logo
Young Aussie's fears for ancient sites amid threat from controversial government plan

Young Aussie's fears for ancient sites amid threat from controversial government plan

Yahoo29-05-2025

At 26, Mark Clifton's adult life is just beginning. He has hopes of having children soon and passing on his culture to them, continuing traditions spanning thousands of years.
But a plan by the Albanese government to approve yet another industrial project near his community's most important sites has him worried. At over 40,000 years old, the Murujuga rock art in Western Australia's Pilbara region is the world's largest and biggest collection of petroglyphs, and scientists say toxic gases are erasing it.
'Some would say it's our Bible. It's our library, it's where all of our knowledge and history is held,' the Mardudhunera man told Yahoo News as he prepared to protest against the plan on Thursday afternoon.
'But I feel strong and empowered, knowing that I'm going to have all my old people with me today, and my ancestors.'
He's carrying on the torch passed down by his mother Raelene Cooper to protect more than one million Indigenous petroglyphs engraved in the rock. In 2022, she flew to Geneva to speak before the United Nations, accusing the government of committing "cultural genocide" against her people.
The art her people are trying to protect is so ancient, some even show thylacines (Tasmanian tigers) before they became extinct on the mainland. But the etchings are more than just images, they're also key to keeping cultural stories and dances alive for one of the world's oldest continuous cultures.
Related: 🌏 Woodside's controversial gas well plan near pristine reef
Environment Minister Murray Watt has indicated an intention to conditionally approve energy giant Woodside's proposal to continue to operate its North West Shelf gas project until 2070. By the time it wraps up, the minister will be 96 years old, and well and truly retired. But Clifton will be just 68, and likely an elder in his community, trying to pass on culture to his grandchildren, and hoping remnants of the rock art survive.
Federal independent senator David Pocock told Yahoo News the situation facing Clifton is not an acceptable state of affairs in Australia.
"This project, when you look at it in terms of First Nations cultural heritage, it's devastating," he said.
Pocock is also concerned the "narrative that the politicians are trying to sell" about the rock art differs from a scientific report.
The WA and Commonwealth governments say the rock art was considered before they agreed to extend the life of energy giant Woodside's North-West Shelf project until 2070. 'I have ensured that adequate protection for the rock art is central to my proposed decision," Watt said on Wednesday.
But an expert in the rock art says the 800-page Murujuga Rock Art Monitoring Report, which was given to the government to inform its decision-making, 'shows unequivocally' that industrial emissions are degrading the petroglyphs. And this conflicts with the presentation of research in the executive summary and media release issued by the WA Government.
The University of WA's Professor Benjamin Smith said on Tuesday there are now multiple lines of evidence showing industrial pollution has degraded the rock art. "It will continue to do so unless we lower the industrial pollution levels," he said.
There are signs the United Nations also has concerns about the government's conservation of the rock art, with UNESCO deferring its decision on giving the rock art World Heritage protection.
The deferral was drafted in July and released this week, urging the government to address the degradation of the site. 'Severe pollution issues from chemical-producing industries outside the nominated property represent a significant adversely-affecting factor, and a major threat against the petroglyphs,' it concluded.
It's the second hurdle the project has faced — in 2023, a submission was rejected by UNESCO after then environment minister Tanya Plibersek's team submitted a vague, low-resolution map of the area.
The North West Shelf extension is the second major project the Albanese Government has approved for the region, with Plibersek green-lighting a fertiliser plant nearby in 2022.
Watt's decision this week was attacked by the Greens and conservationists, who are concerned about its impact on Indigenous culture, and the 1.6 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions it will release into the atmosphere over its lifetime.
Woodside welcomed Watt's decision and said it 'remained committed to protecting the Murujuga Cultural Landscape" and supported its World Heritage nomination.
Woodside claims its project will provide energy security to Australia, and the project has already contributed over $40 billion in taxes and royalties, but Pocock does not believe the extension will provide significant advantages to the country.
"None of the justifications put forward stack up, I don't see the benefit to Australia. We get nothing from the Petroleum Resource Rent Tax when it comes to offshore LNG [liquid natural gas], and we're connected to the international market, so more supply does not equal lower gas prices," he said.
He believes there's a bigger issue than economics when it comes to Woodside's North-West Shelf plan, and that's the impact it will have on generations to come.
"One of the things that we have to work on as a country is cultural change around the way that we think and make decisions. We seem to be happy making short-term decisions, rather than asking, 'What's good for us in a generation or two, what's good in 50 years'," he said.
He sees little difference between Labor and the Coalition when it comes to gas policy, and believes many young people will be feeling "buyer's remorse" after preferencing Labor last election.
"I think it is appalling that we have two major parties in Australia who think they do not have a duty of care for young people and future generations when it comes to climate," he said.
"This is the thing we're going to be judged on by future generations. Anyone who comes after us is going to be asking, What on Earth were you thinking? You had all the scientists telling you what needed to be done."
Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The humanitarian crisis in Sudan deserves the world's attention and outrage
The humanitarian crisis in Sudan deserves the world's attention and outrage

