British, German and French foreign ministers plan meeting with Iranian counterpart
The foreign ministers of the UK, France and Germany are planning to meet the Iranian foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, in what could represent a potential diplomatic breakthrough after five days of Israeli bombing.
The meeting is due to take place in Geneva on Friday but final confirmation from Tehran is still pending; if confirmed it would represent the first face-to-face diplomatic meeting since Benjamin Netanyahu launched Israel's attack on Iran's military and nuclear sites.
Araghchi spoke to the three European foreign ministers by phone earlier this week, but has so far refused to meet with Donald Trump's special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, arguing that Israeli attacks across Iran were approved by the US. Araghchi has said it is impossible to meet Witkoff whilst the Iranians are under assault from Israel.
Before the planned Geneva meeting, the British foreign secretary, David Lammy, will meet the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, in Washington for discussions focused 'on addressing the current situation in the Middle East'.
The meeting would also be attended by the head of EU foreign affairs, Kaja Kallas.
The substance of Friday's talks – which would be coordinated with the US – will focus on how Iran is willing to reduce or close its nuclear program.
In a social media post late on Wednesday, Aragchi said that Iran was acting in self-defence, adding: 'Iran has proven in action what it has always publicly committed itself to: we have never sought and will never seek nuclear weapons.'
He wrote that – with the exception of talks with Israel – Iran 'remain[s] committed to diplomacy. As before, we are serious and forward-looking in our outlook'.
Trump has made diplomacy much harder with a series of social media postings demanding Iran's unconditional surrender and urging the evacuation of Tehran, a city of some ten million people.
The French, British and Germans, by contrast, have called for space to be given to diplomacy and de-escalation. None of the three countries have advocated externally imposed change in Iran or directly supported Israel's attacks, saying instead Israel has a right to defend itself in line with international law.
The German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, has said changes of regime can occur and Israel is doing others' dirty work.
Sign up to Headlines UK
Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
The three countries are signatories to the Iran nuclear deal signed in 2015 that gave permission for Iran to enrich uranium to low levels of purity, subject to external monitoring.
Trump pulled his country out of the deal in 2018; a year later Iran announced its partial withdrawal from the agreement.
None of the three countries have said anything in public to withdraw from that stance. The US has demanded the complete elimination of Iranian domestic enrichment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
38 minutes ago
- Reuters
Australia, New Zealand evacuate small number of citizens, diplomats from Israel, Iran
SYDNEY, June 19 (Reuters) - Australia has evacuated a small number of citizens from Israel, and New Zealand embassy staff have left Iran, but the two governments warned that closed airspace limited how they can assist thousands of citizens requesting help to leave the conflict zone. Around 1,500 Australians in Iran have registered for assistance, with another 1,200 Australians in Israel seeking to leave, Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong said on Thursday. The Australian government evacuated a small group from Israel through a land border crossing on Wednesday, and would look for more opportunities over the next day, Wong told reporters. "There are real limits, hard limits, on what the government can do. The airspace remains closed," she said. Australians in Iran were advised to leave if it was safe to, or shelter in place. "We've been hoping to get the capacity for aircraft to get in and out, but at this stage airports and the airspace are still closed. In Israel we have additional options, whereas in Iran it is very difficult," she told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation in a radio interview. New Zealand's Foreign Minister Winston Peters said New Zealand was doing all it could to help its citizens in the face of "very serious practical constraints", and was providing advice on overland border exits. New Zealand has temporarily closed its Tehran embassy and evacuated two staff and their family by land to Azerbaijan, he said. "An opportunity arose overnight to get our embassy staff out of Iran, as part of a convoy alongside government officials from other countries," he said. New Zealand's consular partners are considering evacuation flights when air space reopens and the government is working closely with Australia, he added.
