logo
Electric Vehicles died a century ago. Could that happen again?

Electric Vehicles died a century ago. Could that happen again?

Observer27-05-2025

BURBANK, Calif. — More than a century before Tesla rolled out its first cars, the Baker Electric Coupe and the Riker Electric Roadster rumbled down American streets. Battery-powered cars were so popular that, for a time, about a third of New York's taxis were electric.
But those early electric vehicles began to lose ground to a new class of cars, like the Ford Model T, that were cheaper and could more easily be refueled by new oil-based fuels that were becoming available around the country. Bolstered by federal tax incentives in the 1920s, the oil industry boomed — and so did gasoline-powered cars.
That history has largely been forgotten, and almost all of the early electric cars have disappeared so completely that most people alive today have never seen one, and many have no idea that they even existed. A few specimens are in museums and private collections, including a fully restored Baker Electric that Jay Leno keeps in his sprawling California garage.
Leno's ancient electric car has a wooden frame and 36-inch rubber wheels. It looks like a stagecoach, but it is propelled by electric motors and batteries just like a current-day Tesla Model Y or Cadillac Lyriq. It elicited smiles and amazement from people on the streets of Burbank, California, when Leno drove it around town recently.
The car may be a novelty, but it is newly relevant because the United States may be poised to repeat history.
The Trump administration and Republicans in Congress are working to undercut the growth of electric vehicles, impose a new tax on them, and swing federal policy sharply in favor of oil and gasoline.
Scholars who have studied the earlier age of electric vehicles see parallels in their demise in the early decades of the 1900s and the attacks they are facing now. In both eras, electric cars struggled to gain acceptance in the marketplace and were undermined by politics. A big knock against them was that they had to be charged and ultimately were considered less convenient than vehicles with internal combustion engines.
'Electric cars are good if you have a towing company,' President Donald Trump said at a campaign rally in Iowa in October 2023. At another appearance the next month, he said, 'You can't get out of New Hampshire in an electric car.'
Charging and access to fuel were also concerns a century earlier.
Americans in the 1920s wanted to explore the country. But many rural and suburban areas didn't have electricity. President Franklin D. Roosevelt made a big push to electrify the entire country in 1936 — the last farms were connected to the grid in the early 1970s. That made it difficult to use electric cars in many places.
Republican leaders say that electric vehicles do not deserve subsidies in the tax code and that their tax bill levels the playing field that Democrats had tilted in favor of one technology.
A hundred years ago, lawmakers also put their thumbs on the scale — and came down on the side of oil.
The oil industry has enjoyed numerous tax breaks. One was enacted in 1926 when Congress allowed oil companies to deduct their taxable income by 27.5% of their sales. The sponsor of the legislation later admitted that the incentive was excessive.
'We grabbed 27.5% because we were not only hogs but the odd figure made it appear as though it was scientifically arrived at,' Sen. Tom Connally, D-Texas, who sponsored the break, was quoted as saying in a biography of Lyndon B. Johnson, 'Sam Johnson's Boy: A Close-Up of the President From Texas.'
That tax break lasted for decades. It was eliminated for large oil producers and reduced for smaller companies in 1975.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, crude oil became dominant. The Energy Department noted on a timeline on its website that electric cars 'all but disappeared by 1935.'
The triumph of internal combustion made long-distance travel accessible to the masses and helped power the U.S. economy. It also led to deadly urban air pollution and has been a major cause of climate change.
Now, the decades-long tug of war between combustion engine and electric cars is intensifying again, and electric cars may be in trouble, at least in the United States.
Sales of electric cars are growing quickly in most of the rest of world, increasing 35% in China in the first four months of the year and 25% in Europe, according to Rho Motion, a research firm. But in the United States, sales were up a more modest 11% in the first three months of 2025, according to Kelley Blue Book.
Republican leaders are pushing legislation that would eliminate many Biden administration programs intended to promote electric vehicle sales, including a $7,500 federal tax credit. They also want to impose a new annual $250 fee on electric vehicle owners to finance highway construction and maintenance.
