'You may start this war, but we will be the ones to end it': Iran warns 'gambler' Trump
Recent hostile action by the United States expanded the scope of legitimate targets for Iran's armed forces, a spokesperson for its Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters said in a video shared on Monday.Ebrahim Zolfaqari said the US should expect heavy consequences for its actions. "Mr Trump, the gambler, you may start this war, but we will be the ones to end it," Zolfaqari said in English at the end of his recorded statement. After the attacks, on Monday, Trump claimed that "monumental damage was done to all nuclear sites in Iran". .Khorramshahr-4: Iran's monster missile used against Israel. "The biggest damage took place far below ground level. Bullseye!!!" he wrote on his Truth Social platform.Trump earlier called on Iran to forgo any retaliation and said the government "must now make peace" or "future attacks would be far greater and a lot easier."(With Reuters inputs)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
By bombing Iran, Trump made a mockery of his own call for talks: Congress
Congress on Monday said the US bombing of Iran's nuclear sites made a mockery of President Trump's calls for continuation of talks with the Islamic republic, speaking on the issue after maintaining silence on it on the previous day. "President Trump's decision to unleash US airpower on Iran makes a mockery of his own calls for the continuation of talks with Iran. The Indian National Congress reiterates the absolute essentiality of immediate diplomacy and dialogue with Iran," said party spokesman Jairam Ramesh. Speaking to media persons in Karnataka, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge said, "We want peace in the world. Iran is our neighbour and always stands with us in tough times. We have trade relations with Iran, and we import crude oil from them. When the question of J&K was raised in the UN, Iran took our side. We want Iran not to suffer. He further said, "We don't want any country to attack any sovereign, democratic country... Be it Israel, Iran, or the US, they shouldn't attack any sovereign, independent country... India has always been with those who want to be at peace." Economic Times WhatsApp channel )
The Hindu
27 minutes ago
- The Hindu
The sorry state of South Asian economic integration
In the year so far there were two major incidents that shook India's economic and national security landscape: the reciprocal tariffs imposed by the Trump administration and the terror attack in Pahalgam. While these events may seem unrelated, their underlying causes and consequences are deeply interlinked, highlighting the urgent need for a comprehensive regional approach to security and economic stability. Economic and national security are often discussed separately, but they are deeply intertwined. Border disputes among South Asian nations significantly hamper trade and economic cooperation, preventing the region from achieving its full potential. Economic instability fuels unrest, while security threats disrupt trade and investment. No country can achieve lasting security without economic prosperity, and vice versa. One of the least integrated The South Asian region is one of the least economically integrated regions in the world. Intraregional trade of South Asia (South Asian Free Trade Area or SAFTA) accounts for barely 5% to 7% of its total international trade, which is the lowest when compared to other trading blocs. In contrast, intraregional trade accounts for approximately 45% of total international trade within the European Union (EU), 22% within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), and around 25% within the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Current trade among South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) countries is just around $23 billion, far below the estimated $67 billion. According to a United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) study, South Asia's potential trade could have reached $172 billion by 2020, which means over 86% of its capacity remains unexploited. Even if we consider this assessment to be optimistic, the immense potential for significantly increasing intra-SAARC trade can never be denied. South Asia, the most populous region of the world (25% of the world's population), represents a combined market of only $5 trillion in GDP. On the other side, the EU, with 5.8% of the world's population, accounts for $18 trillion in GDP, and NAFTA has a GDP of $24.8 trillion. This clearly shows the underexploited capacity of the South Asian region. There is much potential As estimated by the UNESCAP South Asia Gravity Model of intraregional trade, in spite of trade liberalisation under SAFTA, intraregional trade in South Asia is less than a third of its potential. Bangladesh has the highest unexploited proportion, at 93%, followed by the Maldives (88%), Pakistan (86%), Afghanistan (83%), and Nepal (76%). Because of terror insurgencies and border disputes, trade between India and Pakistan has seen a significant decline over the years. Bilateral trade between India and Pakistan fell from $2.41 billion in 2018 to $1.2 billion in 2024. Further, Pakistani exports to India fell from $547.5 million in 2019 to just $480,000 in 2024. South Asia's trade-to-GDP ratio decreased from 47.30% in 2022 to 42.94% in 2024. Additionally, the World Bank reported a softened growth forecast of 5.8% for 2025, down from 6% in 2024. As imports have grown faster than exports for all South Asian countries, the trade deficit of the subregion has widened from $204.1 billion in 2015 to $339 billion in 2022. However, the value of overall trade, covering both exports and imports, increased significantly between 2015-22 to approximately $1,335 billion. Despite SAFTA, trading with neighbours is not 'free'. The inefficient trade governing mechanism