Attack On Life-Saving Aid Boat Proves The Reach Of Israel's Out-of-Control Genocide Through Starvation Is Now Global
Israel's drone attack on the Freedom Flotilla boat 'Conscience' shows Israel's genocide strategy has now gone global, according to PSNA.
The Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa says the attack in international waters is a thoroughly predictable war crime, committed by an out-of-control Israel, intent on violence anywhere to uphold its starvation strategy for Gaza.
The 'Conscience' was loaded with life-saving humanitarian aid for Gaza and was attacked and disabled off the coast of Malta.
'It's another war crime to add to Israel's blood-soaked reputation' says PSNA Co-National Chair John Minto. 'This is a cowardly attack on the best of humanity trying to get aid to more than two million desperate and starving people.'
'Israel has blocked all aid for more than two months in an attempt to starve them to death.'
'This brazen attack in international waters shows how emboldened Israel has become by the silence of Western governments such as New Zealand.'
Minto is pointing to the UN Panel of Inquiry in 2011 on a similar Israeli attack on the Turkish aid vessel the Mavi Marmara the year before. It was chaired by former New Zealand Prime Minster Sir Geoffrey Palmer.
Palmer found that Israel used 'excessive and unreasonable force' in boarding the vessel and killing ten people on board.
'But Palmer also said that Israel had conducted a 'legitimate security measure'. I wonder how Geoffrey Palmer feels about legitimising that action now,' Minto says.
'Palestinian Solidarity Network Aotearoa is calling on the New Zealand government to condemn the aggression on what is an unarmed, civilian vessel in international waters.'
'When Ansar Allah (Houthis) in Yemen did this to Israeli vessels to try to stop the genocide in Gaza, New Zealand involved itself by sending military support to western countries to bomb Yemen.'
'We are not calling on the government to send military support for the bombing of Israel. However, if New Zealand really believes in the freedom of passage of unarmed vessels in international waters, it must condemn Israeli outright for this cowardly attack on the 'Conscience'.'
Minto says to maintain any credibility the government is also overdue and obligated to end its months long silence over other Israeli actions.
'Top of the list is Israel's war crime use of starvation in Gaza as a weapon of war. But the government must also condemn the Israeli army ethnic cleansing and assisting settler attacks in Occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank.'
'Israel is building new illegal settlements there at an unprecedented rate.'
'Israel has also just conducted unprovoked major military assaults on Syria. Our Foreign Minister must surely know about these things, and we are at a loss to know why he says and does nothing.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
9 hours ago
- Scoop
Gaza's 'Humanitarian' Façade: A Deceptive Ploy Unravels
Just one day before the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) began operating officially inside the Gaza Strip, its executive director, Jake Wood, resigned. The text of his resignation statement underscored what many had already suspected: GHF is not a humanitarian endeavor, but the latest scam by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to control the Gaza Strip, after 600 days of war and genocide. "It is clear that it is not possible to implement this plan while also strictly adhering to the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality, and independence," Wood said in the statement, which was cited by CNN and other media. This begs the question: why had that realization become 'clear' to Wood, even though the aid operation was not yet in effect? The rest of the statement offers some explanation, suggesting that the American contractor may not have known the extent of the Israeli ploy until later, but knew that a disaster was unfolding – the kind that would surely require investigating and, possibly, accountability. In fact, an investigation by Swiss authorities had already begun. The US news network, CBS, looked into the matter, reporting on May 29 that GHF originally applied for registration in Geneva on January 31 and was officially registered on February 12. However, in no time, Swiss authorities began noticing repeated violations, including that the Swiss branch of GHF is "currently not fulfilling various legal obligations". In its original application, GHF "pursues exclusively charitable philanthropic objectives for the benefit of the people." Strangely, the entity that promised to provide "material, psychological or health" services to famine-stricken Gazans, found it necessary to employ 300 "heavily armed" American contractors, with "as much ammunition as they can carry," CBS reported. The 'psychological' support in particular was the most ironic, as desperate Gazans were corralled, on May 27, into cages under extremely high temperatures, only to be given tiny amounts of food that, according to Rami Abdu, head of the Geneva-based Euro-Med Monitor, were in fact stolen from a US-based charitable organization known as Rahma Worldwide. Following the CBS news report, among others, and following several days of chaos and violence in Gaza, where at