logo
Children of Radium by Joe Dunthorne review – complicity, courage and cowardice examined in a slippery marvel

Children of Radium by Joe Dunthorne review – complicity, courage and cowardice examined in a slippery marvel

The Guardian07-04-2025

Joe Dunthorne tells us he originally envisaged this book as a story of his grandmother's childhood escape from the Nazis; the reality turned out to be more complex. Narrated with the twists and turns of a detective story, Children of Radium is a family memoir that records the mazy path by which the prize-winning Welsh novelist discovered just how little he knew of his German Jewish heritage. His journey begins with 'a foot-high block of A4': a 2,000-page unpublished memoir by his great-grandfather, Siegfried, a Jewish scientist who worked at a secret chemical weapons laboratory near Berlin before he and his family left for Turkey – not the panicky flit Dunthorne imagined, but a relocation bankrolled by employers with plans for what he could yet do.
Hunches, tip-offs, false trails and dead ends abound in Dunthorne's quest to determine how much Siegfried knew – and when – about his work's murderous potential after he was reassigned in 1928 from toothpaste manufacture by his firm, a specialist in radioactive products. Siegfried's memoir is circumspect, and the hunt for answers isn't straightforward: not only was the site of Siegfried's lab heavily bombed, but Dunthorne's mum also chucked his papers into the recycling while clearing out her late mother's flat.
An eye for that kind of comedy, honed in Dunthorne's novels – the best known is Submarine (2008), filmed by Richard Ayoade – brightens a quixotic voyage into the heart of 20th-century darkness. The trail leads through libraries, museums and medical records, but also less obviously writer-friendly locales: in Germany, he wriggles belly-first into a fenced-off radioactive site in a clandestine hunt for soil to test for gas traces; and in Turkey, Dunthorne blags his way through military checkpoints in the company of a formerly jailed member of the Kurdistan Workers' party, having learned that one of the letters he has from Siegfried might hold evidence of culpability for a massacre in an eastern mountain town prior to the second world war.
Dunthorne's voice – affable, warm, wry – casts a spell right from the book's dedication ('This book is for – and, arguably, by – my mother'), making light work of tricky ground as he weaves fact and guesswork, reading and testimony. Despite everything, humour is never far away. When, in Germany, he suddenly feels the need to apologise to an elderly interviewee for Siegfried's work with chemical weapons, the man demurs and instead apologises on behalf of all Germans to Dunthorne, a descendant of expatriated Jews; at which point the author apologises for putting him in the position where he felt he needed to apologise. It takes a special writer to generate embarrassment comedy from this material, but you come to feel that Dunthorne is probably the kind of author who is witty in his sleep: the Nazis didn't deploy poison gas on the battlefield, he says, because Hitler personally vetoed its use, 'creat[ing] the uneasy situation in which my great-grandfather's work might have been far more lethal without an intervention from Hitler', a line that manages to be heartfelt as well as undeniably comic.
As discoveries and ambiguities mount, the book plays out as a tangled investigation of complicity, courage and cowardice, ceaselessly yo-yoing between potential indictment and mitigation. Dunthorne's instinctively jokey tone doesn't minimise the ever-present horror, yet he recognises, too, that the darkest aspects of his story are tricky to separate from the frisson of proximity, the fundamental thrill of the chase (one chapter ends: 'The real revelation came, several weeks later, via email...'). We catch his perverse sense of disappointment when his hard-won soil sample contains traces of everything but gas from Siegfried's lab. There's steady intrigue, also, in the unmistakable resonance of Dunthorne's decision to embark on an all-consuming pan-continental research quest while slap-bang in the middle of early fatherhood. It's also a kind of stealth post-Brexit narrative, as Dunthorne obtains German citizenship – an ambivalent reintegration by which the convenience of an EU passport is weighed alongside 'formal reconciliation with the country which had tried to systematically eliminate [his mother's] forebears'.
Dunthorne recently told the Guardian how much he admired Laurent Binet's tricksy 2010 novel HHhH, a book that conspicuously shows its own working as it unreliably imagines its way into the Nazi era, and you can feel its imprint here. Children of Radium put me in mind, too, of Richard Flanagan's Question 7, another genealogical retracing that turns into a meditation on guilt, atrocity and unforeseen consequence. Dunthorne's tome is a humbler enterprise, keenly aware that the writerly ego can be led astray by an impulse to join the dots: witness the belated recognition that his focus might after all be entirely in the wrong place, thanks to a splendidly deflating comment from his mother, who wonders if Dunthorne should be writing instead about her great aunt – Siegfried's sister – who bravely oversaw a Munich children's home, caring for Jewish refugees amid rising persecution.
By necessity, Children of Radium is piecemeal, inconclusive, full of pregnant silences, maybes and what ifs. Near the end, Dunthorne and his mother soak up memories in north London, where Siegfried spent his last days in a care home, regularly greeting his granddaughter and her boyfriend – the author's dad – with a meal of ox tongue. 'It speaks to a paucity of other research materials that I thought it worthwhile to cook an ox tongue,' Dunthorne tells us. He didn't know what to expect, and was alarmed when the length of flesh seemed to revive in the pan, 'writhing and flexing', refusing to stay put when prodded with a spoon, 'lifting the lid off the pot'. A metaphor, you can't help think, but it befits the procedures and conclusions of this slippery marvel that we can't quite say for what.
Children of Radium: A Buried Inheritance by Joe Dunthorne is published by Hamish Hamilton (£16.99). To support the Guardian and Observer order your copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Should family history, however painful, be memorialised forever?
Should family history, however painful, be memorialised forever?

