Poll: GOP voters want federal action on child care costs, match other political parties in support
Children in child care. (Photo by Rebecca Rivas/Missouri Independent)
Research by a Republican polling firm shows child care expenses 'continue to be a major financial burden' and a majority of Republicans nationwide join other political parties in seeking action from the White House and Congress.
The new national polling from UpONE Insights, commissioned by the child advocacy group First Five Years Fund and First Five Action, oversampled GOP voters in its 1,000 participants. The results showed 9 in 10 Republicans 'think it's a problem or crisis that Americans can't afford child care,' along with 91% of independent voters and 97% of Democrats.
The research goes along with Ohio-level studies that have shown access to child care, or lack thereof, has an 'undeniable' impact on the state economy and support for child care assistance has the backing of members of all political parties locally as well.
A Public Opinion Strategies poll released in January also found that 61% of non-full-time-working mothers would go back to work if they didn't have to stay home to avoid unaffordable child care costs.
Of those polled in the January study, 86% said access to affordable child care 'will help strengthen Ohio's economy and help its workers.'
A vast majority (79%) of GOP voters in the FFYF poll wanted President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans 'to do more to help working parents afford quality child care.'
Increasing funding for and access to quality child care is as important for families as securing the border and stopping the increase of crime according to 55% of Republican voters, the study stated.
Federal investments were generally supported in the new national poll, including 'especially strong' support for the Child Care Development Block Grant.
The grant provides funding that is then distributed by states as subsidies for child care to benefit low-income families with children younger than 13.
'The majority of these funds support children under age 6, with the remainder dedicated to the care of older children during out-of-school time,' according to a separate analysis of the grants by the First Five Years Fund.
States have discretion in the use of the grant funding, but the subsidies are aimed at helping access quality child care, and very few of the families who qualify for the funding receive it nationwide, the study found.
The U.S. Department of Health & Human Services' Office of Child Care reported more than $70.1 million in federal mandatory funds went to the state of Ohio as part of Child Care and Development Fund allocations in 2024.
Allocations to the fund for each state are based on the state population of children younger than 5 and younger than 13 from U.S. Census Bureau figures. The allocations are also based on the state's amount of free and reduced-price school lunch program participation per the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the per-capita income reported by the U.S. Department of Commerce.
Federal share matching funds were reported at $76.6 million, and the state share matching funds were estimated at $41.6 million.
The state share includes a 9% 'quality spending requirement' and a 3% infant and toddler quality spending requirement, according to the federal department.
The state share was up from $34.4 million in the same report for 2023 funds.
Federal discretionary funds from the fund were $296.7 million, up from $272.7 million in 2023.
The First Five Years Fund said the block grant funding can be used to pay child care providers directly to reserve slots in facilities, or for a voucher 'to use with their choice of approved local child care providers.'
'Additionally, states must invest a portion of the grant on improving the overall quality of child care for all families,' the First Five Years Fund explained.
Gov. Mike DeWine's executive budget proposal, a list of recommendations and priorities he wants to see from the final legislative budget draft, includes the expansion of a Childcare Choice Voucher Program. DeWine's proposal would bring household eligibility up to 200% of the federal poverty level from the current level of 146%.
DeWine has also proposed a refundable child tax credit that can be used for all sorts of costs related to caring for a child. The tax credit would be up to $1,000 per child through age 6.
The First Five Years Fund polling showed a federal child tax credit, the expansion of which is currently awaiting U.S. Senate approval, is 'the only federal tax credit that specifically allows working parents to keep more of what they earn to pay for child care,' garnering 86% support for an increase.
Child care has been a topic of debate on both sides of the aisle in Ohio, with bills coming in and out of the Ohio legislature over the last two years, and a new crop of bills popping up early in the new General Assembly.
Two of the bills – companion legislation that promotes a cost-sharing model where the state, employers and employees would all contribute to child care costs – have seen action in Ohio House and Senate committees.
Another bill that was passed last year, House Bill 7, had an overarching goal to improve outcomes and access in many aspects of child wellbeing, including better engagement with Early Head Start programs and support for child care providers.
