logo
Wealthy Whoopi Goldberg fails to see the irony of her ‘oppression' narrative – or that the US is NOTHING like Iran

Wealthy Whoopi Goldberg fails to see the irony of her ‘oppression' narrative – or that the US is NOTHING like Iran

New York Post6 hours ago

They say the more money you have, the more problems you'll encounter.
For many wealthy leftists, it seems that the more money they possess, the more willing they are to exaggerate the problems of society.
And the tendency to overstate social ills and life hurdles tends to get worse if you're a black person who thrives in the highest tax bracket.
Advertisement
Whoopi Goldberg is one of these wealthy black Americans who enjoys rhetorically disassociating from their economic privilege to wallow in race-oppression narratives.
On Wednesday's edition of ABC's 'The View,' Goldberg ridiculously equated life under Iran's oppressive regime with life in the United States for black Americans.
'Let's remember, too, the Iranians throw gay people off buildings. They don't adhere to basic human rights,' co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin argued.
Advertisement
'I'm sorry, they used to hang black people [in America],' Goldberg retorted.
'It is not even the same,' Griffin tried to explain.
'I think it's very different to live in the United States in 2025 than it is to live in Iran.'
'Not if you're black!' Goldberg countered.
Advertisement
'Nobody wants to diminish the very real problems that we have,' Griffin responded.
'But I think it's important to remember that there are places that much darker than this country.'
'Not everybody feels that way!' exclaimed Goldberg.
'Black-people whisperer'
Advertisement
As the conversation devolved, Joy Behar was momentarily anointed the 'black-people whisperer' as she attempted to translate Goldberg's sentiment.
'Try to reverse roles with a black person in this country, just try to understand from their point of view,' Behar pleaded.
'From that point of view, this country does not do them well.'
One of the many problems with weaving a victim narrative is that it transports you into an ideological oblivion, making you nearly ­incapable of recognizing how self-unaware you sound to normal people.
Watching millionaires on 'The View' trash a nation that has given them lives of abundance
is absolutely nauseating to ­witness — and, to the average American, comes across as ­incredibly ungrateful.
Like Goldberg, many wealthy black people, lacking any ongoing sense of personal struggle, feel guilty for their success.
Yet they believe being black in America is synonymous with strife — and through race association, they can live the poor black experience vicariously, safe inside their gated communities and ­penthouses.
Goldberg is one I would classify as a 'verbal victim,' because she has in fact overcome a multitude of personal and social obstacles to achieve worldwide fame and ­fortune.
Advertisement
Yet she pathetically holds on to her oppression narratives because they carry no negative ramifications in her luxurious world, only applause from victim-enabling white leftists like Joy Behar.
Goldberg could instead hold up her life as an example of an American success story — but then she'd have no struggle to complain about.
So why are you still here?
She can't even see the irony of crying 'oppression' as a public commentator who unabashedly ridicules and disrespects the president — a role that could simply not exist in truly oppressive Iran.
Advertisement
A person's actions mean more than their flippant words: If Goldberg feels so unsafe living in America as a black woman, why is she still here?
People from nations like Iran flee to America to escape real persecution with nothing but an ambitious spirit to support them, yet a multimillionaire with an appetite for whining can't seem to purchase a one-way ticket elsewhere.
Goldberg is one of those upper-class comfortable complainers who uses the perceived problems of others as a form of social ­currency.
When convenient, she'll use my race as either a tool to grab attention for herself, or a weapon to bludgeon the people she despises.
Advertisement
I'm black, I love America, and my experience here is in no way comparable to life in Iran.
Whoopi doesn't speak for me.
Adam B. Coleman is the author of 'The Children We Left Behind' and founder of Wrong Speak Publishing.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The guy helping to ‘bring hell' to Boston? He's from Boston.
The guy helping to ‘bring hell' to Boston? He's from Boston.

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

The guy helping to ‘bring hell' to Boston? He's from Boston.