While the Republican changes probably wouldn't kill electric vehicles, they could set the industry back years. 'E.V. momentum in the U.S. has slowed, with policy uncertainty mounting,' analysts at Bernstein said in a note this month.
But electric cars have not just been hampered by politics. They also had to overcome gender stereotypes. Their benefits, like quiet, smooth operation,n were considered by some men to be too feminine, and, in the late 1800s and early 1900s, many models like the Baker Electric were explicitly marketed only to women.
Advertisements for the early electrics hang on the walls of Leno's Burbank garage. 'Make This the Happiest Christmas — Give Your Wife an Electric,' proclaims one. On another, a young woman pleads, 'Daddy, Get Me a Baker.'
Men, by contrast, have long been pitched on the masculine virtues of gasoline vehicles that roar and thunder.
In the fall of 2022, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga..., who is closely allied with Trump, pushed the notion that gasoline cars are more macho at a rally. 'There's nothing more American than the roar of a V-8 engine under the hood of a Ford Mustang or Chevy Camaro, an incredible feel of all that horsepower.' But Democrats, she said, 'want to emasculate the way we drive.'
Elon Musk, Tesla's CEO who has been working with the Trump administration, has tried to broaden the appeal of electric vehicles. His company's newest model is the Cybertruck, a massive pickup truck with lots of sharp angles.
'Musk has done everything he could to try to make a Tesla a manly vehicle,' said Virginia Scharff, an emeritus distinguished professor of history at the University of New Mexico and author of numerous books, including 'Taking the Wheel: Women and the Coming of the Motor Age.'
But, Scharff added, Musk may have gone too far. His alignment with Trump's conservative politics has alienated some of the most reliable buyers of electric cars — liberals and environmentalists who hope to move the world away from fossil fuels.
'Here's like the gender flip: Tesla is so associated with a kind of toxic masculinity now as opposed to the electric car being associated with femininity in the early part of the 20th century,' Scharff said.
Leno, the former 'Tonight Show' host, who now has an online show focused on cars, 'Jay Leno's Garage,' has a restored 1909 Baker Electric in his collection. It has a top speed of 25 mph and can travel 80 miles on a full charge.
With a high-top cab decorated in Victorian flair, it has two fabric-cushioned bench seats facing each other and roller shades on the windows. The car was meant to accommodate fanciful women's hats, which at the turn of the century were often big and bold. As an added touch, the car's designers mounted a makeup case inside the car.
'What do men like?' Leno said. 'Something that rolls, explodes, and makes noise. That's why men like the gasoline car, because it frightened children, you know, that type of thing.'
Leno said he loves the Baker, which he drives around Burbank at least once a year, to see holiday lights and decorations with his wife.
He said such vehicles had many merits, convenience among them. They are low maintenance, they're fast, and you can fuel them at home, particularly at night when electricity is generally much more affordable than during the day.
The concept of home charging isn't new. Home car chargers also made their debut a century ago, only bulkier and a bit more frightful.
'It looked like a machine out of Dr. Frankenstein's laboratory,' said Leslie Kendall, chief historian at the Petersen Automotive Museum in Los Angeles.
Kendall said electric cars could have stuck around and even done well. But they were hampered by the lack of electricity in many communities, long charging times and their higher costs relative to gasoline vehicles — a Model T in 1908 cost about $650 compared with $1,750 for an electric roadster.
'You could carry extra gas with you,' he said. 'You couldn't carry extra electricity.'
Richard Riker, a grandson of electric car pioneer Andrew L. Riker, said his grandfather had identified one of the biggest stumbling blocks to the cars he designed and sold — one that lingers to this day.
'They didn't have charging stations out on the street corners like my grandfather said they needed to,' Riker said.
During the Biden administration, Congress sought to address that shortcoming by allocating $7.5 billion for the construction of public chargers. Trump has halted that program.
One of Andrew Riker's cars from the mid-1890s, a topless, two-seater cab that still sputters along at about 15 mph, is on display at the Petersen Museum along with other electric vehicles, both from history and those under development.
Despite policy and other challenges, Riker said he was still optimistic about electric vehicles. He expects that in the coming decades, technical advances will give such vehicles a big edge over gasoline vehicles.
'If you can charge a car in five minutes and go 500 miles,' he said, 'the gasoline engine is history.'
This article originally appeared in

