Can a re-routed cross-border pylons plan appease locals?
Energy network bosses hope that a revised route for taking energy to England will appease at least some rural residents of the Scottish Borders.
Since plans for the Cross Border Connection were revealed last year protest groups have been formed in communities near the proposed pylons.
Following the backlash, Scottish Power Energy Networks (SPEN) have altered several sections of the 57-mile route between Lauder and the border, south of Newcastleton.
But Rosi Lister from Action Against Pylons - a collection of local community protest groups - warned: "It's all very well revising the route, but as soon as you move it from one place you affect another community."
SPEN project manager Ewan Borthwick said: "Historically we've had energy coming from the south - England and Wales - through nuclear and hydro, so it's now our turn to send renewable energy the other way."
The Cross Border Connection is seen as a vital link in the UK upgrade of the national grid.
Dozens of wind farms and solar energy parks - from the Highlands all the way down to the Borders - are already connected to the grid, with many more projects in the pipeline.
Finding a suitable route for the 60-metre high pylons, between a proposed new electricity substation near Lauder and awaiting cables at the border near Carlisle, is proving problematic for SPEN.
And bosses have ruled out an underground solution.
Mr Borthwick added: "We know from previous projects that it is between six and nine times more expensive for an underground cable solution, rather than overhead.
"Going underground would take this project from the hundreds of millions [of pounds] into the billions, and we have a licence from Ofgem to come up with the most cost-efficient solution.
"It will be the electricity bill payers that will be paying for this over the next 50 years or so."
The revised route has taken the planned pylons further away from the villages of Roberton and Etrrickbridge - but moved them closer to settlements at Craik and Yarrow Feus.
There is also more use of areas already covered in forestry and the new route will have less impact on the World War II prisoner of war camp at Stobbs, outside Hawick.
More stories from South Scotland
Listen to news for the Scottish Borders on BBC Sounds
SPEN's environmental planner Malrlene Marimbe said: "We reviewed all of the feedback from the public and statutory stakeholders during the consultation for the original route and modified the original preferred route.
"We believe this alternative route is more balanced when it comes to the concerns we received about visual impact and also the attractiveness of the landscape.
"We also took into account concerns about environmental impact as well as health impacts of proximity to residential properties."
The latest consultation over the route will end on May 2, with the official proposed Cross Border Connection route being published later in the year.
Around half a dozen community protest groups along the route have come together to form Action Against Pylons.
Rosi Lister from the group said: "We believe this will destroy a large part of the Scottish Borders.
"It's all very well revising the route, but as soon as you move it from one place you affect another community.
"There are no winners with these pylons."
Protesters to fight cross-border giant pylon plans
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Trump defense chief to rename Navy ship — is that common? Historians weigh in
President Donald Trump's administration is planning to rename a U.S. Navy ship. Is this a common practice? Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth is set to rebrand the USNS Harvey Milk, a fleet replenishment oiler named after the California politician and Navy veteran, according to CBS News. Other news outlets have confirmed this report. Milk served on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors — becoming one of the first openly gay elected officials in the country — before his assassination in 1978. When asked to comment on the report, a Pentagon spokesperson told CBS News that Hegseth 'is committed to ensuring that the names attached to all DOD installations and assets are reflective of the Commander-in-Chief's priorities, our nation's history, and the warrior ethos.' The defense secretary, a former Fox News anchor, has made some negative remarks about LGBTQ people in the past. In his 2024 book, he wrote that policies permitting gay individuals to serve in the military are 'part of a 'Marxist' agenda,' according to The Guardian. Hegseth is also no stranger to rebranding military assets. He previously ordered the renaming of North Carolina's Fort Liberty to Fort Bragg and Georgia's Fort Moore to Fort Benning — restoring their original names, which were associated with the Confederate generals Braxton Bragg and Henry Benning. But, defense officials noted that the restored names now honor World War II solider Roland Bragg and World War I solider Fred Benning. Naval historians told McClatchy News that the U.S. Navy has a fairly long history of rebranding existing vessels — particularly in the distant past — but they stressed that renaming ships explicitly for ideological reasons has little precedent. Long history of renaming ships 'Historically, renaming U.S. warships has been very common,' John Beeler, a history professor at the University of Alabama, who researches military and naval history, told McClatchy News. He cited the example of the USS New York, an armored cruiser built in 1893, which was rebranded to the USS Rochester in 1917, the year the U.S. entered World War I. There were a number of reasons why existing vessels might have had their names switched. For one, they could have been renamed after their role in the Navy changed, or after their capture during wartime, Jason Smith, a history professor at Southern Connecticut State University, who researches maritime history, told McClatchy News. 