WV Senate passes bill that would expand work, training requirements for SNAP
Sen. Rollan Roberts, R- Raleigh, lead sponsor of Senate Bill 249, addresses the Senate during the session Wednesday, March 26, 2025, in Charleston, W.Va. (Will Price | West Virginia Legislative Photography)
The West Virginia Senate has approved a bill that would expand the work and training requirements for recipients of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, commonly called food stamps.
Senators approved Senate Bill 249 with no discussion and a vote of 32 to 2.
With some exceptions, able-bodied people without dependents ages 18 to 54 are required to work or train in order to receive SNAP benefits. The bill would expand the age to 59 by requiring the Department of Human Services to assign people in that age range to a mandatory work or training program.
Under the bill, exemptions include caring for a child under age 6 or an incapacitated adult, going to school at least part time, being employed at least 30 hours a week and participating in a drug or alcohol treatment program, among other things.
The bill would allow the state Department of Human Services to exempt up to 20% of individuals from the SNAP Employment and Training program work based on challenges that the person would experience complying with the requirements.
According to a fiscal note from the Department of Human Services, the agency estimates the cost of implementing the legislation would be $2.7 million in state funding for fiscal year 2026 and about $1.7 million per year in state funding when the bill is fully implemented. Those costs include hiring one new family support supervisor in each county office to oversee the program. The department warns that the implementation of a program based on this bill might lead to a higher error rate for SNAP, which could lead to the state having to pay back federal funding.
'Other states implementing mandatory E&T programs have seen drastic increases in their SNAP error rates,' the department wrote. 'Error rates above the national average for two consecutive years place a state at risk of federal financial sanctions requiring potential repayment of federal funding. While West Virginia's error rates are currently compliant, the administrative complexity of implementing new eligibility criteria under a mandatory program does expose the state to significant risk of repayment.'
Rhonda Rogombe, health and safety new policy analyst for the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy, called the bill harmful.
'We know from lots of studies, including some of our own, that mandating work reporting requirements disconnects people from access to food but does not connect them to work,' she said Wednesday. 'So we have lots of concerns about this bill.'
The bill would also impact retailers that rely on SNAP and put pressure on the state's food banks as they fill in the gaps, she said.
Jeremiah Samples, the former deputy secretary of the Department of Health and Human Resources and now a lobbyist for the right-leaning organization Opportunity Solutions Project, previously testified in support of the bill, saying it gives people both the expectation and resources to work.
The legislation has been opposed by representatives of the state's charitable food network. Caitlin Cook, director of advocacy and public policy for Mountaineer Food Bank, told West Virginia Watch previously that in other states, mandatory education and training programs have increased food insecurity.
The Senate passed the legislation during the 2024 legislative session, but the House did not adopt it.
The bill will next go to the House of Delegates for consideration.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's 2026 Budget Proposal: 4 Things Retirees Need To Know
President Donald Trump's 2026 budget proposal, known as the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' introduces significant changes to federal spending and tax policies. Read Next: Try This: While aiming to reduce non-defense discretionary spending and extend tax cuts, the proposal has raised concerns about its potential impact on retirees who rely on federal programs for income, healthcare and essential services. 'These potential shifts could slow benefit growth, raise Medicare premiums or target higher earners with stricter eligibility or tax rules,' said Aaron Cirksena, founder and CEO of MDRN Capital. 'The biggest concern is uncertainty right now, and retirees rely on predictability, so even these small changes can have a big impact on them.' Here are four things retirees need to know about Trump's 2026 budget proposal. According to Congressional Budget Office analysis, if Trump's budget proposal, currently being debated in Congress, raises the federal deficit by $2.3 trillion over the next decade, it would automatically trigger spending cuts, including a projected $500 billion cut to Medicare. Such cuts may lead to reduced payments to providers, potentially affecting seniors' access to healthcare services. An analysis by the Medicare Rights Center, an advocacy organization, found that the 'bill would undermine access to long-term care by shifting costs to states, likely resulting in cuts to HCBS (Home-and Community-Based Services). It would also make it harder for people to qualify for Medicaid coverage and avoid gaps in care.' Find Out: Key programs under the Older Americans Act, such as nutrition services and caregiver support, are at risk of significant funding reductions or elimination. For example, the National Council on Aging found that the Trump administration proposes to move the Aging Network Support program to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and reduce the program's funding by over 40%. The program allows seniors to live independently in their homes. This matters for individuals saving for retirement, because adult children often incur significant costs for caring for their parents. According to an AARP study, 'On average, caregivers spend 26% of their personal income on caregiving expenses. One in three dips into their personal savings, like bank accounts, to cover costs, and 12% take out a loan or borrow from family or friends.' The budget proposes substantial cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which could disproportionately affect low-income seniors who depend on these programs for healthcare and food security. According to NPR, 'If approved, starting in fiscal year 2028, states would be required to pay between 5% and 25% of food benefit costs for the first time. … In addition, states would receive less federal support to administer SNAP. The proposed changes would decrease the federal reimbursement rate for administrative costs to run SNAP from 50% to 25%.' An analysis of the Medicaid and SNAP cuts by The Commonwealth Fund found that these changes create ripple effects that affect the economies of entire communities, not just low-income households. 