Report: Fewer than 1% of Florida hospital patients say they're not legally in the U.S.
Medical personnel in hospital. (Photo by)
Florida's hospitals and emergency rooms last year treated nearly 94,000 patients who told health care providers they lacked legal permission to live in the United States, or fewer than 1% of hospital inpatient and emergency room admissions for the year.
The state Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) released those numbers this week, based on information reported to it by the hospital industry. AHCA, however, was unable to determine how much uncompensated health care those patients received.
Nevertheless, the report asserts that the costs associated with illegal immigration are passed on, either directly or indirectly, to taxpayers, patients, and insurers and that people residing illegally in the United States place who seek care place a strain placed on the health care system due to increased utilization of services.
'Operating costs will rise because more nurses, hospital beds, and equipment are needed,' the report says. 'Therefore, the rise in care provided to illegal immigrants will have a considerable direct and indirect impact on health care costs, especially if the population of illegal immigrants continues to grow.'
Hospitals did receive $76 million in Medicaid payments for providing emergency health care to immigrants who aren't legally residing in the United States, a figure that includes both state and federal dollars.
The report estimates that the total cost of care (paid or otherwise) provided to immigrants not legally residing in the state is nearly $660 million.
AHCA did not immediately respond to the Florida Phoenix's request for statewide hospital operating revenue data that could help put the $660 million figure into context.
'The cost of care from illegal immigrants is a direct contributor to the strain on Florida's health care system. Uncompensated care as a result of illegal immigration strains the state's limited health care resources and drives up health care costs,' the report reads.
'In addition, regardless of ability to pay for services, increased numbers of illegal aliens in the health care system will continue to impact professional staffing needs, such as additional doctors and nurses, which remain in short supply. As the demand for services outpaces supply, costs will likely go up at a faster pace than inflation.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Uncompensated health care, incurred by rendering health services without receiving any payments to cover those costs, were a driving force behind the mandated report contained in a sweeping immigration bill (SB 1718) that the Legislature passed in 2023 as Gov. Ron DeSantis was poised to enter the Republican presidential primary.
The law required AHCA to submit a report to the Legislature by March 1 quantifying the costs of uncompensated care for 'aliens who are not lawfully present in the United States, the impact of uncompensated care on the cost or ability of hospitals to provide services to the public, hospital funding needs, and other related information.'
Alexis Tsoukalas, senior policy analyst at the Florida Policy Institute, criticized the Amethdology the state used to determine the amount of uncompensated care, which multiplies the percentage of all ER visitors and hospital admissions who told hospitals they were undocumented by the total operating expenses of Florida's hospitals.
'Although the intent of the dashboard under SB 1718 was to show the amount of uncompensated care, the state — just like last year — has chosen not to provide that estimate. The truth is that undocumented immigrants represent a nominal share of all hospital patients and ER visitors,' Tsoukalas said in a statement to the Florida Phoenix. 'Moreover, it is important to consider the myriad contributions that immigrants — including those without a documented status — make to the Sunshine State.'
While the law required the hospitals to ask patients to report whether they were in the United States legally, patients are not legally required to answer the question.
Thomas Kennedy, spokesman for the Florida Immigration Coalition, said his group continues its Decline to Answer campaign, which encourages patients not to answer the question.
'We don't believe that it's neither good for the patient or the provision of health care in the state for this question to be asked,' Kennedy told the Florida Phoenix Monday. 'Therefore patients should not respond.'
According to the report, 233,903 inpatients admitted to hospitals in 2024 refused to answer whether they were legally residing in the United States and another 604,393 emergency room patients refused to answer the question. That's 838,296 patients.
Hospitals are required to report patient data quarterly to AHCA broken out by hospital inpatient data and emergency room visits.
The report contains conflicting data.
For instance, a summary of emergency room visits for 2024 shows that 8,357,273 people presenting at a hospital emergency room department reported residing legally in the United States and that 604,393 emergency patients refused to answer the question. The summary on page 2 also indicates that 67,699 self reported as not legally residing in the United States. But the figure on page 4 indicates that 67,857 patients self-reported as not legally residing here.
And on page 2, AHCA estimates the total number of emergency visits for 2024 is 9,041, 429 on page 2 and 9,029,523 on page 4, which is a discrepancy between the two numbers of 11,906 visits.
