
South Lebanon Votes in Municipal Elections That Will Test Support for Hezbollah
Residents of southern Lebanon voted Saturday in the country's municipal elections that will test support for Hezbollah in the predominantly Shiite areas, months after the end of the destructive Israel-Hezbollah war.
Hezbollah is running in an alliance with the Amal group of parliament Speaker Nabih Berri and both are expected to win mayoral races and the majority of seats in municipal councils. Both groups already won many municipalities uncontested.
South Lebanon is the fourth and last district to vote in the elections since May 4. Among those who voted Saturday were Hezbollah members wounded in the Sept. 17, 2024, explosions of thousands of pagers that blew up near-simultaneously in an operation carried out by Israel. More than a dozen were killed and nearly 3,000 wounded.
"The will of life is stronger than death and the will of construction is stronger than destruction,' President Joseph Aoun said during a tour of south Lebanon Saturday. He told reporters in his hometown of Aaichiyeh that he voted for the first time in 40 years.
Saturday's vote came two days after Israel's air force carried out intense airstrikes in different parts of south Lebanon.
Residents of villages and towns on the border with Israel, including the village of Kfar Kila that was almost completely destroyed during the war, cast their ballots at polling stations set up in the nearby city of Nabatiyeh. Residents of other border villages cast their ballots in the port city of Tyre.
'Southerners are proving again that they are with the choice of resistance,' Hezbollah legislator Ali Fayad, who represents border villages, said in Nabatiyeh.
Lebanon's cash-strapped government has been scrambling to secure international funds for the war reconstruction, which the World Bank estimates at over $11 billion.
Hezbollah began firing rockets at Israel on Oct. 8, 2023, one day after a deadly Hamas-led incursion into southern Israel sparked the war in Gaza. Israel responded with shelling and airstrikes in Lebanon that escalated into a full-blown war that left more than 4,000 dead in Lebanon and more than 80 soldiers and 47 civilians in Israel. A US-brokered ceasefire went into effect in late November.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Asharq Al-Awsat
8 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Lebanon: Hezbollah ‘Mends' Ties with Prime Minister
A Hezbollah delegation visited Prime Minister Nawaf Salam at the Grand Serail on Wednesday with the aim of 'mending' ties with the Premier after the latter's remarks about the party's arms. Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri had met with Salam two days ago in a bid to ease the tension between Salam and Hezbollah and pave the way for the meeting between the two. The Hezbollah delegation comprised head of the Loyalty to the Resistance bloc MP Mohamed Raad, MPs Hussein Hajj Hassan, Amin Sherri, Hasan Fadlallah and Ibrahim al-Musawi. According to sources who spoke on condition of anonymity, the meeting has opened a "new path for the relations' between Salam and Hezbollah. Hezbollah pins high importance on the cessation of Israeli hostilities and the need for Israel to withdraw from five strategic points it still occupies in Lebanon, in addition to reconstruction after Israel's war on Lebanon. Salam for his part emphasized commitment to the provisions in the ministerial policy statement, said the sources, with emphasis on continued coordination between the two. Raad told reporters after the meeting that the party has nothing but 'good intentions' towards the government, 'we are keen for lasting consensus with all the country's components, and with all the ministries'. Raad stated that Hezbollah is keen to cooperate with the government, 'Nothing can hamper the cooperation between us and the government, which we are part of'. 'We know this phase is a difficult as government and people, authorities and political forces, must know that our priorities at this stage stand at ending the Israeli occupation, returning the hostages, and stop the daily Israeli aggressions happening daily on roads and in villages in the South, and to begin reconstruction', stated the MP. Whether discussions with the PM touched on the party's armament, Raad said it was not discussed in detail. 'The issue of arms must be discussed in an objective manner that preserves the country's interest, the choices of its people, and deterring the Israeli aggression threatening its security and stability'. On reports that Hezbollah has conditioned the option of its disarmament to reconstruction, Raad denied saying: 'everything will be discussed in truly time'.