The bill passed without any financial appropriation, so the bipartisan sponsors of the bill are hoping the ongoing budget process will bring about the funds they need to implement further change originally intended in the bill.
In 2023, Democrats attempted to introduce a tax credit similar to DeWine's proposal in his executive budget, a 'thriving families tax credit' that would have been up to $1,000 per child per year up to age five, and $500 per child annually up to age 17. The bill failed to garner enough support in the Republican supermajority to make it past the committee stages, and died at the end of last year's General Assembly.
Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, who's vying to take over for DeWine as governor in 2026, recently brought up 'day care subsidies' as one of the potential uses for some of the $840 million allocated as part of state workforce agency JobsOhio's 15-year extension.
Yost proposed the subsidies as part of a plan to 'promote job creation in high-growth industries while simultaneously supporting Ohioans who need assistance re-entering the workforce or upgrading their skills.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
31 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Chinese hackers and user lapses turn smartphones into a 'mobile security crisis'
WASHINGTON (AP) — Cybersecurity investigators noticed a highly unusual software crash — it was affecting a small number of smartphones belonging to people who worked in government, politics, tech and journalism. The crashes, which began late last year and carried into 2025, were the tipoff to a sophisticated cyberattack that may have allowed hackers to infiltrate a phone without a single click from the user. The attackers left no clues about their identities, but investigators at the cybersecurity firm iVerify noticed that the victims all had something in common: They worked in fields of interest to China's government and had been targeted by Chinese hackers in the past. Foreign hackers have increasingly identified smartphones, other mobile devices and the apps they use as a weak link in U.S. cyberdefenses. Groups linked to China's military and intelligence service have targeted the smartphones of prominent Americans and burrowed deep into telecommunication networks, according to national security and tech experts. It shows how vulnerable mobile devices and apps are and the risk that security failures could expose sensitive information or leave American interests open to cyberattack, those experts say. 'The world is in a mobile security crisis right now,' said Rocky Cole, a former cybersecurity expert at the National Security Agency and Google and now chief operations officer at iVerify. 'No one is watching the phones.' U.S. authorities warned in December of a sprawling Chinese hacking campaign designed to gain access to the texts and phone conversations of an unknown number of Americans. 'They were able to listen in on phone calls in real time and able to read text messages,' said Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi of Illinois. He is a member of the House Intelligence Committee and the senior Democrat on the Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, created to study the geopolitical threat from China. Chinese hackers also sought access to phones used by Donald Trump and running mate JD Vance during the 2024 campaign. The Chinese government has denied allegations of cyberespionage, and accused the U.S. of mounting its own cyberoperations. It says America cites national security as an excuse to issue sanctions against Chinese organizations and keep Chinese technology companies from the global market. 'The U.S. has long been using all kinds of despicable methods to steal other countries' secrets,' Lin Jian, a spokesman for China's foreign ministry, said at a recent press conference in response to questions about a CIA push to recruit Chinese informants. U.S. intelligence officials have said China poses a significant, persistent threat to U.S. economic and political interests, and it has harnessed the tools of digital conflict: online propaganda and disinformation, artificial intelligence and cyber surveillance and espionage designed to deliver a significant advantage in any military conflict. Mobile networks are a top concern. The U.S. and many of its closest allies have banned Chinese telecom companies from their networks. Other countries, including Germany, are phasing out Chinese involvement because of security concerns. But Chinese tech firms remain a big part of the systems in many nations, giving state-controlled companies a global footprint they could exploit for cyberattacks, experts say. Chinese telecom firms still maintain some routing and cloud storage systems in the U.S. — a growing concern to lawmakers. 