Top 10 weakest NATO countries
NATO is a critical alliance for collective security and collaboration, but not all member states have the same level of influence inside the organization.
Business Insider Africa presents the top 10 weakest NATO countries.
This list is courtesy of Global Firepower.
Iceland ranks number 1 on the list.
While the alliance guarantees mutual defense, many smaller or less-resourced countries have relatively little influence over strategic decisions and global security policies.
NATO was founded in 1949 with the goal of uniting Western nations in response to the Soviet Union's growing threat during the Cold War.
Though each member agrees to defend one another, the reality is that military strength, economic power, and political influence are not evenly distributed.
Major powers like the United States, Germany, and France dominate NATO's direction, often setting the agenda and providing most of the military capabilities.
Meanwhile, several smaller members, such as Montenegro, Albania, and Luxembourg, encounter difficulties in expressing their interests.
These countries make the least contributions to NATO's collective resources and frequently rely on the alliance's protection rather than influencing its strategic aims.
Their voices, while heard, are not as powerful as those of larger nations.
Despite this mismatch, NATO offers significant benefits to its weaker members, such as access to sophisticated technology, cooperative military training, and involvement in intelligence sharing.
These smaller countries also benefit from increased security assurances, which they could never afford on their own.
NATO decisions require consensus, which ostensibly allows all members to have a say. However, due to power disparities, smaller nations usually align with the positions of stronger members to maintain unity and influence.
In summary, while NATO provides critical protection and collaboration, some countries' influence is restricted by their size, military capability, and economic might.
The alliance's strength comes from its cohesiveness, but the unequal balance of influence remains a distinguishing element of its internal dynamics.
With that said, here are the 10 weakest NATO countries, according to data from Global Firepower.
Top 10 weakest NATO countries
Rank Country Power index
1. Iceland 3.5181
2. Montenegro 2.9216
3. Luxembourg 2.6415
4. North Macedonia 2.4042
5. Estonia 2.2917
6. Latvia 2.1246
7. Slovenia 2.1016
8. Lithuania 1.9075
9. Albania 1.6815
10. Croatia 1.5074
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
US sanctions money laundering network aiding Iran as regime faces nuclear reprimand at IAEA
The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctioned some 35 individuals involved in laundering money for Iran on Friday as the administration seeks to make a deal with Iran over its nuclear weapons program. A State Department spokesperson said in a statement that,"This network has laundered billions of dollars through Iranian exchange houses and foreign front companies to sustain Tehran's campaigns of terror that undermine international peace and security and line the pockets of regime elites." Meanwhile, tensions with Iran continue, with the Associated Press reporting that Western powers are considering a resolution at the IAEA that would formally declare Tehran in non-compliance with its nuclear obligations. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi called the move a "strategic mistake" and accused the U.K., France, and Germany of choosing "malign action" over diplomacy. "Mark my words as Europe ponders another major strategic mistake: Iran will react strongly against any violation of its rights," he wrote on X. Iran's Khamenei Rejects Us Zero Uranium Enrichment Demand As '100% Against' Its Interests The draft resolution, expected to be introduced next week, would mark the first time in two decades that Western nations bring such a motion against Iran at the IAEA. Read On The Fox News App As U.S. and Iranian negotiators engage in fragile talks, voices from within Iran reveal a grim paradox: while many citizens desperately seek relief from crushing economic hardship, they fear any deal may only tighten the Islamic Republic's grip on power. "Right now, people in Iran do not have any hope for anything," said a female journalist in Tehran, who spoke anonymously out of fear for her safety. "The economy is collapsing. We sometimes don't have electricity or water. The value of the rial is falling. Life is becoming unlivable." Like many Iranians, she believes an agreement could temporarily ease inflation and halt the country's economic freefall. But she—and many others—fear the unintended consequences. "If the regime reaches a deal, it could become more powerful and more confident in suppressing people. That's what frightens us the most," she said. Under Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran has faced growing unrest at home, triggered by economic pain, political repression, and widespread mistrust. As negotiations proceed, Iranian citizens are watching closely—but not with optimism. White House Urges Iran To Accept Nuclear Deal As Iaea Reports Uranium Enrichment Spike "People in Iran are caught in a dilemma," said another Tehran resident, a man who also requested anonymity. "On one hand, they want the regime to fall. On the other, the economic burden is so heavy that any deal offering relief feels like a lifeline. But the truth is, even if a deal is signed, ordinary people won't benefit. We've seen this before." He pointed to the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the Obama-era nuclear agreement that promised economic benefits but, according to many Iranians, never delivered meaningful change for the public. "Only those connected to the regime gained anything," he said. "For the rest of us, life stayed the same." While Iranian leaders claim the nuclear program is peaceful, the U.S. and allies remain concerned about uranium enrichment levels nearing weapons-grade levels. Trump has demanded a full halt to enrichment, while Khamenei insists