Upcoming election most important in 'decades' for struggling workers, labour campaign says
"Rent? Utilities? Gas? Not on this paycheque," read a sign at a Canadian Labour Congress press conference Monday, launching the organization's new platform advocating for the working class.
Slogans like that one illustrate what president Bea Bruske calls an "economic crisis," and the the Labour Congress wants federal election candidates to take note.
"All elections are important, we know this," Bruske said in a speech Monday morning at the Delta Hotel in St. John's. "But this one, I think, is the most significant we've had in many decades.
"This election comes at a pivotal time for Canadian workers, and the choices that we make at the ballot box this year is going to decide the fate of our economy," Bruske continued.
Bruske said Canadian unions want the next prime minister to have a plan to support workers, and the Labour Congress has a specific wish list:
A "worker-first" response to tariff threats.
Tackling cost of living.
Strengthening public health care.
Addressing the housing crisis by building one million affordable homes.
Supporting workers and their families.
Workers' issues at the fore
As tariff threats continue to haunt the Canadian economy, workers are taking the hit, according to Bruske.
"You need workers to keep our economy growing and strong. However, [the candidates] all have different policies in terms of how they would implement various different changes, and not all of them actually benefit workers," Bruske told reporters.
Some of the changes Bruske said workers would like to see include using money from counter-tariffs to offset the impact on workers in affected industries, and making sure Canadians can put food on the table and pay the rent by creating sustainable jobs.
Craig Dyer, president of the Canadian Union of Postal Workers in St. John's, witnessed firsthand the struggle. In November, over 50,000 Canada Post workers walked off the job in a strike, but were ordered back to work in December.
"We are at a pinnacle as we speak right now, locally, regionally, and nationally and globally," Dyer said in a speech. "We need strong leadership in Ottawa that are going to make decisions to help the working class, the unionized workers, that will benefit everybody."
Dyer said now is the time for voters to challenge candidates on the issues that most affect workers' rights.
Newfoundland and Labrador Federation of Labour president Jessica McCormick said about 20,000 jobs in Newfoundland and Labrador may be affected by Trump's tariffs. With that in mind, she said federal candidates are very aware of growing concerns.
"Workers' issues are really at the forefront of the party agenda," McCormick said at the event. "I'm really looking at what are the track records of those parties when it comes to the key issues."
While Liberal Leader Mark Carney and Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre make promises to cut income taxes for the average worker, McCormick said she is more interested in plans for affordable housing and reducing cost of living.
"When I talk to our members … it's about trying to make end meet," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Calgary Herald
an hour ago
- Calgary Herald
Opinion: How Mark Carney is offering CEOs a chance to rebuild trust with Canadians
After last month's throne speech, Bloc Québécois leader Yves-François Blanchet lamented that he feels Prime Minister Mark Carney 'sees himself culturally as the CEO of Canada.' With his background in corporate finance, it's no surprise Carney has been likened to a stereotypical finance boss. Article content But is bringing CEO-type leadership to the federal government a bad thing, particularly at such a precarious moment for our country economically? Article content Article content Article content Canada has been starved of this style of leadership. But this goes beyond a culture change in Ottawa. Carney is also opening the door for CEOs to take on critical leadership roles in the execution of his agenda. With his aggressive economic development platform and the charge to 'build, baby, build,' our prime minister has turned on the CEO bat signal. Article content Article content Not since the depths of the pandemic has business had such an extraordinary opportunity to contribute to the greater good, and for CEOs to offer leadership that offers impact well beyond their workforce. Article content However, the unfortunate reality is that Canadians don't trust their business leaders. The latest Edelman Canada Trust Barometer results, released in March, revealed that only 37 per cent of Canadians trust business leaders — 16 points lower than the average of the 28 countries the firm studies, ranking them near the bottom of that list. Article content Article content How have our business leaders run so afoul of Canadians? Rationalizing food inflation in front of a parliamentary committee doesn't help, nor does the massive gap between CEO compensation and that of the average worker. It also doesn't help that two-thirds of Canadians feel business leaders are actively trying to mislead them, according to the recent Edelman study. Article content This crisis of trust is made worse by the fact that most Canadians feel the system is failing them — that no matter how hard they work, the next generation will not be better off. Business leaders have become a lightning rod for that grievance. Article content It is in this context that CEOs are trying to make sense of the role they should play in a country that needs more from them. And they should play a role. While there have been some well-documented missteps that have led to this extraordinary level of distrust, for years the data has pointed to a growing expectation that they step up and step into the current void.