'At other times, naval vessels have been renamed when a newly commissioned ship was slated to be given the preexisting name, which necessitated renaming the older vessel,' Smith said. David Winkler, a professor at the Naval War College, echoed this view. 'At the turn of the century the Navy named a bunch of armored cruisers for states,' Winkler told McClatchy News. 'When we started building battleships, such as the Pennsylvania, California, and Washington, the cruisers having those names became the Pittsburgh, San Diego, and Seattle.' Further, during the second world war, the escort carrier Midway was restyled as the St. Lo in 1994, allowing a larger battle carrier to take the name Midway. Winkler noted that, 'lore has it that getting your ship name changed is a sign of bad luck,' as the 'St. Lo would be sunk at the Battle of Leyte Gulf.' And, in recent decades, ship renamings have become more rare, he said. A spokesperson for the Defense Department did not respond to a request for comment from McClatchy News. The Navy enters 'the culture wars' But, despite the Navy's history of rebranding commissioned vessels, the Trump administration appears to be venturing into somewhat uncharted waters, historians said. 'What is not common is renaming ships for overtly ideological reasons,' Beeler said. Smith reinforced this view, saying that 'renaming ships for political reasons has been virtually unheard of until recently…' He noted that the sole precedent is the renaming of the the USS Chancelorville and USNS Maury — both styled after Confederate figures — which occurred in 2023, during former President Joe Biden's tenure. These renamings came at the recommendation of a congressional commission established in the wake of the killing of George Floyd. One vessel was renamed the USS Robert Smalls after a former slave who aided the Union in the Civil War, and the other was restyled the USNS Marie Tharp in honor of a ground-breaking oceanographic cartographer, according to the New York Times. Now, the renaming of the USNS Harvey Milk could further cement this new practice of recasting vessels for political reasons, experts said. And, the Milk may only be the beginning. CBS News reported that numerous other ships could see their names changed. Among those on a 'recommended list' are the USNS Harriet Tubman, USNS Ruth Bader Ginsburg, USNS Cesar Chavez and USNS Thurgood Marshall. 'The Navy and its ships have entered—somewhat begrudgingly, I think—into the culture wars along with so many aspects of American public life today,' Smith said.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Canada steelworkers urge Ottawa to counter Trump
Steelworkers in the Canadian city of Hamilton see President Donald Trump's latest trade war escalation as a wake-up call, insisting US efforts to protect struggling metal producers demand an equivalent national response. Hamilton is known locally as "Steeltown," with expansive industrial plants dominating the view from the main bridge that leads into the city. Hamilton has endured countless setbacks as the steel industry that drove its growth through much of 20th Century declined. Trump's decision to double steel and aluminum tariffs to a crippling 50 percent did not come as a shock to those who have spent decades in the industry. "Steel is like a roller-coaster," said Jake Lombardo, who retired after 38 years at Stelco, one of Hamilton's main plants. Lombardo's career spanned the era that saw automation and cheaper foreign product hollow out Hamilton's steel sector. He voiced a degree of understanding for Trump's efforts to shield US producers from external competition. "I'm not a Trump supporter, but one thing I like (about) what he said, he wants to do things in-house. And I don't think there's anything wrong with that," Lombardo, 69, told AFP. "We should have been doing this a long time ago." Hamilton's steel industry was born in the early part of the last century, hitting its peak in the decades following World War II, when the main local union, United Steelworkers Local 1005, counted more than 12,000 members. That number has since fallen to about 650, said union president Ron Wells. Wells said he wasn't opposed to a future where Canadian producers serve Canadian demand and cross-border trade is reduced. But, like Lombardo, he believes Ottawa needs to create the environment that ensures that Canadian steelmakers thrive. "We've been saying that for, like years, if not decades," Wells told AFP. - 'Better late than