
‘Murderbot' Review: Apple's New Comedy Sci-Fi Is A Great Vehicle For Alexander Skarsgard, But Not Without Its Problems
Murderbot
Don't let the name fool you: Apple TV+'s new science-fiction series Murderbot isn't actually about a rampaging robot killing everything in sight, though Alexander Skarsgard's SecUnit certainly ponders the idea from time to time.
SecUnit stands for Security Unit, a cyborg manufactured by the nefarious Corporation Rim, a somewhat nebulous hyper-capitalistic organization that uses, among other things, indentured servitude in its various corporate practices. This particular unit is unique: It's managed to override its 'governor module' – the tech that allows humans to tell it what to do, and protects them from a robot going rogue and killing everyone.
The thought crosses Murderbot's mind when he first hacks his system, but he realizes that it's probably in his best interest not to go on a murder spree. This act of self-preservation leads him to a new job, when scientist hippies on an exploratory mission are forced to rent a SecUnit for security purposes.
These hippies are part of the PreservationAux team, a group that belongs to the Preservation Alliance, a commune-style society that has remained free from the dystopian rule of the Corporation Rim. They don't even want a robot onboard – they view it as a form of slavery – but for insurance purposes, they have no choice. So they take the cheapest model, who just so happens to be Murderbot.
Murderbot
The PreservationAux team is made up of Pin-Lee (Sabrina Wu), Arada (Tattiawna Jones), Ratthi (Akshay Khanna), Bharadwaj (Tamara Podemski), and Gurathin (David Dastmalchian). Gurathin is an augmented human that can tap into computer systems and is by far the most mistrustful of their new cyborg companion. The team is led by Mensah (Noma Dumezweni), a mothering figure who plays a big role in bridging the gap between robot and human this season. What this team is actually up to is quite vague: They're researching . . . something, on a planet that at first seems benign but ends up being far more dangerous than anyone anticipated.
Lucky they brough a SecUnit along, even if it has no desire to be there. The best part about Murderbot, by a long shot, is Skarsgard's performance. He doesn't like people, but he's forced to protect them. Well, not really forced since he's hacked his governor module, but to keep up appearances he does his job. He'd rather be watching TV.
The most endearing thing about Murderbot is it's / his (nobody quite knows how to refer to SecUnit when it comes to pronouns, a running gag) obsession with The Rise and Fall of Sanctuary Moon, which is basically the show you'd get if Star Trek and Days Of Our Lives had a lovechild. The show has 2,797 episodes and we get little glimpses of them in action because Murderbot spends every waking moment glued to his entertainment feed, and is annoyed when pesky humans and their problems get in the way.
Sanctuary Moon has its own cast: Clark Gregg, John Cho, DeWanda Wise and Jack McBrayer all play various roles in the space soap. It's hilariously over-the-top and ridiculous, but Murderbot refers to it as 'premium' even if nobody else agrees. He turns to it constantly when attempting to figure out how to deal with human problems, often quoting it or using various episodes to try to figure out what he should do in a tight spot.
Murderbot
I'm reminded, in no small part, of Resident Alien, though the two shows are quite different for the most part. Still, in that show we have an alien disguised as a human with very underdeveloped social skills who turns to TV in order to learn human ways. In that show, it's Law & Order. Alan Tudyk plays the alien, Harry, with gleeful abandon. Skarsgard's Murderbot is awkward in a totally different way, unsure how to deal with emotion, tortured just by having to look someone in the eye. Both often contemplate killing everyone.
Murderbot is completely confounded by the kindness of the PreservationAux team, though this does little to warm him to them – at first. He'd rather be left alone with Sanctuary Moon. Of course, things don't go as planned on the mission and a series of unfortunate events leads to various precarious situations, betrayals, shoot-outs and daring escapes, all of which get in the way of Murderbot's screen time. I won't spoil any of that.
I can't speak to the quality of the adaptation as I've yet to read The Murderbot Diaries by Martha Wells upon which this show is based. What I can say is that while Skarsgard's Murderbot is consistently hilarious, the rest of the show is less so. The funniest bits are Murderbot's observations and reactions; the team itself is often played for laughs that don't quite land, though we get a few funny bits and some good slapstick here and there.
Of the supporting cast, it's (unsurprisingly) David Dastmalchian who leaves the biggest mark. His mistrust of the SecUnit is rooted in his own unique abilities and backstory, and Dastmalchian gives depth to the role that isn't necessarily in the text. Other than Dumezweni, who adds a welcome layer of emotion and warmth, the rest of the cast feels a bit like throwaway characters used for gags that fall flat more than anything. Do we really need an awkward throuple subplot? No, the answer is no.
