Real check, fake story: Georgia man accused of stealing $32 million in tax refunds
The U.S. Department of Justice said a Jonesboro man with a made up story is facing real consequences after trying to get tax refunds for businesses he didn't own.
According to USDOJ, Christopher Dowtin, 48, was investigated by the Internal Revenue Service on federal charges for allegedly 'fraudulently convert[ing] two businesses' IRS accounts to his name and address.'
Doing so, he got a tax refund check for more than $32 million.
Charging documents say Dowtin submitted fraudulent IRS forms claiming to be the responsible party for two companies.
[DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]
TRENDING STORIES:
Gov. Kemp to sign bill for $1 billion special tax refund. Here's how much you could get
Attorney says new video proves her client didn't try to kidnap a child at Walmart in Acworth
'Just bring it back': Woman pleads for sick dad's classic car after it was stolen from repair shop
In December, the IRS processed eight change of address or responsible party forms for Dowtin, and his requests for those changes were accepted.
USDOJ said Dowtin 'ultimately received two tax refund checks for those companies: one in the amount of $32,495,888.58 and one in the amount of $26,156.50.'
Then, officials accused Dowtin of traveling from Georgia to Ohio with the checks to open a bank account in the Southern District of Ohio.
Just before Valentine's Day, Dowtin tried to take the checks to a Morgan Stanley office in Beavercreek, Ohio to put them into a brokerage account with a trust in his name, where USDOJ says he told a financial advisor the companies were paying him for 'illegally using his 'personhood.''
Nearly a week later, an executive director at the bank contacted the U.S. Secret Service and IRS Criminal Investigation about the suspicious nature of the checks, officials said. Members of law enforcement seized the checks.
Now, Dowtin faces charges of wire fraud and theft of public money, with a possible sentence of up to 20 years in prison. USDOJ said he appeared in court in Atlanta on April 8.
[SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former celebrity lawyer Michael Avenatti gets nearly eight more years in prison at resentencing
Michael Avenatti, the once-swaggering celebrity lawyer who represented adult film star Stormy Daniels in her court battles against President Trump, was resentenced Thursday to 11 years in prison for dodging taxes and stealing millions of dollars from clients. U.S. District Judge James V. Selna resentenced Avenatti to 135 months — slightly more than 11 years — but credited him 40 months for the time he has served in prison for stealing nearly $300,000 from Daniels' advance on a book contract. That brought his sentence to nearly eight years. "Avenatti has done many noble and good things in his life, some reflected in this case, but he's also done great evil for which he must answer," Selna said. "His actions in this case ... show an abandonment of some of the most basic principles of fairness." Avenatti pleaded guilty in June 2022 to four counts of wire fraud for stealing money from clients and one count of obstructing collection of payroll taxes from his Seattle coffee business, which is now defunct. Read more: Michael Avenatti pleads guilty to fraud, tax charges in California One of the clients he stole from, Geoffrey Ernest Johnson, was a mentally ill paraplegic man on disability. Selna on Thursday ordered Avenatti to pay about $9 million in restitution to his victims — at least 10, including the Internal Revenue Service and the State Bar of California. Avenatti, who appeared in court in Santa Ana dressed in a gray sweatshirt and sweatpants, was sentenced to 14 years in prison in 2022. After he appealed the sentence, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered a new hearing. The 9th Circuit found that the trial judge based his decision on calculations of a greater loss than victims actually suffered and gave Avenatti too harsh a sentence. Prosecutors had sought slightly more than 13 years in prison. Avenatti had requested a little more than three. Ahead of the hearing at the federal courthouse in Santa Ana, Selna issued a tentative ruling of 10 years, citing Avenatti's work helping fellow inmates in prison, including as a suicide watch companion and through tutoring. But prosecutor Brett Sagel argued that Avenatti was the same person he was when he stole from his clients and called the judge's proposed sentence "unjust." "He is the same unrepentant person who will say or do anything whether truthful or not, if it benefits him," Sagel said. "He has not changed in the least." Margaret Farrand, Avenatti's federal public defender, said that, from the beginning of his career, Avenatti "has had a part of him that is really seeking to make the world a better place and he is not doing it for money." "This is part of who he is, it's part of what he is — a person that has a good heart and wants to help the world in some way," Farrand said. His actions while in prison, Farrand said, "shows this is the part of himself he wants to carry on." Although Selna had initially proposed a shorter sentence than his final ruling, he appeared