Brinklow residents say green belt homes will destroy village
'Green belt homes will destroy our village'
8 minutes ago
Share
Save
Joan Cummins
BBC Midlands Today
Charlotte Benton
BBC News, West Midlands
Share
Save
BBC
Brinklow resident Linda Johnson said the plans were not sustainable
Plans to build hundreds of new homes to help meet housing targets in a historic village would "destroy" the area, residents say.
The development is part of Rugby Borough Council's local plan with proposals to build 415 new homes on green belt land in Brinklow, near Rugby.
Linda Johnson from the village, said the plans were not sustainable and bringing 1,500 people to the area where there was a lack of public transport, "wasn't the answer".
The authority launched an eight-week consultation at the end of March and hosted a public meeting on Tuesday to encourage the community to tell the council what they thought of the development.
Residents had dubbed the consultation as the "Battle of Brinklow" and said they were not prepared to let their village be "overrun by developers".
"It's absolutely ludicrous that we'd lose a village like Brinklow, if they can build here they can build anywhere," resident Amanda Hayhurst said.
"Why not declassify Westminster Abbey, that's how insensitive these people [the council] are," she added.
About 150 campaigners gathered outside Rugby Town Hall in March when the authority's local plan was considered by the full council.
The authority said it wanted to hear the community's opinion on "individual site allocations" and their views on its strategy to "allocate housing to some of the larger villages", instead of building a new countryside settlement.
A spokesperson for the village's parish council said Brinklow was a "nationally important heritage asset"
A spokesperson for the village's parish council said Brinklow, which was home to 24 listed buildings, a 13th-century church and ancient woodland, was a "nationally important heritage asset".
Ms Johnson added that once the green built land had been built on it would be "gone forever".
"We can't reverse these decisions," she said.
'Change is not a bad thing'
Meanwhile, Debbie Aston, who owns land in the village, supported the authority's plans and said change did not have to be a "bad thing".
Ian Currington from Brinklow Parish Council said the area was not against more people in the village, but thought a plan for a "sustainable amount" of new houses was more appropriate.
"We just want to have a voice and make sure our voice is heard," he said.
The borough council said housing targets were set by central government and all community feedback would be considered as part of the plan making process.
The public consultation is open until 19 May.
Follow BBC Coventry & Warwickshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
42 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Minding our language on the use of Americanisms
The continual expansion of the English language is inevitable and welcome. But while Elisabeth Ribbans is right that 'it would be a mistake to regard language as a fortress', it is not unreasonable to lament the effect of some invasive species whose proliferation is so rapid that native alternatives face possible extinction (How the use of a word in the Guardian has gotten some readers upset, 4 June). 'Gotten' may be an innocuous, if inelegant, English word making a return journey from the US, but some other US variants are more problematic. For example, the phrase 'Can I get …?' is suffocating more polite ways of making a request, such as 'May I/can I have …?' or simply 'I'd like …'. It is also annoyingly inaccurate, since in most cases the person asking has no intention of helping themselves and wouldn't be allowed to, even if they wanted to. But wholesale adoption not only leads to neglect of alternatives, it can also produce banality. So when both a sandwich and a sunset might today be described as 'awesome', it is reasonable to imagine that even as eclectic a wordsmith as Shakespeare might consider modern English borrowings as diminishing the language through having gotten McGilchristCromer, Norfolk Thank you, Elisabeth Ribbans, for your article on the cosmopolitan and evolving use of words in the English language. I am always stung by the snobbery I encounter among my British peers regarding American words or spellings. Criticism of American accents more so. My country of origin provokes pride and shame in increasingly equal measure, but to be cowed because of my voice, both written and spoken, leaves a foul taste. Once we've gotten past this distasteful persnicketiness, we can actually appreciate the meaning of the words being used, not just their Amy FultonOxton, Scottish Borders I grew up in the old West Riding, only a few miles from the county border with Lancashire. In the early 1950s, we regularly used the word 'gotten'. It was frowned on by teachers and others addicted to standard English. I believe the use of the word was common in other districts of Yorkshire. It is an English and not an American word, which has sadly passed out of use. Language evolves!Roderick WilsonAmpleforth, North Yorkshire When I worked at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, US, in the 1980s, my friendly editor had more appreciation of British irony than spelling. She once wrote on a draft paper: 'Richard. Please pick one spelling of 'practice' and stick to it.'Richard LammingShaldon, Devon Am I alone in finding 'shined' for 'shone' less than illuminating? Incidentally, like, who introduced 'like' like?Bill WintripDorchester, Dorset So not an ill-gotten 'gotten' then. Now where do we stand on 'snuck'?Tony RimmerLytham St Anne's, Lancashire Never mind 'faucet' and 'gotten' (Letters, 29 May), I've been racking my brain: in what play did Shakespeare use 'worser'? (Colon used free gratis.)Iain FentonLancaster Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