Al Arabiya
a day ago
- Al Arabiya
Hezbollah chief discusses Iran support with top diplomat
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi met with Hezbollah chief Naim Qassem, the Tehran-backed Lebanese group said Wednesday, with the militants under domestic and international pressure to disarm. The statement did not specify where or when the meeting with Araghchi, who arrived in Beirut on Tuesday, took place. Qassem, who took over last year after an Israeli strike killed the group's longtime chief Hassan Nasrallah, thanked Araghchi for Iran's 'ongoing support for the Lebanese people' and Hezbollah. He also told Araghchi of Hezbollah's 'work to revive Lebanon and its stability and sovereignty, and to expel the occupation from (Lebanese) territory', the statement said, referring to Israel. A November ceasefire largely halted more than a year of hostilities between Hezbollah and Israel including two months of all-out war that left the Iran-backed group heavily weakened. Under the ceasefire, Hezbollah fighters were to pull back beyond the Litani River in the country's south. Israel was to withdraw all forces from Lebanon but has kept troops in five areas that it deems strategic and still carries out regular strikes on the country. Lebanese authorities have vowed to implement a state monopoly on bearing arms amid international pressure including from Washington, though President Joseph Aoun has said disarming Hezbollah is a 'delicate' matter that requires dialogue. During the visit, Araghchi met senior officials on Tuesday including Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, parliament speaker Nabih Berri, a close Hezbollah ally, and Foreign Minister Youssef Raggi. Raggi said on X that he expressed 'Lebanon's hope that Iran remains committed to supporting our country's security and internal stability', including efforts to ensure 'that arms are held solely by the state.' On Wednesday, Araghchi on X said that during the trip he expressed his full support for Lebanon's stability, sovereignty and territorial integrity. 'Our goal and hope is to open a new page in our centuries-long ties, built on mutual respect and common interests,' he added. A Lebanese official told AFP that the minister's visit opened 'a new page' in ties based on 'non-interference.' With Hezbollah weakened, Aoun and Salam took office after the war and following a more than a two-year leadership vacuum as the balance of power shifted. Aoun said after his meeting with Araghchi that he emphasized the importance of dialogue in 'resolving differences', a presidency statement said, adding that post-war reconstruction was a priority for the authorities. The conflict left swathes of the country heavily damaged, particularly Hezbollah strongholds. On Tuesday, Araghchi told reporters that 'Iranian companies are ready to take part in Lebanon's reconstruction.' He also laid a wreath at Nasrallah's grave.

Asharq Al-Awsat
a day ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Why Did Israel Succeed in Lebanon but Not in Yemen?
Israel's crushing victory in its war against Hezbollah in Lebanon last year is considered one of its military triumphs, ranked alongside the Six-Day War victory in 1967. Meanwhile, its operations against the Houthis in Yemen, so far, have been more theatrical than effective, resembling its 2006 war in Lebanon. This, despite the fact that the armed group has no air defense capabilities or a missile arsenal to strike back. Israel's current goals in Yemen resemble its attacks on Lebanon during what became known as the July War. Most of the attacks destroyed civilian or semi-civilian facilities. This may be because Israel doesn't have a strong target bank in Yemen, which is why it resorted to bombing ports, the airport, and roads to halt the reception and transport of weapons. The difference between the two fronts is significant. Against Hezbollah, Israel showed overwhelming and terrifying superiority last year; its operations seemed like science fiction. It eliminated most of the top leadership, whether they were in their homes, cars, or hiding underground in ten-story bunkers, and destroyed or disabled most of Hezbollah's offensive arsenal. If we recall what happened in 2006 during the 34-day war, Hezbollah wasn't destroyed, but Israel paralyzed the Lebanese state. It bombed the airport, the port, power and water stations, highways, around a hundred bridges and crossings, and vast residential neighborhoods. Within two years, Hezbollah had fully restored its capabilities. In contrast, during last year's battles in Lebanon, which lasted 13 months, civilian life in most of the country remained nearly normal, and infrastructure wasn't targeted. Civilian airplanes were taking off and landing at Rafik Hariri International Airport even as Israel bombed Hezbollah positions in the southern suburb of Beirut. The strikes were visible to airline passengers flying in and out of the nearby airport, which remained fully operational. Photographers and journalists would wait for announcements of airstrikes and their targets, sitting across from the buildings awaiting the attack in order to film them up close. Since January, Israel has struck Yemen six times, but not with the same effectiveness as in Lebanon. Few of these attacks actually targeted Houthi forces or leadership. Just last month, Israel bombed Sanaa International Airport and destroyed the last civilian aircraft there, which belonged to the legitimate Yemeni government, not the Houthis. This Yemeni militia resembles ISIS and al-Qaeda and shows little concern for civilian losses or infrastructure damage. Israeli strikes have not deterred the Iran-backed group from launching drones and missiles. Their arsenal is modest compared to Hezbollah's, which suffered massive destruction of its offensive capabilities. Houthi projectiles are limited and do not pose a major threat to Israel. Most have missed their targets, and those that did enter Israeli airspace briefly disrupted air traffic and forced residents into shelters for a short time. This ideologically driven Yemeni group comes from a small minority, no more than 7 percent of the population, and relies on terrorizing civilians with its militias to maintain control in cities under its grip. In other areas, it holds sway through a network of allied tribal forces. These groups will abandon the Houthis once they sense a decline in the militia's military strength. As for why Israel's performance has been so lackluster, I believe there are two possible reasons: First, a lack of intelligence in Yemen, unlike in Lebanon, where it enjoys a vast network of informants and agents, even within Hezbollah itself. This network enabled Israel to gather detailed information and build a target bank over many years in preparation for the awaited day. The other possibility is that the Israeli government itself is unwilling to escalate the confrontation and is content with punitive strikes proportional to the limited damage caused by the Houthis. It is likely waiting for an agreement under which the Houthis would pledge to stop harassing Israel, similar to the arrangement they made with the United States ahead of President Donald Trump's regional visit. Still, in my view, the Houthis are like moths drawn to a flame. They appear advanced because they launch drones and missiles. But in reality, they're no more than primitive cave fighters from the Middle Ages – or reckless mountain rams charging toward the fire.