logo
NPR CEO rips Trump order to defund as ‘retaliation,' insists media outlet is 'non-partisan'

NPR CEO rips Trump order to defund as ‘retaliation,' insists media outlet is 'non-partisan'

Yahoo2 days ago

NPR CEO Katherine Maher assured PBS on Wednesday that her outlet is "non-partisan" following President Donald Trump's latest executive order seeking to defund the station.
In an interview on "PBS NewsHour," the NPR boss trashed Trump's executive order to "cease Federal funding for NPR," calling it "viewpoint discrimination" and saying that Trump is just taking it out on NPR because it goes against his views.
"And so, it is a textbook example of viewpoint discrimination from a First Amendment standpoint," she said, adding, "Essentially, by blocking funding to NPR and PBS, it is a form of retaliation against our organizations for airing editorial programming that the president might disagree with."
Boise State Public Radio Chief Fears Service Cuts If Trump Funding Ban Succeeds
Trump signed the order earlier this month which mandated that the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and other federal agencies stop funding NPR and other public media outlets like PBS.
The text of the order read, "NPR and PBS have fueled partisanship and left-wing propaganda with taxpayer dollars, which is highly inappropriate and an improper use of taxpayers' money, as President Trump has stated."
Read On The Fox News App
Maher's outlet, joined by three public Colorado stations — Colorado Public Radio, Aspen Public Radio and KSUT — filed a lawsuit against the order in federal court on Tuesday. In a statement, the NPR CEO said, "The Executive Order is a clear violation of the Constitution and the First Amendment's protections for freedom of speech and association, and freedom of the press."
5 Things Veteran Npr Editor Exposed In Stunning Criticism Of Own Employer's Liberal Bias
During the PBS interview on Wednesday, Maher suggested that Trump's executive order violated "safeguards" established by the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 that keep "public media independent from government influence."
PBS has not joined NPR's suit but said it is weighing legal options, among others.
"PBS is considering every option, including taking legal action, to allow our organization to continue to provide essential programming and services to member stations and all Americans," PBS spokesman Jeremy Gaines said earlier this week.
PBS NewsHour anchor Geoff Bennett asked Maher about accusations that NPR promotes a liberal bias, bringing up Republicans' claims, as well as those of former NPR editor Uri Berliner.
Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture
Berliner, who quit NPR in 2024, blew the whistle on the outlet in an essay for The Free Press that same year, slamming NPR for its "absence of viewpoint diversity."
Maher responded to the critiques, declaring, "Well, first of all, I respond by saying we're a non-partisan news organization. We seek to be able to provide a range of different viewpoints in terms of who we bring on air, the stories that we tell."
"My view is that is a mischaracterization of our work. We do not seek to favor any political party at all. We seek to ensure that Americans have a wide range of perspectives available to them," she added.
In response to Maher's comments, a White House spokesperson told Fox News Digital:
"The Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) is creating media to support a particular political party on the taxpayers' dime. Therefore, the President is exercising his lawful authority to limit funding to NPR and PBS. The President was elected with a mandate to ensure efficient use of taxpayer dollars, and he will continue to use his lawful authority to achieve that objective."Original article source: NPR CEO rips Trump order to defund as 'retaliation,' insists media outlet is 'non-partisan'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ambarella First Quarter 2026 Earnings: Beats Expectations
Ambarella First Quarter 2026 Earnings: Beats Expectations

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ambarella First Quarter 2026 Earnings: Beats Expectations

Revenue: US$85.9m (up 58% from 1Q 2025). Net loss: US$24.3m (loss narrowed by 36% from 1Q 2025). US$0.58 loss per share (improved from US$0.93 loss in 1Q 2025). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Revenue exceeded analyst estimates by 2.2%. Earnings per share (EPS) also surpassed analyst estimates by 8.2%. Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 13% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 16% growth forecast for the Semiconductor industry in the US. Performance of the American Semiconductor industry. The company's shares are down 15% from a week ago. It's still necessary to consider the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Ambarella, and understanding them should be part of your investment process. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

What We Know About the Conflict Over a Trans Athlete in a California Track Meet
What We Know About the Conflict Over a Trans Athlete in a California Track Meet