Murderbot
Perhaps the biggest issue with Murderbot, however, is that episodes are only 20-ish minutes long and Apple is releasing them weekly. The first two come out this Friday, May 16th, with one episode a week after that all the way up to July 11th. It took me a few episodes to really get invested in the story, and outside of the titular character I found myself more irritated with the others at first, though this is perhaps by design, since Murderbot himself is mostly irritated and vexed by his new companions.
The point is, this might have worked better using Netflix's binge-release model, allowing people to really dive into the show rather than trickle it out weekly. Sure, episodes often end on cliffhangers, but the story is pretty thin, especially at first, with a somewhat generic sci-fi look and feel, and I'm not sure it's enough to capture and then hold interest over the course of 9 weeks. It certainly picks up as it goes along, but expecting audiences to wait four or five weeks to get to that point is a big ask. Watching all ten episodes over two nights helped enormously, but audiences won't have that luxury. I don't feel this way about Apple's other shows currently airing, like The Studio or Your Friends & Neighbors, which are both well-suited for the weekly release model.
Still, this is one I can definitely recommend, mostly because I enjoyed Skarsgard and his narration and internal dialogue so much. A security droid obsessed with TV shows, struggling with his 'humanity' and what the possibility of freedom might mean is right up my alley. Perhaps it's just that I can relate. I like my alone time and my TV shows, too, and humans are terribly puzzling creatures. It's not a masterpiece, but it's entertaining enough, a mostly light and breezy glimpse into a fictional universe that certainly feels like it has a lot more potential.
I'm certainly curious to see where the story goes if Apple picks up a second season. I'll have to read the books before then, though sometimes it's fun to go in without a lot of preconceived notions. I'm curious what book readers will think of the show and of Skarsgard's interpretation of the character.
You can follow me on Twitter, Instagram, Bluesky or Facebook. Also be sure to subscribe to my YouTube channel and follow me here on this blog. Sign up for my newsletter for more reviews and commentary on entertainment and culture.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


TechCrunch
39 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Genetics testing startup Nucleus Genomics criticized for its embryo product: ‘Makes me so nauseous'
Nucleus Genomics, a genetic testing startup founded by 25-year-old Kian Sadeghi, initially launched in 2021 with the goal of calculating a patient's risk for specific diseases. But it's been courting controversy for years with products that claim to tell people how their genetics correlate to a host of complex issues, including their IQ. On Wednesday, it ratcheted up the controversy to an ear-splitting level when it announced a new product called Nucleus Embryo with a tweet that said: 'Every parent wants to give their children more than they had. For the first time in human history, Nucleus adds a new tool to that commitment.' Every parent wants to give their children more than they had. For the first time in human history, Nucleus adds a new tool to that commitment. Welcome to Nucleus — Nucleus Genomics (@nucleusgenomics) June 4, 2025 Nucleus says it can test IVF embryos not just for well-known specific genes that have a high chance of illnesses like breast cancer, but also for appearance — sex, height, hair color, eye color — as well as IQ and complex health attributes like anxiety and ADHD. The launch video includes a screen shot of a comparison menu. The idea is to help parents choose which embryos to pick and which ones to, perhaps, discard. Nucleus Genomics embryos features screen Image Credits:Nucleus Genomics (opens in a new window) Genetic testing of embryos isn't unheard of. IVF physicians can test for genes that can cause conditions like Down syndrome, or when parents know they are of high risk for a particular genetic disorder, like cystic fibrosis. Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW But that's not exactly what Nucleus is doing. It is using controversial 'polygenic scores' to determine 'complex genetic outcomes, like intelligence and anxiety,' a spokesperson says. According to the National Human Genome Research Institute, polygenic scores only calculate the probabilities of a certain complex illness occurring, mainly within populations. 'A polygenic risk score can only explain the relative risk for a disease,' the NHGR says. This is not the same as discovering a specific gene, such as for example the BRCA1 gene mutation, which gives a person a 60-80% 'absolute risk of breast cancer,' the NHGR says. There's a reason doctors don't typically use such tests for individuals. 'Polygenic risk scores are not yet routinely used by health professionals because there are no guidelines for practice and researchers are still improving how these scores are generated,' according to the NHGR. Nucleus defends that its method can be used to determine an individual's risk. The spokesperson pointed us to a 2018 paper where the authors said they had developed validated methods for five common diseases: coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease, and breast cancer. That paper was advocating screenings to help individuals make lifestyle or therapeutic decisions, similar to Nucleus's initial concept. Wednesday's tweet was promising parents that Nucleus can help them create designer babies. It has now been viewed more than 4 million times and has hundreds of comments, many of them either expressing disbelief that this works as promised, or horror at the idea. One VC chimed into the discussion saying, 'I was going to type something like Noah get the boat but honestly the reality of this just makes me so nauseous.' I was going to type something like Noah get the boat but honestly the reality of this just makes me so nauseous — Max Niederhofer ❤️🔥 (@maxniederhofer) June 5, 2025 Nucleus has experienced this kind of controversy before, as TechCrunch previously reported, when it its $14 million series A earlier this year. The startup is backed by Founders