'For example, some of the food purchased in Georgia may have been grown in Kansas or processed in Tennessee, so lower grocery purchases in one state may cause losses in other states,' the Commonwealth report stated. 'A nurse who loses her job at a Louisiana clinic might reside in Texas; thus, a job lost in one state could create economic losses in another.' While the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' proposes extending tax cuts from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, it does not include provisions to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits, contrary to some expectations. The bill does introduce a new $4,000 standard deduction for seniors aged 65 and older, providing tax relief for individuals with adjusted gross incomes of $75,000 and couples with incomes of $150,000 annually. However, the substantial tax cuts and increased spending outlined in the proposal are projected to add approximately $3.8 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. This significant increase in the deficit raises concerns among financial experts about potential future tax hikes to address the fiscal imbalance. 'If the proposal is passed, it could increase taxes on retirement income, making Roth conversions and smart withdrawal strategies more important than ever,' Cirksena said. 'The best move right now is do not wait. Review incomes, run scenarios and add some flexibility into your plan. Better to adjust early than react late.' Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 4 Housing Markets That Have Plummeted in Value Over the Past 5 Years 10 Genius Things Warren Buffett Says To Do With Your Money This article originally appeared on Trump's 2026 Budget Proposal: 4 Things Retirees Need To Know Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk goes scorched earth: Trump will cause recession, implies he should be impeached
Elon Musk and Donald Trump's alliance continues to publicly implode, with the world's richest man taking aim at the president's signature economic policy — tariffs — and implying he should be removed from office. 'The Trump tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of this year,' Musk wrote on X Thursday afternoon. It marks Musk's biggest criticism yet of one of Trump's most beloved policies. Musk also took aim at one of the president's most-hated political maneuvers: impeachment. Responding to another post about who would win in a fight between Musk and Trump — which also calls for Trump to be impeached and for Vice President JD Vance to replace him — Musk simply responded: 'Yes.' Trump was impeached twice by a Democratic-controlled House during his first term, but was acquitted both times by the Senate. Musk — who's been launching back and forth attacks with Trump all day Thursday — has never been a big fan of Trump's sweeping tariff plans, and publicly ridiculed Peter Navarro, one of the public faces of Trump's trade war, while he was still a government employee. The tariffs are set to have huge implications for Musk's car company Tesla, because of the rising costs of materials and manufacturing abroad. The car company's stocks took a dive following the tariff announcements, and were also impacted by Musk's growing absence from the company during his time as Trump's special adviser while leading the Department of Government Efficiency. That said, Musk has called Tesla the 'least affected' car company from the tariffs, due to supply chains being split between Europe, China and North America. But the Tesla CEO hasn't shied away from bashing Trump's trade advisers in the past — even labeling Navarro a 'moron.' In addition to railing against the tariffs, Musk has spent the last three days rallying against the administration's "big beautiful bill," which he called "disgusting" and "pork-filled" in a flood of X posts — urging Senate Republicans to reject the mega-funding legislation. Trump hit back early Thursday, saying he was 'disappointed' by Musk's comments. 'Elon and I had a great relationship,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'I don't know if we will anymore.' Upon return to their respective social media sites, the two turned up the heat. What has since ensued has been a barrage of X posts from the billionaire and corresponding Truth Social posts from the president that have widened a chasm between the two — who just last Friday stood side by side at the Oval Office on Musk's last day in the White House, as Trump thanked him for his service. Now, Trump said Musk has a case of 'Trump Derangement Syndrome,' a taunt usually reserved for his political opponents. He's also floating ending all of Musk's federal government contracts including with his company SpaceX — one of NASA's biggest contractors. The attacks escalated when Musk suggested that Trump would not have won the 2024 election without his help, and that Republicans would have been outnumbered in Congress. 'Such ingratitude,' Musk wrote on X, referencing the hundreds of millions he poured into Trump's and other GOP campaigns. Musk had a poll running at the top of his X feed asking people about forming a third party. He had suggested on Tuesday, when he took his first big shot at the Republican megabill, that he could fund campaigns to primary and potentially unseat Republicans that backed the legislation. The SpaceX founder then dropped what he described as the 'really big bomb.' Musk suggested that Trump's name appears in records of the investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and said the records 'have not been made public' to conceal that fact. In February, the Department of Justice released what it called the 'first phase' of documents related to the Epstein investigation, which has been a fixation of some of the president's supporters. It has long been public that Trump — along with other prominent figures, like Bill Clinton — are referenced in documents released in court cases surrounding Epstein. But Trump is not accused of any wrongdoing linked to Epstein. Trump has tied Musk's criticism of the 'big beautiful bill' to the looming end of a tax credit for electric vehicles, which will also deal a blow to Tesla. 'Suddenly he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out we're going to cut the EV mandate that's billions and billions of dollars,' Trump said Thursday. Musk denied Trump's framing, reaffirming his larger criticism of the bill's spending and the potential for it to add trillions to the national deficit over the next 10 years. The former DOGE adviser also shut down the idea that he was familiar with the 'inner workings' of the bill from his time in the White House, calling that a lie.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Attorney Coretta Anthony-Smith's money haul stirs up race for Thompson's seat
