Hundreds crowd Deerfield school board meeting over transgender student dispute
Deerfield Public Schools District 109's board meeting Thursday, which had been moved to the Caruso Middle School auditorium to accommodate the expected large crowd, was quickly filled with hundreds of people.
That followed the announcement earlier this week by American First Legal, a conservative nonprofit, that it had filed a complaint with the criminal section of the U.S. Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division urging it to investigate District 109 and its administrators over an alleged incident of female students at Shepard Middle School being forced by staffers to change in front of a transgender girl, an allegation the district has denied.
All 200 seats were filled, and the crowd also lined the back wall and out the front door. Rainbow and trans flags could be seen sprinkled throughout the crowd, along with a dozen or so Moms for Liberty shirts.
Despite it not being an item on the agenda, the controversy was the subject of more than two hours of public comments from residents and nonresidents of the district. There was far more support voiced at the meeting for the school board and the unidentified transgender student than for those on the other side of the controversy. After pro-trans speakers finished talking, cheers could be heard from outside on a slight delay as attendees watched via a livestream.
Several speakers read statements they said had been written by parents who were afraid to speak publicly, such as those with transgender or gender nonconforming children. Parents questioned the authenticity of the allegations, while others criticized what they characterized as bullying against the trans community.
One of the speakers was 14-year-old transgender student Lilu Weisberger, a classmate of the student at the center of the complaint. He said he chose to attend after learning that Moms for Liberty would be in attendance.
'I am here tonight to speak for my friend,' Weisberger said. 'I am here tonight to defend dignity for all students and I appear to, unfortunately, have to entertain the idea that my community and my identity is not welcome in our school.'
He emphasized empathy as his friend is at the center of 'national scrutiny,' and being used as 'an excuse to push a political agenda.' The controversy drew national attention after Nicole Georgas, a mother of one of the students allegedly forced to change in front of a transgender student, went on Fox News with her allegations and criticized the district.
There were also some firebrand anti-trans speakers, such as Wheaton College student Hannah Lape, a member of the Christian conservative group Young Women for America, who railed against what she described as 'sexual abuse' and the 'adult fantasy' of 'transgenderism.'
In a statement signed by Superintendent of Schools Mike Simeck and school board President Sari Montgomery, the district said it 'strongly' disputed the 'patently false allegations' of students being forced to change in front of administrators or others. It also again insisted the district's policies and procedures were in full compliance with current local, state and federal laws.
'We recognize the intense reaction by advocates from both within and outside our community, and we are committed to communicating factually and transparently,' the statement said.
Federal Title IX and the Illinois Human Rights Act prohibit all public school districts from discriminating on the basis of sex, including gender identity, the statement said, and current laws mandate that students must be permitted access to the locker room and bathroom that aligns with their gender identity.
'We are following the law,' the district said.
The statement said the district was 'sensitive to the privacy needs' of all students. When their two middle schools were renovated in 2017, five private changing rooms were added in each locker room and made available to all students to, 'ensure that no student is required to change into a gym uniform for physical education class in front of others.'
'All students also have multiple options to change in a private location separate from the locker room if they wish,' the statement said.
According to the statement, this week the district responded to a data request from federal officials for information regarding the district's policies, procedures and practices related to student locker room and restroom use.
The district administration and the board 'stand united with our building leaders and educators in a shared commitment to upholding all applicable local, state, and federal laws,' the statement said. 'We will vigorously support administrators and staff every step of the way.'
The district is pursuing 'all avenues to defend against the egregious and false claims being alleged,' and condemned the, 'unjustified threats that have been directed at school administrators since the false allegations first surfaced in February. No one should be targeted on social media or elsewhere for obeying the law.'
'The District is committed to serving all of its students and continues to do so with the utmost care and professionalism,' the statement said. 'We call upon all of those expressing concerns or perspectives on this issue with our staff and educators to do so in a respectful and civil manner.'
Kristal Larson, executive director of the LGBTQ+ Center Lake County, Avon Township's clerk and a transgender woman, was happy with the 'outpouring of support' she'd seen during the meeting. Deerfield was 'in a good place,' she said.
She criticized the allegations being made against the district, calling them a 'narrative of falsehoods.'
'(District officials) vehemently deny any of these allegations, and I'm proud of the fact they're standing up for their students and their school, their community, against what has become a very national platform of hate,' Larson said.'
Moms for Liberty Lake County chair Marsha McClary said there was 'a lot of misinformation in the community' about the incident that 'needed to be corrected,' and she praised the complaint filed by the AFL.
