logo
Is Swiping Fatigue Real? How Dating Apps Are Reshaping Mental Health

Is Swiping Fatigue Real? How Dating Apps Are Reshaping Mental Health

Forbes29-04-2025

A mobile phone with the Hinge dating app logo on its screen, in Athens, Greece, on 31 January 2024. ... More Photo by Nikos Pekiaridis/NurPhoto via Getty Images.
Recent studies show what many daters already feel: swiping through endless profiles can sap your mental health. Despite promising smarter, faster connections, dating apps are fueling rising levels of stress, self-doubt and emotional fatigue. While the technology keeps evolving, the human brain hasn't—leaving many users caught in a loop of micro-rejections, dopamine highs and quiet burnout.
The dating app industry is projected to surpass $13 billion by the end of 2025, fueled by innovations such as AI matchmaking, video-first profiles and "relationship prediction" algorithms. Despite this technological sophistication, users report rising levels of dissatisfaction, loneliness, and emotional fatigue.
A study published in Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking found that excessive dating app use is positively correlated with higher anxiety, depressive symptoms and decreased self-esteem. Even as user interfaces become more "intuitive," the emotional toll might grow heavier.
Behavioral science has long warned about the "paradox of choice": the more options we have, the less satisfied we often feel. Dating apps amplify this dynamic, offering an endless scroll of possibilities that, instead of empowering users, usually leave them overwhelmed, disillusioned and emotionally exhausted.
Decision fatigue sets in quickly when every swipe demands judgment and evaluation. Profiles blur together, genuine connections feel harder to spot, and the pursuit of "the next best thing" quietly chips away at attention spans and self-worth.
Compounding the problem is intermittent reinforcement, a psychological principle dating apps borrow from casino design. Occasional "wins" (think matches, messages, fleeting attention) can trigger dopamine spikes, encouraging users to stay engaged even when the experience feels increasingly hollow. In other words, the brain learns to chase the high, not the connection. In the end, more choice doesn't necessarily mean more love. Often, it simply means more second-guessing, more emotional wear and tear and less fulfillment.
Each swipe on a dating app isn't just a casual gesture. It activates the brain's reward system, triggering a rush of dopamine, the chemical associated with pleasure and motivation. Over time, this loop of expectation and intermittent reward can create addictive behavioral patterns similar to those seen in gambling.
But it's not just the dopamine rush that reshapes the brain. When matches don't materialize or conversations abruptly end (through ghosting, breadcrumbing or soft rejections), the brain's stress pathways light up. Cortisol, the primary stress hormone, spikes, leading to heightened anxiety, emotional dysregulation and, in chronic cases, burnout.
As Dr. Helen Fisher, a biological anthropologist and chief science advisor for Match.com, explains in her book, Anatomy of Love: A Natural History of Mating, Marriage, and Why We Stray, the human brain evolved for deep, gradual bonding, not the fast-paced, transactional nature of some app-based interactions.
Our neural wiring is still tuned for slow-cooked trust and attachment, not the dizzying buffet of micro-connections and rapid rejections that define today's digital dating culture. Dating apps might be leveraging neurobiology in ways our evolutionary systems aren't built to withstand, with real consequences for emotional resilience and psychological well-being.
The mental health consequences of dating app usage extend far beyond a few bad dates or bruised egos. Emerging research paints a fuller, more concerning picture; here's how:
While dating apps offer the illusion of limitless connection, the emotional reality for many users is far more complicated: increased isolation, lowered self-worth and a gradual erosion of authentic relational confidence.
Despite the challenges, dating apps don't have to be a mental health minefield. With more intentional design and more intentional usage, they can still serve as meaningful, telling tools for connection.
Some emerging platforms are already trying to shift the dynamic. Apps like Snack and Tame are moving away from the high-speed, high-volume model, introducing features like daily swipe limits, deeper profile prompts and compatibility-focused matching algorithms. These slow-dating features prioritize emotional resonance over instant gratification.
However, ethical app design is only part of the solution. Experts emphasize that users must also reclaim agency over how they engage with digital dating.
Practical strategies include:
The healthiest way to date today may not be to swipe faster or smarter but to swipe more mindfully, recognizing that real emotional health can't be outsourced to an algorithm.
Let's be clear: dating apps aren't inherently harmful, but they are powerful. And like any influential tool, they require thoughtful use, self-awareness and responsible design. When driven by algorithms optimized for attention, not well-being, these platforms can leave users more anxious, more isolated and less fulfilled than they were before they logged in.
But the solution isn't to delete every app or reject modern dating altogether. It's to engage more consciously and approach digital romance with the same care we bring to our mental health, our boundaries and our self-worth.
If the world moves faster than our nervous systems can process, the real challenge isn't finding love more efficiently. It's reconnecting with ourselves in the process. It's choosing depth over endless scrolls, intention over impulse and authenticity over algorithm.
Because the most meaningful matches won't come from swiping endlessly; they'll come from showing up as your whole self, grounded and well, whether online or off.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk's Allegation Against Trump Is Deleted From Social Media
Musk's Allegation Against Trump Is Deleted From Social Media

