Crowds of Kneecap fans waving Palestinian flags mob court as rapper Mo Chara is bailed after being charged with terrorism offence 'for displaying Hezbollah flag'
Fans of rap group Kneecap gathered outside court today to support one of its members as he appeared for a hearing after being accused of a terrorism offence.
Liam Og O hAnnaidh, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, is accused of displaying a flag in support of Hezbollah at a gig in November last year.
The 27-year-old arrived at Westminster Magistrates' Court this morning following the alleged incident during a gig at the O2 Forum in Kentish Town, North London.
Following a short hearing today, Og O hAnnaidh was released on unconditional bail until his next hearing on August 20 when legal argument will be dealt with.
Earlier today, he got out of a vehicle with bandmates Naoise O Caireallain and J J O Dochartaigh, arriving to a scrum of hundreds of supporters who cheered as they arrived. The band were wearing 'Free Mo Chara' T-shirts as they arrived at court.
Og O hAnnaidh wore sunglasses, a black t-shirt, trousers and black jacket and held a Keffiyeh - a type of shawl often worn by supporters of the pro-Palestine movement - and his cheering fans chanted 'Free, free Palestine and 'Free, free Mo Chara'.
The members then walked up the stairs of the court and looked over the balcony, smiling and giving a thumbs up to their supporters gathered outside. Members of the crowd had surged around the entrance, with some also entering the lobby.
The charge Og O hAnnaidh faces alleges that he displayed a flag in a public place, 'in such a way or in such circumstances as to arouse reasonable suspicion that he is a supporter of a proscribed organisation' - namely Hezbollah.
Kneecap described the prosecution as a 'witch hunt' in a post on X yesterday, which included a short video which appeared to show a billboard that had been displayed in London with the words 'more blacks, more dogs, more Irish, Mo Chara'.
Outside the court today, hundreds of demonstrators gathered to show their support for the group while an Irish folk band performed traditional songs to the crowd.
Fans of the band held signs and banners stating 'Free Mo Chara', 'Stop Arming Israel', 'Liam's Too Pretty 4 Prison' and 'Defend Kneecap' as well as waving Palestinian and Irish flags and others emblazoned with Kneecap's iconic Irish flag-striped balaclava.
People hold placards supporting Og O Hannaidh outside Westminster Magistrates' Court today
Meanwhile a van drove past stating: 'More blacks, more dogs, more Irish, Mo Chara' - echoing the notorious, racist 'no blacks, no dogs, no Irish' signs commonplace in the windows of rooming houses in London in the 1950s.
As it continued to drive past the crowd, they erupted into cheers as well as chants of 'Free Palestine' and 'From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free'.
In court today, Og O hAnnaidh - who appeared on the court list as Liam O'Hanna - spoke only to confirm his name, date of birth and address.
Prosecutor Michael Bisgrove said: 'This case is not about Mr hAnnaidh's support for the people of Palestine or his criticism of Israel.'
He told the court Og O hAnnaidh is 'well within his rights' to express his support and solidarity for Palestinians.
Mr Bisgrove continued: 'The allegations in this case are wholly different.
'It is about a video recording where Mr Og O hAnnaidh is seen wearing the flag of a proscribed group while shouting 'up Hamas , up Hezbollah'.'
Brenda Campbell KC, one of his lawyers, said the defence would argue that the charge was brought after the six-month limit to bring such a charge.
Og O hAnnaidh was released on unconditional bail until his next hearing on August 20. He requested an Irish language interpreter for the trial.
Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring told him he must attend court on that day. He received a round of applause outside the courtroom after the short hearing.
Hundreds of fans along with journalists crammed against the doors of the court building as they waited for the performer to leave.
He went into a side room to speak with lawyers after the hearing.
Speaking outside the court, a spokesperson for the band said: 'Over 18 countries, 100,000 fans, 80 concerts, not a single complaint.
'Around the world Kneecap are hailed as heroes for speaking truth to power.
'The truth was outed. This was a rushed prosecution following the Coachella performance where Kneecap did not shy away from speaking truth to power.
'Oppression fears the freedom of expression but the reality is Kneecap would stand up to the freedom of expresssion and they will defend their rights. Not only the rights of them but the rights of artists and people all around the world.