'There's obviously a lot of passionate parents here, and we have actually a lot of common goals,' McClary said. 'We want the kids to be all treated with respect and have privacy and safety. I think, though, the district and the state can do better.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
6 hours ago
- CBS News
Baltimore teacher says in lawsuit she was falsely accused of making social media threats
A Baltimore teacher is suing Republican delegates, members of Moms for Liberty, and a right-wing social media account for defamation of character after she was accused of making online threats. Former Baltimore County Spanish teacher Alexa Sciuto said last summer she questioned local Moms for Liberty leader Kit Hart about the meaning of the word "woke" at a conservative parenting summit, which Sciuto was protesting. Sciuto posted a video of the exchange on her TikTok. "I think it got 600,000 views on my platform," Sciuto said. After the video went viral, Sciuto posted a picture of Hart with the caption, "Officer, I swear I didn't mean to murder her," which she said was rhetorical. Lawsuit names state lawmakers, Moms for Liberty members Baltimore County Republican delegates Lauren Arikan, Robin Grammer, Ryan Nawrocki, and Kathy Szeliga wrote a letter to the superintendent of Baltimore County Public Schools saying Sciuto made a death threat to Hart and called for her to be fired. "I did not think that what I said could possibly be interpreted as a threat," Sciuto said. Sciuto resigned from Baltimore County schools in May 2024. Her lawsuit, filed in Baltimore County circuit court, states that members of Moms for Liberty have been falsely claiming she was fired. Sciuto is suing the four delegates who wrote the letter, two local leaders of Moms for Liberty, including Kit Hart, and the owner of a right-wing social media account. She's seeking damages for reputational harm, emotional distress, and loss of future earnings. "People still believe that I was fired, and I was not; they believe that I was asked to resign, and I was not. Worst of all, they think that happened because I made a criminal threat and I did not," Sciuto said. "So, to be taking action and to be speaking for myself after all of that is different and it's good and I'm ready." The defendants named in the lawsuit have yet to respond to WJZ's request for comment.
Miami Herald
10 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Is religious influence increasing in the US? What Americans said in survey
More Americans said they think the influence of religion is increasing in U.S. society compared to the previous year, a new poll found. Thirty-four percent of U.S. adults said they think religious influence is growing, up 14 percentage points from last year, according to a June 11 Gallup poll. However, a majority of respondents, 59%, still said religion is losing its influence in the country, according to the poll. 'The recent shifts represent a departure from the trend over the past 15 years that has generally seen larger percentages of Americans saying religious influence is decreasing rather than increasing,' researchers said. The survey of 1,003 U.S. adults was taken between May 1-18 and has a margin of error of 4 percentage points. Exact reasons behind the shift in opinions are unclear, but it could be 'a reaction to the Republican sweep of the federal government in last fall's election,' researchers said. President Donald Trump has repeatedly vowed to bring religion back to the country. In February, when Trump announced a new task force to investigate 'anti-Christian bias,' he urged Americans to 'bring religion back,' the Associated Press reported. During the White House Easter Egg Roll on April 21, he said: 'We're bringing religion back in America. We're bringing a lot of things back, but religion is coming back to America.' Researchers said a similar shift was recorded in 1994 when Republicans took over Congress for the first time in four decades, but there were no 'meaningful changes' after GOP victories in the 2000, 2010 and 2016 elections. Other notable shifts The highest recorded spike in Americans who said they think religious influence is increasing happened following the 9/11 terrorist attacks on America, when the number jumped 32 percentage points to 71%, according to the poll. More recently, researchers saw a surge during the COVID-19 pandemic, when 38% of Americans said they saw more religious influence in society, up from 19% pre-pandemic, the poll found. Which groups think religion in America is increasing? More Democrats, 41%, said they think 'religion as a whole is increasing its influence on American life,' compared with 35% of Republicans and 31% of Independents who said the same thing, according to the poll. Individuals associated with no religion said they think religion is growing at slightly higher rates than Protestants and Catholics, 36% compared to 33% and 35%, respectively, the poll found. Younger adults, those between 18 and 29 years old, also said they believe religious influence is increasing at higher rates than the rest of Americans, according to the poll.
