Niagara region hospitals aim for every newborn and child without a family doctor to go home with one
Newborns in Niagara region without access to a family doctor will be connected to those accepting patients through a new hospital program.
Called a "pediatric pathway," Niagara Health said it also created the program to help children who are hospitalized, and those with complex care needs, access primary care.
When many infants and kids, under 18-years-old, leave the hospital, they don't have a family doctor to support them, said Niagara Health in a news release Tuesday.
Under the new program, they and their parents or guardians will be provided with information about physicians and community health centres where they can become patients. And for children with complex care needs, pediatricians at the hospital will work closely with the family physician to continue providing support.
"This pathway is about making sure no child falls through the cracks," said Dr. Madan Mohan Roy, chief of pediatrics at Niagara Health, in the statement.
"Our goal is to ensure that every pediatric patient, regardless of their situation, has access to continuous, community-based care after they are discharged."
Family doctor shortage linked to measles outbreak
Children with a family doctor have better access to vaccines, developmental monitor, early detection of health concerns and a contact to support them with everyday health needs, Niagara Health said. It also helps families avoid "unnecessary hospital visits."
About 2.5 million people in Ontario do not have a family doctor, including roughly 360,000 children according to research in 2024 and 2023, respectively, by the Ontario College of Family Physicians.
If a baby is born to parents with a family doctor, he or she could become that doctor's patient. But if the parents don't have a family doctor, the baby could also be without.
The family doctor shortage has contributed to the measles outbreak in Ontario, with many cases in the Grand Erie region, according to local experts. The region includes the City of Brantford and counties of Haldimand, Norfolk and Brant.
"It's availability. It's the family doctor crisis. It's the not being able to get vaccines at a time that works with their work schedule," Dawn Bowdish, a professor of medicine at McMaster University, told CBC's The Current in March.
"The Canadian situation is one in which outright refusal is actually comparatively rare. It's access and availability and convenience that tend to be the drivers of this fallen vaccination rates."
Doctors accepting new patients
There are currently more than 30 family doctors in the Niagara region accepting new patients, said Dr. Jennifer Robert, chief of primary care, said in the news release.
"That's an important opportunity many may not be aware of," she said. "By connecting community members with these providers, we're not only improving individual health outcomes — we're supporting a stronger, more connected healthcare system."
Physicians who accept new patients through the new hospital program so far include four in St. Catharines, three in Welland and one in Fort Erie, as well as through community health centres across the Niagara region.
Niagara Health said it is looking to create a similar program for adults.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vancouver Sun
an hour ago
- Vancouver Sun
Canadians still waiting longer for surgeries than before COVID
The massive surgical backlogs left after rolling pandemic lockdowns are clearing but Canadians are still waiting longer than they were pre-COVID for new hips and knees, cancer surgeries and other 'priority' procedures, new data show. Even though 26 per cent more hip and knee replacements were done in 2024 than 2019, it still wasn't enough to meet the need: just 68 per cent of Canadians received a hip replacement within the 26-week benchmark last year, compared to 75 per cent in 2019. For those needing a knee replacement, 61 per cent got a slot in the operating room within the 182-day threshold, compared with 70 per cent in 2019, even though 21 per cent more knee replacements were performed in 2024 than in 2019. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Median wait times for breast, bladder, colorectal, lung and prostate cancer surgery also rose, with prostate cancer seeing the biggest bump in wait times, an extra nine days over 2019. Wait times for scans to diagnose diseases and injuries also increased, 'with MRI scans requiring an additional 15 days and CTS scans three more days compared with 2019,' the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) reported in a background release. Canadians waited a median 57 days for an MRI scan in 2024. One in 10 waited 198 days. The longer people wait, the more they deteriorate. Delays getting to an operating room 'can lead to disease progression, increased symptoms of anxiety and depression, risk of mental health flareups and worsening of surgical and nonsurgical patient outcomes,' Canadian researchers have warned. Hospitals across the country pushed back non-urgent surgeries during the early waves of COVID to free up beds. Almost 600,000 fewer operations were performed in the first 22 months of the pandemic alone compared to 2019, CIHI reported. The backlog has meant that by the time people see a surgeon, their problem is more complex than it would have been in the past, Dr. James Howard, chief of orthopedic surgery at University Hospital – London Health Sciences Centre said in the news release. Canada's aging baby boomer generation, with arthritis and other joint conditions, is also putting pressure on the system. 'So even with surgeons collectively working as much as they can and completing more surgeries than we have in the past, we are not seeing wait times come down due to the complexity and volume of patients presenting to orthopedic surgeons,' Howard said. While case numbers are bouncing back — five per cent more surgeries of all types were performed in 2023 than in 2019 — the volumes still haven't kept up with population growth (seven per cent over the same period) or the 10 per cent rise in demand for surgery among those 65 and older, CIHI reported. 