Britain's eerie ‘lost village' abandoned overnight with locals forbidden to return… as last ever resident dies aged 100
THE last resident of an eerie lost village abandoned in WW2 has passed away.
The village was once home to more than 220 people who were all evacuated during the war and never returned.
10
10
10
The village was used as a training camp for allied soldiers in 1943.
Peter Wellman was the last surviving resident of the village, he has now sadly passed away from Pneumonia.
He managed to make one final trip to his old home before his passing.
Villagers were promised they could return when the war was over but were never allowed.
On his last visit to the 'ghost village' Peter said: "We had no electricity, no mains gas and no running water – we had to pump that from near the church. There's a tap there now.
10
10
"I remember going to the beach and fishing and we often had mackerel. We were happy until we got moved out."
The eerie ruins of the village are still on MoD land but they are open to the public for most of the year.
When Tyneham was abandoned, a single note was left by a local asking the arriving soldiers to take good care of the village.
Some of the villagers settled into newly built homes in the nearby town Wareham.
Not one resident ever returned to the village after the war, leaving it a spooky ruin.
10
10
A public inquiry, several protests and a number of campaigns to bring the residents home have been launched over the years.
These have all been unsuccessful with a compulsory purchase order being issued and the village remaining the property of the MoD.
Many of the old buildings have been deemed uninhabitable, crumbling over the years.
The school and the church have been converted into museums to teach the public about the villager's sacrifices.
Eerie photos show bits of the village frozen in time with old posters still hanging in the phone box.
10
10
10
Peter Wellman is survived by his two children, his two grandchildren and his three great grand children.
Peter's daughter Lynne spoke of her fathers love for his lost home saying he visited regularly.
Peter worked on a farm for 36 years before moving into a job in the clay industry where he stayed until retirement.
He said he would have liked to see residents return to the village one day.
history buffs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Attacking seagulls divebombing from roofs force posties to abandon their rounds over health and safety fears
Aggressive seagulls divebombing from roofs are forcing posties in a Cornish town to cancel their rounds over health and safety fears - causing deliveries to be delayed due to 'safety issues.' Locals in Liskeard have been warned of disruption to their post, as well as to other visitors and key prescription deliveries, as the pesky nesting birds swoop down on postal workers and other house visitors. The problem has got so bad, Royal Mail has warned them they may not receive their post on time and has started offering residents alternative arrangements - such as a safer delivery address away from the gulls. A local in Liskeard has shared a recent letter they received from the Royal Mail - warning them of the 'difficulties' faced by postal staff. It warned that the fiercely protective parent birds mean it is not always safe for staff to approach homes, and that any mail in missed deliveries will be held at local offices until it can be delivered. Residents have reported posties refusing to attend their address due to the ferocious nature of the birds. One woman told CornwallLive: 'The ones on my roof and and the row behind are the main culprits but the whole street won't be getting regular post. Same with collections - I booked and paid for a parcel to be collected and they wouldn't come.' It's not the first time that Liskeard locals have faced the problem - Royal Mail also apologised last year for delays caused by nesting seagulls in the town. And they are so notorious that Liskeard Town Council has an entire web page devoted to tips to avoid angering the birds. Sent from the Royal Mail's USO (Universal Service Obligation) and Customer Experience department, said: 'As you may be aware we are again experiencing some difficulties safely delivering to you and your neighbours due to seagulls in the area swooping at delivery staff in order to protect their young. 'The purpose of this letter is firstly to advise you of the issues we are experiencing, but also to assure you that we will continue to attempt deliveries every day. 'If on any day we are unable to deliver to you safely, your mail will be returned to the office below, where it will be held securely until we can attempt delivery again the following day.' The letter said the Royal Mail appreciates that it 'may not be ideal' for residents. It also states people have been offered 'alternative arrangements', which includes mail being held in an office named within the letter - until they can pick it up again - and another 'alternative address' away from the gulls. The letter added: 'Please accept my apologies for any inconvenience this may cause, but whilst Royal Mail is committed to providing a consistent daily delivery to addresses, we do place the highest priority on the safety of our employees.' The situation will be 'monitored on a daily basis'. The issue left some locals bemused. One said: 'Royal Mail will soon be providing safety helmets.' Another said: 'These birds are so terrible for being so protective of their young. Something has got to be done about these birds to stop them attacking humans.' Another local said: 'What's wrong with people? Just wear a bl**dy hat!' Nesting season for seagulls is from April to July, according to the RSPB, with people advised to use an umbrella to deter the birds when entering or leaving their homes. It's not just post that the birds are interfering with - one local woman told how her carers were struggling to visit her elderly father due to seagulls nesting in his front yard. Writing on Facebook, she said: 'I know seagulls are protected but can anything be done regarding my dad's situation? 'Carers are struggling to get in and Boots couldn't deliver his tablets. It's not easy running with shopping down the stairs either when they are swooping.' Unfortunately there is little anyone who has the gulls on their properties can do. It is a criminal offence to damage, disturb or destroy a seagull nest - so locals must just wait it out until any chicks are fledged.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Cheapest air conditioning units that cost from 2p per hour to run and keep your home cool