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - School choice continues to expand, even in blue and purple states
Press reports tend to draw a hard line between the 17 states which enacted universal school choice programs when both their legislatures and governors were Republican and the 33 others which have not. But it would be more accurate to say that choice is expanding everywhere, just with different structures. Even in states where at least one branch of government remains opposed to funding non-public education, the rapid growth of three inexpensive K-12 schooling options is making choice a reality for more students. The most popular of these low-cost alternatives is the so-called 'microschool,' a small educational venue which typically serves 16 pupils or less. Spontaneously formed by neighboring families during COVID-19, when the public schools were closed and open private schools were filled to capacity, these small-scale programs have continued to multiply, offering a more personalized learning experience in blue states as well as red. Today, according to National Microschooling Center CEO Dan Soifer, there are around 95,000 microschools across the U.S. serving over 1.5 million K-12 students. Another economical non-public option which has spread to states without legalized school choice is the 'church learning center.' As the name implies, this is a school which operates within a house of worship, typically during weekdays and at other times when its facilities are not used for religious services. Depending on the size of the church, its learning center can be as small as a microschool or serve hundreds of students. An accurate count of these church learning centers is harder to make, in part because there is no national organization representing all of them and also because the larger ones are reluctant to publicize themselves in ways that might invite regulation as a conventional private school. But a clear indicator of their popularity is the growing number of regional and denominational organizations dedicated to helping churches organize their own programs. In Kansas, for example, homeschool mom of six Delana Wallace runs the Heartland Education Reformation Organization, a nonprofit that advocates for 15 parish-sited schools and connects local clergy with educators interested in starting new ones. And in Boston, the city's Family Institute has successfully guided more than 20 religious groups in establishing their own Christian learning centers. At the other end of the country, in California, the Archdiocese of Los Angeles has encouraged the formation of five such schools. The third and final low-cost teaching venue is the 'hybrid school,' a term which refers less to a school's size, location, or curriculum than to how its students divide their time: two or three days a week online at home, and the other days in a more organized group setting. The provider of the structured portion can be a microschool or church learning center, but also a college, business, foundation or public charter school. One of the newer hybrid options is the traditional private or parochial school which runs a separate part-time academy. For example, the Canterbury Christian School in Los Altos, Calif., offers local homeschooled children a two day per week package of more conventional classroom instruction. 'If you're trying to support a family in a place like Silicon Valley, where ordinary homes cost $3-to-$4 million,' says the school's headmaster, Rev. Steve Macias, 'it's not easy to pay [our full-time tuition] with after-tax dollars.' What clearly helps all three kinds of low-cost schools to control their expenses is family involvement in program administration. Students' mothers and fathers work as classroom aids, break and lunchroom monitors, carpooling drivers, sports coaches and even teachers. Church learning centers have the added benefit of being able to draw on volunteer labor from their congregations. The second factor which controls expenses for these schools is that their typical student is registered as a homeschooler, which exempts them from a considerable regulatory burden. From the government's point of view, it is not the microschool, church learning center, or hybrid facility where the child is being educated, but the family home. The school itself is viewed as something more like a tutoring company, although the most accurate descriptor for the vast majority of them would be 'collaborative homeschool.' The final factor which has enabled microschools, church learning centers and hybrid schools to be seen as affordable options, even in the absence of government funding, is that all three of them have become increasingly reliant on the so-called 'classical curriculum.' That is to say, a curriculum which emphasizes logical reasoning over the memorization of facts, and the reading of the great books of Western civilization, especially those which inspired America's Founders. And while this educational methodology is not necessarily any less expensive than others, the evidence for its efficacy has convinced growing numbers of parents that they are getting an exceptional academic return for their investment. As the American Enterprise Institute's director of Education Policy Studies, Frederick M. Hess, has documented, classically educated students get exceptionally high scores on standardized achievement tests. As a result, they also have unusually high college acceptance rates. They even outperform on the SAT — an exam that the classical curriculum does not even attempt to 'teach to.' As for the actual cost of a microschool, church learning center or hybrid school, the answer depends on such factors as the ratio of paid staff to volunteers, the rent required to obtain a venue, and the extracurricular activities provided. On the low end is the Cornerstone Church in Uxbridge, Mass., which has long hosted a parent-run school called DELTIC Prep, short for 'Doing Education in Life Together in Christ.' It annually educates 70 to 90 students across multiple grades for just $15 to $75 each per year. There are programs which cost as much as $5,000 to $10,000, but still less than a conventional private or parochial school in their areas. Given the continuing reluctance of blue and purple state politicians to fund non-public education, school choice is indeed coming to their communities in a different way than in more conservative jurisdictions. But it is coming. Lewis M. Andrews is chair of the Kids' Scholarship Fund. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