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Musk's Allegation Against Trump Is Deleted From Social Media

President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference with Elon Musk in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C, on May 30, 2025. Credit - Allison Robbert—Getty Images Amid President Donald Trump and Elon Musk's bitter online war of words, key posts have been deleted from social media. The most divisive post from Musk alleged that Trump is listed in the files related to the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, and that this is why they have not been fully released to the public. Musk made the allegation on Thursday, in a post shared on his social media platform, X (formerly Twitter). But as of early Saturday morning, Musk's Epstein-related post was no longer showing, with X users instead receiving a notice that reads: "Sorry, that post has been deleted." And it's not the only post of Musk's that has been deleted. Another inflammatory post from Thursday, which saw Musk respond 'yes,' endorsing a message that said 'Trump should be impeached' and that Vance 'should replace him,' is also no longer viewable on X. The deleted posts suggest that the explosive feud between Trump and his one-time ally could be thawing. Read More: Where Things Stand With the Epstein Files Following Musk's Allegation Against Trump Musk's original posts came as Trump also lobbed insults and threatened to take away government funding and contracts related to billionaire Musk's Space X company. Although things appear, for now, to be simmering down, Trump has made it clear he does not have plans to reconcile with Musk. When asked on Friday night by reporters if he intends to speak with Musk—who until recently lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—the President gave a clear response. 'No I don't have plans… I'm not even thinking about it,' Trump said on Air Force One. 'I'm not really interested in that, I'm really interested in the country, and solving problems.' However, when asked if he plans to take back the symbolic White House key that he gifted to Musk, Trump said that he has no intention of doing that."I don't take things back, I gave him a key, he tried very hard,' the President told reporters, praising the efforts of DOGE. Read More: J.D. Vance Speaks Out After He's Dragged Into Explosive Row Between Trump and Musk Trump also appeared to defend Musk against the New York Times' reported allegations that the Tesla CEO regularly consumed ketamine, ecstasy, and psychedelic mushrooms when traveling with Trump on the campaign trail in 2024. 'I don't want to comment on his drug use. I don't know what his status is,' Trump said, when asked by reporters if he had concerns. 'I read an article in the New York Times. I thought it was, frankly, it sounded very unfair to me.' Trump's Air Force One remarks, issued late on Friday, came hours after he told ABC News that Musk had 'lost his mind.' Contact us at letters@

Trump will ban X for ‘national security' reasons if nasty feud with Elon Musk escalates: AI guru
Trump will ban X for ‘national security' reasons if nasty feud with Elon Musk escalates: AI guru

New York Post

time4 hours ago

  • New York Post

Trump will ban X for ‘national security' reasons if nasty feud with Elon Musk escalates: AI guru

