday. "We want to see that there really is stability in Syria, that this regime doesn't only talk, it also takes action."
----------
-With assistance from Dan Williams, Jordan Fabian, Fiona MacDonald, Julius Domoney and Natalia Drozdiak.
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NATO allies will pledge to hike defense spend – but will they deliver?
NATO allies will pledge to hike defense spend – but will they deliver?

CNBC

time26 minutes ago

  • CNBC

NATO allies will pledge to hike defense spend – but will they deliver?

Fireworks could kick off during NATO's annual summit this week, as the U.S. pushes its allies to sharply increase their defense spending to 5% of their gross domestic product (GDP). The 5% figure is made up of 3.5% of GDP that should be spent on "pure" defense, with an extra 1.5% of GDP going to security-related infrastructure, such as cyber warfare capabilities and intelligence. While some member states they're happy to hit that milestone, and some countries are not too far off that mark, others don't even meet the 2% threshold that was agreed over a decade ago. While they might pledge to increase defense spending, whether these promises materializes will be the key question. Talk is cheap and timelines can be vague — but concerted action is what the U.S. and President Donald Trump, who's attending a NATO summit for the first time since 2019, will want to see. "The U.S. is looking for everybody to say, 'Yeah, we mean it. We have a plan. 5% is real. We're going to get there'," Kurt Volker, former U.S. ambassador to NATO and distinguished fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA), said Wednesday. "But one thing to watch for is if the messaging is actually on point. Some of the messaging from some of our European allies, at least when they back brief their own media and their own parliaments is, 'Yeah, 5% but it's really 3.5% and 1.5%, and that can be pretty much anything' ... So there's going to be a whittling down [of defense spending pledges] almost immediately," Volker noted at a CEPA briefing ahead of the NATO summit. "And if that is over emphasized, you're going to have a clash with the U.S.," Volker added. The stakes are high as allies meet in The Hague in the Netherlands on June 24-25, given ongoing conflict in Ukraine and war in the Middle East threatening to destabilize the global economy. Defense analysts say this year's meeting could be the most consequential in the alliance's 77-year history, with the U.S.' spend-pushing heavily forewarned before the summit. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was emphatic as he said 5% "will happen" at a separate NATO gathering earlier this month, with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte also widely plugging that message to allies too. Defense spending has been a thorny subject for NATO members for years, and a persistent source of annoyance and anger for Trump, who was demanding that allies double their spending goals from 2% to 4% of GDP all the way back in 2018. NATO defense expenditure has nevertheless sharply picked up among NATO members since Trump was last in power. Back then, and arguably at the height of the White House leader's irritation with the bloc, only six member states met the 2% target, including the U.S. Times have changed, however; by 2024, 23 members had reached the 2% threshold, according to NATO data. While some greatly surpassed that target — such as Poland, Estonia, the U.S., Latvia and Greece — major economies including Canada, Spain and Italy have lagged below the contribution threshold. No NATO member has so far reached the 5% spending objective, and some are highly likely to drag their feet when it comes to getting to that milestone now. The U.K., Poland and Germany have already said they intend to increase defense spending to the requisite target, but their timeline is unclear. The UK is also reportedly trying to delay the spending rise among by three years, according to the i newspaper. CNBC has reached out to Downing Street for comment. Spain and Italy are seen as major holdouts against the 5% target, after only committing to reach the 2% threshold in 2025. Canada meanwhile spent 1.3% of GDP on defense in 2024, NATO estimates suggest, even less than Italy, Portugal or Montenegro. Spending 5% on defense is a target, but not a given, Jason Israel, senior fellow for the Defense Technology Initiative at CEPA, said Wednesday. "Every single country ... is trying to figure out how they're going to thread that needle of being able to make the commitment, but also make the accounting work when every single nation has to make trade offs against what is generally unpopular, massive increases in defense spending," he noted, stressing it's a "long way from commitments ... to actual capability," European aerospace and defense companies are following NATO spending commentary and commitments closely, but say they're stuck in limbo between pledges and action by way of concrete government procurement. The leaders of Leonardo, Embraer and Saab told CNBC last week the continent needs to act decisively and collectively to make long-term commitments to defense spending and investment contracts to enable companies like theirs to scale-up their production capacity and manufacturing capabilities. "If we go for 3.5% [of pure defense spending] across the European part of NATO, that will mean a lot, and more will be needed in terms of capacity. But we need to understand the capability targets better," Micael Johansson, the chief executive of Swedish defense company Saab, told CNBC. "We can do more, and I think we need to come together in Europe to create more scale, also in what we do to align demand, align requirements, so we can actually be competitive player in internationally. So there's a lot to do still," he said. Roberto Cingolani, CEO of Italian defense firm Leonardo, agreed that "there's a lot of work to be done." "Leonardo has a capacity boost program at the moment because we are quite aware of the fact that we have to increase the production of specific platforms, defense systems, electronics and technology solutions. It is not only matter of money, it's matter of priority. It's matter of reducing the fragmentation among countries in Europe," he told CNBC's Charlotte Reed at the Paris Air Show. Defense companies needed to know what will be expected of them ahead of time, Cingolani said, given the complex nature of global supply chains that underpin the defense industry. "We have approximately 5000 companies in the supply chain, and we are in 160 countries in the world. So it's very complicated," he noted. "You have to invest in supply chain. You have to make investments. You have to protect the supply chain. But of course, we also have to face a shortage of raw materials ... There is no no simple solution. If there were a solution, we would have done it already," he said.

