logo
Nine accused of breaching copyright by publishing social media pictures of Bondi Junction stabbing victim

Nine accused of breaching copyright by publishing social media pictures of Bondi Junction stabbing victim

The Guardian09-04-2025

The fiance of a Bondi Junction stabbing victim has taken aim at news outlets republishing social media photos before the first anniversary of the deadly rampage.
Ashley Wildey's lawsuit poses potential broader ramifications for the media whose coverage has already been placed in focus by an inquest into the April 2024 mass stabbings.
His partner, Dawn Singleton, was among six people killed at a shopping centre in Sydney's east by Joel Cauchi before he was shot dead by police last 13 April.
Wildley alleges Nine Network's 60 Minutes program and sister outlet the Sydney Morning Herald breached his copyright with images of the 25-year-old.
The newspaper published a picture of Singleton – credited to Facebook – ahead of the inquest's directions hearing on Monday.
The situation was 'extremely distressing', given the tragedy's approaching anniversary and an expectation of further alleged infringements, Sue Chrysanthou SC said on Wednesday.
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
'[Nine] has taken the view that it is entitled to take photos that it doesn't own from my client's social media at any time and use those photos in any way it wishes,' Chrysanthou told the NSW supreme court. Such use has been happening for almost a year, she said.
'We became overwhelmed with the number of infringements we discovered once we looked into it,' she said.
Singleton's father, the ad man John Singleton, has called for the upcoming inquest to be abandoned, describing it as a 'waste of time'. His media campaign in the lead-up included an interview on 60 Minutes in which Singleton's images were used.
Barrister Lyndelle Barnett, appearing for Nine, said Wednesday's hearing was the first she heard of the newspaper being brought in to the case.
She expressed concerns the lawsuit's expansion would complicate a case Chrysanthou had portrayed as 'pretty straightforward'. But Barnett indicated the outlets may have a defence under fair dealing provisions which limit copyright claims in news reports.
The case returns to court in May, after the inquest begins on 28 April.
Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Cauchi, 40, killed six people and wounded at least 10 others at a shopping centre in Sydney's east on 13 April 2024, before being shot dead by police.
Singleton, 25, Ashlee Good, 38, Jade Young, 47, Pikria Darchia, 55, Yixuan Cheng, 27, and security guard Faraz Tahir, 30, were killed.
Chrysanthou is representing Singleton's family, excluding her father, as well as relatives of Good and Young at the inquest. They support the inquiry and understood it was mandatory, she said on Monday.
Its scope has expanded to include examinations of media attempts to obtain information, images and footage, as well as the impact of reporting on those who lost family members. 'The media will have to reflect deeply on that, we hope,' counsel assisting Peggy Dwyer SC said.
Ahead of the anniversary, a memorial will be established at Bondi Junction on Thursday with displays of photographs and messages on floral tributes laid after the mass homicide.
Welfare support officers will be on site over the weekend to support the public.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nine key questions could decide fate of beef Wellington mushroom 'poisoner'
Nine key questions could decide fate of beef Wellington mushroom 'poisoner'

Daily Mirror

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Nine key questions could decide fate of beef Wellington mushroom 'poisoner'

