Tesla's future robot legions: First they learn to drive, then to walk
Tesla is taking all the knowledge it's acquired from a decade of autonomous vehicle development to teach the Optimus, its new humanoid robot, how to interact with the world.
Essentially, the robot learns to drive before it can walk — or dance, as a demonstration that CEO Elon Musk posted on social media site X showed May 12. The goal is to create an autonomous robot through artificial intelligence.
Tesla is deploying its Full-Self Driving software to power a robotaxi service scheduled for June to enable the Optimus to move through the world with built-in cameras and an onboard computer.
'Tesla's the leader in real-world AI,' Musk said at a company meeting streamed on YouTube March 20. 'What we learn from the car, we translate to the Optimus robot.'
And if Musk's plan to put millions of robotaxis on the road is adventurous, his promise to deploy billions of Optimus robots with their own Full-Self Driving software is highly optimistic, analysts say.
After all, Musk has promised self-driving cars for a decade without delivering any yet. And robot development is still in its infancy, even if Tesla has a leg up on a variety of competitors in the robot space.
Sign up for the Automotive News Daily newsletter to get the latest top stories in your inbox every business morning.
'There's a ton that we can leverage from autonomous cars and having sort of a head start with all the technology that Tesla has,' said Heni Ben Amor, an Arizona State University professor specializing in robotics.
'But there are some pretty major question marks that need to be resolved,' he said, adding, 'I want to be careful that we're not overhyping things,' with regard to progress on humanoid robots in general.
Unlike robotaxis, humanoid robots will have to balance on two legs, manipulate their hands and fingers in complex ways and interact side-by-side with humans before they can be useful, Ben Amor said.
Tesla already has significant expertise in software, electric motors, power electronics and similar skills that make it a leader in the race for a general-purpose humanoid robot for labor-intensive tasks.
With billions of miles of data and an AI supercomputer in Austin, Texas, Tesla launched an Optimus pilot assembly line in California this year. It plans to make 5,000 robots this year, which Musk likened to a Roman legion.
Tesla plans to first employ the robot in its factories, expanding to outside companies as early as next year. Musk said Tesla could make 50,000 Optimus robots in 2026, scaling to 1 million per year by the end of the decade.
'Ultimately, I think we'll be making tens of millions of robots per year,' Musk said. 'It's like serious volume. Maybe 100 million robots a year.' He said Tesla employees would get first access to the bots for home use.
Some Wall Street analysts forecast that humanoid robot production will eventually overtake the legacy auto industry.
'Over the long term, we project that the market for humanoid robots to be materially larger than the global auto industry,' Morgan Stanley said in an April research note. The investment firm is bullish on Tesla stock.
'Our estimate for $4.7 trillion in global humanoid sales by 2050 is nearly double the aggregate revenues of the 20 largest global auto OEMs in 2024, a figure that could very well shrink,' the bank said.
Tesla is already utilizing what are essentially robot cars for useful work at its Fremont, Calif., factory, Musk said. New vehicles drive autonomously from the end of the production line to a parking lot for shipping.
A key test will come in June when Tesla plans to launch a fully autonomous taxi service in Austin, similar to Waymo, Google's self-driving car company that already operates in several U.S. cities.
In 2026, Tesla plans to launch a full robotaxi, the Cybercab, with no human controls such as a steering wheel or pedals.
Musk wants the Optimus to reach an entirely new level of capability decades down the road.
'The future we're headed for is one where you can literally just have anything you want,' he said. 'If there's a good or service you want, you'll be able to have it. What's key to that is robotics and AI.'
To be sure, it's not just Tesla that's promising autonomous robots for labor-intensive tasks to work in factories, do chores in the home and ultimately transform society.
Boston Dynamics, owned by Hyundai Motor Group, said in April that the automaker will buy tens of thousands of robots in the next few years.
Last year, BMW said it's exploring the use of humanoid robots in production and did a successful test of one model at its South Carolina plant. BMW is partnering with California-based robot company Figure.
But Musk is promising highly aggressive timelines and a vision of the future in which humanoid robots would eventually outnumber human beings and lead to global abundance for every person.
'The only company that has all the ingredients for making intelligent humanoid robots at scale is Tesla,' Musk said. The Optimus will be the biggest product in history and 10 times bigger than second place, he added.
As a well-financed, vertically integrated company with a trillion-dollar market value, Tesla has advantages over its startup rivals in the humanoid robots space, but it also faces difficult technical challenges.
The decadelong development of the Full-Self Driving software is helpful but not decisive, Ben Amor said.
'It definitely helps. All of the gains are useful and some of it is transferable to general autonomy of robots and humanoid robots in particular,' he said.
'But at the same time, there's a big chunk of challenges that are not addressed in autonomous driving for which dedicated algorithms and methods need to be created' for the Optimus, Ben Amor said.
AVs don't interact in the way a humanoid robot in a factory would, for example, balancing on two feet, carefully manipulating its hands and working closely with humans, he said.
'Seeing a human robot as sort of a car on two legs would not do it justice,' Ben Amor said. 'And I think that's kind of an oversimplification when it comes to the physical world.'