Senate Republicans cannot force US Postal Service to scrap EVs, parliamentarian says
Senate Republicans cannot force US Postal Service to scrap EVs, parliamentarian says

Yahoo

time44 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Senate Republicans cannot force US Postal Service to scrap EVs, parliamentarian says

By David Shepardson WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Senate Republicans cannot force the U.S. Postal Service to scrap thousands of electric vehicles and charging equipment in a massive tax and budget bill, the Senate parliamentarian said late on Sunday. The U.S. Postal Service currently has 7,200 electric vehicles, made up of Ford e-Transit vehicles and specially built Next Generation Delivery Vehicles built by Oshkosh Defense. USPS warned on June 13 that scrapping the electric vehicles would cost it $1.5 billion, including $1 billion to replace its current fleet of EVs and $500 million in EV infrastructure rendered useless and "seriously cripple our ability to replace an aging and obsolete delivery fleet." Senate parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, whose role is to ensure lawmakers follow proper legislative procedure, said a provision to force the sale could not be approved via a simple majority vote in the Republican-controlled chamber and will instead need a 60-vote supermajority, according to Democrats on the Senate Budget Committee. She ruled last week that Republicans cannot use the bill to overturn landmark rules to drastically reduce vehicle emissions and boost EV sales. Senate Republicans have also sought to reclaim more than $1 billion out of $3 billion Congress gave USPS in 2023 as part of a $430 billion climate bill to buy EVs and charging infrastructure - including $1.2 billion for electric vehicles. USPS told Congress "summarily removing all electric vehicles and charging infrastructure would hobble our ability to deliver to the American people, it would directly harm our ability to serve your constituents, and it would waste crucial funds for no reasonable purpose." Replacing the current 7,200 electric vehicles would directly cost the Postal Service at least $450 million and USPS has also spent $540 million on electrical infrastructure upgrades "which is literally buried under parking lots, and there is no market for used charging equipment," the company added. USPS would also face significant costs from Oshkosh for halting EV purchases under its contract. USPS said in December that purchases in 2025 would be around "50-50" EVs and gas-powered. USPS plans to buy some 66,000 electric vehicles by 2028. Senate Republicans argued scrapping EVs would "focus USPS on delivering mail and not achieving the environmental aims pushed by the Biden administration." In March, the White House forced out Postmaster General Louis DeJoy, who led efforts to restructure the money-losing U.S. Postal Service for nearly five years. USPS has lost more than $100 billion since 2007. David Steiner, a FedEx board member and former CEO of Waste Management, has been named as incoming postmaster general. President Donald Trump said in February he was considering merging the Postal Service with the Commerce Department, a move Democrats said would violate federal law. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Oil up, but stocks look to slide after U.S. attacks on Iran
Oil up, but stocks look to slide after U.S. attacks on Iran

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Oil up, but stocks look to slide after U.S. attacks on Iran