Erin Patterson has been accused of intentionally poisoning several family members and her eight-day cross-examination in the murder trial has come to an end The world has been gripped by the murder trial of an Australian woman that came after several people died after eating a homemade beef Wellington that is said to have contained poisonous death cap mushrooms. Erin Patterson denies intentionally poisoning three relatives and attempting to kill a fourth by serving them a meal containing toxic death cap mushrooms at her home in Victoria on July 29, 2023. Prosecutors have alleged she deliberately included the poisonous mushrooms in the meal, but her defence insists it was a tragic accident - saying Patterson may have accidentally included mushrooms she had foraged herself. ‌ ‌ Within a week of the meal, three of the guests had died and the fourth was in hospital. Patterson, 50, was questioned by police shortly after the deaths and she was arrested around a month later. Her alleged victims were her in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, both aged 70, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, 66. Ian Wilkinson, the uncle of Patterson's estranged husband, also fell seriously ill but survived after weeks of treatment. These are the nine key questions that could determine how the jury vote. Where were the toxic mushrooms from? Both the prosecution and defence have accepted the potentially deadly death cap mushrooms were in the beef wellington. During the initial police investigation, Patterson denied being a forager and her children told cops they had never seen her pick mushrooms. This completely shifted in the witness box as Patterson claimed that was untrue and said she had picked wild mushrooms since the 2020 Covid lockdown. Her lawyer, Colin Mandy SC, asked if she accepted that the beef Wellington pastries she had served to her lunch guests in 2023 contained death caps. "Now I think there was a possibility there were foraged ones in there," she replied. ‌ How did the mushrooms get into the dish? Prosecutor Nanette Rogers told the court how Patterson had posted in Facebook groups about using a food dehydrator to reduce the size of mushrooms to use in cooking. Patterson posted that she had been "hiding powdered mushrooms in everything". The jury was also shown a CCTV photo showing Erin Patterson at her local tip on August 2 - days after the fatal meal. Among the things she was seen disposing of was a large black box. When inspected a couple of days later, a staff member found a black Sunbeam dehydrator, Nanette Rogers says. Fingerprints were found on the dehydrator and compared to Ms Patterson's, Dr Rogers says - and they matched. It also tested positive for death cap mushrooms, the jury was told. ‌ Did she secretly hate her in-laws? Prosecutors have not identified a "particular" motive in this case but the court heard about issues Patterson faced with her ex-husband Simon's family. The couple were married in 2007 and separated in 2015 but initially had a close relationship even after they split. This changed in 2022 when Simon described himself as "single" on a tax return and affected her ability to claim tax breaks. Patterson asked her in-laws to get involved and they were reluctant to, which led to arguments between them. She posted a series of raging posts on Facebook around that time including: "I'm sick of this s**t. I want nothing to do with them. I thought his parents would want him to do the right thing, but it seems their concern about… not wanting to get involved in their son's personal matters, are overriding that. So f**k them." ‌ How was the meal served? The court was told the four guests were handed their meal on a grey plates while Patterson had hers on an orange plate. The suspect has denied these claims and told the court she did not own any grey dishes. She told the court the meal was served up on a mixture of black and white plates. Despite this, footage from a police search of her home appeared to show two grey plates next to the dishwasher. ‌ Did she vomit after the meal? Patterson told the court she had bulimia and ate several slices of an orange cake her 70-year-old in-law brought for dessert. She told the court: "I kept cleaning up the kitchen and putting everything away and, um, I had a piece of cake and then I had another piece of cake. And then another." She told the court she ate all of the cake and "felt sick. I felt over-full. So I went to the toilets and brought it up again". ‌ Was she genuinely sick? Patterson said she was hit with diarrhoea after the meal and suffered with it for a week. She went to a local hospital and complained of "gastro". Despite this, medical professionals did not believed her symptoms were as bad as what her four guests experienced. The court heard from nurse Cindy Munro who said Patterson "didn't look unwell" when compared to the guests. Doctor Varuna Ruggoo said tests for her liver function came back with normal results. Why did she throw the dehydrator away? The day after Patterson left hospital she went to a rubbish tip and was seen on CCTV throwing the Sunbeam dehydrator out. When asked about the device she claimed she tried to get rid of the dehydrator because she "panicked" after a conversation with her ex-husband a few days earlier. She claimed he asked her: "Is that what you used to poison my parents?" ‌ She said: "I was scared of the conversation that might flow about the meal and the dehydrator and I was scared that they [child protection] would blame me for it." Despite this, the ex-husband claimed he did not remember saying that to her. Why did she lie about having cancer? Patterson invited her in-laws for the meal on a false pretence of receiving a cancer diagnosis, as prosecutors said it was highly unusual for Patterson to hold social gatherings. She had told Gail a few weeks earlier that she found a lump on her elbow. At the dinner she suggested she had been diagnosed with ovarian cancer. The mother of two later admitted she never had cancer, but had been worried enough by symptoms to seek tests. She then said she had been dealing with "self-esteem" issues and was embarrassed to tell her family that. How will the jury decide this case? Patterson has held that the other parties in this case, like her ex-husband, medical professionals and Facebook friends, have been wrong in their accounts. Her eight-day cross-examination has come to an end and she still pleads not guilty. Now the case is in the hands of the jury who will return their verdict.

Hunt for gunmen after Australian man shot dead at villa on Bali
Hunt for gunmen after Australian man shot dead at villa on Bali

Leader Live

time5 hours ago

  • Leader Live

Hunt for gunmen after Australian man shot dead at villa on Bali

The shooting just after midnight on Friday, at Villa Casa Santisya near Munggu Beach in the district of Badung, killed Zivan Radmanovic, 32, from Melbourne. The second victim, who is 34 and also from Melbourne, was beaten, said Badung Police Chief Arif Batubara. 'We cannot yet determine the motive,' he said, adding that an investigation is under way. The two Australians were taken to hospitals in Denpasar, the provincial capital. According to police, the villa had three rooms occupied with a total of five guests when the shooting happened. The two victims' wives were also there and another foreign tourist, Mr Batubara said. Mr Radmanovic was shot in a bathroom where police found 17 bullet casings and two intact bullets. At least three witnesses at the villa told investigators that two gunmen, one wearing an orange jacket with a dark helmet and another wearing a dark green jacket, a black mask and a dark helmet, arrived on a scooter at around midnight. Mr Radmanovic's wife, Gourdeas Jazmyn, 30, told police that she woke up when she heard her husband screaming. She cowered under a blanket when she heard multiple gunshots. She later found her husband's body and the injured Australian, whose wife has also said she saw the attackers. The Australian consulate in Bali has been contacted by authorities and a post-mortem examination will be carried out if the family of the victim give permission, Mr Batubara said.

Hunt for gunmen after Australian man shot dead at villa on Bali
Hunt for gunmen after Australian man shot dead at villa on Bali

North Wales Chronicle

time9 hours ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Hunt for gunmen after Australian man shot dead at villa on Bali

The shooting just after midnight on Friday, at Villa Casa Santisya near Munggu Beach in the district of Badung, killed Zivan Radmanovic, 32, from Melbourne. The second victim, who is 34 and also from Melbourne, was beaten, said Badung Police Chief Arif Batubara. 'We cannot yet determine the motive,' he said, adding that an investigation is under way. The two Australians were taken to hospitals in Denpasar, the provincial capital. According to police, the villa had three rooms occupied with a total of five guests when the shooting happened. The two victims' wives were also there and another foreign tourist, Mr Batubara said. Mr Radmanovic was shot in a bathroom where police found 17 bullet casings and two intact bullets. At least three witnesses at the villa told investigators that two gunmen, one wearing an orange jacket with a dark helmet and another wearing a dark green jacket, a black mask and a dark helmet, arrived on a scooter at around midnight. Mr Radmanovic's wife, Gourdeas Jazmyn, 30, told police that she woke up when she heard her husband screaming. She cowered under a blanket when she heard multiple gunshots. She later found her husband's body and the injured Australian, whose wife has also said she saw the attackers. The Australian consulate in Bali has been contacted by authorities and a post-mortem examination will be carried out if the family of the victim give permission, Mr Batubara said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store