never'? - The union chief said he was encouraged by Prime Minister Mark Carney's pledge to counter Trump's trade war by boosting internal trade and ushering in an era of massive construction across Canada. Asked about the prospect that Hamilton could benefit from Carney's recent promise that his government would "build baby build," Wells said: "we applaud it." "It's better late than never." Carney on Wednesday called Trump's decision to double steel and aluminum tariffs "unjustified" and "illegal" and promised that Canada -- the largest supplier of foreign steel and aluminum to the United States -- will respond. But in the short term, Wells said there is cause for concern. Stelco, which was bought by the US steel producer Cleveland-Cliffs last year, had been sending about 30 percent of its output to the United States, Wells said. Those orders largely dried up when Trump imposed a blanket 25 percent tariff on all metal imports in March. But Stelco was still selling to Canadian clients who were making products subsequently sold to the United States, with the American importers absorbing the 25 percent tariff hit. - 'The wrong foe' - At 50 percent, Wells voiced fear that business could vanish. "People are just pissed off that (Trump) keeps changing his mind and he's playing chicken with the economy," Wells told AFP. "Our members want to see the tariffs situation get resolved. So go back to full production and we can share the wealth." The Canadian Steel Producers Association, an industry group, said Wednesday that "at a 25 per cent tariff rate, we saw significant layoffs, curtailed investments and a significant drop of shipments to the United States." "At a 50 per cent tariff rate, the US market is effectively closed to Canadian steel, leaving billions of dollars of Canadian steel without a market," it warned. Throughout Trump's trade war, Canadian workers in targeted sectors -- notably auto and metal -- have voiced frustration over the president's decision to harm a bilateral trade relationship widely seen as mutually beneficial. "We think they're picking on the wrong foe," Wells said. Tony Mclaughlin, who has worked for Stelco for 47 years, told AFP he "always thought we'd be exempt," from tariffs." "Is he trying to get a new trade agreement?" He asked. "Maybe that's the big plan." bs/nl
Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Japanese royal family supports peace while touring Okinawa
June 4 (UPI) -- Japan's imperial family honored the war dead in Okinawa on Wednesday, where the last major battle of World War II occurred 80 years ago, from April 1 to June 22, 1945. Emperor Naruhito and Empress Masako brought their daughter, Princess Aiko, with them during a two-day visit to the Okinawa Prefecture, The Japan Times reported. The trip is to remember the deaths of an estimated 110,000 Japanese soldiers, 12,520 U.S. soldiers and an unknown number of Okinawan civilians who died during the battle. "I hope it will be an opportunity to reflect deeply on the value of peace and renew our resolve to uphold it," Naruhito told media before embarking on the trip. The royal family's visit also underscores its commitment to peace while making planned visits to place flowers at the National War Dead Peace Mausoleum in Itoman on Wednesday. The mausoleum contains the remains of an estimated 180,000 civilians and soldiers who died during the long and bloody battle. Japan's royal family afterward visited the Cornerstone of Peace, which has the engraved names of 240,000 war victims, and then the Okinawa Prefectural Peace Memorial Museum. While there, the royal family spoke with some of the family members whose forebears died during the battle, Kyodo News reported. A 91-year-old survivor of the battle for Okinawa told reporters that Princess Aiko told her she "felt the importance of peace" during the visit. Emperor Naruhito has been a staunch supporter of peace and is a direct descendant of Emperor Hirohito, who led Japan before and during World War II. The royal family also visited with Okinawans in their 20s and 30s who help to preserve wartime stories and share them with visitors at the memorial museum. The royal family on Thursday will visit the Tsushima Maru Memorial Museum to lay flowers for the victims of the Tsushima Maru evacuation ship, which a U.S. Navy submarine torpedoed and sank on Aug. 22, 1944. The vessel was carrying 1,800 civilians who were being evacuated, and 1,484 died when it was sunk near the island of Akusekijima in the Kagoshima Prefecture. Emperor Naruhito, Empress Masako and Princess Aiko also will visit Shuri Castle on Okinawa. The castle's main hall is being rebuilt after a 2019 fire destroyed it. The royal family will return to Japan on Thursday night after completing their tour of Okinawan sites. They also have a memorial visit to Hiroshima on June 19 to remember the victims of the Aug. 6, 1945, atomic bombing by the United States that killed up to an estimated 135,000, including between 60,000 and 80,000 who died when the bomb detonated over the city. The U.S. Army Air Force dropped an atomic bomb on Nagasaki three days later, which killed an estimated 40,000 people upon detonation over the city. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