Spectator

time2 hours ago

  • Spectator

Should family history, however painful, be memorialised forever?

Be under no illusions: this is not a food memoir. Chopping Onions on My Heart is a linguistic exploration of belonging; a history of the Jewish community in Iraq; and an urgent endeavour to save an endangered language. Above all, it is a reckoning with generational trauma. The subjects of Samantha Ellis's previous books include the life of Anne Brontë, heroines of classic literature, feminism and romantic comedy. She is the daughter of Iraqi Jewish refugees, and the language she grew up around, the language of her people and culture, is dying. Judeo-Iraqi Arabic 'came out of the collisions of Hebrew-speaking Jews and Aramaic-speaking Babylonians, and then absorbed linguistic influences from all the other people who conquered Iraq'. Ellis is irrepressible in the way she talks about her mother tongue, calling it 'earthy, sinewy, witty, excessive, wry, noisy, vivid… Hot, where English often seems cold. Mouth-filling, where English seems empty. Patterned, when English seems plain.' Jewish people first came to Iraq in 586 BC. At the community's height in the 1940s there were 150,000 Jews living in the country. At best guess, by 2019 just five remained. Most left in the decade following Farhud, the pogrom carried out against the Jews of Baghdad over two days in 1941. More than 180 Jews were murdered and countless raped and injured. Ellis's father's family left for Israel, while her mother's stayed on for more than 20 years. But both her parents eventually ended up in London, where Ellis was born. She was raised speaking English, 'but all the gossip, all the stories, all the exciting, forbidden grown-up life happened in Judeo-Iraqi Arabic'. She quietly absorbed the language, but as she grew up, lost it. Now, as an adult and mother, she is acutely aware of the consequences for herself and her son. The mass exodus of Iraqi Jews in 1950-51, and their assimilation into adopted countries, meant that the language was marginalised, and speaker numbers dwindled fast. Ellis's early investigations are urgent, panicked, motivated by a combination of incredulity and guilt that a language that informs her heritage, but that she doesn't speak, isn't being preserved by someone else: 'I raced to my laptop to find out if anyone was saving my language. Someone had to be!' She begins language classes, visits museums and consults relatives. She attempts to trace the history of her people. She cannot accept that the reason languages become extinct is because second generation, non-native speakers 'didn't value or care for them, that we were recklessly letting them die'. She realises that 'there was always violence somewhere in the vanishing of languages. There certainly was in mine'. The mother tongue is 'earthy, sinewy, witty, excessive, wry, noisy, vivid…Hot, where English often seems cold' The psychological effect of being brought up by families who have experienced war, discrimination and displacement is what makes Ellis both neurotic and determined not to pass on that inherited fear to her son. When he garbles the history of how they came to Britain, Ellis decides: 'If I was going to unmuddle him, maybe I had to try to unmuddle myself first.' But how does one preserve the stories of a culture's past without also holding on to the pain that imbues them? In her search for home and belonging, she finds solace in cooking her country's traditional dishes. But this is not a tidy personal narrative that finds resolution in a comforting stew or finishes with a glorious homecoming wrapped neatly in bread dough. Ellis is wary of simplifying the past and making it more palatable through food. The problem is not Iraqi Jewish cuisine; that's the easy bit. It's the gnarly, traumatic parts that are harder to engage with. So, no, this is not a food memoir. And if at times it doesn't seem to know quite what it is, then isn't that sort of the point? Unpicking, extricating different facets of heritage is near impossible, compounded by the conflicting motivations of a second generation immigrant. What begins as a shapeless mass, a grey cloud of uncertainty, slowly morphs into a full-colour, defined picture of a more confident, peaceful acceptance of Ellis's duality – of being Judeo-Iraqi, but not in Iraq, of belonging to two places at once, even if one place cannot be visited. Like her identity, Ellis's book contains multitudes.