Sky News
44 minutes ago
- Sky News
Israel's block on international journalists in Gaza should not be allowed to stand
On Sky News this week we're showing a film about Israel's war in Gaza which has now been going on for more than 620 days. It is a chastening watch. Swathes of Gaza's medical infrastructure have been razed, many of the territory's buildings have been destroyed, and tens of thousands of Gazans have been killed, maimed and left hungry and malnourished in a war fought mainly from the air with heavy ordinance dropped on crowded civilian areas. These extraordinary eyewitness accounts are not brought to our screens by experienced international war correspondents - they are barred from entering Gaza - but by two British medics whose mission was to save lives not to report on the horrors of war. That visiting surgeons Victoria Rose and Tom Potokar felt compelled to do just that, speaks not only to the tragedy unfolding in Gaza, but to the swingeing restrictions imposed on reporting what is happening there. In the history of modern warfare, the presence of journalists on the battlefield has been essential in holding the combatants to account and ensuring that war crimes and atrocities are uncovered and prevented. And Israel stands accused of egregious crimes in Gaza. Since it launched its war there in response to the Hamas terror attacks of October 7th 2023, in which around 1,200 Israelis and other nationals were murdered and a further 250 taken hostage, more than 55,000 Palestinians have been killed according to the Gazan health authorities. Many of the dead have been women and children. Earlier this month, former US State Department official Matt Miller told the Sky News Trump100 podcast that Israel had committed war crimes in Gaza. Ex-UN humanitarian chief Martin Griffiths went further, telling Sky News presenter Yalda Hakim that Israel is responsible for genocide there. It's an accusation supported by Ireland, Spain, and South Africa which is pursuing Israel for genocide at the International Court of Justice - the UN's highest court. Israel rejects the case against it, claiming that many of the dead are Hamas fighters who have been hiding in tunnels under the hospitals that it has the right to attack in self-defence. Israeli officials and diplomats deny that its military targets women and children and react with outrage to the suggestion that it is responsible for ethnic cleansing or genocide - accusations of crimes against humanity that are taken as particularly loaded given the dark resonance they have for the Jewish people. But Israel's confidence in the integrity of its wartime conduct is not matched by a willingness to allow international journalists into Gaza to witness what is going on there for themselves. Military-organised 'embeds' fall well short of independent journalism For the course of its longest war, no reporters have been permitted entry to Gaza other than on organised and controlled 'embeds' of a few hours alongside Israeli soldiers. These managed opportunities fall well short of independent journalism, for which Sky News and other global news organisations must rely on trusted and heroic local reporting teams who lack the support and infrastructure to provide a complete picture of what is going on. And these Palestinian journalists have paid a heavy price for their work; according to the Committee to Protect Journalists, 185 of them have been killed during the war and 86 imprisoned. The Foreign Press Association, which represents the interests of international journalists operating in Israel, has been petitioning its High Court of Justice to lift the ban on reporting independently from Gaza. So far, that legal action has been unsuccessful and last month the court again postponed a hearing in the case without reason or setting a new date. Israeli officials push back on the need and suitability of allowing journalists to operate independently in Gaza. They say that their military's priority is the rescue of the remaining hostages and the fight against Hamas and that the safety of reporters could not be ensured. But journalists from Sky News and fellow news organisations have operated in Gaza in previous conflicts, providing details of their location and movements to the Israel Defence Forces. 'We accept the risks' Moreover, we have decades of experience of covering conflict zones and our reporters are highly trained at doing so. The risks are real, for sure. But they're risks that we accept. It's what we do. The ongoing denial of access to Gaza feels much less about the safety of journalists and more about preventing proper scrutiny and accountability of the desperate situation there. The barring of international journalists is accompanied by the active delegitimisation of what reporting on the war has been possible which is often shamefully labelled as anti-Semitic and compared to the darkest periods in Jewish history. All together this constitutes a war on truth that is at odds with Israel's proud and oft-repeated claim to be the Middle East's only democracy and it should not be allowed to stand.
Reuters
44 minutes ago
- Reuters
Shell is being 'very careful' with shipping in the Middle East, CEO says
TOKYO, June 19 (Reuters) - Shell (SHEL.L), opens new tab CEO Wael Sawan said on Thursday the oil and gas major was being "very careful" with its shipping through the Middle East given the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran. The Iran-Israel air war entered a seventh day on Thursday with President Donald Trump keeping the world guessing on whether the United States will join the fighting. "The escalation in tensions over the last few days, in essence, has added to what has already been significant uncertainty in the region," he told an industry conference in Tokyo. "We're being very careful with, for example, our shipping in the region, just to make sure that we do not take any unnecessary risks." About 20% of the world's oil and fuel flows through the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial waterway in the Middle East, and Sawan said what was particularly challenging was electronic interference disrupting commercial ship navigation systems. "The Strait of Hormuz is, at the end of the day, the artery through which the world's energy flows, and if that artery is blocked, for whatever reason, it'll have a huge impact on global trade," he said. Sawan said the rise in oil and gas prices in recent days has been "moderate" as investors wait to see whether physical infrastructure might be damaged. Oil prices have risen to their highest levels in more than two months this week. Shell is closely monitoring the possibility of U.S. military action and has plans in place should things deteriorate, he said.