'And it's not new for Irish people to be prosecuted under special powers and terrorism acts. But friends, fans, family do not be afraid we are on the right side of history
'The more they come after Kneecap the louder we will get. If the British Government had any sense of history they will know they have already lost.'
Advertising their upcoming gigs to the hundreds of fans outside the courtroom, Naoise O Caireallain said: 'For anybody going to Glastonbury, you can see us there at 4pm on the Saturday.
'If you can't be there we'll be on the BBC, if anybody watches the BBC. We'll be at Wembley in September But most importantly: Free, free Palestine.'
Other chants outside the courtroom from supporters included: '2,4,6,8 Israel is a terrorist state'; 'Palestine '48 we don't want no two states'; 'From the belly of the beast, hands off the Middle East'; 'When Gaza is colonised, resistance is justified'; and 'When people are occupied, resistance is justified.'
Ahead of Og O hAnnaidh's arrival to court, Kneecap shared a picture of the musician on Instagram showing his middle finger to the camera alongside the caption: '20 minutes away a chairde Gael'.
Austrian Alexandra Kennedy, who had travelled from her home country to show support in London, said: 'I think that Kneecap are important to so many people that if Liam Og O hAnnaidh gets a heavy sentence, then maybe people will lose something, they need the connection to Kneecap.'
Copywriter Victoria Ashworth and her daughter Lily travelled from their home in Brighton to attend the protest before the court hearing.
Ms Ashworth, 53, said: 'I just feel like the charges are utterly ridiculous. I believe in freedom of speech. We want to be part of this to be on the right side of history.
'We have been fans of the music for quite a while.'
Lily, 20, a university student, added: 'They're allowed to have their own voice and shutting them down doesn't seem fair.'
She said she heard about the protest on social media and from various fan groups.
Charles Parker, 35, said protesting was important to him because he believed in 'freedom of speech'.
The composite engineer from Northamptonshire said: 'I believe in freedom for Palestine. I come from an Irish Republican background and Palestine helped us in the 1990s.
'We stand by those who stand by us. I have been a fan of Kneecap since I saw them in Belfast about five years ago.
'I'm open to whatever may happen. If the Metropolitan Police do anything, you've got to be ready for anything.'
Police removed a pro-Israel protester who walked into the crowd wearing an Israeli flag which prompted boos, swearing and shouts of 'free Palestine'.
The crowd became animated and shouted 'Israel is a terrorist state' and 'take him out for his own safety' as he made gestures and argued with protesters.
Kneecap members DJ Próvaí (JJ O'Dochartaigh, left) and Móglaí Bap (Naoise O Caireallain), in front of a projection onto the Electric Ballroom in Camden, North London, yesterday
Police surrounded the man as the crowd moved towards him, with protesters cheering as he was removed.
The Metropolitan Police said the force had charged O hAnnaidh, who appears on the court list as Liam O'Hanna, after initially being made aware of a video from the gig at the O2 Forum which had been posted online.
In a separate event shortly after the terrorism charge, O hAnnaidh could be seen in social media videos entering the stage with tape covering his mouth.
The Met previously said the Belfast rap trio were under investigation after clips posted online appeared to show the band calling for the deaths of MPs and shouting 'up Hamas, up Hezbollah'.