Admirable in their awfulness – the siblings Gus and Gwen John
Admirable in their awfulness – the siblings Gus and Gwen John

Spectator

time2 hours ago

  • Spectator

Admirable in their awfulness – the siblings Gus and Gwen John

'In 50 years' time,' Augustus John gloomily reflected following his sister's death on 18 September 1939, 'I will be known as the brother of Gwen John.' He was right. In 2004, when the Tate mounted a joint retrospective of Augustus and Gwen John, it was Gwen who had become the major artist. The 'variable strident chords' of the self-styled Gypsy King, likened in his youth to Michelangelo, Rembrandt and Raphael, had been supplanted by the 'sustained minor key' of the nunlike recluse. The first decades of the 20th century were what Virginia Woolf described as 'the Age of Augustus John'; but the praise lathered on him after his own death, aged 83, in 1961 – 'one of the greatest artists in British history', 'a man in the 50-megaton range', 'the last of the Titans' – now seems embarrassing. The reputation of Gus, as Gwen called him, with Judith Mackrell following suit in her absorbing dual biography, had been on the wane since the 1930s. In the 1940s he despaired that 'my work's not good enough'. 'I'm just a legend,' he said in the 1950s, 'I'm not a real person at all.' Again, he was right: Augustus John is remembered now for his flamboyant hats, gold earrings, open marriage and the 100 offspring he is rumoured to have sired. When he walked through Chelsea, it was said, he patted the head of every child he met in case it was one of his own. Aged 82, he wrote to one of his daughters, Amaryllis, that should she 'ever feel the need' to have a baby, 'just give me a nudge and I will do my best'. His suggestion, Mackrell comments, 'might have been judged goatish, or even outlandish, to an outsider', but to Amaryllis, 'it reflected only their private code'. The middle two of four children, Gwen and Gus were raised in the Welsh seaside town of Tenby, where they ran wild with their sketchbooks. Gwen was eight when their mother died in 1884, and Gus six. 'Mama's dead! Mama's dead!' the siblings chanted, charging through the house in a crazed state. The near-demented erotic pursuits of their adulthood were born from this early abandonment. A figure of 'vast carelessness', as Mackrell describes him, Gus was a man on the run, brawling and shagging, while Gwen, inward-looking and fearing attention, lived and painted in slow time. He was 6ft and lavishly handsome; she was a wiry and feral 5ft; he was agnostic and she was a Catholic; he chose a large metropolitan existence and she a small life in rural France. They would appear to observers like the tortoise and the hare, but on closer inspection they were, as Gus put it, 'much the same, really'. Gus described the force of his desire as 'a sort of paranoia or emotional hailstorm' It is the similarities that Mackrell draws out with her customary care. Cut from the same cloth, brother and sister were both monsters. Artists to the core, they were equally selfish, obsessive and dangerous to know, particularly if you had the misfortune to be loved by one of them. Gus described the force of his desire as 'a sort of paranoia or emotional hailstorm'; as soon as he was attracted to one woman, who invariably became his model, she would be 'immediately obliterated' by another. Gwen was less fickle, but more terrifying. Her passions for both men and women were similarly immediate and overwhelming, affecting her, as she put it, 'beyond reason'. She behaved like a stalker, besieging her love objects with daily letters, debasing herself, waiting on their every word. Even her mentor Rodin, with whom she was besotted for a decade, was afraid of her. His death in 1917 freed Gwen from her sickness, but her place in his life had been 'a secret so small', as Mackrell puts it, that she was not even invited tohis funeral. When Gus went to the Slade, aged 16, in 1894, Gwen followed suit, but only after a fight. Doors swung open for Gus, but everything Gwen did involved a struggle, initially with their father, Edwin. When he would not let her go to Paris to be taught by Whistler, Gwen marched round the house singing 'to Paris, to Paris' until he gave in. When Edwin then told her that she looked, in the white dress she had copied from a painting by Manet, like a prostitute, she excised him from her life. Included in the Paris trip was Ida Nettleship, Gwen's best friend at the Slade before she became Gus's wife when they were both aged 23. His maîtresse-en-titre, the beautiful and otherworldly Dorothy 'Dorelia' McNeill, was similarly stolen from Gwen, who then tried to steal her back when Dorelia joined her on a walking tour to Rome. The two women set off together, says Mackrell, like a 'giddy eloping couple', but there was what Dorelia called a 'hard and queer' quality to Gwen's character and, having got as far as Toulouse, she eloped instead with a Belgian called Leonard. No one was allowed to leave Gus, who importuned Dorelia to separate first from Gwen and then from Leonard, and live instead in 'wonderful concubinage' with himself and Ida. Gwen, with nothing left to lose, now sided with her brother. Even Ida, who wanted her freedom back, could see the benefits of including Dorelia in the household. Living with Gus, 'a mean and childish creature', was pushing her towards a breakdown. And so docile Dorelia, who did what others wanted her to do, returned to England and devoted the next 60 years to Gus and his spawn. When Ida died exhausted, aged 30, after giving birth to her sixth son, Dorelia (who died in 1969) took over the household, at which point this once radiant figure disappears from view. It is not surprising, given his raids on her emotions, that Gwen now cordoned herself off from Gus. Moving to France, she refused to visit her nephews and nieces in England or use the studio that Gus built for her in his garden. Family was everything to Gus, while for Gwen, 'the family has had its day. We don't go to Heaven in families now, but one by one'. Gwen behaved like a stalker, besieging her love objects with daily letters, waiting on their every word While Gus's unconventionality became a pose to sell his paintings, Gwen's refusal to conform to any socially acceptable female norm was the cost of competing as an artist on equal terms with men. He was greedy, but she was an extremophile. As a student, she was so poor that she would break into abandoned buildings in order to sleep. When she lost her adored cat, she slept in the forest. She died, aged 63, in Dieppe, where she had gone for an overnight stay without bringing any luggage. In the chaos of war, the cause of her death, which appears to have been starvation, was left unspecified on her death certificate, and the details of where she was buried were lost. Her friend Louise Roche described Gwen at the end as 'treating her body as though she was its executioner… To go to the doctor inconvenienced her, to take solid nourishment inconvenienced her'. As tough and implacable as a medieval saint, Gwen painted for God. Her pictures were 'prayers', not objects to be bought and displayed. Despairing of her unworldliness, her patron, the American collector John Quinn, despatched his mistress, Jeanne Robert Foster, to form a friendship with his elusive genius. 'All the pathetic dramatisation of life has fallen away,' Jeanne reported to Quinn. 'Gwen is real.' Her life, said Wyndham Lewis, was 'chaste and bare and sad'. Why, he wondered, had she kept herself 'so isolated from the influences of her age'? She influenced, however, our own age: the successor of Gwen John is Celia Paul. Gwen's intransigence and resolve, what Mackrell calls her 'stubborn grit', can be seen in her first self-portrait, painted in 1899-1900, when Gus and Ida were falling in love. Here was a woman, hand on hip, who would be no one's wife or mother, who saw anything but the most primitive domestic conditions as 'bourgeoise'. Gwen was not eccentric: she had a demon inside her. It is hard to tell, Mackrell says in her opening pages, if Gus and Gwen were 'admirable or awful'. By the end of this haunting book they seem admirable in their awfulness.