particularly swayed by Alexis Gardner, one of Avenatti's former clients, who spoke at the hearing. Avenatti admitted stealing from a $2.75-million settlement that Hassan Whiteside, Gardner's former boyfriend and a pro basketball player then with the Miami Heat, agreed to pay Gardner to avoid a potential lawsuit. Avenatti, who during his crime spree drove a Ferrari, used most of that money to buy a private jet. Gardner was trembling as she stood before Selna, at times pausing to collect herself, noting that it was tough to "have to stand next to my abuser." "Eight years ago, I expected a life-changing settlement that would give me security and a chance to build my future," Gardner said. "Instead, Mr. Avenatti misappropriated my funds, and he dictated my fate without my consent, based on choices that he made." Gardner called Avenatti a "legal predator" and said that if it weren't for him, she would be a homeowner, would own a car and would have savings. Read more: Michael Avenatti gets four years for defrauding Stormy Daniels "This is someone who looked me in my eyes and told me that they were protecting me," she said. "I think you should give him the most that you can give him because it protects people who are not equipped to fight these legal battles." When he addressed the court, Avenatti said if could change that past, "I would." "All I can do is try to move forward in a positive way, and that's what I've attempted to do, and that's what I'm going to continue to attempt to do," he said. After the hearing, Sagel told reporters that he believed Avenatti should have gotten more time, "but obviously getting the equivalent of 11 years on a fraud matter is a significant sentence." "I'm pretty sure he doesn't see this as a victory, doing double digits in jail," Sagel said. It's unclear exactly when Avenatti will be released from prison. After Selna handed down the sentence, Avenatti seemed to signal to someone in the crowd that another legal action was coming. "We'll be back," he said. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
New jury trial set for Kamas mother charged with killing her husband
A request for an appeal in Kouri Richins' case has caused a 10-month delay in her case. New jury trial dates were scheduled in a virtual hearing on Friday, with jury selection beginning on Feb. 10, 2026, and the trial beginning two weeks later on Feb. 23. Her April trial was delayed when her attorneys said they wished to appeal a decision to only allow jurors from Summit County, as the court declined Richins' request to also have jurors from Salt Lake County. Richins is a mother and real estate agent who is charged with murdering her husband and attempting to murder him a month earlier. She was charged over a year after his death. With the new trial, her attorneys asked for more time to select a jury — since now it will come from only residents of Summit County — and for the trial itself to be one week longer than initially planned because of the length of the witness list. Kathy Nester said Richins may testify, and if she does, it would be 'very lengthy.' Other witnesses will also need a lot of time, in addition to video and audio tapes, Nester said. In Friday's hearing, 3rd District Judge Richard Mrazik also set dates for additional hearings before the trial and asked attorneys to work together to decide when certain documents will be filed in order to have everything ready for the trial. There are currently four motions ready for oral argument and a decision, including requests to exclude the defense's expert witnesses, a motion from Richins' attorneys to not allow the 'Walk the Dog!!' letter into trial and prosecutor's request to bring evidence," Mrazik said. Kouri Richins' attorneys said they still wish to file at least one motion to ask for additional evidence to not be allowed in trial. Mrazik said the court will send jury questionnaires to 2,000 people, which is more than were sent for the previously scheduled trial. The court planned for six days to question jurors, with 40 potential jurors coming in each day. On March 4, 2022, Richins called dispatch to report her husband, Eric Richins, 39, was unresponsive in the early morning hours. She is accused of administering a fatal dose of fentanyl that night and has also been charged with giving a lethal dose of drugs to her husband on Valentine's Day, less than three weeks before. She was ordered to stand trial for aggravated murder and attempted murder, both first-degree felonies; two counts of distributing a controlled substance, two counts of insurance fraud and two counts of filing a fraudulent insurance claim, all second-degree felonies; and three counts of forgery, a third-degree felony. Richins will face a separate trial for two counts of mortgage fraud, a second-degree felony, and two additional counts of forgery, a third-degree felony. Her attorneys said in a statement after the hearing that they are relieved she has a trial date and are confident 'once the facts are heard it will be clear to all that Kouri is innocent.' 'She is ready for the truth to come out — and of the false narratives that have defined this case to be confronted in a court of law,' they said. Richins' next hearing will be on Aug. 1.
