Orange County, Calif., registrar sued over non-citizen voter records
June 25 (UPI) -- Orange County (Calif.) Registrar of Voters Robert Page has unlawfully refused to provide complete records showing the removal of non-citizens from voter registration lists, the Department of Justice says.
The DOJ on Wednesday accused Page of refusing to provide records showing the removal of non-citizens from voter registration records in violation of federal election laws.
The DOJ filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for Central California in Los Angeles and named Page as the sole defendant.
The DOJ accuses Page of violating the Help America Vote Act of 2002 and the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, which require him to maintain voter lists and disclose them.
"Voting by non-citizens is a federal crime, and states and counties that refuse to disclose all requested voter information are in violation of well-established federal elections laws," Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon said Wednesday in a news release.
"Removal of non-citizens from the state's voter rolls is critical to ensuring that the state's voter rolls are accurate and that elections in California are conducted without fraudulent voting," Dhillon said.
"The Department of Justice will hold jurisdictions that refuse to comply with federal voting laws accountable," he added.
The lawsuit arises from a June 2 complaint that Attorney General Pam Bondi received from the family member of a "non-citizen" in Orange County.
The complaint says the "non-citizen" received a mail-in ballot that the person did not request but allegedly was sent by Page.
Maureen Riordan, Acting Chief of the DOJ's Civil Rights Division's Voting Section, on the same day asked Page to provide records dating from Jan. 1, 2020, to the present and showing the cancellations of voter registration records due to respective individuals not being U.S. citizens.
Riordan also asked for records for the same period that show the respective voter registration applications, registration records, voting histories and related correspondences for each cancelled voter registration.
The DOJ said Page responded to Bondi's request on June 16 by providing records that redacted state driver's license and ID card numbers, social security numbers, state-assigned voter ID numbers, language preferences and images of each person's signatures.
Page "relied upon several California statutes as the basis for the redactions," the DOJ said.
The DOJ a day later notified Page that the documents he provided make it impossible to accurately assess compliance with federal election laws due to the redactions.
The DOJ also notified Page that his reliance on state law to prevent the DOJ from receiving the requested information is pre-empted by federal law.
Federal law requires Page to "maintain for at least two years ... all records concerning the implementation of programs and activities conducted for the purpose of ensuring the accuracy and currency of official lists of eligible voters," according to the DOJ.
Page on Monday, through Assistant Orange County Attorney James Steinmann, confirmed he won't provide the unredacted records that were requested by the DOJ, the lawsuit alleges.
The DOJ accuses Page of one count each of violating the HAVA and NVRA and asks the court to provide the unredacted information sought by Bondi and others in the Justice Department.
Orange County officials declined to comment on the matter due to the "pending or ongoing litigation."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Hegseth orders 3rd border buffer zone along U.S.-Mexico border
The Pentagon has ordered the creation of a third National Defense Area along the U.S.-Mexico border. File Photo by Pat Benic/UPI | License Photo June 26 (UPI) -- Amid the Trump administration's crackdown on immigration, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered the establishment of another buffer zone along the U.S.-Mexico border where the military can apprehend non-citizens. The National Defense Area, announced Wednesday, will cover about 250 miles of the Rio Grande River in Texas' Cameron and Hidalgo Counties. According to a statement from the U.S. Air Force, Hegseth issued the directed on June 18. "This designation marks the latest in a series of NDAs established to strengthen interagency coordination and bolster security operations along the U.S. southern border," the Air Force said. With the move, three NDAs have been established along the U.S.-Mexico border under President Donald Trump's April 11 memorandum directing the U.S. military to seal the southern border to repel an alleged "invasion" of immigrants trying to enter the country. Border security was a key focus of Trump's re-election campaign, which included him spouting derogatory rhetoric and misinformation about migrants. Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has led a crackdown on immigration. In NDAs, U.S. military personnel can temporarily detain alleged trespassers and then transfer them to appropriate law enforcement. So far, the Trump administration has erected three NDAs including the one announced Wednesday. The first NDA was established in New Mexico on April 21 and spans some 170 miles along the state's border. The second one was erected on May 1 in West Texas, covering about 63 miles between El Paso and Fort Hancock. The first trial conviction for trespassing in an NDA occurred earlier this month.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