Similarly, the hospital inpatient admissions data included on pages 2 and 4 of the report list different figures.
Page 2 shows 3,155,826 hospital admissions by people who self-reported living legally in the United States and another 26,185 admissions from patients who self-reported not legally residing in the United States.
Add in another 233,903 patients who refused to answer the question and the total inpatient admissions for 2024 was 3,415,914. That number doesn't match what's listed on page 2 (3,415,629) or page 4 (3,411,492).
The administration had offered no accounting for the disparity in its numbers as of this publication.
Kennedy told the Florida Phoenix: 'That math ain't mathing.'
AHCA was required to submit the report to the Legislature by March 1. The Florida Phoenix reported on Friday that the agency missed the deadline. DeSantis Communications Director Bryan Griffin attributed the missed deadline to delays by some hospitals in submitting data to the state.
The 2024 report is the second submitted to the Florida Legislature since the law passed.
The first edition of the annual report tracked hospital data from June 1, 2023, through Dec. 31, 2023, and 10 years of hospital audited financial data. It, too, found that fewer than 1% of all Florida hospital admissions and emergency room visits involved patients who self-reported as not legally residing in the United States.
The first report also was unable to pinpoint the amount of uncompensated care provided to people not legally residing in the United States. The report noted the agency was unable to find 'any obvious correlation between the level of uncompensated care and the level of illegal aliens presenting at the hospital.'
The report for 2023 states that 'high levels of uncompensated care are more associated with rural county status than illegal immigration percentages. There also did not appear to be a correlation between total profitability and illegal immigration percentages. All the counties that had negative profit margins had below average illegal immigration ratios.'
None of these findings are in the second iteration of the report.
Following the release of the first report and press coverage of the findings AHCA developed a second report that contained none of those findings and published it on its website.
This story has been updated to include comment from Alexis Tsoukalas, senior policy analyst at the Florida Policy Institute.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr. ousts entire CDC vaccine panel
The Brief Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. removed all members of the CDC's vaccine advisory committee. He claimed the committee had too many conflicts of interest and plans to appoint new members. The panel's work has been in limbo since Kennedy took office, including a delayed February meeting. WASHINGTON - Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Monday announced he had removed every member of a scientific committee that advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on how to use vaccines and pledged to replace them with his own picks. What they're saying Kennedy, who was one of the nation's leading anti-vaccine activists before becoming the nation's top health official, has not said who he would appoint to the panel, but said it would convene in just two weeks in Atlanta. Although it's typically not viewed as a partisan board, the Biden administration had installed the entire committee. "Without removing the current members, the current Trump administration would not have been able to appoint a majority of new members until 2028," Kennedy wrote in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece. "A clean sweep is needed to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science. " Kennedy said the committee members had too many conflicts of interest. Committee members routinely disclose any possible conflicts at the start of public meetings. The other side Major physicians and public health groups criticized the move to oust all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Dr. Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, called Kennedy's mass ouster "a coup." "It's not how democracies work. It's not good for the health of the nation," Benjamin told The Associated Press. Benjamin said the move raises real concerns about whether future committee members will be viewed as impartial. He added that Kennedy is going against what he told lawmakers and the public, and the public health association plans to watch Kennedy "like a hawk." "He is breaking a promise," Benjamin said. "He said he wasn't going to do this." Dr. Bruce A. Scott, president of the American Medical Association, called the committee a trusted source of science- and data-driven advice and said Kennedy's move, coupled with declining vaccination rates across the country, will help drive an increase in vaccine-preventable diseases. "Today's action to remove the 17 sitting members of ACIP undermines that trust and upends a transparent process that has saved countless lives," Scott said in a statement. Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, a doctor who had expressed reservations about Kennedy's nomination but voted to install him as the nation's health secretary nonetheless, said he had spoken with Kennedy moments after the announcement. "Of course, now the fear is that the ACIP will be filled up with people who know nothing about vaccines except suspicion," Cassidy said in a social media post. "I've just spoken with Secretary Kennedy, and I'll continue to talk with him to ensure this is not the case. Dig deeper The 17-member Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices had been in a state of flux since Kennedy took over. Its first meeting this year had been delayed when the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services abruptly postponed its February meeting. RELATED: RFK Jr. orders review of baby formula: What to know The backstory Kennedy, who was one of the nation's leading anti-vaccine activists before becoming the nation's top health official, recently took the unusual step of changing COVID-19 recommendations without first consulting the panel. The committee had been in a state of flux since Kennedy took over. Its first meeting this year had been delayed when the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services abruptly postponed its February meeting. During Kennedy's confirmation, Cassidy had expressed concerns about preserving the committee, saying he had sought assurances that Kennedy would keep the panel's current vaccine recommendations. Kennedy did not stick to that. He recently took the unusual step of changing COVID-19 recommendations without first consulting the advisers. The webpage that featured the committee's members was deleted Monday evening, shortly after Kennedy's announcement. The Source The Associated Press contributed to this report. The information in this story comes from a Wall Street Journal opinion piece written by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as well as official records from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. This story was reported from Los Angeles.