Kneecap said they have 'never supported' Hamas or Hezbollah, both of which are banned in the UK.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The off-Broadway play imagining Prince George as gay
Last Saturday, Prince George cut a dignified figure as he joined the royal family on the balcony of Buckingham Palace for the Trooping the Colour ceremony. But, across the Atlantic, a very different picture is being painted of the future king in a controversial new off-Broadway play with a gasp-inducing title: Prince Faggot. Canadian writer Jordan Tannahill 's highly speculative royal romp, which this week premiered at Playwrights Horizons, is set in 2032 and sees 18-year-old Oxford student Prince George, nicknamed 'Tips' (played by British actor John McCrea), return home to introduce his Indian boyfriend Dev (Mihir Kumar) to the Prince and Princess of Wales (African-American actor K. Todd Freeman and transgender actress Rachel Crowl). Dev is nervous, quipping that George's parents might fear 'We've got another Meghan'; Prince Andrew also gets a name-check in the context of the royal family's fraught history. Tannahill's juicy drama then envisions the tabloid feeding frenzy that follows their relationship going public (including fury from Piers Morgan), and internet comments such as 'Glad someone's adding some spice to that Yorkshire pudding'. Audiences at Prince Faggot must place their phones in lockable Yondr pouches to prevent anyone taking pictures or videos. The reason for that soon becomes apparent: McCrea and Kumar appear naked during graphic sex scenes. They experiment with poppers, acid and S&M fetish: Prince George appears in bondage and shares a kinky fantasy of being walked like a puppy. Prince George also imagines communing with the ghosts of former allegedly gay monarchs: Edward II, Queen Anne, James I, and Richard the Lionheart. Tannahill wraps in postcolonial angst too, with Dev fretting: 'Getting f---ed by the Prince of England? My ancestors would never forgive me.' N'yome Allure Stewart plays a feisty Princess Charlotte (Prince Louis doesn't appear). When her father, concerned about Prince George's explosive fling, says 'Our job is to serve, not to make spectacles of ourselves', she shoots back that they already make a spectacle 'with capes and crowns and motorcades'. Tannahill, an experimental, gay writer, frequently has his 'queer and trans' cast break the fourth wall, refracting their own life experiences through this provocative premise. Stewart talks about earning her version of a royal title at a New York drag ball, and there is discussion around those in power versus marginalised communities. Earnest explorations aside, this is the latest example of a peculiarly pervasive trend: Americans turning our royal family into an explicitly gay soap opera. The jumping-off point for the play is the viral 2017 photograph of the real four-year-old Prince George visiting a military helicopter in Hamburg. The young prince gasped in delight when he spied the chopper and struck a dramatic pose with his hands clasped to his face. Addressing the Prince Faggot audience, actor Mihir Kumar compares the image to a fey photo of himself as a boy, stating: 'We know one of our own when we see one because we ourselves were once queer children.' Internet commentators were certainly gripped by the 'Sassy Prince George' phenomenon. Posts on Twitter (now X) included: 'Prince George is already a bigger gay icon to me than Boy George', 'Do we have our first openly gay royal?', and 'Guys what if Prince George is gay and it causes a constitutional crisis?'. American writer Gary Janetti, who worked on TV shows like Will & Grace and Family Guy, went viral with his spoof Instagram posts imagining Prince George delivering catty zingers to his family – especially Meghan Markle. In one post, 'George' responds to a news story about Meghan doing her make-up in the back of an Uber by sneering 'Does she get dressed in the back of an Uber, too? Because that would explain a lot.' Janetti's work grew so popular that HBO turned it into an animated sitcom called The Prince in 2021, starring Orlando Bloom, Alan Cumming, Sophie Turner and Dan Stevens. Two years later, streamer Amazon Prime Video premiered the film adaptation of non-binary author Casey McQuiston's steamy novel Red, White & Royal Blue, about a gay romance between a closeted British prince and the son of the female President of the United States. Nicholas Galitzine starred as Prince Henry, who bears a physical resemblance to Prince William, but, as the rebellious 'spare' in a contentious relationship, is more obviously inspired by Prince Harry. Perhaps it's the Montecito exile who has turbo-charged this American fascination with royal figures who both benefit from and chafe against their hereditary privilege. Putting a queer spin on our princes allows these writers to indulge in the fantasy of regal luxury – a sort of real-life Disney fairy tale, or a more refined version of their celebrity culture – while also rebelling against it by introducing a transgressive element, and comparing the stuffy Brits unfavourably with the enlightened Americans. In Red, White & Royal Blue, Prince Henry's lover Alex accuses him of being a conformist snob, and the prince eventually confesses that he feels trapped by tradition. Indeed, the disapproving King, Henry's grandfather (played by Stephen Fry), thunders: 'The nation simply will not accept a prince who is homosexual.' In contrast, Uma Thurman's liberal President warmly welcomes her son's coming out, cheerily asking: 'So are you gay? Bi? Fluid? Pan? Queer?', and offering to help him get on the HIV-prevention drug Truvada. Amazon also gifted viewers the bizarre historical fantasy series My Lady Jane in 2024, featuring a gay King Edward VI, plus characters who turn into animals and are 'othered' by society, in another clunky marginalisation metaphor. This trend arguably reached its apotheosis with the horrifically kitsch musical Diana, about the late Princess of Wales, which (dis)graced Broadway in 2021. Although none of the characters were gay, it is unarguably camp trash. Are all of these depictions a grave insult to the institution? Not really. When the material is this navel-gazing, fluffy or downright dumb, it's hard to take it seriously. If anything, it's an odd compliment: a sign that the Americans still can't get enough of our royals, even if they have to view them through a fictionalised, flamboyantly queer modern lens to justify their enduring obsession.