Forbes
10 hours ago
- Forbes
Tax Breaks: The New Chapter Is Beginning At The IRS Edition
It's a new chapter at the IRS. getty The traditional individual tax filing season ended two months ago (those of us on extension still have a few months to go), but the IRS is still in the news. Most notably, the Senate has confirmed Billy Long as the new commissioner of the IRS (you can read more about that in a bit as part of our Deeper Dive below). How Long's tenure might impact the future of the IRS and tax administration is still a question, but far from the only one. Still to be determined? What the tax picture might look like during the next filing season for millions of taxpayers. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) passed the House in May and moved to the Senate, where the White House hoped for a quick approval. Nearly a month later, there's been no real movement. A vote hasn't yet been scheduled, and it's looking very unlikely that the bill will be signed into law by July 4, President Trump's target date (a fact that Trump recently acknowledged). The biggest obstacle in the Senate may not be Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) or stalwart deficit hawk Rand Paul (R-Ky.), but rather Elizabeth MacDonough. The name may not ring a bell, but MacDonough has been a fixture in the Senate for over a decade, serving as the Senate Parliamentarian. The Parliamentarian advises on procedural matters and guides precedent. That includes sorting out what's allowed during the debate, amendment, and voting processes. That matters here because reconciliation bills (like OBBBA) are subject to special rules in the Senate. Since those rules can be tricky, the Parliamentarian helps determine what is—and isn't—allowed, especially when it comes to interpreting the Byrd Rule, which imposes limits on what can be in reconciliation bills. If the Parliamentarian determines a provision in a bill violates the Byrd Rule, the provision must be removed from the bill unless the Senators vote to waive the rule—that requires 60 votes, instead of the lower 51 vote majority allowed for reconciliation. As currently written, OBBBA would deliver an average tax cut of almost $80,000 next year to those in the top one percent. That's 40 times the tax relief going to middle-income families who struggle with the costs of housing, food, and raising children. This windfall for the wealthy would be paid for through cuts to health insurance, Pell grants, and food aid for millions of lower income American families. The bill is far from finalized. Elaine Maag writes that the Senate still has time to deliver on the pro-family promises made by many Republican leaders by amending the budget bill to provide economic relief for all families. Key senators, she notes, including Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) have already put forward plans that would do so. One OBBBA provision targeted to families is the creation of the Trump Accounts. If the bill passes, these savings accounts will be funded by the federal government and will provide each baby born between January 1, 2025, and December 31, 2028, with $1,000. The initial set of rules associated with the accounts is complicated–getting it right is crucial if the accounts are to be successful. Not all of the work in Congress this week focused on future budgets – the House of Representatives voted to rescind $9.4 billion in funding for the National Public Radio (NPR), the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS), and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The bill, proposed by President Trump, does not focus on approving new dollars, but instead targets a clawback of previously approved funds, a move known as rescission. Not all deal-making was happening in Congress: U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilken has approved a settlement between the NCAA and lawyers representing college athletes. While the details are nuanced, the key takeaway is that schools can now begin paying athletes directly. While this is the first time that college athletes can receive direct payments from their schools, athletes have been receiving millions of dollars through name, image, and likeness (NIL) payments and endorsements in recent years. While these significant cash flows for the college athletes can be financially beneficial, they also carry tremendous tax burdens. College athletes aren't the only sports figures to navigate tricky wins. The U.S. Open continues to represent one of golf's biggest prizes. While any golfer would give whatever it takes to take home this year's trophy (the first-place prize is expected to be $4.3 million), there is an extra layer of incentive this year that makes it even more beneficial relative to future years: taxes. Athletes must pay state and local income taxes in the jurisdictions where they earn the money–sometimes referred to as a jock tax. This year, the U.S. Open will be held at Oakmont Country Club, located in the suburbs of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Luckily