WITH temperatures ramping up across the UK in recent weeks, you've probably been pulling out all the stops to try to keep your home cool. And if you're thinking of scrapping your fan for something more sophisticated this summer, there are multiple air conditioning and air cooler units available right now on the high street and online. 7 When it comes to running costs, USwitch estimates that it will set you back around 27p an hour to run a typical portable air conditioning unit. This would work out at £2.46 a day if you were to leave it on for nine hours. If you're looking for a cheaper option, an air cooler costs between 2-5p to run per hour on average - or up to 45p per day - according to Air Con Centre. If you're looking to invest for the summer, we've rounded up the cheapest air con and air cooler units to keep your space cool this summer. What's the difference between an air conditioner and air cooler? MANY people are unaware that there's a big difference between air conditioners and an air coolers - so it's important to know exactly what you're paying for. Air coolers tend to be more affordable than air conditioners, with prices for smaller models starting from as little as £10. They work by drawing in warm air and sending it through a wet pad, causing the water to evaporate and cooling the air. Air conditioners, on the other hand, remove heat from the air by using cold coils to cool it down, before recirculating the air with internal fans. Air coolers don't require any outside ventilation, whereas air conditioners must be vented, normally through an exhaust hose. While an air cooler will cost you less than an aircon unit, air conditioners can lower the temperature far more compared to an air cooler, according to ProBreeze. Air coolers B&Q's Marco Paul Portable Air Cooler - £9.99 At less than £10, B&Q's Marco Paul Portable Air Cooler Unit is a cheaper option than many desktop and standing fans. The unit comes with three settings so you can adjust the temperature to your preference, and it's compact enough (16 x 17cm) that you can sit it on an office desk or bedside table. It will run for up to 12 hours and comes with a USB charger, making it perfect for travelling. There's also a night light function, which provides a relaxing glow after dark. Watch Dyson's Hot+Cool air-purifying fan in action – including 'sleep' mode Aldi's Ambiano Air Cooler - £39.99 Budget supermarket Aldi recently added air cooler units to its middle aisle, perfect if you're looking to keep your space cool on a budget. The Ambiano Air Cooler will set you back just £39.99, and is equipped with three speed levels with a water tank capacity of 5.5 litres. The retailer says it's suitable for rooms up to 108 square feet, and also features a touch panel and LED display. It's also easy to move around your home with carrying handles on the sides and four wheels for "easy transportation". The unit is currently in stores, but you'll have to be quick as it's only available while stocks last. Curry's Beldray Portable Air Cooler - £59.99 Curry's has recently reduced its Beldray EH3187 6-Litre Portable Air Cooler to under £60, from £84.99. The device has three speed settings, and it also purifies the air in your space. The six-litre water tank is easy to refill, either from the drawer or the top, and the wheels and carry handle make it a good portable option. Air conditioning units Homebase's HOMCOM 4 in 1 Air Conditioner - £134.00 7 The HOMCOM Black 5000BTU 4 in 1 Air Conditioner is currently on sale at Homebase with £65 off. The cooling unit has been reduced from £199 to £134, and is available both online and in stores. Homebase says the multi-functional unit can help you stay cool and comfortable all summer long, and is perfect for unpredictable weather. It features four different modes - cooling, ventilating, dehumidifying, and a sleep mode which gently increases the air temperature overnight for a comfortable sleep. The portable unit also automatically shuts off when the tank is full, preventing overfilling and damage. The same unit is also available at other retailers but for a higher price, including Amazon for £189.99, and B&Q for £169.99. Amazon's Daewoo Portable 3-in-1 Air Conditioning Unit - £149.99 7 Amazon has reduced its Daewoo 5000 BTU Portable 3-in-1 Air Conditioning Unit to almost half price. The portable unit is reduced to £149.99 from £279.99, offering £130 off. It comes with an LED display and remote control, as well as two fan speed settings, making it perfect for keeping your home or office cool in the hot weather. As well as a cooling fan, it also operates as a dehumidifier for the perfect room temperature. Dunelm's Tower 3-in-1 Air Conditioner - £219 The Tower 5000BTU 3-in-1 Air Conditioner offers three different functions - a cooling, fan and dehumidifying function, and is available at Dunelm for £219. It also features a sleep mode, which will turn the appliance off after six hours, using less energy for a comfortable sleep. It stands at 70cm in height, 33cm in width and 28cm in depth, while it also has a manufacturer guarantee of two years. .
