
Scotland's 'worst lay-bys to break down in' named as one tops UK list of shame
Experts have named and shamed the places that are the worst to have a breakdown.
Scotland's "worst lay-bys to break down" have been revealed by car experts. And one even has the ignominy of being named the worst in the whole of the UK.
According to experts at ALA Insurance, monthly search volume around 'car breakdowns' has hit 199,000 as of May 2025. As a result, they have created a ranking of the worst lay-bys across the UK in which to have a breakdown.
The experts considered a range of factors when putting together their ranking, including the distance to services, the average temperature, annual rainfall, and mobile signal. These were then combined to give an overall 'Index Score'.
According to the experts, the worst lay-by to break down in Scotland —and the whole of the UK—is the one on the A713 near New Galloway. It received an Index Score of 8.3.
The lay-by is situated in the south of Scotland, a short distance from the town of New Galloway in Dumfries and Galloway. It scored poorly on distance to services, average temperature, and annual rainfall.
And its position on top of the list of shame was secured by its weak mobile signal, which ranked 120 out of 120 locations listed.
Meanwhile, the second worst lay-by in Scotland—and the whole of the UK, again—according to ALA Insurance is lay-by 99 along the A9 southbound. Located near Etteridge in the Scottish Highlands, it received an Index Score of 11.7.
While its mobile signal was significantly better than the A713, it ranked last for average temperature and also scored badly for rainfall and distance to services.
The third and final Scottish lay-by to appear on the experts' list is the one along the A84 in the FK1 postcode. Coming in at number five on the overall UK-wide list, the lay-by was assigned an Index Score of 17.5.
Meanwhile, the other two in the top five worst lay-bys in the UK are one along the B4302 by Talley and another on the A483 near Gresford—both situated in Wales. Placing third and fourth respectively, they were assigned Index Scores of 12.9 and 13.1.
ALA Insurance commented: "It's never an ideal situation when your car decides to act up during a long drive, especially during busier times around holidays, when motorway driving can be stressful enough as it is.
"It's clear this is on the mind of Britain's drivers, with the monthly search volume around 'car breakdown' hitting 199,000 as of May 2025.
"To help with this common concern and give you all the information you need on how to dodge the worst places in the UK for a breakdown to occur, we've taken a look at the quality of the nation's main roads and lay-bys."
When setting out on a car journey, there is nothing worse than breaking down on a busy road. To help drivers this summer, ALA Insurance has also shared tips to prepare for a breakdown.
The experts suggest checking tyres, fluids, and battery before setting off on a journey. They also recommend always carrying essentials such as a fully charged mobile phone and warm clothing, and letting somebody know your route and estimated arrival time.
Meanwhile, according to ALA Insurance, it is also a good idea to plan routes carefully—particularly if journeying off the beaten track. Other top tips include downloading offline maps and being prepared for all weathers.
The worst lay-bys in the UK
A713 - New Galloway, Scotland
A9 - Lay-by 99, Scotland
B4302 - Talley, Wales
A483 - Gresford, Wales
A84 - FK1, Scotland
A470 - LD3, Wales
A44 - SY2, South East
A57 - Cutthroat Bridge, North West
A37 - BA3, South West
A40 - LD3, South West
Article continues below

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
TV Twix advert is BANNED for encouraging dangerous driving - because it shows long-haired driver crashing his caramel-coloured motor on top of another car
An advert for Twix bars showing a long-haired driving crashing his caramel-coloured motor has been banned for 'condon[ing] unsafe driving'. The bizarre ad, released at the end of March, shows sporting a 70s-esque fashion involved in a car chase. But when he takes a sharp turn, he winds up plummeting off the side of the road, overturning the vehicle several times. However when the clip pans back to the vehicle at the foot of the cliff, there are two identical versions of the car sandwiched upon one another - like a Twix. To further add to the intrigue, a Twix bar falls from the sunroof of both cars before they head off into the sunset, the 'two is more than one'. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said the ad 'must not appear again' as is, asserting it 'condoned unsafe driving. And while the watchdog noted the stunt took place in a fanciful-type advert, it claimed parts of the video 'appeared likely to breach' the Highway Code. It also highlighted there was an 'emphasis on speed' as well as 'fast paced beat and music' during the chase, with 'visible skid marks left' on the road. Mars-Wrigley, who own Twix, contested their advert was a 'cinematic presentation' set out in an 'absurd, fantastical' world 'removed from reality'. Defending their cinematography further, Mars argued the cars featured were driving as 'lawful speeds' and any simulation would reflect 'legal and safe driving'. The confectionery firm, which also represents Celebrations, Maltesers, said its caramel biscuit bar is renowned for it playful humour, which was further exhibited in the 'fantastical' ad. Clearcast, a non-governmental organisation, which approves adverts defended the sweet giant, adding the video did not imply 'safe driving was boring' or encourage people to drive in an unsafe manner. ASA's final ruling on the matter instructed Mars not to 'condone or encourage irresponsible driving' that was unlikely to break the Highway Code via adverts. A Mars Wrigley UK spokesperson said: 'We always take pride in maintaining high standards across all our communications and every advert we produce is submitted for approval through the appropriate review channels. 'In our view, this particular advert adopts a fantastical tone that is neither realistic nor intended to be imitated. 'Nonetheless, we take our responsibility as an advertiser seriously and never intended to cause any offence or concern, so we are reviewing the ruling carefully in order to work collaboratively towards a resolution.'