Fund, Alexis Ohanian's 776, and angels including Adrian Aoun (CEO at Forward Health), Brent Saunders (former CEO at Allergan), and Matteo Franceschetti (CEO at Eight Sleep). Last year, Sadeghi launched Nucleus IQ, which is supposed to tell users how much their genetics influence intelligence. The product was blasted as 'bad science and big business' by some critics. Sadeghi published a lengthy defense of his company's methodology. Even so, telling adults that they are genetically smart is one thing. Telling IVF parents that they can choose the appearance and other complex attributes for their children is, many would argue, something else. Nucleus is not currently conducting such tests via IVF lab partners itself, The Wall Street Journal reports. It's partnering with Genomic Prediction, which works with IVF clinics. A Genomic executive told the WSJ that many parents request intelligence tests, and it doesn't provide that. Parents can voluntarily upload genetic data information to Nucleas if they want to pursue it. Or, as Sadeghi said in the launch video aimed at would-be parents: 'Not that long ago IVF-1 sparked fear and the stigma of test tube babies,' he said. 'What was once controversial is now an everyday practice. The same is true with genetic optimization. The technology is now here and it's here to stay.'


Forbes
40 minutes ago
- Forbes
What Format Should You Choose For How To Train Your Dragon 2025?
How To Train Your Dragon will be getting an HDR by Barco release for true HDR presentation but with ... More only a few capable screens worldwide IMAX and Dolby Cinema will be major quality choices. The How to Train Your Dragon franchise has been a great success story for director Dean DeBlois in the animated world, but taking a leaf out of Disney's playbook, it has now taken the leap into the realm of live action. It retains Gerard Butler as Stoick the Vast, with Mason Thames as Hiccup Horrendous Haddock III and Nico Parker as his love interest, Astrid Hofferson. Among the other cast members, we also get Nick Frost as Gobber the Belch, who was also recently announced as Hagrid in the upcoming TV remake of the Harry Potter franchise. Resembling to my eyes, a child-friendly version of House of the Dragon, the new How to Train Your Dragon is big, bold family entertainment, so it's no wonder that it is being released in a plethora of formats, so we'll run through them here to help you decide which one to choose. With a behind-the-scenes trailer IMAX to accompany it, DeBlois says that the film has been made 'specifically with IMAX in mind.' Captured using the Arri Alexa 35 and Arri Alexa LF IMAX, both of which are 'Filmed For IMAX' certified, for over 50 minutes of its runtime, the film will expand to the 190:1 aspect ratio in all IMAX screens. This is likely to be for the big action sequences. Note, though, that this isn't the full-fat IMAX experience that you'll get with films shot with IMAX film cameras with 1.43:1 aspect ratio sequences, but there's no doubt that the flying sequences will be impressive on the extra-large IMAX screens. Also, note that not all IMAX screens are equal. The best ones will use laser projectors for a brighter picture, and most of these will also have 12-channel sound, which does better with overhead effects for more immersiveness. The movie will also get an IMAX 3D release, but my local cinema only has two showings in this format, so you'll have to hunt for this if you're a fan of stereoscopy. Sadly, I found IMAX 3D to be disappointing for the recent Marvel Thunderbolts movie, but technologies such as TrueCut Motion can help with motion blur and perceived brightness, so unless it's confirmed that this tech has been used for this release, I wouldn't recommend 3D in this case. What can be confirmed is that it has had an HDR by Barco grade —the projection technology that makes full use of the dynamic range that the digital cameras used are capable of capturing. As such, this will be the top choice for image quality. Sadly, the projectors are only available in six screens worldwide, and not all of them are showing the movie on their HDR-capable screens. This includes Cineworld London Leicester Square, which is instead showing the new Ballerina movie (which does have an HDR by Barco grade at least) and Mission: The Final Reckoning, which is top draw but doesn't have an HDR grade. At least you'll get more consistency if you choose to see it at a Dolby Cinema. Having seen the trailer in this format at the Dolby screening room in its London HQ (more on this coming soon), I can attest that the intense colors from the greenery and the dragon flames make it a delight for the eyes, while the Dolby Atmos audio is a great match for the swirling flight scenes. If you can't get to IMAX or Dolby screen but still want a large image and great audio, then seek out a premium large-format screen. Every chain has its own branding for these, so look out for Cinemark XD, Cineplex UltraAVX, Xtreme Xscape, Prime at AMC, Regal RPX, and in the UK, Odeon iSense and Cineworld Superscreen. These will all give you 4K laser projection, Dolby Atmos, and decent seats, so it's worth the extra. If you want something really fun, though, consider 4DX, which, for How to Train Your Dragon, is combined with 3D. As such, you might not mind the motion blur as you'll be being thrown around by the moving seats in time with the on-screen action, with rumblers in the seats will make you feel every crash landing, which to me sounds like a ton of fun. ScreenX is also available, which offers extra footage shown on screens that run down the sides of the auditorium. Save for Grand Turismo, where the side-screens were amazing for the cockpit scenes, I've yet to be convinced by ScreenX—though I could see how it could all to the immersiveness of the flying scenes. Aside from this, there's regular RealD 3D in standard screens, but there's a danger it will be an aging Xenon bulb, which could hurt the experience by delivering a dim picture. Personally, you know there's a laser projector in play in your particular chosen screen; if you're not going to choose one of the above formats, I'd avoid it and stick with regular 2D. But with so many other, much more exciting ways of seeing How to Train Your Dragon, it would seem a shame not to take advantage and jump aboard one of them.