San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
New York lawmakers approve bill that would allow medically assisted suicide for the terminally ill
ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — Terminally ill New Yorkers would have the legal ability to end their own lives with pharmaceutical drugs under a bill passed Monday in the state Legislature. The proposal, which now moves to the governor's office, would allow a person with an incurable illness to be prescribed life-ending drugs if he or she requests the medication and gets approval from two physicians. A spokesperson for New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said she would review the legislation. The New York Senate gave final approval to the bill Monday night after hours of debate during which supporters said it would let terminally ill people die on their own terms. 'It's not about hastening death, but ending suffering,' said state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal, a Democrat who sponsored the proposal. Opponents have argued the state should instead improve end-of-life medical care or have objected on religious grounds. 'We should not be in the business of state-authorized suicide,' said state Sen. George Borrello, a Republican. The state Assembly passed the measure in late April. The proposal requires that a terminally ill person who is expected to die within six month make a written request for the drugs. Two witnesses would have sign the request to ensure that the patient is not being coerced. The request would then have to be approved by the person's attending physician as well as a consulting physician. The legislation was first introduced in 2016, Hoylman-Sigal said, though it has stalled year after year in the New York statehouse. Dennis Poust, executive director of the New York State Catholic Conference, which has opposed the measure, said 'This is a dark day for New York State." Eleven other states and Washington, D.C., have laws allowing medically assisted suicide, according to Compassion & Choices, an advocacy organization that backs the policy. Corinne Carey, the group's local campaign director, said lawmakers had 'recognized how important it is to give terminally ill New Yorkers the autonomy they deserve over their own end-of-life experiences.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
New York lawmakers approve bill that would allow medically assisted suicide for the terminally ill
ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — Terminally ill New Yorkers would have the legal ability to end their own lives with pharmaceutical drugs under a bill passed Monday in the state Legislature. The proposal, which now moves to the governor's office, would allow a person with an incurable illness to be prescribed life-ending drugs if he or she requests the medication and gets approval from two physicians. A spokesperson for New York Gov. Kathy Hochul said she would review the legislation. The New York Senate gave final approval to the bill Monday night after hours of debate during which supporters said it would let terminally ill people die on their own terms. 'It's not about hastening death, but ending suffering,' said state Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal, a Democrat who sponsored the proposal. Opponents have argued the state should instead improve end-of-life medical care or have objected on religious grounds. 'We should not be in the business of state-authorized suicide,' said state Sen. George Borrello, a Republican. The state Assembly passed the measure in late April. The proposal requires that a terminally ill person who is expected to die within six month make a written request for the drugs. Two witnesses would have sign the request to ensure that the patient is not being coerced. The request would then have to be approved by the person's attending physician as well as a consulting physician. The legislation was first introduced in 2016, Hoylman-Sigal said, though it has stalled year after year in the New York statehouse. Dennis Poust, executive director of the New York State Catholic Conference, which has opposed the measure, said 'This is a dark day for New York State." Eleven other states and Washington, D.C., have laws allowing medically assisted suicide, according to Compassion & Choices, an advocacy organization that backs the policy. Corinne Carey, the group's local campaign director, said lawmakers had 'recognized how important it is to give terminally ill New Yorkers the autonomy they deserve over their own end-of-life experiences.' 'The option of medical aid in dying provides comfort, allowing those who are dying to live their time more fully and peacefully until the end,' said Carey.