and an unpromising political environment increase the cost of intraregional trade, which is one of the major reasons for significantly smaller intra-regional trade. Costs of trading within South Asia remain high at 114% of the value of the goods being exported, making trading with neighbouring nations more expensive or less competitive, compared to trading with distant partners. For instance, South Asia's bilateral trade cost with the U.S. is only 109% despite the vastly greater distance. It is about 20% more costly for a company in India to trade with Pakistan than with Brazil, which is 22 times farther away. This discourages the formation of regional value chains despite the geographic contiguity. In contrast, intraregional trade costs for ASEAN are some 40% lower than intra-SAARC trade costs, at 76%, creating high incentives for interdependence in that bloc. The main hurdles The low level of intraregional trade in South Asia demonstrates the absence of strategic policies. SAFTA and other regional agreements have the potential to create greater economic linkages. Besides, over two-thirds of the potential of intraregional trade in goods, the potential of trade in services, and investments in South Asia remain untapped. To this end, greater regional cooperation could facilitate the development of complementary and mutually beneficial export sectors by focusing on lowering trade barriers. SAARC had the aim of ending distrust and tension, but trust deficits and regional conflicts hinder the full implementation of agreements such as SAFTA. Political diversity, regional disputes, minority issues and terrorism are major obstacles to regional cooperation. Most SAARC countries are in conflict with each other, preventing effective regional integration. Lesser trade opportunity means lesser capacity for innovation, production and investment in the people of the country. Therefore, to exploit the full potential of the South Asian region, members must work actively to enhance intra-regional trade, keeping aside their bilateral conflicts. Shashank Patel is a scholar of international trade law at the South Asian University (SAU), New Delhi
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Oil falls more than 4% as Iran's retaliation focuses on regional US military bases
Oil prices slipped more than $3, or 4%, on Monday after Iran attacked the U.S. military base in Qatar in retaliation for U.S. attacks on its nuclear facilities, and took no action to disrupt oil and gas tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz . Brent crude futures were down $2.91, or 3.8%, at $74.09 a barrel by 1:13 p.m. ET (1713GMT). U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude (WTI) eased $2.8, or 3.8%, to $71.06. Explosions were heard over Qatar's capital Doha on Monday, a Reuters witness reported, shortly after a Western diplomat said there had been a credible Iranian threat against the U.S.-run al Udeid air base in the Gulf Arab state since midday. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Upgrade to Lifetime Office 365 (Discover Now) prime software Upgrade Undo Also Read: 'I'm watching': Trump warns oil producers not to hike prices amid fears of closure of Strait of Hormuz by Iran "Oil flows for now aren't the primary target and is likely not to be impacted, I think it's going to be military retaliation on US bases and/or trying to hit more of the Israeli civilian targets," said John Kilduff, a partner at Again Capital. Live Events Qatar said it closed its airspace, while United Arab Emirates' airspace was closed based on flight paths and air traffic control audio, according to Flightradar. U.S. President Donald Trump said he had "obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites in strikes over the weekend, joining an Israeli assault in an escalation of conflict in the Middle East as Tehran vowed to defend itself. Israel also carried out fresh strikes against Iran on Monday including on capital Tehran and the Iranian nuclear facility at Fordow, which was also a target of the U.S. attack. At least two supertankers made U-turns near the Strait of Hormuz following U.S. military strikes on Iran, ship tracking data shows, as more than a week of violence in the region prompted vessels to speed, pause, or alter their journeys. About a fifth of global oil supply flows through the strait. However, the risk of a complete shutdown is low, analysts have said. A telegraphed attack on a well defended U.S. base could be a first step in reducing tensions provided there are no US casualties, Energy Aspects said in a post. "Unless there are indications of further Iranian retaliation or escalation by Israel/the US then we may see some geopolitical risk premium come out of the price in subsequent days," it said. Qatar said there were no casualties from the attack on the U.S. military base. Iran, which is OPEC's third-largest crude producer, said on Monday that the U.S. attack on its nuclear sites expanded the range of legitimate targets for its armed forces and called Trump a "gambler" for joining Israel's military campaign against the Islamic Republic. Meanwhile, Trump expressed a desire to see oil prices kept down amid fears that ongoing fighting in the Middle East could cause them to spike. On his Truth Social platform, he addressed the U.S. Department of Energy, encouraging "drill, baby, drill" and saying, "I mean now." Investors are still weighing up the extent of the geopolitical risk premium, given the Middle East crisis has yet to crimp supply. HSBC expects Brent prices to spike above $80 a barrel to factor in a higher probability of a Strait of Hormuz closure, but to recede again if the threat of disruption does not materialise, the bank said on Monday. Iraq's state-run Basra Oil Company said international oil majors including BP, TotalEnergies and Eni had evacuated some staff members working in oilfields.