Oil up, but stocks look to slide after U.S. attacks on Iran originally appeared on TheStreet. The U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear facilities on Saturday changes the focus of what's ahead for the U.S. economy in the last full week of June. Because everyone is waiting to see what Iran will do, other than fire missiles on Israel. That's what happened late Saturday. 💵💰💰💵 The three biggest questions a day later: How will energy and stock markets react? Does Iran still have enough enriched uranium to make and deploy a small nuclear weapon? Will Iran move to block the ships from passing from the Persian Gulf through the Strait of Hormuz into global shipping lanes? Outside geopolitics, economic events coming up include Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell's testimony before Congress on Tuesday and an important inflation nuclear question is on the table because U.S. officials weren't sure Sunday if the attacks on facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan actually destroyed nuclear materials. Vice President J.D. Vance, in fact, suggested that Iran's nuclear stock pile is still intact. If that's the case, it's possible Iran could assemble a first-generation weapon. That would be as powerful as the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, Robert Pape of the Chicago Project on Security and Threats told MSNBC's Alex Witt on Sunday. Not having this awful idea become reality depends on cooler heads prevailing. A key issue: If Iran is willing to discuss destroying or otherwise ceding control its nuclear development efforts. The Trump Administration is threatening more attacks if Iran rejects the demand. Blocking the Strait of Hormuz, through which 25% of the world's crude oil passes — headed mostly to China, India and Asia — will send global oil prices surging and, ultimately, will boost gasoline prices in the United States and elsewhere. Stocks and bonds also would slump. Crude oil futures in New York opened up nearly $3 a barrel, then fell back quickly. At 7:30 p.m. EDT, crude was was up $2.12 to $75.99. Brent crude, the global benchmark, jumped to as high as $81.40, then fell back to $79.20 per barrel, up $2.19 Crude oil settled at $73.84 a barrel on Friday, up 34 cents. or 1.2%, from Thursday and up 21.5% so far in June. AAA's daily report on gasoline prices put the U.S. average at $3.218 a gallon, down slightly from Saturday's $3.129. Stock index futures were lower in early trading Sunday with S&P 500 futures off 28 points to 5,990. Futures based on the Dow Jones Industrial Average were down just 184 points to 42,333. Nasdaq-100 futures had fallen 137 points to 21,710. Stocks overall were flat last week even as global tensions heated up. Some defense-oriented stocks slipped on Friday. Palantir Technologies () was off 2% to $137.30. Lockheed Martin () , however, was up 0.4% to $470.56. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, who is always verbally battered by President Trump, will testify before the Congress twice this week. The questions almost certainly focus on the Iran situation and its impact on the economy. He will also have to explain why the Fed is so stubborn about NOT cutting its key federal funds rate. The Fed decided last week to leave its federal funds rate at 4.25% to 4.5%. One Fed governor, Christopher Waller, who voted in support of holding rates steady, thinks a rate cut could come in July. Mary Daly, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, thinks the Fed will have better information by September. The federal funds rate mostly affects short-term rates. Bond yields influence rates on, say, home mortgages and auto loans. The 30-year mortgage rate was just under 7% on Friday. Powell's first appearance is before the House Financial Services Committee on Tuesday and the Senate Banking Committee on Wednesday. More Economic Analysis: Federal Reserve prepares strong message on long-term interest rates Massive city workers union approves strike Analyst makes bold call on stocks, bonds, and gold The most important economic report this coming week is the Personal Consumption Expenditures Index (PCE), due Friday from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. This is the Federal Reserve's preferred inflation rate. The index for May is expected to show a 2.3% year-over-year index. The core index, stripping out food and energy, is expected to rise 2.6%, up slightly from April. The inflation rate is still the lowest since March 2021, Barrons says. Four reports come this week that will help clarify the condition of the housing market. Existing homes sales for May, due Monday from the National Association of Realtors. Most estimates are around 4.1 million units on a seasonally-adjusted annual basis, up From April's 4 million rate. S&P Case-Shiller Home Price Index, due Tuesday from Standard & Poor's. New-home sales, due Wednesday from the Commerce Department. Pending home sales, due Thursday from the National Association of Home Builders. S&P Global reports its flash purchasing manager index reports for June. These measure what manufacturing and services companies are actually buying. The Conference Board comes out with its monthly Consumer Confidence Index report for June Tuesday morning It may show a slight gain because the data were collected as stocks were rallying after April's stock-market slump. The University of Michigan offers its revised Consumer Sentiment Index report on Friday. Its early version suggested consumers were a touch less worried and cited the market up, but stocks look to slide after U.S. attacks on Iran first appeared on TheStreet on Jun 23, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jun 23, 2025, where it first appeared. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store