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

The humanitarian crisis in Sudan deserves the world's attention and outrage

Five food aid workers were killed this week, a state sanctioned military force claimed control of a major city, and in just the past two years, nearly 4 million people have fled their homes and becomes refugees. You might think I'm describing events in Gaza, but you'd be wrong. I'm talking about what's been happening in Sudan. It's the humanitarian crisis it seems that almost no one wants to talk about despite several global powers exacerbating the civil war and trying to use Sudan for their own advantages. We need to talk about why that is, why 4 million people fleeing their homes — a number roughly equivalent to the population of Oklahoma — hasn't garnered more attention. The humanitarian crisis in Gaza is a background beat in the cadence of American news; while people disagree on whether starvation is being used as a weapon of war, the details and images of the conflict are readily available in our devices, and we experience a type of unfiltered access to what's happening there. People pore over every aid convoy movement and military strike launched since Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, using those details to analyze what should, can or will happen to the more than 2 million residents of Gaza. We should care about what's happening to humans in Gaza, whether they be Palestinian or Israeli. We should also care what's happening in Sudan. We are objectively not seeing the same level of online discourse or public empathy for the people living in unspeakable conditions there. It's not that Sudan lacks national security or global trade importance; world and regional powers like Russia, China, the UAE and Saudi Arabia are deeply involved in the current conflict. It is fair to look at this dynamic — and our individual consumption of global news — and ask if the relative lack of concern about this crisis unfolding in Africa is because the people at the center of it are Black. Though the narrative about Sudan's civil war isn't framed in biblical terms, its people have experienced apocalyptic conditions. Two brothers in arms worked to overthrow a harsh, autocratic leader, leading civilians to victory in 2019. But the two brothers, paramilitary leader Gen. Mohammed Hamdan Dagalo and the army chief, Gen. Abdel Fattah Burhan, could not resist the lure of earthly power. Falling victim to the sin of pride, they turned against each other and set their armies to burning villages, taking conscripts and razing the land. Men, women and children were not spared the brutal fighting; many had already experienced similar horrors before they escaped Syria. Famine, one of the four horsemen of the apocalypse, was declared a reality in North Darfur last year. According to the United Nations, on Monday night, 15 trucks carrying food had traveled more than 1,110 miles from the Red Sea toward the famine area. The World Food Programme and UNICEF insist standard protocol had been followed and all parties in the area had been made aware of the convoy. Still, it was attacked approximately 50 miles from the destination, leaving five people dead. This would have been the first convoy of food aid to reach the area in more than a year, the U.N. reports. In addition to statements of outrage from the WFP and UNICEF, U.N. spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric said the United Nations condemns the 'horrendous attack in the strongest possible terms.' Still, the attack on humanitarian workers and the overall crisis itself have drawn minimal concern from inside the U.S. Sudan is attractive for trade and security reasons because of its location connecting the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa. When the fighting escalated in 2023, U.S. special operations forces dramatically airlifted 70 Americans to safety, then quietly stopped engaging in negotiations or diplomatic outreach. By 2024, the embattled Biden administration likely didn't find political sense in investing more resources into a region that Donald Trump had lumped together as 's---hole countries,' especially given the focus on a post-Oct. 7 Middle East. Meanwhile, Russia remains keen on establishing a Port Sudan naval base, its first on the continent, so it stands firm behind the current military dictator in Khartoum. The United Arab Emirates is accused of doing China's dirty work by supplying gold, bombs and howitzers to the opposition paramilitary group. Saudi Arabia, meanwhile, picks around the edges of both groups to recruit for its never-ending war in Yemen. Major world powers are openly using military power and massive economic investments to twist Sudan's crisis to their advantage, while the United States withdraws from the region. Even in a power dynamic calculus, humanitarian aid is widely seen as having a soft power that extends beyond the most immediate need. But under the Trump administration and the auspices of the Department of Government Efficiency, the United States has callously zeroed out aid and refugee programs that otherwise could save millions of lives while also advancing American interests. That's all the proof we need that the United States, as a government and a public, is no longer even pretending to care about what happens to people in the Sahel and the least among us. This article was originally published on

Brazil advances Amazon oil exploration ahead of climate conference
Brazil advances Amazon oil exploration ahead of climate conference

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Brazil advances Amazon oil exploration ahead of climate conference