US drops charges against LA protester accused of assaulting officers: ‘A huge relief'
Federal prosecutors in California have moved to dismiss charges against a Los Angeles protester accused of assaulting border patrol agents, a major victory for the demonstrator who said he himself was brutally attacked by law enforcement. US attorney Bill Essayli, a Donald Trump appointee, filed a motion on Wednesday to dismiss a complaint against Jose Manuel Mojica, a 30-year-old Los Angeles resident who was present at one of the first major protests of immigration raids in southern California this month. Mojica, a father of four born in LA, came forward last week to the Guardian, which published footage of his arrest by a group of officers. Mojica, who strongly rejected the charges, was facing eight years in federal prison over the 7 June arrest, which left him injured. 'I feel a huge relief,' Mojica said on Thursday. He had spent two nights in jail and has been forced to wear an ankle monitor for nearly two weeks. 'They knew they were in the wrong and they didn't want to face the court. The truth is always going to come out in the end.' Mojica was one of nine people arrested and charged with federal crimes in a first round of charges that the Trump administration highlighted as evidence of violence by protesters. On Wednesday, US prosecutors also moved to dismiss the charges against a second protester who was arrested at the same time as Mojica and who was seen on footage being shoved by a federal agent. Civil rights advocates and defense attorneys who analyzed the Department of Justice's criminal complaints and footage of the incidents have scrutinized the prosecutions, arguing that in some cases authorities were misrepresenting events, going after people who were themselves injured by officers and criminalizing free speech. The US attorney's office and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) did not respond to requests for comment on Thursday about the dismissal of charges. After hearing reports of Ice indiscriminately targeting workers and neighbors in his predominantly Latino community, Mojica said he went to the demonstration in Paramount, in southern LA county near his home. He had not participated in protests since marching with his father as a child, but after seeing how Ice caused widespread fear and panic in the region, and as a US citizen, he wanted to support the rally. Mojica, who works at warehouses in the region unloading shipping containers, said the situation escalated when increasing numbers of heavily armed agents arrived. Grainy cellphone footage, including video taken by his spouse, captured the moment when he was arrested in a chaotic scuffle. While some demonstrators shouted at officers, one agent was seen forcefully shoving a protester standing near Mojica. The videos did not clearly show what happened next, but Mojica said he was trying to de-escalate the situation and stop the protester who was shoved from retaliating. A crowd of officers then quickly took them both to the ground. 'I thought I was going to die at that moment and never get up from the ground and see my kids again,' Mojica said last week. 'I couldn't breathe.' He said officers held him in a chokehold and pushed him into the pavement, causing a large contusion on his nose and bruises all over his body – some of which were visible four days later. At one point during his arrest and transport, an officer told him he could be facing 20 years in prison, he recalled. Mojica, who had no criminal record, was charged alongside three other co-defendants he said he didn't know. A criminal affidavit included few details about Mojica but alleged he 'elbowed and pushed' border patrol agents and 'physically made an attempt to thwart [the other protester's] arrest'. Prosecutors' two-page filing to dismiss Mojica's case provided no details on the decision, but said the request was 'made in good faith and in the interest of justice'. A judge still has to sign the order. 'Based on the video, I knew my client did nothing wrong,' Meghan Blanco, Mojica's attorney and a former federal prosecutor, said on Thursday. 'There was no scenario that I could see this case moving forward in a manner that would have been helpful to the government. Once they had an opportunity to look at the video themselves, I think they very quickly came to the same conclusion.' Blanco, who previously prosecuted use-of-force cases against federal agents, said Mojica's case was not unique. 