Yet Another Federal Judge Blocks Trump's B.S. Deportations
Another federal judge has blocked the Trump administration's efforts to deport migrants under the Alien Enemies Act, at least for now.
Judge Charlotte Sweeney, of the Colorado District Court, ruled on Tuesday that the White House could not order the removal of migrants held in Colorado detention centers under the Alien Enemies Act (AEA), an 18th century wartime law that President Donald Trump is exploiting in order to remove undocumented migrants from the United States. Trump asserts he can use the law to deport people, without due process, by declaring them to be members of gangs he's deemed terrorist organizations.
Sweeney's ruling is the latest in a series of decisions in which federal judges have intervened to delay or prevent the use of the AEA to carry out deportations without due process. The judge found that Trump is using the act 'improperly,' because the U.S. is facing no actual invasion or predatory incursion.
Judge Sweeney granted a temporary restraining order to the American Civil Liberties Union and the Rocky Mountain Immigrant Advocacy Network filed on behalf of migrants detained in Colorado. She wrote that the government was required to not only provide written notice to the individual — in a language they understand — that the 'government intends to remove individuals pursuant to the [AEA],' but that it must 'provide notice of a right to seek judicial review, and inform individuals they may consult an attorney regarding their detainment and the government's intent to remove them.'
Her order follows a Saturday ruling from the Supreme Court temporarily blocking the president from using the AEA to deport another cohort of Venezuelan migrants, after his administration sent hundreds to Salvadoran prisons where they could face torture and human rights abuses.
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court determined that the Trump administration was required to notify migrants detained under the AEA that they were subject to removal under the act and provide them a reasonable opportunity to contest their removals. Despite the ruling, the ACLU and other advocacy organizations have asserted that the administration has continued to detain migrants and attempt to deport them without giving reasonable notice or time to contest their deportations.
Trump lashed out at the Supreme Court on Monday after it paused his deportations under the AEA. 'We cannot give everyone a trial, because to do so would take, without exaggeration, 200 years,' the president claimed, despite the requirement under the Fifth Amendment that the government extend due process rights to everyone.
D.C. District Court Judge James Boasberg, the first judge to intervene on behalf of migrants being subjected to the AEA, is currently weighing contempt proceedings against members of the Trump administration over their open defiance of his court order barring their original deportation of hundreds of migrants to El Salvador. District court judges in Massachusetts, New York, and Texas have also issued orders forcing the administration to pump the breaks on their immigration crackdown.
The Supreme Court has separately directed the administration to 'facilitate' the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man whom it illegally sent to prison in El Salvador, despite a court having granted him a 'protection from removal' order barring him from being sent back to that country.
Trump's administration has made a public show out of refusing to comply with the Supreme Court's order in that case, and it has refused to follow a lower court's orders seeking to facilitate Abrego Garcia's return as directed by the Supreme Court. Lawyers for Abrego Garcia's family wrote in a court filing on Monday that the administration is now failing to comply with the lower court judge's order granting discovery regarding the government's efforts (or lack thereof) to bring him back to the U.S.
'On the eve of the first court-ordered deposition concerning the government's failure to comply with this court's orders, the government responded to plaintiffs' discovery requests by producing nothing of substance,' wrote the lawyers for Abrego Garcia's family.
Trump's Justice Department claimed in its discovery filing before the lower court on Monday that the administration has not been — and cannot be — 'ordered to facilitate Abrego Garcia's release from custody in El Salvador.'
This is patently false. The Supreme Court's April 10 ruling found the lower court's original order in Abrego Garcia's case 'properly requires the government to 'facilitate' Abrego Garcia's release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador.'
Trump's administration has, indeed, been ordered to fix its illegal deportation under the AEA. It just doesn't care.