The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Race and lack of accountability involved in Child Q strip search, tribunal hears
Race and lack of accountability are at the heart of why and how a 15 year-old black girl was strip-searched at school by police after being wrongly suspected of carrying cannabis was handled, a misconduct hearing has been told. The degree of failures surrounding the 'grossly disproportionate search', allegedly without an appropriate adult present, meant the Metropolitan Police officers did not look to protect a potentially vulnerable child, according to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). Their actions could possibly undermine public trust and confidence in the police, the IOPC warned. The girl, known as Child Q, was strip searched by officers in Hackney, east London, on December 3 2020. She arrived for a mock exam smelling of cannabis and was taken to the medical room to be strip-searched while teachers remained outside. This involved the removal of her clothing including underwear, her bending over and having to expose intimate parts of her body while she was menstruating, the panel heard. Trainee detective constable (TDC) Kristina Linge, Pc Victoria Wray and Pc Rafal Szmydynski, who were all police constables at the time, all deny gross misconduct over their treatment of the girl. In closing submissions Elliot Gold, for the IOPC, said discrimination is not the sole ground the panel needs to consider, but added: 'The issue of race provides you with the only explanation that is left as to why the officers' failures were so great and why so much went wrong and the only explanation as to why it all went so badly.' He told the tribunal panel in south-east London, who could consider sacking the officers if gross misconduct is proved: 'The resolution of this case should primarily be forward-facing. 'It is about preventing similar misconduct from recurring in the future, with the consequent damage to trust and confidence in the police, especially within the black community, which these events have caused.' He added: 'This case shows, that members of racial groups need protection from conduct driven by unrecognised or unconscious bias as much as from conscious and deliberate discrimination.' Mr Gold also noted 'there are almost no contemporaneous documents or records of this case – why? That's because it is the officers who failed to make them.' No drugs were found by the teachers before the school's safeguarding deputy called police. They were called amid fears Child Q could have been carrying drugs for someone, being exploited or groomed in the community – which meant it was a safeguarding issue for her and other school pupils. Mr Gold said 'there is a potential evidential conflict as to whether the teachers were insistent there should be a search'. He added: 'There may be criticism of the school calling the police for advice on a safeguarding matter but that shows they did not know what to do, rather than being insistent (on a search) it shows uncertainty.' Child Q's mother, who was described as a 'supportive' parent, was not present during the strip search and neither was any appropriate adult. Mr Gold said that 'simply being questioned by two police officers, two white police officers for a young black girl may be daunting.' Mr Gold said: 'No adult was present to assist child Q during this time – whether during the conversation with child to decide on the search, when the decision was made to perform a search or when the decision was made to perform a strip search.' PC Linge told Child Q she would be arrested if she failed to consent to being searched, the panel heard. Child Q told the two officers who searched her that she was menstruating, but the search continued during which her sanitary pad was exposed, the panel was told. When no drugs were found after the strip search, Child Q's hair was also scoured. When Child Q said she was on her period this was 'a new piece of evidence' for the officers and it was a chance for the officers to consider the proportionality of what they were doing, according to the IOPC. Within days of the strip search, Child Q had gone to her doctor with symptoms of anxiety. Mr Gold went through a series of doctors' notes including one which suggested Child Q had the 'appearance of symptoms of anxiety consistent with PTSD'. He added: 'No one is likely to suggest that Child Q was anything other than distressed and shaken by a traumatic episode.' According to the allegations, Pcs Linge and Szmydynski performed a search that exposed the girl's intimate parts when this was 'disproportionate in all the circumstances'. Pcs Linge and Wray are also accused of performing or allowing the search in a manner which was 'unjustified, inappropriate, disproportionate, humiliating and degrading'. It is alleged that all of this happened without authorisation, in the absence of an appropriate adult, and with no adequate concern being given to Child Q's age, sex, or the need to treat her as a child, and that the child's race was an effective cause of this. Pcs Szmydynski and Linge are further accused of giving a 'misleading record' of the search afterwards. Outrage over Child Q's treatment led to protests outside Stoke Newington Police Station. Scotland Yard has previously apologised over the incident.