The Sun
44 minutes ago
- The Sun
My algae-covered fence panels went from green to brown overnight with a £12 Wickes buy you just have to spray and leave
AN AFFORDABLE, easy-to-use product could help keep your garden in tip-top shape this summer. The fence cleaner will help ensure you can be garden proud as we approach the summer months. 3 What's more, the product is available for just £12 at Wickes. The KilrockPRO Wood, Deck & Fence Cleaner has been praised as a quick and easy solution to your fence-related problems. A product description on the Wickes website reads: "The KilrockPRO Wood, Deck & Fence Cleaner cleans, brightens and rejuvenates outdoor wooden surfaces." It can be used for a wide range of purposes, making the £12 price tag seem like even better value for money. The cleaner can be used to tackle dirt and stains caused by algae, mould and mildew on fences, wood, decking, sheds, cladding, shake shingles, and other wood surfaces. With 5 litres of concentrate, it can make up to 50 litres of usable product when diluted, ensuring you have enough to keep your fences spotless throughout the summer. Once diluted, the formula can be applied using a spray or a brush. For bigger areas of growth, a spray can help speed up the process, while a brush might help get those hard to reach spots in between fence panels. The solution can then be left to work its magic, making for a quick and easy application process. After waiting for a suitable length of time, according to the product's instruction manual, the product can then be washed off. My garden was looking so old and the patio was broken - now it's a lush oasis and people can't believe how little I spent Reviews for the product were generally positive, with one shopper writing: "After a day the green algae was fading and a couple of days after that it's no longer there. They added: "Moral of the story - use Kilrock fence cleaner first, on a dry day without any threat of rain for at least 6 hours and then leave it for 3 days or so to work it's magic. "It will save you days of time and effort!" Another customer said they use a dilution ratio of one to four, left it for 24 hours, before rewashing it which has meant their "decking has come up like new." One reviewer posted a photo of their fence, clearly showing the difference between the algae covered panels and the new and improved clean fencing. They wrote: "From what I can tell, people who have had trouble and left poor reviews are expecting instant results. It works overnight - spray and leave it alone!" Others were less positive, saying that the product had not worked as effectively they've hoped. A couple of lower rated comments suggested that soapy water and a stiff broom would have done just as good a job. The diluted formula is also safe on plants and grass, as it doesn't contain bleach or acid, meaning the rest of your garden won't be ruined in the process. Shoppers are advised to test the solution on a small "inconspicuous" area before applying to the rest of the fence. Once cleaned, the product description claims that it "provides long lasting surface protection that deters regrowth for months."
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Humans need both housing and wild places
Your article highlighting that more than 5,000 English nature sites may be at risk from planning reforms brings into focus the ethical and emotional challenges involved in decisions about land use (Revealed: 5,000 English nature sites at risk under Labour's planning proposals, 3 June). Our new citizen science project, Last Haven, explores precisely these tensions. What happens when the last known habitat for an endangered species stands in the way of vital human development? We present participants with simplified, hypothetical scenarios, such as a hospital being dismantled to make space for a rare plant sanctuary, or an agricultural initiative threatening the last refuge of a wild species, to examine how people reason through competing priorities. Our work suggests the value of nature as an important factor in human flourishing and mental health. Yet access to housing and infrastructure is also vital for wellbeing and security. These thought-provoking cases help uncover the values and beliefs that guide people when faced with choices between ecological preservation and human needs. Our wider hypothesis is that human flourishing and the wellbeing of the non-human world are fundamentally connected. Understanding how people perceive this relationship can help inform more ethically grounded decisions. As the UK considers the future of its planning frameworks, we hope that those making these important decisions, and indeed all of us, will reflect on the values at Edmond AwadSenior lecturer, University of Exeter Your article makes chilling reading for the future of some of our most important wild places. Some years ago, while engaged in a successful fight to forestall planning consent for an intrusive power line overland from Ullapool to Beauly in the north-west Highlands, my group, Highlands Before Pylons, was accused of nimbyism – a term now widely used to imply a blinkered, backward-looking approach to necessary progress. I asked a scholarly friend if we should redefine the word nimby. She suggested a tweak in the acronym to nimbie: 'Not in my beautiful, irreplaceable environment.' Perhaps the Guardian and its readers could set a new HopkinsonBath I note that the five English landscape 'jewels' listed in the print edition, 10 in the online version of the article, are almost entirely in the south-east. As a native of the north-west, I don't know whether to be pleased or disappointed about this. Pleased because none of our northern jewels are under threat but disappointed because, as usual, all the investment is going to the LuptonPrestwich, Greater Manchester Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