'I'm hopeful this is just the first of many [dismissals] for protesters who were charged with violating the law simply based on the fact that they were protesting and exercising their constitutional rights, not because they were being violent or doing anything illegal,' Blanco said. The impacts of the prosecution have been significant, she noted. Essayli, the US attorney, earlier posted Mojica's photo and name on X, formerly Twitter, announcing his arrest and saying the government would 'continue to arrest anyone who interferes with federal law enforcement'. The post led to widespread comments calling for Mojica, a US citizen, to be deported. Mojica said he had been suffering flashbacks from his arrest and was still struggling with pain in his back and ribs from his injuries, in addition to having difficulty sleeping. 'I want people to know they are not alone, there are a lot of people on our side, and they know how the officers treat people,' he said. 'And if people know they are innocent, they should keep fighting and don't be intimidated.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
DoJ leader suggested defying courts over deportations, whistleblower says
Emil Bove, the Department of Justice's principal associate deputy attorney general, who Donald Trump nominated for the US court of appeals for the third circuit, reportedly said the department 'would need to consider telling the courts 'fuck you'' when it came to orders blocking the deportation of undocumented people. Former attorney at the justice department, Erez Reuveni, claimed Bove said the agency should violate court orders. In a whistleblower letter to members of Congress first obtained by the New York Times, Reuveni painted the scene of a lawless justice department willingly to defy the courts and fire the people who stood in their way. Related: 'Clouded in mystery': how Ice became a rogue agency that does Trump's bidding 'Mr. Reuveni was stunned by Bove's statement because, to Mr. Reuveni's knowledge, no one in DOJ leadership - in any Administration – had ever suggested the Department of Justice could blatantly ignore court orders, especially with a 'fuck you,'' says the letter, written by his lawyers at the Government Accountability Project. The comments came in the context of Trump invoking the Alien Enemies Act to deport people on removal flights in mid-March, the letter contends, after Bove 'stressed to all in attendance that the planes needed to take off no matter what'. At the time of Bove's alleged comments, Reuveni, who was in the meeting, said he was in disbelief. But in the three weeks that followed, his disbelief became 'a relic of a different time' as the department undermined the courts and rule of law. In three separate cases Reuveni was involved in, he found 'internal efforts of DOJ and White House leadership to defy (court orders) through lack of candor, deliberate delay and disinformation'. Reuveni was a career attorney who had served across multiple administrations for 15 years in the department, including the first Trump administration. Reuveni says he directly witnessed and reported to his superiors a host of misconduct, including 'DOJ officials undermining the rule of law by ignoring court orders; DOJ officials presenting 'legal' arguments with no basis in law; high-ranking DOJ and DHS officials misrepresenting facts presented before courts; and DOJ officials directing Mr. Reuveni to misrepresent facts in one of these cases in violation of legal and ethical duties as an officer of the court'. Reuveni had notified the court in the case of Kilmar Ábrego García, the Maryland man erroneously deported to El Salvador who has since returned to the US, that Ábrego García's deportation had been a 'mistake'. He said he refused his superiors' directive to file a brief to the court that would have misrepresented the facts of the case. He was subsequently put on administrative leave and then terminated on 11 April. Trump administration officials have said Reuveni didn't 'vigorously' or 'zealously' defend his client, the United States. 'Discouraging clients from engaging in illegal conduct is an important part of the role of lawyer,' the whistleblower letter says. 'Mr. Reuveni tried to do so and was thwarted, threatened, fired, and publicly disparaged for both doing his job and telling the truth to the court.' Bove is set for a confirmation hearing on his judicial nomination before the Senate judiciary committee on Wednesday, where the whistleblower's claims are sure to enter into questioning. The White House and justice department have denied Reuveni's claims, according to the New York Times. Todd Blanche, the deputy attorney general and Bove's boss, called Reuveni's accounts 'falsehoods purportedly made by a disgruntled former employee and then leaked to the press in violation of ethical obligations' and questioned the timing of its release ahead of Bove's confirmation hearing.