An influential techie predicts President Trump will ban Elon Musk's X if the feud between the two titans escalates. The bromance came to an abrupt end this week in a very public and ugly way, as both men traded insults on their respective platforms. Now former a former Disney child star turned AI guru says the hostility could lead to a government ban of the social-media platform under national-security pretexts. Advertisement 5 Big, beautiful break-up: the bromance came to an abrupt and ugly end this week. Getty Images 'The President possesses executive authority to declare X a national security risk, which would permit him to ban the platform outright,' said Devan Leos, co-founder of Undetectable AI, a tool embraced by 15 million users which claims to make AI-generated text sound more human. 'Elon's a very smart person – yet he's prone to kind of having these mood swings and going on these campaigns and tirades. I think there's only so much Elon can do before Trump is ultimately going to invoke a show of force,' Leos told The Post. Advertisement 'An executive order is definitely something Trump could do to say, 'hey, I'm the one who's in control, I'm president, I am the commander in chief.'' 5 Former Disney actor Devan Leos co-founded Undetectable AI in 2023. Devan Leos/ Instagram Things spiraled quickly this week, after Musk called Trump's big, beautiful bill a 'pork-filled…abomination,' which led the president to accuse the tech billionaire of having 'lost his mind' and falling victim to 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' 'Musk now faces a difficult choice. He can ban Trump from X in retaliation, but that would almost certainly trigger an executive response from the White House,' Leos predicted. Advertisement Leos believes Trump could invoke Musk's security clearance – or even the South African-born billionaire's recent claim that Trump is part of the Epstein files – as justification that the Tesla CEO's X rants could pose a national security threat. 5 Before he turned to AI, Leos was most famous for staring in the Disney series 'Mighty Med.' Penske Media via Getty Images 'If there's anything related to that that could be the true, or if he is referencing something that is classified or privileged information, that could be considered a national security threat,' he said. Leos believes the legal framework for a ban already exists, and that Trump would likely invoke the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Advertisement 5 The men traded insults on their respective social media platforms. 5 Things got ugly real quick after Musk's last day in government as part of DOGE a week ago. realDonaldTrump/TruthSocial He also thinks the spat will lead to discussions about regulating social media platforms and their influence on politics. Trump said Friday he has zero interest in speaking to Elon Musk amid their escalating feud.

Google's AI is ‘hallucinating,' spreading dangerous info — including a suggestion to add glue to pizza sauce
Google's AI is ‘hallucinating,' spreading dangerous info — including a suggestion to add glue to pizza sauce

New York Post

time18 hours ago

  • New York Post

Google's AI is ‘hallucinating,' spreading dangerous info — including a suggestion to add glue to pizza sauce

Google's AI Overviews, designed to give quick answers to search queries, reportedly spits out 'hallucinations' of bogus information and undercuts publishers by pulling users away from traditional links. The Big Tech giant — which landed in hot water last year after releasing a 'woke' AI tool that generated images of female Popes and black Vikings — has drawn criticism for providing false and sometimes dangerous advice in its summaries, according to The Times of London. 3 Google's latest artificial intelligence tool which is designed to give quick answers to search queries is facing criticism. Google CEO Sundar Pichai is pictured. AFP via Getty Images In one case, AI Overviews advised adding glue to pizza sauce to help cheese stick better, the outlet reported. In another, it described a fake phrase — 'You can't lick a badger twice' — as a legitimate idiom. The hallucinations, as computer scientists call them, are compounded by the AI tool diminishing the visibility of reputable sources. Instead of directing users straight to websites, it summarizes information from search results and presents its own AI-generated answer along with a few links. Laurence O'Toole, founder of the analytics firm Authoritas, studied the impact of the tool and found that click-through rates to publisher websites drop by 40%–60% when AI Overviews are shown. 'While these were generally for queries that people don't commonly do, it highlighted some specific areas that we needed to improve,' Liz Reid, Google's head of Search, told The Times in response to the glue-on-pizza incident. 3 Google AI Mode is an experimental mode utilizing artificial intelligence and large language models to process Google search queries. Gado via Getty Images The Post has sought comment from Google. AI Overviews was introduced last summer and powered by Google's Gemini language model, a system similar to OpenAI's ChatGPT. Despite public concerns, Google CEO Sundar Pichai has defended the tool in an interview with The Verge, stating that it helps users discover a broader range of information sources. 'Over the last year, it's clear to us that the breadth of area we are sending people to is increasing … we are definitely sending traffic to a wider range of sources and publishers,' he said. Google appears to downplay its own hallucination rate. When a journalist searched Google for information on how often its AI gets things wrong, the AI response claimed hallucination rates between 0.7% and 1.3%. 3 Google's AI Overviews, was introduced last summer and is powered by the Gemini language model, a system similar to ChatGPT. AP However, data from the AI monitoring platform Hugging Face indicated that the actual rate for the latest Gemini model is 1.8%. Google's AI models also seem to offer pre-programmed defenses of their own behavior. In response to whether AI 'steals' artwork, the tool said it 'doesn't steal art in the traditional sense.' When asked if people should be scared of AI, the tool walked through some common concerns before concluding that 'fear might be overblown.' Some experts worry that as generative AI systems become more complex, they're also becoming more prone to mistakes — and even their creators can't fully explain why. The concerns over hallucinations go beyond Google. OpenAI recently admitted that its newest models, known as o3 and o4-mini, hallucinate even more frequently than earlier versions. Internal testing showed o3 made up information in 33% of cases, while o4-mini did so 48% of the time, particularly when answering questions about real people.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store