New York Times

time21 minutes ago

  • New York Times

What We Know About the Conflict Over a Trans Athlete in a California Track Meet

A transgender girl in California qualified for this week's state high school track and field meet, and her inclusion in the two-day event has angered people who do not believe that trans girls should compete in girls' events. They believe that trans girls hold a physical advantage and say that allowing them to take part is unfair. Her participation has fueled a political debate that has reached the White House: President Trump has threatened to pull federal funding from the state if it lets the trans girl, AB Hernandez, compete at the meet. Civil rights advocates have denounced the threat as bullying behavior. Now the eyes of the president, the governor, conservative activists and transgender rights groups will be on the meet, which began Friday in Clovis, near Fresno. It's arguably the most competitive high school track and field meet in the nation. Here's what to know: What events is the trans girl competing in? Hernandez qualified for the meet in three events: the high jump, the long jump and the triple jump. On Friday, she finished as the top qualifier in all three events and advanced to Saturday's finals. There, medals typically go to the top nine athletes. She is one of the favorites in the long jump and the triple jump. What is the gist of the debate? People who are against trans girls' competing in girls' events believe that those athletes hold unfair advantages over other competitors. Athletes who were born male, they say, have a physiological edge — including muscle mass and bone length — that they retain even after their transition. They think that physical edge makes it harder for all girls to have an equal chance at making teams, qualifying for meets and winning. In California, trans girls have had the right to compete in girls' events since 2013, when a law was passed that said students could participate in school sports in the category that matched their gender identity. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Newly pardoned Todd Chrisley shares what life was life behind bars
Newly pardoned Todd Chrisley shares what life was life behind bars

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Newly pardoned Todd Chrisley shares what life was life behind bars

Todd Chrisley's schedule in prison included daily workouts, reading and time spent deepening his faith. He was also able to regularly speak with his children and email his wife, Julie Chrisley. "I think I had nothing to do other than to read and work out," he said during a news conference days after President Donald Trump announced a pardon of both Chrisleys. "I worked out every morning at 10:45 a.m. until 12 p.m. with my buddies there, and I read, and my walk with Christ became deeper." Dressed in a light-blue collared sweater and white slacks, Todd Chrisley was accompanied by his lawyers and daughter Savannah, who led a tireless campaign to secure the pardons. "I haven't had the same effects that so many people leaving the prison system have had, so I'm grateful for that," Todd Chrisley said. "Maybe it's just all the residual Botox that never wore off." Julie Chrisley didn't attend, and was at home with another of their children, Todd Chrisley said. Todd Chrisley and Julie Chrisley had been in separate federal prison since January 2023. They were found guilty in 2022 of defrauding the IRS and committing tax evasion. Julie Chrisley was additionally convicted of obstruction of justice and wire fraud. 'Over the course of a decade, the defendants defrauded banks out of tens of millions of dollars while evading payment of their federal income taxes' U.S. Attorney Ryan K. Buchanan said in a statement November 2022, at the time they were sentenced. 'Their lengthy sentences reflect the magnitude of their criminal scheme and should serve as a warning to others tempted to exploit our nation's community banking system for unlawful personal gain.' The U.S. Attorney's Office, Northern District of Georgia, detailed the charges in a news release at the time: "The Todd and Julie Chrisley conspired to defraud community banks in the Atlanta area to obtain more than $36 million in personal loans. The Chrisleys, with the help of their former business partner, submitted false bank statements, audit reports, and personal financial statements to Georgia community banks to obtain the loans. The Chrisleys spent the money on luxury cars, designer clothes, real estate, and travel – and used new fraudulent loans to pay back old ones. After spending all the money, Todd Chrisley filed for bankruptcy and walked away from more than $20 million of these fraudulently obtained loans." Speaking at Day 2 at the Republican National Convention in 2024, Savannah Chrisley said a "two-faced justice system" targeted her parents for their "public profile and conservative beliefs." Julie Chrisley, 52, had been serving her seven-year prison sentence at the Federal Medical Center in Lexington, Kentucky. She was to also have three years' supervised release. Her most recent release date prior to the pardon was slated for January 2028. Todd Chrisley, 56, who'd initially received a 12-year sentence that was shortened to nine years by the time of his release, has been an inmate at FPC Pensacola. He was expected to be released April 7, 2032. Savannah Chrisley said the family will be returning to reality television but it's unclear if they will stay in the Nashville area. "Nashville will always have a special place in our heart," he said during the post-pardon news conference, "but we have other plans." This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Todd Chrisley said he maintained a fitness schedule while serving time

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store