for those golfers, my own state of Pennsylvania boasts one of the lowest state income tax rates in the country, with a flat rate of 3.07% for 2025. This means that, absent any other deductions, the winner of the $4.3 million prize will only pay approximately $132,010 in state income taxes on the winnings. That's not a bad take-home pay for a few days' work. The U.S. Open kicks off this weekend–hopefully, the weather holds. There are a few other key happenings over the next few days, including a notable birthday (Happy birthday, Mom!). Enjoy your weekend, Kelly Phillips Erb (Senior Writer, Tax) Is the price you pay the price you can claim as a deduction when donating clothes to charity? It's complicated. getty This week, a taxpayer asked: I love to shop. Sometimes, when I'm in the store, I'll pick up something on clearance to donate to the local women's shelter. I get some excellent deals. I've always thought that I could deduct the value of the item (Coach is still Coach even if it's on sale), but my daughter says that I can only deduct what I paid. Who is right? Normally, it's true that if you contribute property to charity, the amount of your deduction is generally the fair market value (FMV) of the property at the time of the contribution. FMV is the price a willing buyer would pay a willing seller for the item in its current condition in the marketplace. In this case, the clothing is new, so the key is whether you paid a genuinely discounted price—or whether the item was actually worth the lower price that you paid. Here's an example. Let's say you bought a coat that sells for $200, but you paid $50. If the coat normally sells for $200 and is brand new, and this was a one-time sale, the FMV may be close to $200. However, if the coat is available for sale for $50 in many stores, or if it's out of style or out of season, then $50 may be the true FMV. But remember that if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. There's even a Tax Court case on this issue. In Grainger. v. Commissioner, Estelle Grainger was a grandmother who also liked to shop—especially at Talbots. She purchased hundreds of items on sale, often using her Talbots discount points. She then donated those clothes to charity and claimed the retail price, not the price she paid. Those deductions were significant: $18,288 in 2010, $32,672 in 2011, and $34,401 in 2012. The IRS challenged the value of the deductions, and Grainger took the matter to Tax Court. For contributions of property, like clothing, you must be able to provide reliable written records that include the name and address of the donee, the date and location of the contribution, and a description of the property. You must also keep records to establish 'the fair market value of the property at the time the contribution was made' as well as the method used to determine the value. Grainger had receipts from Talbots and from the charity where she donated the items. The receipts included some pertinent info: date, location, and the type of gift. Depending on the value of the property, a written appraisal may also be required. Specifically, the tax rules require taxpayers who donate 'similar items of property' with a value exceeding $5,000 to obtain an appraisal to determine the FMV. Grainger didn't do that. So, the IRS allowed her a total deduction of just $6,117 for all three years, the amount she actually paid for clothing she donated to charity. But don't get too excited. The Tax Court noted that even with the appraisal, it wouldn't have helped because, applying the willing buyer and willing seller test, no 'rational buyer' would have paid more for the clothes than what Talbots was charging. There was one more problem with Grainger's deduction scheme. As the Tax Court noted in a footnote, even if Grainger had been able to prove that the clothing was worth more than what she paid, it would not have helped her. Under section 170(e)(1)(A) of the tax code, you must reduce any allowable charitable deduction by "the amount of gain which would not have been long-term capital gain * * * if the property contributed had been sold by the taxpayer at its fair market value (determined at the time of such contribution)." Since Grainger donated all or most of the items shortly after purchasing them, she would have realized short-term capital gain if she had sold them instead. — Do you have a tax question or matter that you think we should cover in the next newsletter? We'd love to help if we can. Check out our guidelines and submit a question here. The IRS uses a variety of resources to identify fraudulent returns, including those filed by identity thieves, and to prevent the issuance of refunds associated with those returns. According to a recent report from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA), those efforts are paying off–most fraudulent tax returns are stopped before the refund is paid. As of February 22, 2025, the IRS has stopped over $900 million in fraudulent refunds. That number was nearly double from the same time