ASUNCIÓN, Paraguay, June 5 (UPI) -- Brazil's environmental authority has approved one of the final requirements for state-run oil company Petrobras to proceed with oil exploration at the mouth of the Amazon River. After several rejections, Petrobras secured approval from the Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources for its wildlife protection plan. The decision allows the company to proceed to a preoperational evaluation phase. This stage includes live emergency simulations to test Petrobras' response capabilities. The success of these tests will be key to the environmental authority's final decision whether to issue a drilling license. Petrobras aims to drill a well about 109 miles off the coast of Amapá state, in a maritime zone known as Block 59. The company says the activity will be low-impact and time-limited. Still, the project has sparked widespread environmental and social concerns. Environmental groups and experts have warned about the risks to the mouth of the Amazon River, an ecologically rich region and home to coral reefs, mangroves and endangered species. They also point to a lack of comprehensive environmental studies and the failure to consult Indigenous communities, as required under International Labor Organization Convention 169. The environmental institute' s stance on the project has shifted over time. Throughout 2023, its technical staff repeatedly recommended denying Petrobras permits to drill, citing inadequate environmental assessments and serious risks to biodiversity and local communities. Despite those recommendations, the authority's leadership approved Petrobras' latest protection plan May 19. Claudio Angelo, international policy coordinator at Observatório do Clima -- a Brazilian network of 90 climate-focused organizations -- said the plan's approval amounts to a capitulation to pressure from the state-run oil company. He warned the move could pave the way for auctioning 47 additional blocks at the mouth of the Amazon River, which he described as a setback for environmental protection in Brazil. An investigative report by InfoAmazonia found that Petrobras' strategic plan for 2025 to 2029 includes drilling 15 wells along Brazil's equatorial margin. The company plans to invest $3 billion in the project, representing 38% of its five-year budget for new oil and gas exploration, including projects in both Brazil and Colombia. Brazil's Federal Public Ministry has urged the National Petroleum Agency to suspend the auction of the 47 blocks, scheduled for June 17, citing the absence of required environmental studies and consultations with Indigenous peoples. Although the ministry's recommendations are not legally binding, ignoring them without justification can trigger civil or criminal legal action. President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has defended the project, saying oil exploration is essential for national development, and that revenues could support the country's transition to clean energy. Still, his position has drawn criticism for contradicting Brazil's climate commitments, especially with the United Nations Climate Change Conference to be held in November in Belém, a city in Brazil's Amazon region. The event will bring together world leaders, scientists, non-governmental organizations and advocates to discuss and negotiate global climate action. Brazil is expected to play a central role in the talks. It will be the first time a COP is held in the Amazon, underscoring the region's importance in the global climate agenda.

U.N. food agency appeals for $46 million to help 2 million Haitians facing severe hunger
U.N. food agency appeals for $46 million to help 2 million Haitians facing severe hunger

Los Angeles Times

time3 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

U.N. food agency appeals for $46 million to help 2 million Haitians facing severe hunger

UNITED NATIONS — The U.N. food agency is appealing for $46 million for the next six months to help about 2 million Haitians in dire need of food, including 8,500 at the worst catastrophic level of hunger. The appeal was issued by Lola Castro, the World Food Program's regional director for Latin America and the Caribbean, who recently returned from Haiti, where escalating gang violence has displaced well over 1 million people and left half the population — 5.7 million people — in urgent need of food. Two million of them are in the two worst categories in the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, the leading international authority on hunger crises, and 8,500 are in the worst Phase 5 category, she said. That means at least one in five people or households severely lack food and face starvation and destitution. Haiti is one of only five countries in the world that have people in the Phase 5 category of catastrophic hunger, Castro said, 'and it is really dramatic to have this in the Western Hemisphere.' Gangs have grown in power since the assassination of President Jovenel Moïse in July 2021 and are now estimated to control 85% of the capital and are moving into surrounding areas. Haiti has not had a president since the assassination, and the top U.N. official in the country said in April the country could face 'total chaos' without funding to confront the gangs.. A U.N.-backed mission led by Kenyan police arrived in Haiti last year to help quell gang violence, but the mission remains understaffed and underfunded, with only about 40% of the 2,500 personnel originally envisioned. The WFP, the world's largest humanitarian organization, is among the U.N. agencies facing funding cuts, mainly from the United States, which provided nearly half of its funding in 2024. Castro said WFP reached over 1.3 million people this year until March using carryover funds from last year. But the agency is facing a dramatic situation now with food stocks only until July to assist with emergencies, new displacements or hurricanes, she said. In the past four years, Castro said WFP always had stocks to help between 250,000 and 500,000 people with any emergency. 'This year, we start the hurricane season with an empty warehouse where we have no stocks for assisting any emergency, or we have no cash neither to go and buy (food) locally if it was possible in some areas, or to do a rapid humanitarian response,' Castro said. 'We are very concerned that a single storm can put hundreds of thousands of people in Haiti again into humanitarian catastrophe and hunger.' WFP normally provides a meal every day for around 500,000 school children, but that number will be cut in half without additional resources, she told a video press conference on Tuesday. With $46 million, she said, WFP will be able to help the 2 million Haitians in most need of food, keep providing school meals for half a million children, and provide social protection for very vulnerable people in camps for the displaced. Haiti must not be forgotten as the world deals with other crises, Castro said, urging donors to be generous. 'We really need to stop this and to hold the line on hunger,' she said. 'We continue calling the humanitarian community to provide support.' With $46 million, she said, WFP will be able to help the 2 million Haitians in the two worst IPC categories, keep providing school meals for half a million children, and provide social protection for very vulnerable people in camps for the displaced. Lederer writes for the Associated Press.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store