West Bengal School Service Commission holds talks with ‘sacked' teachers
The chairperson of the West Bengal School Service Commission (WBSSC) on Thursday (June 12, 2025) met a delegation of 12 representatives of the 'untainted and sacked' teachers over their demands for job reinstatement.
The delegation belonged to the Jogyo Shikkhok Shikkhika Adhikar Mancha (JSSAM). No conclusion was reached at the meeting by the time of this report being published.
Hundreds of 'untainted' teachers, who lost their jobs after an April 3 Supreme Court order invalidating nearly 26,000 teaching and non-teaching jobs, gathered at Karunamoyee in Bidhannagar on Thursday and marched to the WBSSC office. They raised slogans demanding their jobs be reinstated, as about hundred-odd police personnel stood guard around and inside the office premises.
The 'untainted' teachers underlined four crucial demands. These include publishing their original OMR sheets and a list of 'untainted' candidates from the cancelled 2016 recruitment panel certified by the WBSSC.
Additionally, they have demanded that the new recruitment process be kept on hold till the review petition is heard by the apex court, and for their jobs to be kept intact through a 'repanelling' process where the original OMR sheets from 2016 are re-evaluated for a new merit list without tainted candidates.
The situation arose after the Supreme Court cancelled the entirety of the recruitment panel of 2016, citing a 'vitiated and tainted' hiring by the WBSSC. The apex court consequently directed the West Bengal government to complete a fresh recruitment process for assistant teachers' positions by December 31, till when the 'sacked' teachers have been allowed to work with full salaries.
'While it is true that the State and the WBSSC filed review petitions at the Supreme Court, the deadline for the online application for fresh recruitments is before the apex court reopens after summer recess. This has been done by design to put pressure on us. We will not appear for a reselection, and especially not before the review petition yields a result,' a protesting 'untainted and sacked' teacher, Suvojit Das, told The Hindu.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Uphaar Cinema fire tragedy: 28 years on, families demand justice
'We have a parallel criminal justice, one for the rich and powerful and one for the poor,' remarked Neelam Krishnamoorthy, the face of the campaign seeking justice for the victims of the 1997 Uphaar Cinema fire tragedy, in a prayer meeting held Friday at Smriti Upvan. This year marks the 28th anniversary of the fire accident that broke out on June 13, 1997, claiming 59 lives due to asphyxiation and leaving hundreds injured in the ensuing stampede. Families of the 59 people who died meet annually to remember their loved ones. Neelam and her husband, Shekhar Krishnamoorthy, lost their children — 17-year-old Unnati and 13-year-old Ujjwal — in the blaze. 'I have kept these pictures for 28 years, the irony is many family members have died since,' Neelam said while she took down photos of the deceased pinned on a soft board post the ceremony. As president of the Association of Victims of the Uphaar Tragedy (AVUT), she and her husband have led a long struggle for justice. 'The courts are testing my patience too, but I've not given up because I have promised my children that we will get justice for them,' she added. Commenting on the Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad, which claimed 241 lives yesterday, she said, 'A whistleblower had already raised that there were problems with Boeing, but nobody listened. Similarly, the cinema also ran for years despite violations of norms. When greed overtakes a company, it's ordinary people who are availing the services.' Questioning a city court's decision to reduce the jail term of the accused brothers and owners of the cinema hall, Gopal and Sushil, Neelam said, 'The judge said that the accused also suffered, but how can they compare it with the pain of a mother who lost both of her children? Had it been an ordinary citizen, he would've been languishing behind bars.' In July 2022, a Delhi court granted relief to the brothers, ordering their release from jail by asking them to serve only the sentence already undergone, in a case of tampering with evidence in the case. The court observed that a trial court had earlier passed a sentence that was 'punitive and retributive in nature' to teach them a lesson. In 2015, the Supreme Court imposed a Rs 60-crore fine on the accused brothers in lieu of a custodial sentence. The amount was deposited with the Delhi government and was earmarked for building a second trauma centre, in memory of the victims, as an extension of AIIMS in Dwarka. However, this project has remained stalled. 'They (the Supreme Court) actually awarded the government for its failure. They were given Rs 60 crores to build a second trauma centre, but there's no sign of it so far,' she said. Neelam has since approached the apex court enquiring about the trauma centre. Amidst calls for justice, the Uphaar cinema in Green Park stands bearing the marks of the blazing tragedy, with a warning sign that reads 'stay away.'