As a researcher who served as a visiting scientist at the Google DeepMind laboratory in California, Ben Amor is a cheerleader for robot development. But he warns that too much hype could lead to disappointment.
'From a really well-functioning prototype to something that's deployable and reliable in a company, you actually take five to 10 years and where we are now is we don't have the solution yet,' Ben Amor said.
Optimists on the Optimus include Tesla's former director of AI, Andrej Karpathy, now CEO of startup Eureka Labs. He was involved in the Optimus project before he left Tesla in 2022.
'In terms of transfer from cars to humanoids, it was not that much work at all,' Karpathy said on a No Priors podcast in September.
'One of the early versions of the Optimus robot, it thought it was a car. It had the exact same computer, it had the exact same cameras,' Karpathy said. 'It thought it was driving, but it was moving through an environment.'
Humanoid robots like the Optimus are likely to be first used in-house for tasks like material handling and only later in the refinement process will they be safe enough to interact with humans in a home setting, he said.
'I think a lot of people have this vision of it like doing your laundry, etc. I think that will come late,' Karpathy said. 'I don't think we can have a robot like crush grandma is how I put it. I think it's too much legal liability.'
Have an opinion about this story? Tell us about it and we may publish it in print. Click here to submit a letter to the editor.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Business Insider
21 minutes ago
- Business Insider
What A-list economists are saying about Trump's tax bill as Musk rebels against it
Elon Musk has departed his role as a "special government employee" in Trump's White House — and he's using his time outside the administration to hammer the GOP spending bill that's a cornerstone of the president's agenda. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination," Musk wrote on X earlier this week. Trump responded by saying Musk's criticism of the legislation is "disappointing." President Trump's tax bill will likely face a vote in the Senate in the coming weeks after passing the House in May. It would reduce the tax rates of lower-income workers, particularly those earning less than $107,200, and eliminate taxes on tips, social security, and overtime. The bill would also cut spending on social programs like Medicaid and SNAP benefits, which provide food assistance to low-income Americans. Like Musk, investors and economists are seemingly concerned that the bill will cause the national debt to balloon and further widen the US budget deficit. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office said this week that it would grow the deficit by $2.4 trillion over the next decade . Trump and his allies have pushed back, arguing that higher economic growth from lower taxes would help boost government revenue. Here's what top economists are saying about the bill. Phillip L. Swagel, director of the Congressional Budget Office Despite the lower tax rates for low earners, Swagel said in a May 20 letter that the bill would negatively impact poorer Americans. "CBO estimates that household resources would decrease by an amount equal to about 2 percent of income in the lowest decile (tenth) of the income distribution in 2027 and 4 percent in 2033, mainly as a result of losses of in-kind transfers, such as Medicaid and SNAP," he wrote. "By contrast, resources would increase by an amount equal to 4 percent for households in the highest decile in 2027 and 2 percent in 2033, mainly because of reductions in the taxes they owe." William McBride, chief economist at the Tax Foundation McBride, along with several colleagues at the non-partisan Tax Foundation think tank, said in a May 23 report that while the bill would support economic growth, it wouldn't be enough to offset the revenue loss from tax cuts. "Our preliminary analysis finds the tax provisions included in the House-passed bill would increase long-run GDP by 0.8 percent," the report said. "The bill's tax and spending changes would increase the 10-year budget deficit by $2.6 trillion from 2025 through 2034 on a conventional basis before added interest costs. On a dynamic basis, accounting for economic growth, the deficit would increase by $1.7 trillion over ten years before interest costs." It continued: "The bill's tax provisions alone would reduce federal tax revenue by $4.1 trillion from 2025 through 2034 on a conventional basis before added interest costs. On a dynamic basis, accounting for economic growth, the revenue reduction would fall by nearly 22 percent to $3.2 trillion over 10 years before added interest costs." 6 Nobel Laureates Six Nobel Prize-winning economists — including Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, Peter Diamond, Paul Krugman, Oliver Hart, and Joseph Stiglitz — said in a June 2 letter that the bill would worsen wealth inequality in the US. "The combination of cuts to key safety net programs like Medicaid and SNAP and tax cuts disproportionately benefiting higher-income households means that the House budget constitutes an extremely large upward redistribution of income. Given how much this bill adds to the U.S. debt, it is shocking that it still imposes absolute losses on the bottom 40% of U.S households," the letter said. "The House bill addresses none of the nation's key economic challenges usefully and exacerbates many of them," it added. Ken Rogoff, professor of economics at Harvard University Rogoff, former chief economist at the IMF, cast doubt on the notion that the bill would boost growth in a piece for Project Syndicate this week. "Trump and his acolytes argue that his "big, beautiful bill" will supercharge economic growth, generating enough revenue to make up for sweeping tax cuts. But history offers little support for such claims," he wrote. "While both Democratic-led spending sprees and Republican-backed tax cuts have fueled the growth of US debt over the past two decades, tax reductions have accounted for the lion's share of the increase. Moreover, the notion that tax cuts pay for themselves was already discredited in the 1980s, when President Ronald Reagan's tax cuts led to soaring deficits rather than self-sustaining growth." He added: "Will America's rising debt ultimately trigger a full-blown crisis? Perhaps, but a continued upward drift in long-term interest rates is more likely." Desmond Lachman, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute Lachman, a former IMF official who currently works for a conservative-leaning think tank, said in a June 4 post that rising bond yields, a declining dollar, and appreciating gold prices could be harbingers of an economic crisis brought on by Trump-driven policy volatility. Trump's tax bill is adding to investors' fears due to its inflationary implications. But one of its clauses undermines confidence in the reliability of the returns on Treasurys, he said. "That bill includes a clause that has to be sending shivers down foreign investors' spines. According to Section 899, the US Treasury can impose additional taxes of up to 20 percent on income earned by foreign entities from countries that enact taxes deemed 'unfair' to US interests."
