Stockholm v Trump: 'If US embassy wanted a building permit, they would have a problem'
Stockholm's city government has missed a deadline from the US government to certify that they do not have any Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programmes. Jan Valeskog, the city's deputy mayor, explained why he has rejected this 'bizarre' request.
Advertisement
On Friday, May 9th, the Stockholm City Planning Department, missed the ten-day deadline to submit a signed document requested by the US government on April 29th, something Jan Valeskog, the deputy mayor responsible for the planning department, said he had never intended to do.
"It's bizarre, because it goes against everything we stand for, and also against Swedish law," he told The Local. "All municipalities are working with anti-discrimination. It's unbelievable."
READ ALSO: Stockholm hits back at US embassy's 'completely bizarre' anti-DEI contract
On Tuesday, April 29th, Stockholm's city's planning department received an email from the US embassy, giving them 10 days to sign a document certifying that they "do not operate programs promoting DEI", along with what looked like a threat to withhold payment.
The city government, the US embassy wrote, should "agree that such certification is material for the government's payment decision", suggesting that the Stockholm city government would be "subject to the False Claims Act", under which suppliers to the US government risk fines of up to $10,000.
Advertisement
The letter enforces US President Donald Trump's Executive Order 14173, which, among other things, forbids US government agencies from "allowing federal contractors and subcontractors to engage in workforce balancing based on race, color, sex, sexual preference, religion, or national origin".
The US embassy, like all other US government agencies, is required under the executive order to include a term in all future contracts, "requiring such counterparty or recipient to certify that it does not operate any programs promoting DEI that violate any applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws".
Valeskog told The Local had been hoping that the US embassy or the State Department would withdraw the demand before the deadline passed.
"We are expecting them to withdraw this and maybe say that they are sorry," he said. "I'm not sure [US President] Trump has ever used these words, but this could have been the first time. There were rumours they were going to issue a statement last Friday, but they didn't."
Advertisement
Permit problems
Valeskog said that if the US embassy in Stockholm were to cancel contracts or freeze payments because of a refusal to sign the document, they would only damage themselves.
"Every fourth year, the embassy wants a building permit and if they want to get the building permit, they need to cooperate with us and if they don't want to do that, they would have a problem."
Christopher Fjellner, the leader of the opposition Moderate Party, called on city government to take an even more robust approach, threatening to cut off municipal services like hot water or garbage collection.
"It's them who are dependent on our garbage collection, our hot water, and our sewage treatment, so if they want to do without them, I say good luck to them!" he told Sweden's public radio broadcaster SR.
Government's job to protest
Fjellner also called for the Social Democrat-led city government to demand a meeting with the embassy, something Valeskog rejected.
"This is a real misunderstanding. We are not allowed to do foreign policy, so we cannot take 'revenge' on the embassy or call the embassy personnel up to the city offices. That's not for us to do, it's for the government, but they are silent. A lot of governments are silent for some reason when it comes to Trump administration. It's a very strange situation."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local Sweden
a day ago
- Local Sweden
Sweden's Constitution Committee criticises government for citizenship slowdown
KU, the Swedish parliament's constitution committee, has criticised the leaders of all three government parties for writing an article in a Swedish newspaper calling for a slowdown or stop in granting Swedish citizenship applications. Advertisement On November 29th, the three governing parties of Sweden's right-wing coalition and the Sweden Democrats published an opinion piece in the Dagens Nyheter newspaper titled 'It should be harder to become a Swedish citizen'. The parties pledged in the article to 'as much as possible, take measures to stop more Swedish citizenships from being granted until new rules are in place', hinting that they would take steps to get the Migration Agency to slow down the processing of citizenship applications. They did not explicitly say how they would do so, but the government did in January order the Migration Agency to make extra efforts to identify potential security threats in citizenship cases. These security checks, which came into force on April 1st, led to a near two-month freeze in citizenship applications this spring, and have slowed down the process of issuing new citizenships by forcing all applicants to attend in-person ID checks before their applications can be granted. READ ALSO: The Green Party reported the government to the Constitution Committee for ministerstyre or ministerial governance ‒ essentially, individual ministers trying to influence or meddle in the affairs of a public agency. Advertisement
Local Sweden
a day ago
- Local Sweden
Swedish PM 'not ruling out' state apology to international adoptees
Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson, who chaired the agency managing adoptions to Sweden some 20 years ago, has said he's not ruling out an apology after an inquiry unveiled widespread abuses spanning several decades. Advertisement Kristersson told the TT news agency that he's not ruling out an official state apology to international adoptees, after the government-appointed inquiry sharply criticised previous state inaction on adoptions under questionable circumstances. The investigation, led by civil law professor Anna Singer, found evidence of child trafficking in about ten cases, mostly from the 1970s and 80s. In many more cases, parental consent was missing or poorly documented. It proposed banning all international adoptions. It was launched in 2021 after reports surfaced of children stolen from countries such as Chile, China, and South Korea. Kristersson himself has been caught up at the centre of scandal, as he served as chair of Adoptionscentrum, the organisation arranging international adoptions to Sweden, between 2003 and 2005. "The information there is now didn't exist at the time, it has emerged afterwards," he told TT. He said that he welcomed the inquiry commission's report. "It's incredibly important that this work has been done. There's a great number of proposals from the commission which we are now going to study very carefully," he said. "The government isn't ruling anything out."
Local Sweden
a day ago
- Local Sweden
Who would govern Sweden if an election were held today?
With just over a year to go until Sweden's next election, a key poll suggests that the centre-left Social Democrats may take a decisive leap forward. Advertisement If an election were held today, the Social Democrats would get 36.2 percent of the vote, according to number-crunching state agency Statistics Sweden's survey – a 5.9 point increase on the 2022 election. The ruling Moderates, on the other hand, would only get 18.3 percent, 0.8 percentage points down on the last election, although that decrease is not statistically significant. They would, on the other hand, by a tiny margin, claw back the spot as Sweden's second-largest party from the far-right Sweden Democrats, who would take the worst hit out of all the parties compared to the 2022 election, with a -2.5 point drop in support to 18 percent. 'The Swedish people are clear about wanting to see Magdalena Andersson as prime minister,' the Social Democrat's party secretary, Tobias Baudin, told the TT newswire. But he cautioned that the election, in September 2026, is still over a year off. 'This is a poll, but the decision will be made on election day. We're then going to lead the next government,' he said, saying the party wouldn't be resting on its laurels until then. The Sweden Democrats' deputy party secretary, Fredrik Lindahl, said voters would change their minds once his party's collaboration with the government starts to yield results. 'We think voters will see it and appreciate our alternative,' he told TT. Advertisement Out of the five smaller parties, the left side fared the best in the poll, with the Left Party claiming 7.1 percent of the vote and the Green Party 6.5 percent. The Centre Party – who is currently collaborating mainly with the centre-left – would get 5.5 percent. The two parties that also make up the right-wing government coalition, however, would not manage to get enough votes to make it across the four-percent parliamentary threshold. The Christian Democrats would get 3.4 percent and the Liberals 2.8 percent. This means that even if the Centre Party were to pull its reluctant support of the centre-left, or switch sides altogether, the left bloc would still win more seats than the right bloc. It's worth noting however that some of the smaller parties often poll below the parliamentary threshold in-between elections, but manage to secure enough votes on voting day. Statistics Sweden's party sympathy poll is only carried out once a year and is one of Sweden's biggest political public opinion polls. More than 9,000 voters were questioned between April 29th and May 28th.