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Population Census 2027 to be held in two phases along with enumeration of castes
Population Census 2027 to be held in two phases along with enumeration of castes

Times of Oman

time14 hours ago

  • Times of Oman

Population Census 2027 to be held in two phases along with enumeration of castes

New Delhi: The central government on Wednesday announced that the Population Census-2027 will be conducted in two phases and will also include the enumeration of castes. Opposition parties accused the government of further delaying the nationwide enumeration exercise. The Ministry of Home Affairs made the announcement in a statement, mentioning that the census will follow different reference dates depending on the region, in accordance with logistical and climatic factors. "It has been decided to conduct Population Census-2027 in two phases along with the enumeration of castes," the statement said. Reacting to the announcement, Congress said that the government was further delaying the already late census. DMK alleged that the census would be held after the proposed delimitation and that there was a plan to reduce Tamil Nadu's Parliamentary representation. According to the MHA statement, the reference date for the "Population Census-2027 will be 00:00 hours on March 1, 2027, for most parts of the country." However, for the Union Territory of "Ladakh, and the non-synchronous snow-bound areas of Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, and Uttarakhand, the reference date will be 00:00 hours on October 1, 2026.' The government has also indicated that a notification of intent to conduct the census, adhering to the above-mentioned timelines, will be published in the Official Gazette on June 16, 2025. This will be done under Section 3 of the Census Act, 1948, which governs the legal framework for the decennial census exercise in census, due in 2021, was delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Census 2027 is slated to be one of the most comprehensive data-gathering exercises undertaken by the Indian government. Census of India is conducted under the provisions of the Census Act, 1948 and the Census Rules, last Census of India was conducted in 2011 in two phases, namely i) Phase I - House Listing (HLO) (1 April to 30 September 2010) and (ii) Phase II - Population Enumeration (PE) (February 9 to February 28, 2011) with reference date - 00:00 hours of the first day of March 2011, except for snow-bound non-synchronous areas of Jammu and Kashmir, Uttarakhand and Himachal Pradesh for which it was conducted during September 11 to 30, 2010 with reference date as 00.00 hours of the first day of October 2010. Census 2021 was also proposed to be conducted in two phases in a similar manner with phase I during April-September 2020 and second phase in February 2021. All the preparations for the first phase of the Census to be conducted in 2021 were completed and field work was scheduled to begin in some States/UTs from April 1, 2020. However, due to the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic across the country, the census work was postponed. Congress leader Jairam Ramesh said in a post on X that there is really no reason to delay the Census, which was due in 2021, for another twenty-three months. 'The Modi Government is capable only of generating headlines, not meeting deadlines,' he said. Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin said that the Indian Constitution mandates that delimitation must follow the first Census after 2026. 'The BJP has now delayed the Census to 2027, making their plan clear to reduce Tamil Nadu's Parliamentary representation. I had warned about this. It is now unfolding,' he said in a post on X. He also hit out at AIADMK leader Edappadi K Palaniswami.

Musk unleashes another attack on Trump's spending legislation
Musk unleashes another attack on Trump's spending legislation

Times of Oman

time14 hours ago

  • Times of Oman

Musk unleashes another attack on Trump's spending legislation

Washington, DC: Tesla chief executive Elon Musk has unleashed yet another assault on US President Donald Trump's flagship spending legislation, urging Americans to lobby Congress to "KILL the BILL" - mere days after departing his position within the Trump administration. The Tesla and SpaceX founder served 130 days as a "special government employee" at the helm of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), with a mandate to eliminate what he characterised as bloated government programmes. However, his exit last week has triggered an avalanche of condemnation directed at the very administration he previously championed. Musk intensified his offensive earlier today, cautioning that "America is in the fast lane to debt slavery" while insisting on a comprehensive overhaul of the legislation. "A new spending bill should be drafted that doesn't massively grow the deficit and increase the debt ceiling by 5 TRILLION DOLLARS," he demanded. He even urged people to call their senators, Congressmen regarding the bill. In a post on X, Musk stated, "Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL." In another post shared on X, Musk stated, "This spending bill contains the largest increase in the debt ceiling in US history! It is the Debt Slavery Bill." Musk's dramatic intervention arrives at a pivotal moment for Trump's self-described "big, beautiful bill", which encompasses sweeping tax reductions and expanded military expenditure. The House of Representatives approved the measure by the narrowest of margins last month, with only three Republican members dissenting against solid Democratic resistance. The tech entrepreneur's vow to "fire all the politicians who betrayed the American people" in upcoming midterm contests has reverberated throughout Republican circles. Given his investment of hundreds of millions in their electoral campaigns, Musk's hostility could spell disaster for sitting members confronting primary battles and imperil Republican aspirations to maintain Congressional dominance. The White House has responded to Musk's insurrection with marked restraint. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt indicated that Trump is "already aware" of Musk's stance, declaring: "This is one big, beautiful bill, and he's sticking to it." Trump has established a Fourth of July target for the legislation's completion, which incorporates a USD 4 trillion expansion of US borrowing capacity. US Treasury Department advisors caution that failure to implement this increase by August could precipitate America's first-ever sovereign debt default.

The top sources of U.S. steel and aluminium imports
The top sources of U.S. steel and aluminium imports

Observer

timea day ago

  • Observer

The top sources of U.S. steel and aluminium imports

The U.S. tariff rate on most imported steel and aluminum doubled on Wednesday as President Donald Trump ratcheted up a global trade war. Here's a summary of the major trade partners it will affect. STEEL: Roughly a quarter of all steel used in the U.S. is imported, the bulk of it from neighbours Mexico and Canada or close allies in Asia and Europe such as Japan, South Korea and Germany. While China is the world's largest steel producer and exporter, it sends very little to the United States. Tariffs of 25% imposed in 2018 shut most Chinese steel out of the market. China exported 508,000 net tons of steel to the U.S. last year or 1.8% of total American steel imports. ALUMINUM: For aluminum, the U.S. is more heavily reliant on imports. Roughly half of all aluminum used in the U.S. is imported, with the vast majority coming from Canada. At 3.2 million tons last year, Canadian imports were twice those of the next nine countries combined. The next largest sources of imports are the United Arab Emirates and China, at 347,034 and 222,872 metric tons, respectively. The U.S. aluminum smelting industry is small by global standards. Total smelter capacity in the country was just 1.73% of the global total according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store