logo
Warning over nation 'staring into humanitarian abyss' - with direct impact on UK

Warning over nation 'staring into humanitarian abyss' - with direct impact on UK

Daily Mirror2 days ago

Sudan is suffering a catastrophic humanitarian crisis "while the world stands by", with vulnerable children not knowing where their next meal is coming from, a new report has found
War-torn Sudan is 'staring into a humanitarian abyss' as millions of children increasingly face violence, extreme hunger and disease, a report has found.
Sudan is currently in the midst of the world 's worst humanitarian crisis as a result of a civil war that broke out in 2023. It is having a direct effect on the UK with swathes of Sudanese and South Sudanese migrants now filling refugee camps in northern France in a bid to make perilous dinghy journeys across the Channel. In the year to March, some 9% of the 36,000 small boat arrivals were from Sudan, according to Home Office data.


While Sudanese made up 21% - the highest number - of the 2,585 'recorded detections' in the UK, meaning those believed by authorities to have evaded border controls to enter the UK irregularly, up to 72 hours beforehand. The Mirror witnessed first hand the horrifying stories of Sudanese and South Sudanese refugees in a camp in Dunkirk, northern France, in April. Many young men felt they had no option but to flee their East African home for fear of being forced to join murderous militias.
A report by international aid agency World Vision says some 24.6 million people - 51% of Sudan's population - faces 'crises level food insecurity or worse'. While 38% of its child population is experiencing severe hunger, and 52% moderate hunger, the Sudan Crises and Migration Emergency Response (SCRAMER) analysis found.
UN Children's agency UNICEF has previously said that armed men are raping and sexually assaulting children as young as one. The impact on children has seen widespread displacement, trauma and school disruption.
While desperation for food has resulted in harmful coping strategies, the SCRAMER report said, including child labour and family separation. The wide-ranging assessment, spanning six countries in East and Central Africa, reveals a deepening crises, with Sudan and South Sudan 'at the epicentre of an unfolding catastrophe', said World Vision.
'We are staring at a humanitarian abyss,' said Simon Mane, World Vision's SCRAMER Multi-Country Response Director. 'When half the population of a country is unsure of their next meal, and hundreds of thousands are in catastrophe levels of food insecurity, it is no longer a crisis - it is a collapse.

"The world is standing by while millions of children are at risk of malnutrition and hunger. Many people don't even know about it because it rarely makes the headlines.'
After a 2021 coup, a council of generals ran Sudan, led by the two military men at the centre of this dispute - Gen Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, the head of the armed forces and in effect the country's president. And his deputy and leader of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), Gen Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, better known as 'Hemedti'.

But they disagreed on the direction the country was going in and the proposed move towards civilian rule, and war broke out between them. As well as sparking major displacement, both sides in the conflict have been accused of war crimes.
The UN says the war has triggered the world's worst humanitarian crises. Cuts to US AID by Donald Trump in February had an immediate impact, sources said, with many aid groups struggling to provide the needs required.

Organisations' ability to plan have also been hit by talk in Europe of international aid cuts, sources added. Sir Keir Starmer controversially cut the UK's foreign aid budget to fund defence spending, but Sudan has remained an aid priority, along with Gaza and Ukraine.
Last week British filmmaker Steve McQueen, cookery legend Delia Smith and actor Will Poulter urged Starmer to take greater action to tackle the crisis. The trio are among celebs who have signed a letter to the PM calling for the government to help save lives in the war-torn African country.

England footballer Lucy Bronze, Downton Abbey star Joanne Froggatt, chef Rick Stein and actress Dame Harriet Walter have also put their names to the call. The letter to Starmer says: 'Following over two years of violent conflict, Sudan is now the world's largest humanitarian crisis, with half of the country's population – a staggering 24.6 million people – already facing high levels of acute food insecurity. Together with a coalition of Sudanese civil-society and UK aid organisations, we are calling for rapid and scaled-up action from the UK Government to help save lives before it is too late.
'The conflict has had a horrifying impact on children's lives, with a staggering 16 million children now in dire need of support. These children have witnessed and been subject to brutal violence, have lost loved ones, have fled their homes and been forced to say goodbye to their schools and communities.'
The letter, organised by charity Plan International UK, was handed in at Downing Street on Monday. In April, at a conference in London, Foreign Secretary David Lammy – who visited the border of Sudan earlier this year – announced an extra £120 million of support for the stricken country.
But the letter urges the government to 'step up its efforts by… Announcing additional emergency funding for the Sudan crisis to help save lives, providing funding that has been promised so it reaches people who need it in the coming weeks, and urging other governments to scale-up their humanitarian efforts'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Supporters of Priya Rastogi pleads for family to stay in the UK
Supporters of Priya Rastogi pleads for family to stay in the UK

BBC News

time23 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Supporters of Priya Rastogi pleads for family to stay in the UK