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Court awards over Rs 27 lakh compensation to man injured in 2019 road accident
In an order dated June 4, the tribunal said it was established that the accident occurred 'on account of the speedy and rash driving' by its driver named Shankar Yadav. Presiding Officer Shelly Arora noted the claimant or injured Prahalad Rai's statement, according to which he was riding his two-wheeler from Kalindi Kunj to Madanpur Khadar when a rashly driven truck rammed into his vehicle on July 9, 2019. New Delhi, Jun 13 (PTI) Underlining that medically determined permanent disability cannot be mechanically applied to find the loss of earning capacity because of functional disability, a motor accident claims tribunal here has awarded Rs 27.07 lakh as compensation to a man injured in a 2019 road accident. It noted that according to Rai, he suffered a grade-III fracture of both bones of his left leg and underwent surgeries, and prolonged medical treatment, which rendered him 63 per cent permanently disabled, leading to substantial loss of income because of an adverse impact on his earning capacity. The court said, according to the precedents established by the Supreme Court and high courts, medically determined permanent disability cannot be equated with loss of earning capacity because of functional disability, as it would result in a non-objective and absurd compensation. It said, 'There, however, might be certain cases where the two would correspond to each other, but it cannot be mechanically applied; rather, it requires evaluation of applicable factors independently in each case to reach a fair quantification of loss of earning capacity.' The court noted that the claimant, who was employed as a delivery boy, endured substantial disability, including deformity in the left lower limb. 'This impairment significantly restricts mobility, a critical requirement for his prior employment, which heavily relied on driving and physical activity. The nature of his injury directly impacts his ability to perform essential job functions, particularly those involving extensive fieldwork and continuous driving, which are indispensable for a delivery boy,' the court said. It said that the 'psychological and emotional consequences' of the injury further diminished Rai's capacity to adapt to alternative employment, which compounded the overall effect on his earning ability. 'Given the substantial impact on his ability to undertake field-oriented work, his functional disability is assessed as 50 per cent concerning his earning capacity,' the court said. It computed a total compensation of around Rs 27.07 lakh, payable to Rai under various pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses. The court directed the insurer, United India Insurance Company Ltd, to pay the entire compensation along with interest. PTI MNR AS AS This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
SC seeks Karnataka govt reply over ban on Kamal Haasan's 'Thug Life'
The Supreme Court on Friday issued a notice to the Karnataka government and sought its response to a petition filed by a Bengaluru resident, challenging the de facto ban on the screening of the Kamal Haasan starrer Thug Life in the state. A two-judge vacation bench of the top court, headed by Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Justice Manmohan, issued notice and sought a response from the Karnataka state authorities after hearing the PIL filed by Bengaluru resident M. Mahesh Reddy, through his advocate A. Velan. The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) sought direction from the top court to appropriate authorities to ensure the safe and unimpeded screening of the movie across Karnataka. Velan on Friday argued that the State has completely capitulated to the elements calling for riots against linguistic minorities and burning of theaters. The counsel further contended before the top court that sadly, no FIR has been registered by the state authorities and no action has been initiated against such kind of elements, instead the State has joined hands with extremist elements. The plea of Reddy sought a declaration from the top court that the ban on the movie was illegal, unconstitutional, and void ab initio, being violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g), and 21 of the Constitution. "This ban stems not from any lawful process, but from a deliberate campaign of terror, including explicit threats of arson against cinema halls, incitement to large-scale communal violence targeting linguistic minorities, and a chilling call for a repeat of past anti-Tamil riots," the plea contended.