More from Rolling Stone
Activating the 'Silent Majority' to Fight Climate Change
Trump's Tariffs Lead to Layoffs as IMF Warns of 'Shock' To Economy
Harvard Sues Trump Administration in Escalating Fight Over Constitutional Rights
Best of Rolling Stone
The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign
Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal
The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
33 minutes ago
Trump administration hit with second lawsuit over restrictions on asylum access
McALLEN, Texas -- Immigration advocates filed a class action lawsuit Wednesday over the Trump administration's use of a proclamation that effectively put an end to being able to seek asylum at ports of entry to the United States. The civil lawsuit was filed in a Southern California federal court by the Center for Gender & Refugee Studies, the American Immigration Council, Democracy Forward, and the Center for Constitutional Rights. The lawsuit is asking the court to find the proclamation unlawful, set aside the policy ending asylum at ports of entry and restore access to the asylum process at ports of entry, including for those who had appointments that were canceled when President Donald Trump took office. Unlike a similar lawsuit filed in February in a Washington, D.C., federal court representing people who had already reached U.S. soil and sought asylum after crossing between ports of entry, Wednesday's lawsuit focuses on people who are not on U.S. soil and are seeking asylum at ports of entry. No response was immediately issued by the Department of Homeland Security or Customs and Border Protection, which were both among the defendants listed. Trump's sweeping proclamation issued on his first day in office changed asylum policies, effectively ending asylum at the border. The proclamation said the screening process created by Congress under the Immigration and Nationality Act 'can be wholly ineffective in the border environment' and was 'leading to the unauthorized entry of innumerable illegal aliens into the United States.' Immigrant advocates said that under the proclamation noncitizens seeking asylum at a port of entry are asked to present medical and criminal histories, a requirement for the visa process but not for migrants who are often fleeing from immediate danger. 'Nothing in the INA or any other source of law permits Defendants' actions,' the immigrant advocates wrote in their complaint. Thousands of people who sought asylum through the CBP One app, a system developed under President Joe Biden, had their appointments at ports of entry canceled on Trump's first day in office as part of the proclamation that declared an invasion at the border. 'The Trump administration has taken drastic steps to block access to the asylum process, in flagrant violation of U.S. law,' the Center for Gender & Refugee Studies stated in a news release Wednesday.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House preparing Trump's meetings at G7 summit, which Zelenskyy attends
The White House has confirmed that it is preparing separate bilateral meetings on the sidelines of the Group of Seven summit, where, in addition to the G7 leaders, the presidents of Brazil, Mexico and Ukraine are expected to attend. Source: White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt during a press briefing in Washington, quoted by Ukrinform Quote from Leavitt: "I can confirm there will be quite a few bilateral meetings between the president [Trump – ed.] and other foreign leaders." Details: Meanwhile, Leavitt did not specify whether a meeting between President Donald Trump and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is planned. Quote from Leavitt: "The White House is still working very hard to finalise that schedule, and we will provide that for you as soon as we have it." Background: The Office of the President of Ukraine hopes to organise a meeting between Zelenskyy and Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit on 15-17 June. Last week, Zelenskyy confirmed that he had received an invitation to the G7 summit. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Thin-Skinned Trump Snaps Over Kennedy Center Snub
Donald Trump snapped at a reporter who tried to ask about Kennedy Center actors who were planning to walk out rather than perform for him Wednesday night. He cut off the question, insisting, 'I couldn't care less!' 'Honestly, I couldn't,' Trump continued on the red carpet. 'All I do is run the country well,' he said, before launching into a lengthy list of his self-proclaimed achievements. Les Misérables cast members were offered the option to sit out the show on the night of Trump's attendance, and about a dozen performers were planning to do so, CNN reported last month. It underscores the ongoing conflict between Trump and members of the performing arts center, which he effectively seized control of in February. The president ousted much of the board, replaced them with loyalists, and appointed himself chairman, vowing to eliminate programming he deemed too 'woke,' such as events featuring drag performers. 'There's no inflation. People are happy. People are wealthy. The country is getting back to strength again,' said Trump, who was accompanied on the red carpet by Melania. 'That's what I care about.' In fact, inflation held largely steady in May at 2.4 percent. There are protests across the country as anger over Trump's immigration crackdown grows, especially in Los Angeles, which is contending with a militarized response from the Trump administration that local officials say they did not want or need. The Kennedy Center, meanwhile, has seen subscription sales plummet by more than a third year-on-year in the wake of Trump's takeover. But Trump has insisted his leadership will make the center 'great again.' Richard Grenell, the Trump-appointed president of the Kennedy Center, slammed the potential boycott last month and suggested actors who participated should be publicly identified, telling The New York Times, 'Any performer who isn't professional enough to perform for patrons of all backgrounds, regardless of political affiliation, won't be welcomed.' 'In fact, we think it would be important to out those vapid and intolerant artists to ensure producers know who they shouldn't hire—and that the public knows which shows have political litmus tests to sit in the audience,' he added. Loud boos could be heard from the audience as Trump waved from the presidential box, there were also cheers and a chant of 'USA! USA!' There was applause earlier for several drag queens as they arrived at the event. A group of drag performers had been expected to attend in protest after some attendees gave up their tickets following Trump's shakeup. Vice President JD Vance also attended the event with his wife, Usha Vance, and joked on X that he had no idea what the iconic musical was about. Trump, too, appeared to lack knowledge of the plot when he couldn't say whether he identified more with the protagonist or antagonist.