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
‘Serious crash' shuts major A-road in BOTH directions with rush-hour traffic snarling back for 15 miles
A MAJOR A-road has been shut off in both directions following a serious crash. The horror smash happened at about 2.20am between J13 (Thrapston) and J22 (Brampton) on the A12 in Cambridgeshire. 1 Motorists driving on the main route connecting Kettering, Thrapston and Huntingdon have been hit with delays following the collision. The horror smash involved one car, according to National Highways. The A-road has been closed since for an investigation. Motorists were warned of 30-minute delays on approach as the rush hour gets underway, with rush-hour traffic snarling back for 15 miles. Local village roads could become congested as the A14 normally takes the brunt of traffic between Thrapston and Huntingdon. "Emergency services including Cambridgeshire Police are in attendance," National Highways said in a statement. "National Highways contractors will also be assisting with traffic management. "Due to the nature of the incident, the road is expected to be closed for a significant length of time, this is to allow for Police collision investigation works to take place." Cambridgeshire Constabulary said: "Please be aware of road closures on A14 between junctions to Catworth and Spaldwick in both directions, due to an ongoing incident. "Please find alternative routes." is your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures and must-see video. Like us on Facebook at and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSun.


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Twix advert banned for encouraging dangerous driving
A Twix chocolate advert has been banned for encouraging unsafe driving, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has ruled. The advert, called Two Is More Than One and shown on both TV and Video on Demand, shows a man driving a car while being followed, before putting the hand brake on, swerving to the right-hand side of the road and breaking through a metal barrier. A man is seen inside the car falling down a rocky hill, before the vehicle is then shown upside down but placed on top of an identical car at the bottom of the hill. Five complaints that the adverts encouraged dangerous driving and were irresponsible were made to the ASA. Mars Wrigley Confectionery - who own Twix - argued the advert "was set in a separate world that was absurd, fantastical and removed from reality," and said they made sure the acts depicted "would be impossible to recreate". But while the ASA acknowledged the ad contained "some clearly fantastical elements," it upheld the complaints and ruled the ads "must not appear again in their current form". "We considered the road was clearly realistic," it wrote in its ruling, before adding: "The scenes were depicted as a chase with the emphasis on speed. In addition, the first man was then shown putting the handbrake on and the car swerved off the road leaving visible skid marks. "We considered the emphasis on a chase, and the speed inherent to that, and the driving manoeuvres featured would be dangerous and irresponsible if emulated in real life on a public highway." Another ruling from the ASA also banned a Diesel clothing advert that featured model Katie Price. That ad - a paid-for spot on the Guardian news website that ran on 26 March 2025 - featured an image of Price wearing a bikini and holding a handbag in front of her chest. It drew 13 complaints, with some believing it objectified and sexualised women, challenging whether it was offensive, harmful and irresponsible. Others challenged whether the ad was irresponsible as Ms Price appeared "unhealthily thin". While Diesel argued "the image was a celebration of Ms Price's sexuality and empowerment" and noted it was part of a wider campaign, the ASA upheld the first complaint. It said that the positioning of the handbag in the ad "had the effect of emphasising and drawing attention to her breasts," and therefore "sexualised her in a way that objectified her" and was "likely to cause serious offence". The ASA did not find that the ad depicted Ms Price in a way "to make her appear unhealthily thin".