Call for Celtic to take action over IRA banner
A Democratic Unionist Party MP has called on Celtic Football Club to take action against fans who held up a banner commemorating a former IRA man at a match this week.
The banner was unfurled at Celtic Park ahead of Tuesday's Scottish Premiership match against Aberdeen.
It paid tribute to Brendan 'Bik' McFarlane, who died at the weekend, describing him as a "hero".
McFarlane was jailed in 1976 for his part in a gun and bomb attack on Bayardo Bar in Belfast in which five people were killed.
DUP MP Gregory Campbell tabled an early day motion at Westminster raising concern about the banner and calling on Celtic to take action against those responsible.
Campbell said if the club failed to act it will lead to the "belief in wider society" that it is content to be associated with the tribute.
On Friday, Sinn Féin's Gerry Kelly expressed condolences following the "sad passing of my friend and comrade", adding he was a "huge figure within republicanism".
Celtic Football Club have been approached for comment.
During a Scottish Premiership game on Wednesday night, fans of Rangers Football Club held up a banner which described McFarlane as a "coward".
Former IRA man 'Bik' McFarlane dies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Expert warns 'China Shock' on manufacturing that struck one state could spread to the rest of the country via the 'Big Beautiful Bill': 'A chilling effect'
Few states were hit harder by "the China Shock" than North Carolina. Now, few are seeing a bigger manufacturing revival. This is an economic turnaround story that every American should hear. After China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001, factory jobs in North Carolina collapsed — especially in textiles, apparel, and furniture. Entire communities in places like Hickory and Alamance County saw their local economies hollowed out. Between 2000 and 2010, the state lost nearly 330,000 manufacturing jobs — that's almost half its industrial workforce gone in less than a decade. The Great Recession accelerated those job losses as companies invested in automation. Since then, manufacturing jobs have been basically flat. But that could soon change. In 2022, Democrats passed the Inflation Reduction Act — the largest investment in clean energy and advanced manufacturing in U.S. history. North Carolina has emerged as one of the biggest winners of this law. Companies have flocked to the state, investing more than $20 billion in new advanced manufacturing facilities. These factories are expected to generate thousands of jobs. This manufacturing renaissance could come to an early end if the IRA is repealed as part of the so-called "Big Beautiful Bill." To that end, few U.S. senators will hold more sway in these negotiations than Thom Tillis from North Carolina. Tillis has voiced concern about killing the IRA, and he was one of four senators who publicly supported the protection of clean energy incentives. North Carolina has benefited from $23 billion in clean energy manufacturing investments since the IRA passed. If the law is repealed, the state could lose 17,500 future jobs. Tillis has warned that an abrupt repeal would create "whiplash" for investors and "devastate" America's ability to remain an innovation leader. Should the government continue to give tax incentives for energy-efficient home upgrades? Absolutely No Depends on the upgrade I don't know Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. An immediate phaseout, he told The Washington Post, would "have a chilling effect" on "future investments" in the domestic energy sector. In fact, the manufacturing renaissance resulting from the Inflation Reduction Act, CHIPS and Science Act, and Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill has amounted to a 279% increase in manufacturing across America. Whether that manufacturing growth will continue may be up to the senators debating the Big Beautiful Bill in Congress. Editor's note: If you want to use your voice to make a difference, you can look up how to contact your own state senators here — whether or not (and perhaps especially if not) they appear on this list. Michael Thomas is the founder of Cleanview, a platform that helps clean energy leaders track the energy transition in real-time, and the author of a newsletter about climate change, Distilled, that has been read by more than 50 million people. Follow Michael on LinkedIn here, where this post appeared in its original form, or subscribe to his newsletter here. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
If this GOP bill passes, your electric bills will rise
Electricity prices are soaring, and if Senate Republicans gut the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) this summer, they're about to start rising even faster. On Thursday, House Republicans passed a budget bill that would eliminate several key clean energy incentives from the IRA—including valuable tax credits, such as the federal solar tax credit, for homeowners and businesses.. The bill will likely be voted on in June. If these incentives are cut, industry analysts predict residential electricity costs will rise by about 7%—that's roughly $143 more per year in electricity expenses for the average household, according to EnergySage data. Despite 21 House Republicans writing a letter to the committee chairman this March warning that repealing the tax credits would lead to 'drastically higher power bills for American families,' with the increase starting 'the very next day,' the House GOP still kept the cuts in this version of their budget bill. Stay informed on the latest industry news—delivered to your inbox each month. Sign up for EnergySage's newsletter. Several studies have confirmed the Republican letter's statement: Eliminating clean energy incentives—specifically the 48E investment and 45Y production tax credits—would increase electric costs for the average American. A report from the Clean Energy Buyers Association (CEBA) estimates a family's electric bill could increase by $110 per year on average without these incentives. Another study by The Brattle Group and ConservAmerica says the additional cost would likely be between $83 and $152 in added expenses each year, with families in America's heartland most likely to pay in the higher end of that range because of their high reliance on wind. The GOP bill would terminate the 48E and 45Y tax credits, which incentivize businesses to create clean energy facilities like solar and wind farms (excluding nuclear energy). These incentives were scheduled to start phasing out in 2032, but under the new bill, any project that isn't in service before January 1, 2029, won't qualify. These are huge projects that take extended periods oftime to get up and running, so the bill also specifies that the projects must begin construction within 60 days of the bill's enactment to qualify for the credit, putting companies in a difficult time crunch. Without these incentives, developers will be less keen to build clean-energy facilities, which would lead to a