'Although an increase in the volume of procedures performed across Canada means that the surgical backlog from the height of the pandemic period has effectively been cleared, ripple effects in the health systems — due in part to the pandemic — persist that impact wait times in Canada,' CIHI's Cheryl Chui, director of health system analytics, said in a statement. Factors driving those longer wait times include a shortage of specialists and nurses, limited operating room time, space and staff, and emergency cases that take priority over scheduled ones. Ontario and other provinces are trying to push through more surgeries and procedures, partly by doing more on an outpatient basis, meaning no overnight hospital stay. Ontario has also announced plans to expand the number of private clinics providing publicly covered hip and knee replacements. Other provinces have done the same, though 'the impact on surgical volumes and wait times is still being assessed,' CIHI said. According to the agency's latest waitlist snapshot, while the number of hip replacements increased from 22,000 in 2019, to 28,000 in 2024, and the number of knee replacements from 35,000 to 42,000 over the same period, a smaller proportion of people received joint replacement surgery within the recommended six months. Nationally, in 2024, only 68 per cent of people needing a new hip were treated within the 26-week benchmark, compared to 75 per cent in 2019. Ontario fared better than all other provinces: 82 per cent of hip replacement patients were treated within that timeframe. Newfoundland and Labrador (41 per cent) and Prince Edward Island (45 per cent) performed the worst. British Columbia (63 per cent), Saskatchewan (50 per cent), Manitoba (54 per cent) and Quebec (49 per cent) also scored below the proportion nationally. In Alberta, 73 per cent of hip replacements were performed within the benchmark in 2024. Ripple effects in the health systems — due in part to the pandemic — persist that impact wait times in Canada Overall, patients waited a median 125 days for hip surgery in 2024 (half waited less, half waited more). One in 10 waited 340 days. For knee replacements, 79 per cent of patients in Ontario received surgery within the 26-week benchmark in 2024, compared to 38 per cent in Quebec, 47 per cent in Saskatchewan, 55 per cent in B.C. and 62 per cent in Alberta. While efforts are being made to better manage and monitor surgical waitlists, researchers have warned that people with severe pain or worsening symptoms aren't being prioritized. Wait times for cataract surgery were close to pre-pandemic levels — 69 per cent of people were treated within a 16-week benchmark in 2024 versus 70 per cent in 2019. The percentage of people who received radiation therapy within 28 days and surgery to repair a fractured hip within 48 hours dropped slightly, by three percentage points from 2019 to 2024, falling to 94 per cent and 83 per cent, respectively. The volume of prostate cancer surgeries performed dropped by three per cent, from 3,500 in 2019, to 3,400 in 2024. And men waited longer for the procedure — from a median 41 days in 2019, to 50 days in 2024. Slower-growing cancers like prostate cancer tend to have the longest surgical wait times, CIHI reported. Median wait times for breast cancer surgery increased from 18 days in 2019 to 23 days in 2024, and wait times for bladder cancer increased from 24 days to 28 days. National Post Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .
Vancouver Sun
6 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Opinion: Exercise improves cancer survival — and a Canadian study leads the way
Last week, history was made in the world of cancer research — not with a new drug, but with something far more accessible and powerful: exercise. A landmark study published in The New England Journal of Medicine has confirmed, for the first time in a randomized controlled trial, that a structured exercise program can significantly improve survival for people treated for early-stage colon cancer. The Challenge trial showed that a three-year structured exercise program initiated after chemotherapy reduced the risk of cancer recurrence or death by 28 per cent, and improved overall survival by 37 per cent. Compared to health education alone, this was a 7.1 per cent improvement in the likelihood of being alive at the eight-year mark. Let that sink in: Brisk walking a few times a week can improve survival as much — or more — than many modern cancer drugs, with none of the side effects and at a fraction of the cost. A daily roundup of Opinion pieces from the Sun and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Informed Opinion will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. For years, observational studies hinted that physically active cancer survivors tended to live longer and feel better. But these studies were limited by their design — confounded by the fact that healthier people might be more likely to exercise. Now, the Challenge trial provides the gold-standard evidence we've been waiting for — led by Drs. Christopher Booth and Kerry Courneya through the Canadian Cancer Trials Group, this 'first-in-class' trial enrolled 889 patients in Canada, Australia, and the UK and confirmed that supervised exercise with behaviour change support improves both disease-free and overall survival, while enhancing physical functioning and quality of life. This has profound implications for cancer care — and for our health system. First, it's time to redefine 'treatment.' Cancer care has long focused on surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. But what happens after treatment is often an afterthought. Survivors may be left with side effects, fatigue, and fear of recurrence, and limited resources to support them. The Challenge trial flips