in 2024. The IRS says it is stopping more fraudulent tax returns. Kelly Phillips Erb The IRS attempts to proactively prevent identity theft by issuing Identity Protection Personal Identification Numbers (IP PIN). An identity protection PIN (IP PIN) is a six-digit number issued by the IRS that adds an extra layer of prevention. Think of it like a password – since the IP PIN is only known to you and the IRS, no one else can file your electronic or paper tax return without triggering a warning. The IRS also uses identity theft filters to identify tax returns with characteristics indicative of confirmed identity theft, including amounts claimed for income and withholding, filing requirements, prisoner status, taxpayer age, and filing history. For the 2025 filing season, the IRS used 295 filters to detect potential identity theft tax returns and prevent the issuance of fraudulent refunds. That's more than the 282 filters used in the 2024 Filing Season. Tax returns identified by these filters are held during processing until the IRS can verify the taxpayer's identity, usually with a Notice 5071C. Taxpayers can use their IRS online account or a dedicated toll-free telephone number to verify their identity (here's more information on answering Notice 5071C). The IRS aims to process tax returns and issue refunds within nine weeks after a successful identity verification. If the individual's identity cannot be confirmed, the IRS removes the tax return from processing to prevent the issuance of a fraudulent refund. Depending on when a return is flagged as potentially fraudulent, the IRS may be able to prevent the tax return and associated refund from being paid. If the fraud isn't identified until after the refund is paid, the IRS may pull the return for post-refund compliance processes. The data was published in the Interim Results of the 2025 Filing Season report published by TIGTA in June 2025. The report presents the results of TIGTA's review to evaluate the processing of individual income tax returns for the 2025 Filing Season. WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 20: Former Rep. Billy Long (R-MO), U.S. President Donald Trump's nominee to be Internal Revenue Service Commissioner, departs after a Senate Finance Committee nomination hearing on Capitol Hill on May 20, 2025 in Washington, DC. The IRS has had four acting commissioners since U.S. President Donald Trump took office in January. (Photo by) Getty Images The Senate has confirmed former U.S. Representative Billy Long of Missouri as the next commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The vote was 53-44 along party lines, with all Republicans in the Senate voting yes—all of the no votes came from Democrats. The vote puts a period on a process that had grown contentious at times. President Donald Trump announced Long's nomination in December of 2024, even though Danny Werfel was then serving a term as IRS Commissioner that would normally run until late in 2027. Werfel subsequently announced his resignation, effective January 20, 2025. Since Long had not yet been confirmed at that time, Werfel was replaced by Doug O'Donnell, who served as Acting Commissioner following Werfel's departure. O'Donnell left his position on February 28, 2025, and was replaced by then IRS Chief Operating Officer Melanie Krause. Krause announced her departure in April 2025, following the tax agency's agreement to share immigrant tax data with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Michael Faulkender joined the revolving doors at the IRS as the Acting Commissioner on April 18, 2025—he has been in the position since that time. Long will now officially take the reins at the tax agency. (You can read more about Long here.) Former IRS Commissioners Lawrence Gibbs, John Koskinen, Charles Rettig, and Daniel Werfel shared lessons learned from their tenures and predictions for the agency's future with Tax Analysts President and CEO Cara Griffith. The discussion spanned two hours and covered many of the big questions plaguing the IRS. Tax Notes curated a selection of the former commissioners' responses (but if you'd like to hear the whole discussion, you can find the link in the show notes). 📅 June 16, 2025. Due date for individuals living and working abroad to file their 2024 federal income tax return and pay any tax due. 📅 September 30, 2025. Due date for individuals and businesses impacted by recent terrorist attacks in Israel. 📅 October 15, 2025. Due date for individuals and businesses affected by wildfires and straight-line winds in southern California that began on January 7, 2025. 📅 November 3, 2025. Due date for individuals and businesses affected by storms in Arkansas and Tennessee that began on April 2, 2025. 📅 June 16-19, 2025. Latino Tax Fest. MGM Grand Hotel & Casino, Las Vegas, Nevada. Registration required. 