heavier reliance on other energy sources and therefore spike prices, according to a new report from the Rhodium Group. The report says increasing demand for natural gas would increase wholesale natural gas prices by 2-7%. Clean energy—especially solar and onshore wind—is much cheaper than fossil fuels. And, unlike fossil fuels, it isn't vulnerable to market fluctuations, either. It provides much-needed power to fuel our growing energy demand while providing greater energy independence and long-term affordability for American households. There are other factors at play, too. Todd Brickhouse, CEO and general manager of Basin Electric Power Cooperative, told the House Energy and Commerce Committee in March that 'immediate removal of [tax credits] will not allow utilities to plan for and avoid increased costs, and this will also immediately harm rate payers.' It also comes at a time when America's energy demand is nearing 'unprecedented levels,' according to economist and fellow Jesse Buchsbaum from Resources for the Future (RFF). He said a big driver are all the new AI data centers—which are are reportedly already putting a strain on household electricity. 'The projected energy demand is enormous, and I think meeting the projected demand is going to be really difficult,' Buschbaum told EnergySage. 'It's going to be a big challenge figuring out what tools are needed, what infrastructure investments are needed, and how to pay for them.' De-incentivizing the creation of new energy facilities will make it harder for America's energy supply to meet demand, which could cause even more volatility with electricity pricing. Not only will the proposed House bill increase energy costs, it will also reduce valuable energy savings for American families. The bill would also eliminate the Residential Clean Energy Tax Credit (Section 25D) and Energy Efficient Home Improvement Tax Credit (25C). Currently, the average homeowner who qualifies for these tax credits saves roughly 70% on their energy bills annually, or $2,240 per year, according to a recent analysis from Rewiring America. Once you factor in estimated increases in electricity prices, the report suggests that the average family's savings from 25C and 25D would be $2,590 by 2026. House Speaker Mike Johnson said he intends to pass the entire package through the House by Memorial Day and have it on the President's desk by the Fourth of July. Right now, there still appears to be some bipartisan support for clean energy tax credits in the Senate, so the current bill may still face some pushback. In addition to mitigating rises in electricity costs, these tax credits have helped create hundreds of thousands of jobs, increased domestic manufacturing, and given everyday Americans a chance to take control of their household's energy independence. Terminating IRA tax credits jeopardizes all of this progress towards a clean energy future. Republican proponents of this bill are pushing for its swift approval in the Senate. We encourage you to take action now by contacting your representatives directly to share how eliminating the clean energy tax credits would impact you and your community. Your voice can make a difference. Send a note to your elected officials.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
U.S. Tariffs Are a Big Win for Mexico, Report Finds
Tariffs are expected to push companies to bring manufacturing back to the U.S., but a new report said that automation will likely replace some of that job creation. While reshoring has created about 2 million U.S. jobs over the past decade and a half, manufacturing still accounts for only about 8% of the U.S. workforce. 'Nearshoring,' where production is moved to closer or more friendly countries, is seen as a more likely result of tariffs, with Mexico, Vietnam, and India expected to be big beneficiaries, a Bank of America report are set to be a big win for one North American country: Mexico. A new report from Bank of America showed that while higher import taxes pushed by President Donald Trump may bring some manufacturing back to the U.S., the policy is more likely to create even more production opportunities for nearby countries like Mexico. According to the BofA Global Research survey of 56 of the firm's analysts, only 20% of respondents expect that tariffs and other policy changes will result in significant 'reshoring,' where manufacturing that is based in another country is relocated to the U.S. Instead, nearly two in five said that relocation back to the U.S. is more likely to be "mild" and focused on specific sectors. 'Therefore, nearshoring, or friendshoring, appears much more likely to benefit from tariffs this time around,' the June 5 report said. 'Mexico is considered to be a net beneficiary from the [move] from cost efficiency to geopolitical risk management.' The report comes as Mexico has been subject to its own set of tariffs by the Trump administration, though some have been delayed. Trump has argued that tariffs will benefit the U.S. economy, namely that they will bring manufacturing back to the U.S. and reduce the U.S. trade deficit. However, the report showed that most reshoring is likely to occur in select industries like electronics, biotechnology, and metals and mining. Reshoring already has been happening, the report found, creating nearly 2 million U.S. manufacturing jobs over the past 15 years, with about half of that coming in the past five years. However, manufacturing jobs still only account for 8% of the U.S. workforce, down from 30% in the 1980s. That's thanks to higher tariffs introduced in Trump's first administration, along with job-creating legislative initiatives from former President Joe Biden's administration like the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and the Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors (CHIPs) Act. Most of the new manufacturing jobs in the U.S. are focused on electrical equipment, appliances, electric vehicle batteries, and computers, as well as transportation equipment like cars and airplanes, the report said. But advances in automation may undercut some job creation, it added. 'Since most of the reshoring will be concentrated in industrials and manufacturing, reshoring will not create a significant number of new jobs as those new production lines will be mostly automated,' the report said. What's more expected, especially in more labor-focused industries, is 'friendshoring' or 'nearshoring,' in which production is moved out of places like China and either closer to the U.S., or to places with better U.S. relations, the survey found. 'The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) and geographical proximity makes Mexico a more straightforward potential beneficiary,' the report found. 'Additionally, Mexico should be a net beneficiary in transportation, food and beverages, restaurants, and homebuilders.' Other countries likely to benefit from this shift are Vietnam, Thailand, and India, the report found. Read the original article on Investopedia Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