Geek Tyrant
41 minutes ago
- Geek Tyrant
Mike Flanagan on THE LIFE OF CHUCK: Dance, Death, and Defying Genre Expectations — GeekTyrant
Mike Flanagan is no stranger to horror. Over the past decade, he's built a fiercely loyal fanbase through intimate, unsettling explorations of grief, trauma, and the supernatural, usually with a Stephen King book in one hand and a camera in the other. But his latest film, The Life of Chuck , is something else entirely. It's still strange. It's still King. But it's also joyous, hopeful, and, packed with dancing. Speaking with Variety, Flanagan explained how the story arrived at a moment of personal crisis, and how its emotional impact altered the course of his creative path. 'This story came into my life at a very interesting time, because I read it in April 2020. The pandemic lockdown is a month old... it hit close to home, to the point that I was initially reluctant to finish reading it. I didn't know if I could take it.' But something shifted. 'By the end of it, I was shocked that I'd been taken from that place into a whole different headspace of optimism, gratitude and joy. I was crying, and not tears of sadness.' That emotional shift became the foundation of The Life of Chuck , a movie Flanagan describes as possibly his most personal work. 'If I could make it into a film that could do that for one other person... then what an incredible opportunity,' he said. Tom Hiddleston leads the film as Chuck, whose life is told in reverse across three acts—beginning at the end of the world and unraveling toward childhood. The narrative structure is unconventional, and Flanagan was adamant about preserving it. 'Life only makes sense when you look back. If you started with his childhood and worked it all the way up, it doesn't seem to hold that same wisdom... the catharsis of looking back and seeing the connections.' That insistence on nontraditional storytelling was a major reason Flanagan made the movie independently. 'I'm certain that if we had tried to do this through the traditional studio system... it would have been mandated to make it far more ordinary.' The film features a major dance sequence with Hiddleston and co-star Annalise Basso, choreographed by Mandy Moore and scored by live drumming, and it was intimadating. Flangan said: 'My favorite movie of all time is Bob Fosse's All That Jazz. I wasn't going to presume to tell Mandy Moore how to choreograph... My job was to capture them creating this spontaneous, joyful experience.' To prepare, Flanagan and cinematographer Eben Bolter studied dance scenes from the silent film era all the way through Hollywood's Golden Age, crafting a sequence that 'would ideally dance with them.' 'It wasn't even so much in the filming of it, but in the editing. Finding a way for me, as the editor, to try to become the Invisible Dancer... It's one of the most complicated sequences I've ever been involved in.' Of course, no Flanagan project based on a King story would be complete without the King himself. The director described their creative partnership as respectful, loose, and built on trust. 'He's very serious that the book is the book, and the movie is the movie, and he doesn't want to influence your creative expression. 'He gets approval on all casting. He's reading the scripts and sending his thoughts... but mostly he backs off and then we talk extensively about it after the fact.' By the time Chuck came along, King gave him the green light without hesitation. 'He was very much like, 'You do you,' and he loved the movie.' As for what's next, Flanagan's tackling Carrie as a series—and that took a bit more convincing. King's initial response? ''Why?' His first response was, 'Leave her alone. She's been through enough.'' But once Flanagan laid out his vision, King changed his tune. 'Then he said, 'Ohh, now I'm interested, just as a fan.'' The Life of Chuck might not look like a Mike Flanagan film on the surface, but beneath its dance beats and surreal optimism is the same deep empathy and strong storytelling that's always defined his work. It's still about confronting mortality. It's just doing it with a little more joy.