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
MongoDB Soars 14.2% After Crushing Q1 -- $1B Buyback, AI Push, and Customer Surge Spark Rally
MongoDB (NASDAQ:MDB) is off to a fast start in fiscal 2026and investors might want to take a closer look. The company reported $549 million in Q1 revenue, up 22% from last year, with its cloud product, Atlas, growing 26% and now making up 72% of total sales. Management added 2,600 new customers, marking the biggest quarterly gain in six years. The share is up 14.2% at 12.09pm today. CEO Dev Ittycheria pointed to strong traction from both enterprises and startups as AI workloads and modern app development continue to drive demand for flexible, cloud-native databases. Behind the scenes, MongoDB is becoming a cash machine. The company more than doubled non-GAAP operating income to $87.4 million and posted $105.9 million in free cash flowup 74% year-over-year. With $2.5 billion in cash and short-term investments on hand, it just authorized another $800 million in share repurchases, taking its total buyback program to $1 billion. That kind of financial firepower could give MongoDB more room to support long-term growth while returning capital to shareholders. On the AI front, MongoDB isn't just playing defense. It rolled out new retrieval modelsVoyage 3.5 and 3.5 Litethat improve accuracy and efficiency for building AI-powered apps. It also debuted its Model Context Protocol Server, which connects MongoDB to tools like GitHub Copilot and Anthropic's Claude, letting developers use natural language to interact with their data. With FY2026 revenue guidance raised up to $2.29 billion and full-year non-GAAP EPS projected to hit as high as $3.12, MongoDB could be shaping up as a quiet leader in the AI infrastructure race. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


New York Times
22 minutes ago
- New York Times
Live Updates: Trump-Musk Alliance Dissolves as They Hurl Personal Attacks
Pinned President Trump and Elon Musk's alliance dissolved into open acrimony on Thursday, as the two men hurled personal attacks at each other after the billionaire had unleashed broadsides against the president's signature domestic policy bill. While meeting with Friedrich Merz, Germany's new chancellor, in the Oval Office, Mr. Trump broke days of uncharacteristic silence and unloaded on Mr. Musk, who until last week was a top presidential adviser. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon,' Mr. Trump said. 'I've helped Elon a lot.' As the president criticized Mr. Musk, the billionaire responded in real time on X, the social media platform he owns. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Mr. Musk wrote. 'Such ingratitude,' he added, taking credit for Mr. Trump's election in a way that he never has before. Mr. Musk had been careful in recent days to train his ire on Republicans in Congress, not Mr. Trump himself. But he discarded that caution on Thursday, ridiculing the president in a pattern familiar to the many previous Trump advisers who have fallen by the wayside. What started as simply a fight over the domestic policy bill sharply escalated in just a few hours. Within minutes of one another, Mr. Trump was making fun of Mr. Musk's unwillingness to wear makeup to cover a recent black eye, and Mr. Musk was raising questions about Mr. Trump's competency as president. The public break comes after a remarkable partnership between the two men. Mr. Musk deployed hundreds of millions of dollars to support Mr. Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. After Mr. Trump won, he gave Mr. Musk free rein to slash the federal work force. And just last week, Mr. Trump gave Mr. Musk a personal send-off in the Oval Office. The president praised Mr. Musk as 'one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced' and gave him a golden key emblazoned with the White House insignia. Mr. Musk promised to remain a 'friend and adviser to the president.' But now Mr. Musk, who has left his temporary role, has turned into the most prominent critic of a top presidential priority. Mr. Musk has lashed out against the far-reaching policy bill in numerous posts on X. He has called it a 'disgusting abomination,' argued that the bill would undo all the work he did to cut government spending and hinted that he would target Republican members of Congress who backed the legislation in next year's midterm elections. Mr. Trump on Thursday said Mr. Musk's criticism of the bill was entirely self-interested, saying he only opposed the legislation after Republicans took out the electric vehicle mandate, which would benefit Tesla, Mr. Musk's electric vehicle company. (Mr. Musk has previously called for an end to those subsidies.) The president also downplayed Mr. Musk's financial support for him during the campaign, arguing he would have won Pennsylvania without Mr. Musk, who poured much of his money and time into the critical battleground state. Mr. Musk also on Thursday rebutted Mr. Trump's statement that Mr. Musk 'knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here.' 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Mr. Musk wrote, sharing a video of Mr. Trump saying he was disappointed in Mr. Musk.