Over the past weeks, many Americans have taken to the streets to protest the deportation of coworkers, family, schoolmates, and neighbors — and in some cases to protest the existence of ICE. At the same time, Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up For Lyons, the mission remains simple: enforce immigration law. Advertisement While criminals are the priority, 'everything's on the table,' he told me in a conference room at ICE headquarters in Washington, D.C., this week. And it appears he means it. From The agency is acting more broadly than it did under President Joe Biden, who banned collateral arrests — detaining illegal immigrants who were found while in pursuit of migrants with criminal records. 'If more agencies had just turned people over in a confined setting [law enforcement custody], we wouldn't be out in the community. We're going to bump into more people. We can't walk away from them,' Lyons said. That was the same justification ICE used last month when its agents Advertisement Trump officials have zeroed in on progressive-led places like Boston and Massachusetts in an effort that partially feels like political retribution for sanctuary policies. The president's border czar, Tom Homan, threatened to But Lyons, who worked in immigration enforcement in Boston for four years, sees the pressure less as political, and more as self-inflicted. Massachusetts often releases immigrants charged or convicted with serious crimes instead of handing them over to ICE, authorities often But that isn't Lyons' only gripe. 'Lunn just says you can't hold anybody on our detainers,' he said. 'But that doesn't mean the Mass. State Police can't pick up the phone and say, 'Hey, we got this guy on the side of the road.'' Advertisement He claimed that some of the state's political leaders obstruct this cooperation. But sometimes police unofficially give ICE their support. He gave an example from Joint Base Cape Cod, which served as a temporary migrant shelter. Lyons said that a State Police official claimed they found a 'guy that's wanted for murder in Venezuela,' but that they weren't allowed to turn him over to ICE. But a law enforcement official told him: 'If you magically show up at the front gate, we'll give him to you.' Other local police departments have quietly reached out for help, he says, leaving ICE to take the heat when they detain people. That is what Lyons told me happened during Martha's Vineyard has six different police departments, and doesn't have one police chief. The county sheriff Robert Ogden told me that he didn't have any prior knowledge of the recent operation. I reached out to Lyons after the interview and was told that some police departments on the Vineyard 'cooperate, a few don't.' The ability to cooperate with local officials to track down criminals is personal for Lyons. He says he lost a family member some years back to a fentanyl overdose. When investigators tried to pinpoint the source, it was 'tracked to a Dominican drug dealer that had been previously deported from my office,' he said. 'Night after night after night, Lawrence PD, Lowell PD, Methuen, Boston, have [custody of] these fentanyl dealers, three or four times,' Lyons contends, and many of them have reentered the country after deportation. Advertisement Can this system that both parties claim to hate be fixed? Any ICE director 'would say we are totally open to congressional rewrites of the law,' he said, and that streamlining would make it easier to focus on criminals. Too many Biden-era migrants were promised a chance at asylum – which he called a 'false hope' because many are in a state of legal limbo. A better system would allow some migrants to apply for asylum from their home country rather than making the dangerous trek to the US, then waiting years in immigration court. But until reform comes, Lyons is sticking to the law. He gave an example from his time as a police officer in Florida: Stopping a dad on the way to work with a busted taillight only to find he also had a warrant on him for being delinquent on child support payments. 'You feel bad for that person, but it's still a law,' he told me. 'That's kind of the predicament I'm in.' Carine Hajjar is a Globe Opinion writer. She can be reached at

Donald Trump's Juneteenth Message Gets Surprising Response
Donald Trump's Juneteenth Message Gets Surprising Response

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump's Juneteenth Message Gets Surprising Response

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's complaint that there are "too many non-working holidays in America" has sparked a surprising response on his social media platform. "It is costing our Country $BILLIONS OF DOLLARS to keep all of these businesses closed," Trump posted on Truth Social on Thursday, the same day as Juneteenth National Independence Day, commemorating the end of slavery in the United States. "The workers don't want it either! Soon we'll end up having a holiday for every once working day of the year. It must change if we are going to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" While Truth Social has many subscribers who are Trump supporters, his post received a largely negative response. "You lost me here, Americans are already overworked and in many cases underpaid," one user replied to Trump. President Donald Trump speaking on the South Lawn of the White House on Wednesday. President Donald Trump speaking on the South Lawn of the White House on Wednesday. Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images This is a breaking story. More to follow.

Donald Trump Celebrates Legal Win Over Deploying National Guard
Donald Trump Celebrates Legal Win Over Deploying National Guard

Newsweek

time2 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Celebrates Legal Win Over Deploying National Guard

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump hailed a "BIG WIN" in a federal appeals court that said he did have the power to deploy California's National Guard over Gov. Gavin Newsom's head to quell the recent riots and disorder in Los Angeles. The decision in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals halts a ruling from a lower court judge who found Trump acted illegally when he activated the soldiers over opposition from Newsom. "BIG WIN in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on the President's core power to call in the National Guard!" Trump posted to his Truth Social platform after the ruling. "The Judges obviously realized that Gavin Newscum is incompetent and ill prepared, but this is much bigger than Gavin, because all over the United States, if our Cities, and our people, need protection, we are the ones to give it to them should State and Local Police be unable, for whatever reason, to get the job done. "This is a Great Decision for our Country, and we will continue to protect and defend Law abiding Americans. Congratulations to the Ninth Circuit, America is proud of you tonight!" The deployment was the first by a president of a state National Guard without the governor's permission since 1965. In its decision, a three-judge panel unanimously concluded it was likely Trump lawfully exercised his authority in federalizing control of the guard. It said that while presidents don't have unfettered power to seize control of a state's guard, the Trump administration had presented enough evidence to show it had a defensible rationale for doing so, citing violent acts by protesters. This is a developing article. Updates to follow. This article includes reporting by The Associated Press.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store