logo
New Georgia law could help wrongfully convicted seek recompense

New Georgia law could help wrongfully convicted seek recompense

Miami Herald25-05-2025

ATLANTA - In most states, when someone has been wrongfully convicted, exonerated by a court and freed from prison - often after being incarcerated for decades - the state will compensate them for the years they lost.
Beginning this year, Georgia will join the 38 other states that have a standardized way of compensating those who've served time in prison for crimes they say they didn't commit and the courts have released them from incarceration.
People released from prison will soon be able to petition for compensation through the Office of State Administrative Hearings and begin to rebuild their lives.
The law, which was proposed in Senate Bill 244, aims to fix what lawmakers have called a "very laborious process" that can sometimes become political and many are often hesitant to get involved with.
Georgia has not compensated anyone who has been exonerated by a court and released from prison since 2022. But that's not because people haven't tried.
Mario Stinchcomb was 23 years old when he was arrested in 2002 and charged with murder. In 2004, he was sentenced to life in prison. Then, in 2021, he became the first person to be exonerated through the Fulton County Conviction Integrity Unit. The unit is made up of a team within the district attorney's office that investigates claims of wrongful convictions.
Stinchcomb was 41 when he was released from prison.
Stinchcomb has petitioned the state for the past several years seeking compensation for the time the courts said he wrongfully spent in prison. Each year, his request stalled. Upon hearing the news that a new system would be put in place to take the process out of the Legislature, Stinchcomb said he was cautiously optimistic about his future.
"It is a blessing for all of those who have been in prison, whether it's a lengthy time or a short time, (who have) just been in prison for something you did not do," he told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "This is a major steppingstone for the Georgia system - being able to be (compensated) when you've been taken away from society for so long."
Kristin Verrill, executive director of Georgia Innocence Project, said the process for exonerees to seek compensation was "simply broken." The nonprofit organization she leads uses DNA evidence and research to clear people's names.
"It was arbitrary and unpredictable and highly politicized," she said. "This new process uses the administrative law procedures that are already in place under Georgia law and create a neutral fact finder whose profession it is to be a fact finder and interpret laws, instead of a legislator having to be faced with those decisions."
The new procedure will allow someone who has been exonerated to file a claim with the Office of State Administrative Hearings.
That claim would be evaluated by an administrative law judge. If the person who'd been released from prison can prove their innocence, they would be eligible to receive $75,000 per year of incarceration. They would be eligible for another $25,000 per year if they served their time on death row. These cases often involve people who've spent upward of 20 years in prison.
The process would return to the General Assembly, though, which would have to include any payment in the state budget.
Terry Talley was 23 in 1981 when he was convicted of a series of LaGrange sexual assaults that he insists he didn't commit. It resulted in four life sentences. A DNA test in 2009 proved he didn't commit one of the crimes, but he still had three life sentences from the other assaults that didn't have DNA evidence.
It took 12 more years before the local law enforcement agency that initially arrested Talley worked with defense attorneys to persuade a judge to agree to exonerate him in three related cases. The district attorney didn't challenge the release but said the decision should not be considered an endorsement of Talley's innocence in the whole case.
Talley said it was "about time" the state enact a new process for compensating those who've served years in prison before being exonerated and released.