The special election for state Senate in Orange County includes two high-profile siblings and a former congressman. But a newcomer to politics is hauling in more campaign money then all of them. Coretta Anthony-Smith, 54, an attorney from Gotha, is the wild card in the race to succeed the late state Sen. Geraldine Thompson, who died in February. Anthony-Smith is running in the June 24 Democratic primary for District 15, which includes parts of Orlando, Ocoee and western Orange County, against three current or former lawmakers — state Rep. LaVon Bracy Davis, former state Sen. Randolph Bracy, who is Bracy Davis' brother, and former U.S. Rep. Alan Grayson. The race was already going to be a heated one, with Bracy Davis garnering her mother's endorsement over her brother, Bracy slamming his sister in turn, and Grayson's long history of liberal bomb-throwing. But as of Thursday, Anthony-Smith has raised more than all of them combined, loaning herself $175,000 alongside contributions totaling more than $39,000. An affiliated PAC chaired by Anthony-Smith, Action for Change now, has also raised $66,500, largely from personal injury firms. Meanwhile, Bracy has raised $9,000, most of it loans to himself, while Grayson loaned himself $9,000. Bracy Davis has taken in about $10,000, while the committee Liberated by Democracy, which she chairs, has raised $7,500 this year. 'The money makes it a potential for an upset there,' said Matt Isbell, a Democratic elections analyst. 'It's not a guarantee, and it could also fall flat. But it's definitely a race to watch now, even more than it was already.' Last year, Bracy Davis, 45, endorsed Thompson over her brother when Bracy launched what became a bitter Democratic primary battle, ultimately won by Thompson. Bracy, 48, threw his hat into the ring again the day after Thompson died, announcing via video from Italy that he would run for her seat. His sister announced her candidacy about a month later. Grayson, 67, served two incendiary stints in Congress and has since run unsuccessful campaigns for Congress, U.S. Senate and state Senate. Anthony-Smith, 54, said she became a personal injury attorney in part because of her family's tragic history. When she was a teen, her mother was killed by a drunk driver who ended up serving very little jail time, and her father died of cancer shortly afterward. 'Growing up like that, it causes you to have a certain amount of resilience, a certain amount of determination, a certain amount of 'I will not let this get me down,'' she said. She said she was inspired to run after years of meeting with legislators and testifying before committees in Tallahassee gave her an upfront view of how the process works. And it made her want to do better, especially after she heard insurance company executives speak and was convinced they were not being truthful nor looking out for customers. 'When they called the insurance companies to testify in the House, they were telling citizens that there was a lot of fraud going on, there was a lot of litigation going on, and so that's why they were losing money,' Anthony-Smith said. 'But in reality, they were making money. They were just playing some type of shell game with their affiliates while not paying claims, but raising premiums.' She was hopeful that the Legislature would crack down on insurance companies, but the attempts at reform over the last few years — focused mostly on combating fraud — left her disappointed 'Nothing happened,' she said. 'It just fell through the cracks. … I don't recall the representatives coming back and telling their constituents anything about what was going on in Tallahassee. I don't recall them coming back and letting us know that, 'Hey, there's an insurance crisis that's about to take effect that's going to seriously affect all of our lives.'' Aubrey Jewett, a professor of political science at the University of Central Florida, said Anthony-Smith's biggest challenge is to get her name out to the public, especially considering her high-profile opponents. 'She hasn't held office before, and that means most people probably are not that familiar with her,' Jewett said. But she's helped by special elections typically having very low turnouts compared to regular elections, he added. 'In a four-way race, you don't have to get to 50%,' Jewett said. 'You just have to get more than everybody else, because we don't have runoffs. She needs to be willing to go out and spend a lot of money, and spend it wisely in ways that make sense for an outsider candidate to try to raise their name recognition.' More than $19,000 of her campaign's spending, according to campaign filings, has been for marketing and merchandise being done through Zoolix, an Ocoee corporation for which Anthony-Smith is the registered agent. That includes her website and campaign t-shirts. She's also tried to get one-on-one time with as many voters as possible. 'I've been going to different churches every Sunday,' she said. 'I've been going to HOA meetings. I've been going to community events. I've been doing a lot of grassroot efforts. I ask people, 'If you cannot donate to my campaign, at least can you donate your time? Can you phone bank? Can you canvas?' Meanwhile, Bracy Davis, as an incumbent House member, is hamstrung by the law preventing incumbent state lawmakers' campaigns from fundraising while the Legislature is in session. A budget deadlock between the House and Senate led to leaders extending the session until June 30 — six days after the Democratic primary. The winner of the primary will face Republican Willie Montague on Sept. 2.