on retaining it. "I'm a journalist, and we work under extreme censorship," said the woman in Tehran. "We're not allowed to mention U.S. or Israeli military capabilities. We can't publish anything about the talks without approval." Trump Administration Open To Allowing Iran To Continue Some Uranium Enrichment: Report She described a system where state censors dictate what reporters can and cannot say—down to the vocabulary. "It's not just the content—it's the individual words. And that makes journalism almost impossible." In the interviews with Fox News Digital, Iranians expressed deep skepticism that Khamenei would abide by any agreement. "He lies," the journalist said bluntly. "What he says publicly is never what he actually does. He manipulates both the public and foreign governments. No one should trust a dictator like him." The man echoed the sentiment. "The regime's survival depends on its hostility toward the U.S. and Israel. If it truly committed to a deal, it would undermine its own ideological foundation. That's why no one believes it can last." Recent months have seen a resurgence of protest activity in Iran, including a growing nationwide strike by truck drivers demanding fair wages and lower fuel prices. Though largely ignored by international media, these strikes follow years of widespread protests—most notably the 2022 "Woman, Life, Freedom" uprising sparked by the death of Mahsa Amini in morality police custody. That movement, along with economic demonstrations in 2019 and 2021, was met with violent crackdowns, mass arrests, and internet blackouts. The pattern has left Iranians wary that any sign of instability is met with brutal suppression. An Iranian student pointed to the truckers' strikes currently roiling parts of Iran as a sign of grassroots unrest. "These strikes are a direct message from the people," he said. "They've been largely ignored by the media, but they are powerful and legitimate. This is how change begins—if it's allowed to." The Associated Press contributed to this article source: US sanctions money laundering network aiding Iran as regime faces nuclear reprimand at IAEA
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
White House tries to water down Russia sanctions
Donald Trump is pressuring a US senator to weaken a Bill that would impose sweeping sanctions on Russia. White House officials hoping to mend relations with Moscow have been quietly contacting senator Lindsey Graham's office urging him to water down his Bill, which aims to cripple Vladimir Putin with huge sanctions. The Bill, backed by nearly the entire Senate, would impose 500 per cent tariffs on countries that continue to buy Russian oil and gas, which bankrolls Putin's war effort. Officials have been demanding the Bill include waivers that would allow Mr Trump to choose who or what was sanctioned, congressional aides told the Wall Street Journal. Other attempts to weaken the legislation include softening the language, replacing 'shall' with 'may' to avoid making the reprimands mandatory. Removing the mandatory nature of the sanctions would render the Bill effectively toothless and do little to hamper Putin's war machine, aides fear. 'We're moving ahead and the White House is included in our conversations,' Richard Blumenthal, senator and lead Democratic co-sponsor of the Bill, told the paper. Russia's war effort is funded by fossil-fuel exports. Moscow has adapted to existing sanctions with relative ease, turning to North Korea and China for support. Fearing the impact on pump prices, Joe Biden, former president, was unwilling to crack down on Russian energy exports. Mr Trump, has threatened to impose sanctions on Ukraine, as well as Russia, if the two sides fail to reach a peace agreement. 'Any sanction package must provide complete flexibility for the president to continue to pursue his desired foreign policy,' a White House official said. They added that the constitution 'vests the president with the authority to conduct diplomacy with foreign nations'. Speaking in the Oval Office alongside Friedrich Merz, German chancellor, on Thursday, the US president said that the Bill should not move forward without his express approval. 'They'll be guided by me. That's how it's supposed to be,' he told reporters. 'They're waiting for me to decide on what to do.' Last week, Mr Graham and Mr Blumenthal visited Ukraine where they applauded the country's drone attack that destroyed 40 aircraft deep inside Russian territory. However, they were ridiculed and accused of 'stirring up' the conflict by key allies of Mr Trump, including Steve Bannon. 'By trying to engage Putin – by being friendly and enticing – it's become painfully clear [Putin's] not interested in ending this war,' Mr Graham said earlier this week. '[Putin] needs to see and hear that message as well from us, from the American people,' said Mr Blumenthal. Both said that failing to act now could pull the US deeper into the conflict later. If Putin isn't stopped in Ukraine, Mr Blumenthal said, Nato treaty obligations could compel US troops into battle. Earlier this week, Russian negotiators tabled a long memorandum, resembling a complete capitulation for Ukraine, in a second round of direct talks with Kyiv in Istanbul. They demanded Ukraine must withdraw its troops from four eastern regions that Russia only partially occupies and that international recognition of Russian sovereignty over them and Crimea must be granted. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Why Pres. Trump will win his battle against elite higher education