"I feel like all those who get their cases back in court and get exonerated, they got something to live for now," he said.
The process Talley, Stinchcomb and other exonerated people have previously undergone has been called arduous by supporters of the new law.
Once a judge or prosecutor has thrown out the charges against someone who had been convicted, they must find a legislator who is willing to sponsor a resolution that would compensate them. That process often gets bogged down by politics.
State Rep. Katie Dempsey, a Republican who sponsored the legislation that became the language in SB 244, said it was not easy for the men who've been waiting years to be compensated by a state that had wrongfully taken decades from their lives.
"Now we have another opportunity to allow for people proven innocent to have a true chance that is not a retrial from legislators, but a fact-finding process and decision from an administrative law judge valuing the opinion of other judges," she said.
There's been a bottleneck in the Senate with some Republican leaders declining to pass legislation compensating those exonerated and released from prison.
Senate Majority Whip Randy Robertson, a Republican who is a former sheriff's deputy, has spent the past several legislative sessions opposing the procedural change offered by House members. This year, he proposed his own version. That bill didn't gain any traction.
Robertson said for the past few years, he's pulled the case files for each person who's seeking compensation and gone back through them to determine if they are truly innocent. He said someone being released from prison because a district attorney declines to retry a case because of a technicality or because it has been so long since the original trial that the original witnesses are dead does not mean they've been exonerated.
After years of blocks, House GOP leadership inserted the language of Dempsey's bill to overhaul the wrongful conviction compensation process to legislation that was heavily supported by Senate Republicans: a bill allowing criminal defendants to recover attorney fees and legal costs if the prosecutor of their case is disqualified for misconduct and the case is dismissed.
That means the new law could allow President Donald Trump to recoup his attorney fees if Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis is disqualified in the case related to Trump's efforts to overturn his 2020 loss to Democrat Joe Biden in Georgia.
During the debate of SB 244, Robertson said that, while he opposed the amendment to the bill, he supported the original topic enough to vote for the legislation. "We'll tackle the other thing that's attached to it, and we'll come up with a process that works," he said.
"So understand, if anybody in this state is innocent (and) they're convicted, we should make sure that we take care of them," he said. "We should make sure they have due process, but we need to do it the right way. And we need to start remembering that for every crime there is - and there are 50,000 people in the Georgia Department of Corrections - means there are thousands upon thousands upon thousands upon thousands of crime victims - if they are alive - walking the streets of this state, looking for somebody to stand up for them."
State Rep. Scott Holcomb, a Democrat who has worked on the issue for years and was a cosponsor on Dempsey's bill, said having the procedural change pass the Legislature was "a long time coming."
"This is going to mean a lot for the people who need it," he said. "No compensation claims have been approved since 2022, and there are several who are clearly innocent and will benefit from this. So I'm glad that now they can present their case and have an opportunity to receive compensation. This doesn't guarantee that they'll prevail, but it gives them an outlet to be heard."
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Derek Dooley, former Tennessee coach and Vince Dooley's son, eyes GOP Senate run in Georgia
Derek Dooley, former Tennessee coach and Vince Dooley's son, eyes GOP Senate run in Georgia