'The American people deserve to know if Beijing is quietly using state-owned firms to infiltrate our critical infrastructure,' U.S. Rep. John Moolenaar, R-Mich. and chairman of the China committee, which in April issued subpoenas to Chinese telecom companies seeking information about their U.S. operations. Mobile devices have become an intel treasure trove Mobile devices can buy stocks, launch drones and run power plants. Their proliferation has often outpaced their security. The phones of top government officials are especially valuable, containing sensitive government information, passwords and an insider's glimpse into policy discussions and decision-making. The White House said last week that someone impersonating Susie Wiles, Trump's chief of staff, reached out to governors, senators and business leaders with texts and phone calls. It's unclear how the person obtained Wiles' connections, but they apparently gained access to the contacts in her personal cellphone, The Wall Street Journal reported. The messages and calls were not coming from Wiles' number, the newspaper reported. While most smartphones and tablets come with robust security, apps and connected devices often lack these protections or the regular software updates needed to stay ahead of new threats. That makes every fitness tracker, baby monitor or smart appliance another potential foothold for hackers looking to penetrate networks, retrieve information or infect systems with malware. Federal officials launched a program this year creating a 'cyber trust mark' for connected devices that meet federal security standards. But consumers and officials shouldn't lower their guard, said Snehal Antani, former chief technology officer for the Pentagon's Joint Special Operations Command. 'They're finding backdoors in Barbie dolls,' said Antani, now CEO of a cybersecurity firm, referring to concerns from researchers who successfully hacked the microphone of a digitally connected version of the toy. Risks emerge when smartphone users don't take precautions It doesn't matter how secure a mobile device is if the user doesn't follow basic security precautions, especially if their device contains classified or sensitive information, experts say. Mike Waltz, who departed as Trump's national security adviser, inadvertently added The Atlantic's editor-in-chief to a Signal chat used to discuss military plans with other top officials. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth had an internet connection that bypassed the Pentagon's security protocols set up in his office so he could use the Signal messaging app on a personal computer, the AP has reported. Hegseth has rejected assertions that he shared classified information on Signal, a popular encrypted messaging app not approved for the use of communicating classified information. China and other nations will try to take advantage of such lapses, and national security officials must take steps to prevent them from recurring, said Michael Williams, a national security expert at Syracuse University. 'They all have access to a variety of secure communications platforms,' Williams said. "We just can't share things willy-nilly.'


Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Trump and Musk aides have spoken amid pause in hostilities
The shaky detente in the social media strife between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk is holding following a call between representatives for both sides Friday, according to two White House officials. 'He's stopped posting, but that doesn't mean he's happy,' one of the officials said about Trump's Truth Social hiatus with Musk. 'The future of their relationship is totally uncertain,' added the official, who was granted anonymity to speak freely. Both men have paused their war of words that included Musk suggesting the president be impeached and Trump threatening to cut off federal contracts for the billionaire's companies. But neither wanted to, according to the two officials familiar with the reaction of both men. A spokesperson for Musk did not return a message seeking comment. Trump was particularly peeved by Musk insinuating the president was tied to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, claiming Trump was 'in the Epstein files.' It's long been public that Trump and other prominent figures are referenced in documents released in court cases surrounding Epstein, though Trump has not been accused of any wrongdoing linked to Epstein. But Musk's boast that Trump couldn't have won without his support, including over a quarter-billion dollars in political contributions – is what really set the president spinning, the two officials continued. 'Such ingratitude,' Musk wrote on X after taking credit from Trump's victory in November. The feud came as the president and Republican leaders tried to shoulder through a major package of domestic policy legislation, which could be the biggest legislative achievement of Trump's second term. Musk criticized the so-called megabill for having a 'MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK.' When reached for comment, press secretary Karoline Leavitt told POLITICO, 'As President Trump has said himself, he is moving forward focused on passing the One Big Beautiful Bill.' The relationship began to sour before the dueling social media posts erupted last week. Trump was upset about what he saw as Musk overselling DOGE's inability to make massive cuts in the federal bureaucracy. Then the White House pulled the nomination for Jared Isaacman, the billionaire's pick to lead NASA, which was one of the final tethers in a tenuous alliance. White House personnel director Sergio Gor, who was behind that move, has had a long-simmering tension with the billionaire, according to both White House officials. Musk refused to work with Gor after a March Cabinet meeting where the president told his agency heads they were in charge of their departments — not Musk, who was in the room. That meeting happened after the Tesla founder set off a series of mass firings and warnings to government workers that in turn triggered lawsuits and criticism from both Democratic and Republican lawmakers. While most lawmakers and Republican operatives agree that Trump ultimately has the upper hand should their feud reignite, there's never been an adversary quite like Musk: the world's richest man with an online megaphone to rival the presidential bully pulpit.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump orders troops to Los Angeles to combat violent protests against immigration enforcement