least 49 Palestinians were killed and over 300 wounded by those who promised to give aid and comfort, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz revealed that the funding for the operation is coming directly from Israel. Prominent Israeli politician and Knesset member Avigdor Lieberman went even further, claiming that the money, estimated by the Washington Post to be $100 million, 'is coming from the Mossad and the Defense Ministry.' But why would Israel go through all of this trouble while it can, at no financial cost, simply allow the massive shipments of aid, reportedly rotting on the Egyptian side of the border, to enter Gaza and to stave off the famine? In Netanyahu's mind, the aid mechanism is part of the war. In a video message, reported by The Jerusalem Post on May 19, he described the new aid distributing points, manned jointly by GHF and the Israeli army, as "parallel to the enormous pressure" Israel is putting on the Palestinians – exemplified in Israel's "massive (military) entrance (into Gaza)" – with the aim of "taking control of all of the Gaza" Strip. In Netanyahu's own words, all of this, the military-arranged aid and ongoing genocide, is "the war and victory plan." Of course, Palestinians and international aid groups operating in Gaza, including UN-linked aid apparatuses, were fully aware that the secretive Israel-US scheme was predicated on bad intentions. This is why they wanted to have nothing to do with it. In Israel's thinking, any aid mechanism that would sustain the status quo that existed prior to the war and genocide starting on October 7, 2023, would be equivalent to an admission of defeat. This is precisely why Israel labored to associate the UN Palestinian refugee agency, UNRWA, with Hamas. This included the launching of a virulent campaign against the UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres himself, and other top officials and rapporteurs. On July 22, the Israeli Knesset went as far as to designate UNRWA a 'terrorist organization'. Still, it may seem to be a contradiction that the likes of extremist Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich would agree to such an 'aid' scheme just days after declaring that Israel's intention is to "entirely destroy" Gaza. However, there is no contradiction. Having failed to conquer Gaza through military force, Israel is trying to use its latest aid scheme to capitalize on the famine it has purposely engineered over the course of months. Luring people to 'distribution points', the Israeli army is trying to concentrate the population of Gaza in areas that can be easily controlled through leveraging food, with the ultimate aim of pushing Palestinians out, in the words of Smotrich, "in great numbers to third countries." The latest scheme is likely to fail, of course, like other such stratagems in the last 600 days. However, the inhumane and degrading treatment of Palestinians further illustrates Israel's rejection of the growing international push to end the genocide. For Israel to stop scheming, the international community must translate its strong words into strong action and hold, not just Israel, but its own citizens involved in the GHF and other ploys, accountable for being part of the ongoing war crimes in Gaza. - Dr. Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He is the author of six books. His latest book, co-edited with Ilan Pappé, is ' Our Vision for Liberation: Engaged Palestinian Leaders and Intellectuals Speak Out'. His other books include 'My Father was a Freedom Fighter' and 'The Last Earth'. Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA). His website is
RNZ News
11 hours ago
- RNZ News
'No upside and very considerable downside' in annoying China: Helen Clark and Don Brash warn
Helen Clark and Don Brash. Photo: RNZ Two former prime ministers and an ex-governor of the Reserve Bank have put their names to a letter questioning the coalition government's foreign policy - in particular "positioning New Zealand alongside the United States as an adversary of China". Helen Clark, Sir Sir Geoffrey Palmer and Dr Don Brash say they are "deeply concerned" about statements made by Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Prime Minister Christopher Luxon, and actions taken by the government, when it comes to our relationship with the two superpowers. "Our country has for many years enjoyed a cordial relationship with both the United States and China. Both countries were comfortable with that in the past," they said. "But more recently, the United States has described China not only as a competitor, but also as an adversary, and has been putting pressure on other countries to take sides." They said while the US had made a valuable contribution to trade and development in the Pacific, and "good relations… must be maintained", they held concerns about initiatives such as AUKUS Pillar 2, which New Zealand is keeping an open mind about. An update provided to ministers in February said Pillar 2 had the "potential to support New Zealand's national security, defence, and foreign policy settings in the Indo-Pacific" through technology sharing and development. China has [ warned New Zealand against joining it. New Zealand did not consider Pillar 1, as it involved nuclear-powered submarines. The group cited a number of decisions as potentially souring