The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
Inmate died after ‘restraint-related' incident in prison, inquest hears
A home office doctor has warned jurors about the 'complex' restraint-related death of a father-of-four prisoner, an inquest heard. Azroy Dawes-Clarke, 28, from Romford, east London, was an inmate at HMP Elmley, on the Isle of Sheppey, when he died after suffering multiple cardiac arrests on November 10 2021. He is alleged to have attempted to commit suicide by suffocation before becoming violent and being 'restrained' by prison staff. The medical cause of death has been given as hypoxic ischemic brain injury but it is unclear when and by whom that injury was caused. On Wednesday, Home Office forensic pathologist Dr Olaf Biedrzycki told jurors at Kent and Medway Coroner's Court in Maidstone that medically, Mr Dawes-Clarke's case was 'about as difficult as it gets' for him. He said: 'The cause of death is given as hypoxic ischemic brain injury that's due to either the fact that his heart or lungs stopped working … and that happened very quickly after a period of third-party restraint, which happened shortly after seizure-like activity, which was treated with Diazepam. 'That all followed compression of the neck with a ligature.' There had been a previous incident where Mr Dawes-Clarke had attempted to self-harm or commit suicide two days before his death, the court heard. Body-worn camera footage taken in HMP Elmley and shown in court showed four officers kneeling on and next to Mr Dawes-Clarke, who was face down on the floor prior to his first cardiac arrest. He could be heard yelling repeatedly while restrained, until he was handcuffed and then went limp. One officer was heard saying, 'Have we got a pulse on him? We're not sure if he's breathing, we're not sure', as Mr Dawes-Clarke lay on the floor. Medical staff began CPR before he was taken to hospital, he suffered two more cardiac arrests in the ambulance and a fourth upon his arrival at hospital, where he died soon after. Dr Biedrzycki added that the 'crux' of the inquest would be whether Mr Dawes-Clarke recovered between the suicide attempt and the restraint from prison officers. 'The restraint element is of greater importance if you conclude that the initial ligature compression did not actually cause him to be unconscious and fitting,' he added. Mr Dawes-Clarke's alleged history of self-harm and suicide attempts whilst in prison was not known to the family; he also had several physical health conditions that required ongoing treatment, the court heard. His mother, Marcia Neil, was indignant through tears as she told the court: 'Maybe if they'd phoned me, I could have helped!' Reading a pen portrait, his sister, Shay Inico, said: 'My brother was more than just family; he was my anchor, my confidant, and my unwavering source of support. He was kind-hearted and compassionate, always putting the needs of others before his own. 'Losing him in such a senseless and cruel manner has completely shattered me. The thought of him being restrained, suffering and treated without dignity haunts me every single day.' Father-of-four Mr Dawes-Clarke liked fantasy films and played semi-professional football, he was in the Arsenal FC academy while he was growing up. 'I share this statement because my brother's story deserves to be heard. He was a person full of love, kindness, and potential. He was not defined by his circumstances, and he deserved so much more than the injustice he faced. His life mattered, and his memory will forever remain in our hearts,' said Ms Inico. On Wednesday, his mother, sister and uncle were in court to observe proceedings, and his brother appeared via video-link. Mr Dawes-Clarke was recalled to HMP Elmley on April 23 2020 after breaching his license. 'Where restraint-related deaths do occur, they're invariably erroneously complex cases,' Dr Biedrzycki warned jurors. He added: 'This is about as difficult as it gets for forensic pathologists, and I don't have all the answers.' The inquest continues and is listed until July 11.