📅 June 18, 2025 at 12 p.m. ET. Taxes In The Political Crosshairs: How To Prepare For One Big Beautiful Bill. Members only webinar featuring Forbes editor Janet Novack, Forbes senior writer and tax attorney Kelly Phillips Erb, National Managing Director of alliantgroup and former senior counsel and tax counsel to the U.S. Senate Committee on Finance Dean Zerbe, and PwC Senior Policy Advisor and former Chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means Dave Camp. Registration required. 📅 June 18, 2025. Avalara CRUSH on Tour. Bridgeport Art Center (Skyline Loft), 1200 W. 35th Street, Chicago, IL 60609. Registration required. 📅 June 26, 2025. Avalara CRUSH on Tour. Iron23 (Flatiron District), 29 West 23rd Street, New York, NY 10010. Registration required. 📅 July 1-September 16 (various dates), 2025. IRS Nationwide Tax Forum in Chicago, New Orleans, Orlando, Baltimore and San Diego. Registration required (discounts available for some partner groups). 📅 July 18-19, 2025. Tax Retreat "Anti Conference." Denver, Colorado. Registration required. 📅 July 21-23, 2025. National Association of Tax Professionals Taxposium 2025. Caesars Palace, Las Vegas, Nevada. Registration required. 📅 July 22-24, 2025. Bridging the Gap Conference. Denver Marriott Tech Center, 4900 S. Syracuse Street, Denver, Colorado. Registration required. 📅 July 28-30, 2025. Tax Summit 2025. Grand America Hotel, Salt Lake City. Registration required. Charitable giving comes in various forms. Which woman launched a reading program in 1995 to provide young children with a free book each month? (A) Dolly Parton (B) J.K. Rowling (C) Oprah Winfrey (D) Reese Witherspoon Find the answer at the bottom of this newsletter. The U.S. Department of the Treasury and the IRS issued Notice 2025-33, extending and modifying earlier transition relief for brokers required to file Form 1099-DA to report certain digital asset sale and exchange transactions by customers. Specifically, Notice 2025-33 extends the transition relief from backup withholding tax liability and associated penalties for any broker that fails to withhold and pay the backup withholding tax for any digital asset sale or exchange transaction effected during calendar year 2026. The IRS published Internal Revenue Bulletin 2025-25. The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) submitted comments to the IRS containing 183 recommendations regarding the 2025-2026 Priority Guidance Plan. The AICPA's recommendations come from the organization's Tax Technical Resource Panels (TRP), which cover the following areas: Corporations and Shareholders; Employee Benefits; Exempt Organizations; Individual and Self-Employed; International; IRS Advocacy & Relations; Partnerships; S Corporations; Tax Methods and Periods; and Trust, Estate and Gift Tax. The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) released an exposure draft for the Proposed Criteria for Controls Supporting Token Operations: Specific to Asset-Backed Fiat-Pegged Tokens, with comments sought from the public through Aug.11, 2025. The draft provides a framework for controls over stablecoins, the fiat currency-backed digital asset that is currently a key focus of regulatory activity in the United States. Tax attorneys Zhanna A. Ziering and Aaron M. Esman have founded Ziering & Esman PLLC, a tax law firm in New York. Ziering & Esman PLLC focuses on tax controversy, providing representation to individuals and businesses involved in disputes with the IRS and state tax authorities. KPMG announced the Americas Board of Directors has elected Will Williams as the next Chair of KPMG's Americas Region, beginning July 1, 2025. Williams will succeed Paul Knopp, who has held the position since 2020. Georgia lawmakers are exploring raising the tax on cigarettes. Currently, only Missouri charges a lower tax than Georgia for a pack of 20 cigarettes. Raising the tax by a dollar to $1.37 would generate between $400 million and $500 million. The cigarette tax currently generates about $115 million a year, and Georgia is spending about $850 million a year on Medicaid costs attributable to smoking. The gas tax in Mississippi will increase by 3 cents per gallon, effective July 1, 2025, as part of a 9-cent boost phased in over three years. The state's gas tax has been 18 cents per gallon since 1987. According to the Tax Foundation, Mississippi's 18-cent gas tax is the second-lowest in the U.S.—only Alaska's is lower at 8.95 cents per gallon. — If you have tax and accounting career or industry news, submit it for consideration here or email me directly. Here's what readers clicked through most often in the newsletter last week: You can find the entire newsletter here. The answer is (A) Dolly Parton. American singer, songwriter and actress Dolly Parton, performs with a guitar, 1976. (Photo by David Redfern/Redferns) Redferns In 1995, Dolly Parton created Dolly Parton's Imagination Library to benefit children in East Tennessee, USA. The first book order totaled just over 1,700. Today, Dolly Parton's Imagination Library sends more than one million books per month to children around the world. How did we do? We'd love your feedback. If you have a suggestion for making the newsletter better, submit it here or email me directly.