New Zealand's relationship with China, including: They also cited Peters' recent criticism of the 2008 free-trade deal New Zealand made with China (signed during one of his former stints as foreign minister). "It would not be surprising if China were to come to the conclusion that the special relationship which New Zealand has had with it since becoming the first developed country to have a free trade agreement with it in 2008 is no longer so valued by New Zealand. "Yet China is already by far our largest export market, and is almost certain to become an even more important market as the country continues to develop. We see no upside and very considerable downside in the situation which has developed." The group said while New Zealand shared more "political values" with the US, and a longer relationship, a "military relationship with the United States directed against China has many risks for New Zealand". "That is especially true in a situation where the United States itself has recently become more ambivalent about its defence relationships with traditional partners." They urged Luxon to "make it clear at the highest level that New Zealand retains its bipartisan commitment to its strategic partnership with China in the interests of a peaceful and prosperous region and world" when made it to Beijing, expected to be sometime this year. Luxon first met Chinese President Xi Jinping at last year's APEC meeting. He was yet to visit China as prime minister. The other signatories to the statement were former Speaker of the House Sir David Carter, former New Zealand Ambassador to China Carl Worker, and David Mahon, a New Zealand businessman resident in Beijing since 1984. In response, a spokesperson for Peters told RNZ he saw "no value in indulging the tired arguments of various former politicians". "The AUKUS II process was commenced by the Labour government in 2021. New Zealand has yet to be invited to join. "The government stands by its independent foreign policy approach which has been transparent about its focus on advancing New Zealand's security and prosperity after the years of inaction by the previous administration." Clark and Brash, once political foes, last year teamed up to criticise the government's foreign policy, in paticular its refusal to rule out joining AUKUS Pillar 2 . Labour has promised it would not sign New Zealand up to the US-UK-Australia defence agreement . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
12 hours ago
- Scoop
France, UK Preparing To Recognise Palestinian State, NZ Must Join Them
Justice for Palestine welcomes the news that France and the United Kingdom are planning on recognising the State of Palestine at the UN conference on the two-state solution on 17 June. We urge the New Zealand government to follow suit. 'The Minister said New Zealand recognising Palestine was 'a matter of when, not if'. The time has come to join not only France and the UK, but 147 out of 193 UN member states that recognise the State of Palestine,' says Kate Stone, Justice for Palestine co-convenor. The UN conference hosted by France and Saudi Arabia will occur against the backdrop not only of the war in Gaza, but also against Israel's increasingly brazen moves to expand its illegal settlements on Palestinian land. Israeli Ministers have recently declared Israel will establish 22 new illegal settlements and 'legalise' existing informal settlements or outposts with the express purpose of preventing the establishment of a Palestinian state. In 2016 when New Zealand was on the UN Security Council we co-sponsored a resolution which reaffirmed that the establishment of Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territories was illegal and 'a major obstacle to the achievement of the two-State solution and a just, lasting and comprehensive peace' (UNSC 2334). 'Israel is and has for decades been flagrantly violating international law with impunity and standing in the way of any just solution in Palestine. New Zealand, alongside France, the UK and others, must stand up against Israel, and stand up for the rights of Palestinians to self-determination,' say Kate Stone. 'This is also about standing up against might over right, and standing up for the international rules based order, which we all benefit from through the protection of our rights,' 'What's more the people support New Zealand recognising Palestine. Polling we conducted in September 2024 showed that of those that had a view two-thirds supported recognition of Palestine.' The time for moral clarity and decisive action is now. After 77 years of dispossession, suffering, and systemic injustice at the hands of Israeli apartheid, the Palestinian people deserve action, not further delay. New Zealand must not remain silent in the face of what the international community is increasingly recognising as a campaign of ethnic cleansing both in Gaza and in the wider Occupied Territories. We must act. Justice for Palestine calls on the New Zealand Government to: Recognise the State of Palestine, as the basis for equal negotiations for a just peace that respects Palestinians' right to self-determination and to return to their homeland Impose sanctions on Israel, until it complies with international law Create a special emergency visa for Gazans with family in Aotearoa Continue and increase aid funding to UNRWA