Calgary Herald
an hour ago
- Calgary Herald
Opinion: India relations are complicated; but remembering the dead is not
Article content As we approach the 40th anniversary of Canada's worst mass-casualty event — an act of domestic terrorism — families of the victims must contend not only with their loss but also the pain of abandonment by this country. As illustrated by the Angus Reid Institute two years ago, nine out of 10 Canadians know little or nothing of the bombing of Air India Flight 182 on June 23, 1985, that killed all 329 people aboard, including 280 Canadians. Article content Article content This action was conceived and executed from within our borders by individuals bent on maintaining a cycle of revenge. As has been covered for decades by Postmedia's Kim Bolan and Terry Glavin, and CBC's Terry Milewski, it began with extremists in India waging war on innocents. This seemed reason enough for Canadian disinterest to set in; in the eyes of authorities, those who died when Flight 182 exploded off the coast of Ireland were not our own. Article content Article content Writing for the Ottawa Citizen in 2023, Shachi Kurl describes this event as 'a near blank page: a calamity that has morphed from open wound to an unhealed scar, and risks fading from our collective memories entirely.' Inconceivably, that blank page is increasingly filled not by the truth, but by what can only be charitably described as fantasy. Article content Some members of Canada's Indian community — those who wish to carve out a theocratic homeland, Khalistan, from India — continue to perpetuate a baseless argument that the Indian government was responsible for the bombing. That theory was given consideration and duly dismissed, during the meticulous public inquiry led by retired Supreme Court Justice John Major. Article content Article content Major was clear in his conclusions, among them that the bombing could have been prevented. The Government of India had fulsomely shared its intelligence; it warned Canada to be wary of bombs in luggage and even identified the doomed flight. But Canadian officials of the day dismissed India's warnings, instead chalking it up to India wanting free security for its planes. Article content There was an unmistakable whiff of condescension in those Canadian attitudes, an unwillingness to see India as a partner in global relations. That attitude seems only to have deepened; many contemporary Canadian politicians prefer to support Canadians who continue to agitate for Khalistan in defiance of the wishes of Indians living in India. Article content Yet, when U.S. President Donald Trump expressed his views that Canada should become the 51st American state, Canadians made their feelings quite clear. We are a sovereign nation, our borders are inviolate and our affairs are not to be interfered with by outsiders.
Calgary Herald
an hour ago
- Calgary Herald
Opinion: Is a land swap a win-win solution to the Canada-U.S. crisis?
Article content Although I'm an American, I agree with Canadians that U.S. President Donald Trump's '51st state' pronouncements are idiotic and counterproductive. But, give the devil his due: Trump often spurs people to reconsider previous assumptions that, on examination, don't always make sense. Article content As the expression goes, he makes us think outside the box. Case in point: the Canada-U.S. border. Article content Article content Article content Forget the 51st state nonsense, but consider instead a strategic land swap between the two countries. If done properly, it would be a win-win solution for both countries. We know from history that national borders are often subject to change. Sometimes those changes are imposed by one country on another, but sometimes they're done voluntarily and in a mutually-beneficial way. Article content Article content In the early 19th century, the U.S. grew enormously in one fell swoop when Napoleon offered to sell president Thomas Jefferson all of France's Louisiana Territory (which extended from New Orleans to the Pacific Ocean), to finance his European wars. Many thought Jefferson insane to spend big money on 'useless' land (as many also did years later when the U.S. purchased Alaska from Russia), but the deal was done and both countries were satisfied with it. Article content Article content For years now, there's been a progressive movement in the U.S. Pacific Northwest to secede from the U.S. and form an independent country called Cascadia, a movement that has gained steam during Trump's presidencies. The people behind the Cascadia plan have usually seen their future territory as encompassing what is now Washington, Oregon and Northern California, but a Trump-hating southern California may be delighted to jump on the bandwagon. Article content What would the U.S. get in return? Two things: the entire northern tier of Canada from the Yukon to Baffin Island, a mostly empty but mineral-rich area that meshes perfectly with Trump's Arctic ambitions; and also Alberta, which for years has felt ignored and even belittled by the politicians in Ottawa, the cultural elites in Toronto and by the incessant and unreasonable demands of the Quebecois.