Thousands of people have signed a petition calling for a widow and her children not to be deported to India following the death of her Rastogi died on 18 February in Southmead Hospital, Bristol, hours after suffering a cardiac wife Priya Rastogi and their family, who have lived in South Gloucestershire for more than three years, are tied to Sunil's work visa which they depend on to live in the UK, but it expires in August meaning they face Rastogi said: "People are supporting me, they're thinking about me. As a single mum, I feel very strongly to fight for my kids and myself." Under Home Office rules, Mrs Rastogi, her seven-year-old daughter and eight-week-old son, are set to lose their right to stay in the UK because of his Home Office has been contacted for comment. Mrs Rastogi returned to India to be with Sunil's family and take part in religious ceremonies following his death, and is now the subject of a petition asking Home Secretary Yvette Cooper to grant them compassionate Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) in the said: "It's been very tough actually for me, especially with the two children."It's not just a loss, it's everything lost - our security, our trust, the future of my child. "My daughter is missing her school, her pals and her home. Life has turned upside down. It's not about the grief, it's about being displaced.""Our life is very much over there [the UK]." An online crowdfunder has so far raised more than £47,750 for the family and petition by a cross-party group of South Gloucestershire councillors has received more than 24,000 and Bradley Stoke MP Claire Hazelgrove, said she is trying to get clarity on the visa rules so the family "can plan their future", and has raised their case with the Home Gloucestershire councillor Sanjay Shambhu, said Home Secretary Yvette Cooper "has discretion to gift someone the right to remain" in the said: "This is a very unfortunate situation with profound impact on this family. A very young family. We're supporting the family."This family has been a contributor to our economy, society and community."Raman Kumar, a family friend, said: "Sunil's vision was to have a future here. He had his first kid in India but he migrated here, he was a taxpayer working hard to build his family here."North Bristol NHS Trust, which runs Southmead Hospital, said a "comprehensive review" into the circumstances of Mr Rastogi's death is still ongoing, after his family believe he was given minimal medical attention after the cardiac arrest.

Everything we know about Trump's friendship with Epstein after Musk bombshell
Everything we know about Trump's friendship with Epstein after Musk bombshell

Daily Mirror

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Everything we know about Trump's friendship with Epstein after Musk bombshell

With a single post, Elon Musk reignited scrutiny over Donald Trump's intimate association with Jeffrey Epstein who trafficked and raped underage girls - all while socialising with the world's elite Donald Trump's decades-long friendship with Jeffrey Epstein is today under a blazing spotlight after Elon Musk publicly claimed the president's name appears in the paedophile's government files. Musk's statement on X, where he commands an audience of over 185 million, was as brief as it was damning. "Time to drop the really big bomb,' the billionaire wrote, 'Trump's in the Epstein files', and 'that is the real reason they have not been made public.' He signed off: 'Have a nice day, DJT!' ‌ With his single post, the Tesla billionaire reignited scrutiny over Trump's intimate association with a man who allegedly trafficked and raped underage girls - and did so with impunity for years, while socialising with the world's elite. How Trump is allegedly mentioned in the files he vowed to release, only few know. ‌ But what is documented and undeniable is the US leader's closeness to Prince Andrew's paedophile pal for years. The Epstein flight logs, released by Trump's own attorney general in February, include his name seven times. The documents, reviewed by The Mirror, show him flying alongside Epstein as early as October 1993, with Ghislaine Maxwell - now a convicted sex trafficker herself - also listed aboard. Despite years of denials and deliberate distancing, the paper trail is growing, and with it, the pressure to answer one increasingly urgent question: What exactly did Donald Trump, if anything, know about Jeffrey Epstein? It is compounded by how the property mogul said six years before the sex offender was convicted in 200 for soliciting a minor for prostitution, how his pal liked women, ' many of them are on the younger side. To understand how deeply intertwined Trump and Epstein were, one only needs to look at the 1992 video footage from Mar-A-Lago. There, the two men, surrounded by young women, some reportedly NFL cheerleaders, can be seen laughing, pointing, whispering, and dancing. And not just any dance. The stiff, robotic shimmy Trump wheels out at campaign rallies - dubbed by his MAGA supporters the 'Trump Dance' - was on full display three decades ago while he partied with Epstein. 'It was only during last year's election campaign that the world saw Donald dance, but those at the club have seen it for years,' a Mar-A-Lago source said. ‌ 'He and Jeff would party up a storm in West Palm Beach. At times, they seemed joined at the hip… It is the exact same moves he honed back in the early nineties while partying with Jeff." It's not just their socialising that raises red flags. At the time the footage was taken, Epstein would describe Trump as his 'best friend.' Trump, in turn, famously told New York Magazine in 2002: 'I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do - and many of them are on the younger side.' That comment, casually tossed off during Trump's playboy era, has not aged well. It begs questions of why the businessman would make such a statement. Court testimony from a woman known only as 'Jane Doe' adds further fuel to the Trump-Epstein fire. She told jurors she first met Trump when Epstein brought her to Mar-A-Lago at age 14. She did not accuse the president of any wrongdoing, but placed him squarely in Epstein's orbit at a time when the financier was grooming minors. Another woman, former model Stacey Williams, claimed that Trump groped her during a visit to Trump Tower in 1993. She said she was dating Epstein at the time, who introduced her to the future president. ‌ 'The second he [Trump] was in front of me, he pulled me into him, and his hands were just on me and didn't come off,' she alleged. 'It became very clear then that he and Donald were really, really good friends and spent a lot of time together.' Author Michael Wolff has claimed he has seen explosive material from Trump's years-long friendship with Epstein - including a set of lewd photographs that he says, if made public, could severely damage the former president. ‌ The writer, who spent hours interviewing the financier before his arrest in 2019, said: 'I have seen these pictures. I know that these pictures exist and I can describe them,' Wolff said, referring to a trove of alleged images featuring Trump and Epstein, who died by suicide in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges. 'There are about a dozen of them,' Wolff alleged. 'The ones I specifically remember is the two of them with topless girls of an uncertain age sitting on Trump's lap. And then Trump standing there with a stain on the front of his pants and three or four girls kind of bent over in laughter - they're topless, too - pointing at Trump's pants (trousers).' The president has denied all wrongdoing. The US leader used the Epstein files as a vote winner while campaigning last year for the White House. He had hyped the Epstein files as a bombshell - a revelatory moment that would bring justice to victims and expose the powerful figures complicit in the cover-up. Instead, it has been a damp squib. ‌ The documents contained flight logs, a redacted contact book, and a masseuse list — almost all of which had already been disclosed in court or through investigative reporting. No new names. No meaningful accountability. No answers. 'He made a big deal about releasing these files, but in the end, we got nothing,' one victim told the Mirror. Critics say the release had all the hallmarks of a smokescreen: a heavily redacted, incomplete document dump designed more to protect than expose. Attorney General Pam Bondi, a Trump loyalist, admitted she had received only 200 pages, despite reports that thousands more exist. ‌ So, where are the missing files? What names are still being protected? And why, after promising transparency, has Trump delivered silence? While figures like Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton have spent years attempting to distance themselves from Epstein, Trump's tactic has always been deflection. He has downplayed and dismissed Epstein as a 'guy I didn't like' while ignoring the decade-plus of mutual admiration and frequent encounters. But as each new detail emerges - whether in a flight log, a court testimony, or a viral clip - the picture becomes harder to deny. Trump didn't just know Epstein. He welcomed him into his private club. He praised him. He partied with him. He danced beside him while Epstein preyed on girls. Trump once claimed that if the truth about Epstein ever came out, 'a lot of very important people' would be taken down. What he never clarified was who those people are.