President Donald Trump ordered thousands of National Guard troops to help quell violent protests against immigration enforcement in Los Angeles, where helmeted police in riot gear clashed with concrete-hurling protesters who opposed tougher federal actions against undocumented immigrants. The clash spanning June 6 and 7 marked one of the most serious confrontations yet between agents carrying out Trump's directives on mass arrests and deportations, and local officials who oppose the stricter enforcement measures. Some protesters hurled large chunks of broken concrete at officers, slashed tires and defaced buildings, according to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Police declared an unlawful assembly and responded by firing tear gas, pepper spray and flash-bang concussion rounds toward the crowd. Trump signed a memo June 7 deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. The Trump administration has a zero tolerance policy for criminal behavior and violence, especially when that violence is aimed at law enforcement officers trying to do their job, she said. "Left-wing radicals waving foreign flags are viciously attacking ICE and Border Patrol agents and obstructing official law enforcement activities in Los Angeles," Leavitt said in a statement. "The mob violence will be quelled, the criminals responsible will be brought to justice, and operations to arrest illegal aliens will continue unabated." The clash enflamed an ongoing feud between federal and state officials. Trump said on social media June 7 that federal authorities needed to step in because of the inaction of California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. "If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!" Trump said. Newsom criticized the military deployment on social media, saying local police are available at a moment's notice. 'That move is purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions,' Newsom said. 'This is the wrong mission and will erode public trust.' The Department of Homeland Security said 118 undocumented immigrants were arrested during the week in Los Angeles, including five alleged gang members and others with criminal records for smuggling, drug trafficking and assault. Todd Lyons, acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said agents were outnumbered June 6 for hours as more than 1,000 rioters surrounded the federal building. 'What took place in Los Angeles yesterday was appalling,' Lyons said in a statement June 7. Lyons, who vowed to continue the enforcement action, accused Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass of taking 'the side of chaos and lawlessness over law enforcement.' Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said city policy since 1979 has barred officers from initiating police action based solely on trying to determine a person's immigration status. He said the department 'will not assist or participate in any sort of mass deportations.' 'I'm aware that these activities cause anxiety for many Angelenos, so I want to make it clear: the LAPD is not involved in civil immigration enforcement,' McDonnell said in a statement June 6. Bass said she was 'deeply angered' about the enforcement actions and that she would coordinate with immigrant-rights organizations. 'These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city,' Bass said in a statement June 6. 'We will not stand for this.' "We will," FBI Director Kash Patel replied on social media June 7. Border Patrol Chief Michael Banks highlighted on social media how a rock pierced the windshield of an agent's vehicle and injured him. "Imagine if more had followed," Banks said. "This incident is a stark reminder of the real dangers our agents face every day. Thankfully, it wasn't worse − but it easily could've been." FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino asked for the public's help in identifying a helmeted protester who threw rocks at police cars. "And yes, multiple arrests have already been made for obstructing our operations. More are coming," Bongino said on social media. "We are pouring through the videos for more perpetrators. You bring chaos, and we'll bring handcuffs. Law and order will prevail." One of the skirmishes involved the arrest of a union leader, David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union of California, who was injured and detained by ICE at one site. The union said Huerta was arrested "while exercising his First Amendment right to observe and document law enforcement activity." "We all collectively have to object to this madness because this is not justice,' Huerta said in a post on social media. 'This is injustice." U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli accused Huerta of deliberately obstructing federal agents at a worksite. Huerta will be arraigned in federal court June 9, Essayli said. 'Let me be clear: I don't care who you are – if you impede federal agents, you will be arrested and prosecuted,' Essayli said in a post on social media. 'No one has the right to assault, obstruct, or interfere with federal authorities carrying out their duties.' Federal authorities said they would continue their enforcement actions despite the protests in Los Angeles and across the country. ICE announced June 6 that nearly 1,500 undocumented immigrants were arrested in Massachusetts during a monthlong Operation Patriot. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump orders troops to LA as agents, protesters clash over immigration