that paradigm: recovery isn't passive. Exercise is not a 'nice to have' — it is a powerful, life-prolonging intervention. Second, access to structured exercise programs are not currently a standard-of-care for cancer survivors in Canada. That must change. These programs require relatively modest investment compared to the high costs of systemic therapies — yet they deliver survival benefits on par with expensive drugs. And unlike drugs, exercise can also reduce cardiovascular risk, improve mental health, and enhance overall quality of life. Third, this is a Canadian success story. The Challenge trial was conceived, led, and executed by Canadian investigators. The Canadian Cancer Society, together with global partners, funded this 15-year effort — a testament to the power of sustained investment in publicly funded clinical research. At a time when Canada's health research ecosystem faces financial strain, the success of Challenge highlights what's possible when we back bold ideas with the resources they deserve. Finally, the findings call on all of us — policymakers, cancer agencies and clinicians — to act. We must embed exercise into survivorship care across the country and simply telling people to exercise is not enough. This will require funding to support exercise professionals in cancer centres and the community, build incentives for survivor-focused programming, and eliminate structural barriers to participation. Survivorship care is not optional — it's essential. Of course, exercise is not a cure-all. Some patients may be unable to participate due to comorbidities or limitations. But for the majority, supervised aerobic activity like walking or cycling can and should be part of the care plan. Importantly, the Challenge program was designed to be adaptable and accessible — guided by behavioural science, delivered by trained consultants, and tailored to each patient's fitness level. We should applaud the Challenge investigators, the Canadian Cancer Trials Group, and the hundreds of patients who participated in this transformative trial. Their commitment will change how we support people after cancer — not just in Canada, but around the world. Now, it's our turn to rise to the challenge. Dr. Sharlene Gill is a medical oncologist at B.C. Cancer, professor of medicine at the University of B.C., and chair of the GI Disease Site for the Canadian Cancer Trials Group.
Global News
10 hours ago
- Global News
Cost of living has half of Canadian pet owners skipping vet visits: survey
Half of Canadian pet owners are skipping visits to the veterinarian's office because of financial concerns, a new survey shows. According to a survey conducted by PetSmart Charities of Canada and Gallup, half (50 per cent) of Canadian pet parents have either skipped or declined necessary veterinary care for their pets. Financial pressure was the leading cause of people skipping the vet's office, the survey of 2,033 dog and cat owners from the 10 provinces in Canada found. Of those who said they were declining or skipping those visits, 67 per cent said they did so because it was not affordable, they did not believe the services were worth the cost or a combination of both. 0:59 Global Okanagan Adopt A Pet: Diesel The rate of pet parents skipping the vet was higher among younger Canadians (59 per cent). Story continues below advertisement Even higher-income Canadians were facing financial pressures in dealing with pet care, with 27 per cent of pet owners who make more than $90,000 a year saying they have skipped vet visits. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Of the Canadians who declined pet care, 21 per cent said their veterinarian offered them a payment plan and 66 per cent said an interest-free plan could double what they are able to spend on life-saving care for their furry friends. Another major reason for Canadians skipping pet care is that their vet is simply too far away. Just under half (46 per cent) of those who travel under 10 kilometres to the veterinarian report skipping or declining care, but that figure rises to 54 per cent for those who travel more than 10 kilometres. 2:48 Global Peterborough's Shelter Pet Project June 6 Nearly one in five (18 per cent) pet owners said they rely on non-vets when their pet is sick. This includes consulting the internet, friends or pet professionals, such as trainers and groomers. Story continues below advertisement Four in 10 pet owners said they would be open to services like telemedicine or home visits by vets. 'These data suggest that services like community clinics and telemedicine — where permitted and available — could help make care more accessible, and many pet parents would use them if they could. But awareness and regulation of these services still vary across regions, pointing to opportunities for expanded infrastructure and support,' said Julie Ray, Gallup's managing editor for world news. A recent Ipsos poll showed that inflation and cost of living was the top issue for Canadians. That issue was considered the top domestic news story in Canada by 71 per cent of Canadians, according to the polling conducted exclusively for Global News on what people considered the biggest stories of this year. 4:44 Adopt a Pet: New Hope Dog Rescue fostering dogs for wildfire evacuees Results for the PetSmart Charities of Canada-Gallup State of Pet Care study are based on a combined web- and phone-based survey conducted with 2,033 dog and cat owners from the 10 provinces in Canada. Gallup surveyed 1,804 Canadian adults who indicated they currently owned at least one dog or cat via a web-based survey Nov. 28-Dec. 31, 2024. Gallup also surveyed an additional 229 dog and cat owners via a telephone survey Dec. 5-23, 2024, to reach pet owners who may not have access to the internet. For results based on the total sample of 2,033 Canadian dog and cat owners, the margin of sampling error is ±2.3 percentage points at the 95 per cent confidence level. Margins of error for subgroups are larger.