Who won Race Across the World today? BBC final recap
Who won Race Across the World today? BBC final recap

Scotsman

time3 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Who won Race Across the World today? BBC final recap

See which of the four teams managed to win Race Across the World series 5 🏃‍♂️ Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Race Across the World has crowned the winners for series 5. The winning pair walks away with the grand prize after the final leg. But which team made it to the last checkpoint first? The fifth winners of Race Across the World have been crowned after a rollercoaster final on the BBC. The remaining teams faced one last dash to reach the last checkpoint on a truly mammoth journey. After eight weeks - and around 14,000km - four pairs successfully completed the journey from the Great Wall of China to Kanyakumari in India. It is an incredible journey that has taken them across two of the most populous countries in the world - via Nepal. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However, all good things must come to an end, as they say. The final of Race Across the World's fifth series took place tonight (June 11) and just over seven hours separated the top three teams heading into the last leg. But which of the pairs managed to run out as victors at the end of the race? Here's all you need to know: Who won Race Across the World series 5? Race Across the World series 5 finalists | BBC Heading into the final leg of the mammoth race from China to the bottom of India, mother and son duo Caroline and Tom were in the lead. They reclaimed the top spot at the end of last week's seventh leg - as then-leaders Brian and Melvyn saw themselves tumble to the bottom of the leader board after opting for the rural route and avoiding Mumbai and falling 17 hours behind. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Caroline and Tom had a nearly seven hour lead over sisters Elizabeth and Letita. Young Welsh couple Fin and Sioned were ever so slightly further behind at seven hours and 48 minutes - having clawed back from a 33 hour deficit earlier in the season. It set things up for a dramatic final dash across the southern states of India. But who made it to Kanyakumari first? Caroline and Tom were the first to reach the last checkpoint and thus were crowned winners of Race Across the World series five. What does the winner of Race Across the World get? The winning couple walk away with a £20,000 jackpot - as well as bragging rights of course. It has been the same prize since the show began back in 2019. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Fortunately for fans, the show is not completely over as there is still one episode left in the season. Race Across the World will be back next week (June 18) with a reunion special that will reunite the five teams six months after the end of the race. It promises unseen footage, behind-the-scenes insights and plenty more. Find out how to watch it here. Have you got a story you want to share with our readers? You can now send it to us online via YourWorld at . It's free to use and, once checked, your story will appear on our website and, space allowing, in our newspapers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store