JEREMY HUNT: After her spending U-turns, let us hope Chancellor Reeves has learnt from her mistakes
JEREMY HUNT: After her spending U-turns, let us hope Chancellor Reeves has learnt from her mistakes

Daily Mail​

time12 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

JEREMY HUNT: After her spending U-turns, let us hope Chancellor Reeves has learnt from her mistakes

Do I feel sorry for Rachel Reeves? That was one of the more unexpected questions I have been asked this week in my interviews to mark the launch of my new book Can We Be Great Again? which was serialised in the Mail. So let me say up front that, on a personal level, yes, I do recognise Rachel has some unenviable choices. Many of those, however, are because of decisions she herself has made. In next week's spending review she has a chance to put them right. Here are three things I will be looking out for that will tell us if she has. Firstly, Labour promised to end austerity – normally defined as cuts to unprotected departments. They opposed every single difficult spending decision we took to get our national finances under control. Remember how George Osborne inherited a deficit of 10 per cent of GDP from the previous Labour government? We more than halved that. But now they are in government, they are doing exactly the same cuts themselves! But the real question is not a fake debate about the definition of 'austerity' but whether you can avoid the impact on the vital public services people depend on. That can only be done by making public services more efficient. We know there will be cuts for the Home Office, the Ministry of Justice and the Department for Communities. But will we see funding to make them more efficient? Will we get a new national computer system for the police? Digitisation of the courts? Measures to drag the planning system into the online age? Secondly, having told us she was against 'black holes', the Chancellor has now created her own one: a Strategic Defence Review that needs 3 per cent of GDP on defence when she has only put 2.5 per cent on the table. Raising defence spending to 3 per cent-plus is necessary to stop war – there is no other way to say it. There will be no hiding place for the Government if the Chancellor ducks this. Finally, assuming she sticks to her spending envelope, the elephant in the room is whether her fiscal rules will mean more growth-destroying tax rises in the autumn Budget. These can only be avoided by welfare reform. Getting working age claims back to 2019 levels saves £49 billion – more than enough to avoid tax rises and fund an increase in defence spending. Biting the bullet on our mushrooming welfare state is good fiscally, good economically and, most of all, good for the individuals involved. That's because work is by far the best poverty-killer. Absolute poverty went down more than a million under the Conservatives – because we created four million more jobs. So if we hear nothing on Wednesday about welfare reform we should fear the worst in the autumn Budget. 'Labour isn't working' was the devastating slogan that got Margaret Thatcher elected. Let's hope Rachel Reeves has learned the lessons of history.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store