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
There's going to be uproar at my kids' school thanks to new mobile phone rule – they'll no longer be safe, I'm outraged
A MUM has predicted there's "going to be uproar" at her children's school due to a new mobile phone rule that's been introduced. Lisa explained that there was an email sent round to all parents in which it stated that "as from September, children are not allowed to bring their mobile phones on site to school". 2 2 However, Lisa predicted in a video on her TikTok page that it's all "gonna kick off", as she admitted: "I'm not happy about it at all, but I know there's gonna be lots of parents that are not happy about this!" And while she didn't get a phone herself until she was 16, she said that times have changed, and added: "We have that luxury now to know that our kids are safe and they've got their phones if ever they need us. "This is senior school. These children walk to school, some get the bus to school. "How can they be expected not to have a mobile phone on them?" Lisa continued to say that the school had initially allowed students to use their phones at break and lunchtime, but "swiftly took that away". "And I agree with that," she said. "That's great that they aren't allowed to use their phones at school. "But to not be allowed to have their phones on site, I don't agree with it. I don't agree with that at all. "It now means that I will be taking mine and picking them up because I don't I don't feel that it's it would be safe for them to walk to and from school without a phone now." In fact, the letter goes as far as to state that " children are not to use mobile devices whilst wearing the school uniform". Mum-of-10 raging as she realises EXTRA step she has to take when her kids are sick to avoid getting hefty school fines "They are not allowed to physically have a phone to their ear in any school uniform and they will be punished for that if they're caught outside of school using their mobile phone in school uniform," she admitted. "Like I say, there's gonna be absolute uproar over this, I'm sure." People in the comments section quickly sparked a debate, as many argued that a phone is a necessity for journeys to and from school. "I would not be ok not being able to contact my child or them contact me should they need to," one wrote. "They shouldn't be using it during the day agreed but there are too many weirdos around to not give them a lifeline!!" "If they want to reduce technology use, then they need to stop making the homework online etc," another added. "My kids will always go with a phone!" "In my school there was multiple times where I had to phone my mum cause of an emergency," a third commented. "Kids need their phones in case something happens - they need contact with their parents whenever they need it." "That's so controlling…. Yes no phones at school but how do they contact you if there's an issue to or from school?!? Wow," someone else raged. "What happens if they get the bus to school and they miss it and need to call for a lift?" another wondered. "What if they don't live in walking distance and are going out with friends after school in that area? "How do they call parents for a lift? What if something happens?" However, others hit back and said they agreed with the rule, and kids shouldn't need a phone at any point at school. "If they can't get to and from school without our a phone we collectively aren't doing a good enough job," one sighed. "Honestly it doesn't have to be such a huge deal." "Too right. Phones are wrecking their lives. Support the school," another agreed. I see no problem, we had no phones, we were OK!!! My kids school is a no phone school and has been for years . And to be honest I think it's a good idea stops the bullying and stops people filming fights and sharing it . But everyone is different I'll be devils advocate here a girl I worked with was voice recorded teaching a few weeks ago. The kids the used AI software to change what she said 'sexual comments' and she's under investigation. Hit rock bottom thinking her career is ruined! Kids do not need phones in school!