President Trump escalated his war on Harvard, Columbia and illiberal academia this week by suspending foreign student visas at Harvard and challenging Columbia University's accreditation for consistently failing to protect Jews from hate crimes on campus. The president has already cut off Harvard's grants and contracts, while threatening the university's tax-exempt status. 8 Columbia University in New York City is at the center of Pres. Trump's attack on higher education. This past week the university was threatened with the revocation of their formalized academic accreditation. Getty Images/iStockphoto Predictably, heads exploded within the progressive elites, its lawfare commentariat, and the legacy media. They claim the president's actions are unconstitutional and retributive. Even some of the most powerful critics of the DEI, such as Heather Mac Donald, have criticized the administration's actions for overreach. 8 Pres. Trump possesses both the moral and legal authority to demand a higher-education revolution. AP But the meta story that critics miss is that Trump is fighting a major decay within the university and public education system that is producing abysmal results academically and inculcating anti-Western ideologies that could do our civilization lasting harm. 8 Author Coleman Hughes has question the necessity of race-based preference programs such as DEI. Public trust in universities is declining rapidly, and the continuing acts of racial discrimination across campuses, on which much of Trump's critique rests, stand on thin ice with the US Supreme Court. While the courts may chip away at Trump's offensive, the president has multiple funding spigots over which he has near plenary discretion. Harvard, Columbia and others have few pressure points other than the courts which have already, in the case of Harvard, slapped down some of its discriminatory programs. Accordingly, they should, and likely will, soon come to the table. China's Chairman Mao ushered in the brutal 'cultural revolution' in the 1960s by first capturing the epicenter of culture: universities. His Red Guard tortured and killed dissident professors, students and others who challenged his orthodoxies. A softer form of Maoism soon found a warm bath for academics in the West. 8 Harvard has seen billions of federal funding stripped by Trump. AFP via Getty Images Along with Frantz Fanon and Edward Said, Herbert Marcuse was the lion on the anti-Western academic left in the 1960s. 'Liberating tolerance,' he argued, 'would mean intolerance against movements from the right and toleration of movements from the left.' Marcuse's ideas presaged a new era of progressive illiberalism on campuses. Harvard has created an 'oppressively intolerant monocultural intellectual microclimate,' says writer Gerald Baker. Students and professors and professors regularly report an environment that punishes contrarianism. Only 3% of faculty identify as conservative. 'When your liberal ideas on campus are not challenged, your education is mediocre,' says noted Harvard professor Arthur Brooks. 8 During the Cultural Revolution of the 1960s, Chairman Mao began his assault in intellectualism by first targeting universities. AP For years, Harvard had discriminated against some of the most talented Americans on the basis of skin color in service of what writer Coleman Hughes calls a neo-racist DEI theology that patronizes favored racial groups with substantially lower admissions standards under the perverse idea that they can't hack a level playing field. Many believe the University is still defying the Supreme Court's rebuke of these practices, in both admissions and hiring. Universities across the country have also bathed the climate of hate. 'Harvard is an Islamist outpost,' says one of its more esteemed professors, Ruth Wisse. The university's own report on antisemitism concedes that the school turned a blind eye to threats and acts of violence against its own Jewish students — acts that it would never tolerate against blacks or other minorities. At least $60 billion in foreign funds have flowed to American universities in recent decades, including from adversaries like China and Qatar. All the while, academic standards seem to have plummeted. 8 Heather Mac Donald is one of many notable thinkers who've made the case for closing the education achievement gap as the primary objective of academic researchers. 'The Elite College Students Who Can't Read Books,' thundered an Atlantic magazine headline. And we were all gob smacked by reports that Harvard would teach remedial math. The ideologizing is also rampant K-12 public schools. Two-thirds of public school students lack reading and math proficiency. In the name of 'social justice,' teachers unions and an ever-bloated public school administrative bureaucracy try to eliminate excellence programs like AP courses and magnet schools. In their place, they seek to impose 'grading for equity' curricula that dumbs down testing, homework and other performance measures. 8 The University of Chicago has opted to not take positions on political issues. Getty Images Instead of illiberal leftism, universities should follow the University of Chicago model and refrain from taking institutional positions on politics. Together with banning menacing encampments, this would help stop the adolescent, narcissistic, performative protests that are embarrassingly uninformed on basic historical facts. In turn, that could actually encourage informed debate. Universities should also draw a clear line against any kind of discrimination in hiring and admissions consistent with the Supreme Court's affirmative action ruling. Instead, they could work with K-12 public schools to refocus on remedying the yawning racial achievement gap in primary and secondary education, as Professor John McWhorter and Heather Mac Donald have persuasively argued. 8 One of the many pro-Palestinian protests that have rocked American campuses — and become the ire of Pres. Trump. AFP via Getty Images And following Arthur Brooks' admonition, they should seek greater ideological balance with faculty conservatives, not because the government demands it but because critical thinking does. Merit must be education's north star. So far, it's worked out for us pretty well. I would like to see the education industry return to fundamentals and depart from the Marcusian ideological poison without the heavy hand of government. And if the elite universities and public schools want to stop the destructive path toward anti-Western self-immolation it should take these steps on its own without the heavy prod of the federal government.