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Derek Dooley, former Tennessee coach and Vince Dooley's son, eyes GOP Senate run in Georgia

Derek Dooley, a former University of Tennessee football coach, said Friday that he is considering a Republican run for U.S. Senate in Georgia in 2026 against Democratic incumbent Jon Ossoff. The trial balloon shows how Gov. Brian Kemp's decision not to run for the seat has left Georgia Republicans looking for other options to face off against Ossoff, considered the most vulnerable Democratic incumbent up for reelection next year. [DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks] Dooley, 56, said he would decide on a bid in coming weeks. 'Georgia deserves stronger common-sense leadership in the U.S. Senate that represents all Georgians and focuses on results — not headlines,' Dooley said in a statement. 'I believe our state needs a political outsider in Washington — not another career politician — to cut through the noise and partisanship and get back to real problem solving.' The announcement, first reported by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, came as other declared candidates stumped before the state Republican convention in the northwest Georgia city of Dalton. Among Republicans who have declared their candidacies are U.S. Rep. Buddy Carter, Insurance Commissioner John King and activist Reagan Box. Other Republicans who could run include U.S. Reps. Mike Collins and Rich McCormick, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and state Sen. Greg Dolezal. Attacks on Ossoff were among the most reliable applause lines during Friday afternoon speeches at the convention. 'Folks, President Trump needs backup, he needs backup in the Senate,' King said. RELATED STORIES: Gov. Kemp announces decision on Senate run in 2026, ending speculation Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene rules out run against Ossoff for Senate With Brian Kemp not running for Senate, which Georgia Republicans could challenge Jon Ossoff? Dooley has never run for office before. His appeal wouldn't be based on his career 32-41 record at Louisiana Tech and Tennessee, but his status as the son of legendary University Georgia coach Vince Dooley and Kemp's long ties to the Dooley family. As a teenager, Kemp was a frequent guest in the Dooley home, and roomed with Derek's older brother, Daniel Dooley, at the University of Georgia. Kemp has the most effective Republican political organization in Georgia, and he would likely give Dooley a big credibility boost. Kemp and President Donald Trump have been trying to agree on a mutual candidate to back for Senate in 2026, hoping to avoid the conflict that plagued Kelly Loeffler's unsuccessful run, where she lost to Democrat Raphael Warnock in a 2021 runoff. That, along with Republican David Perdue's loss to Ossoff on the same day handed control of the U.S. Senate to Democrats. Trump had preferred then U.S. Rep Doug Collins instead of Loeffler. Then in 2022, Trump anointed Georgia football legend Herschel Walker as the Republican nominee, but Warnock turned back Walker's flawed candidacy in another runoff. Kemp only swung in to help Walker in the runoff. The effort to screen 2026 candidates has already produced some results, with U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene saying she wouldn't bring her right-wing positions to the Senate campaign trail. Dooley would be far from the first sports figure to run for office. His father was frequently discussed as a possible candidate, but never took the plunge. But other coaches have gone far. Former Auburn University football coach Tommy Tuberville was elected to the Senate in 2020 from Alabama and is now running for governor. Former Ohio State University coach Jim Tressel is currently that state's lieutenant governor. And University of Nebraska coaching legend Tom Osborne served three terms in the U.S. House. Dooley walked on in football at the University of Virginia and earned a scholarship as a wide receiver. He earned a law degree from the University of Georgia and briefly practiced law in Atlanta before working his way up the college coaching ladder, becoming head coach for three years at Louisiana Tech and then moving on to Tennessee. Dooley recorded three consecutive losing seasons in Knoxville before he was fired in 2012 after losing to in-state rival Vanderbilt. After that, he has worked as an assistant coach for the NFL's Miami Dolphins and Dallas Cowboys, the University of Missouri and the New York Giants. Most recently, Dooley was an offensive analyst with the University of Alabama. [SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]

The changes coming to Trump's 'big beautiful bill have little to do with Elon Musk
The changes coming to Trump's 'big beautiful bill have little to do with Elon Musk

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

The changes coming to Trump's 'big beautiful bill have little to do with Elon Musk

Washington was on two parallel tracks this past week when discussing President Trump's "big, beautiful bill." On one front: The nation's capital was transfixed by a seismic fight between Elon Musk and President Trump, centered on the cost of the $3 trillion tax and spending bill. On another front: Republican leaders steadily advanced the pricey package with only a few changes apparently on offer. "Pedal to the metal," Senate Majority Leader John Thune offered in a speech Thursday near the height of the Musk drama — ignoring promises from the world's richest man to oust lawmakers who didn't join his effort to kill the bill. Republicans instead appeared to move closer to passage. They previewed changes that will be of interest to taxpayers and businesses, but with little to fulsomely address the critique from Musk and others around the package's price tag. In spite of Musk's campaign and multiple government and independent analyses that found at least $2.4 trillion in new red ink, Thune dismissed Musk this week by saying "we're a long ways down this track" and that his party is "rowing in the same direction." Thune may be overstating things a touch, with a vocal group of fiscal conservatives emboldened by Musk suggesting they will vote no. But Republican leaders from the president on down echoed Thune's position throughout the week. Stifel's Brian Gardner offered a bottom line in a note this past week, suggesting the fighting "makes for great TV and fodder ... but it is unlikely to fundamentally change the composition of the tax bill." "Musk's sway among Republican voters is limited," he added. The week saw a flurry of negotiations over changes to the House package, but, perhaps Washington being Washington, even the cost-saving changes appear to have been immediately spoken for. A meeting on Wednesday with the president, Thune, and members of the Senate Finance Committee ended with a focus on two changes. The first could save significant money by paring back a $40,000 tax deduction in the House bill for state and local taxes (SALT). Any changes there will face fierce opposition when the bill returns to the House, but the Washington Post reported this week that Trump has even indicated he is willing to lower the deduction. But any savings there may be quickly eaten up by the second bit of news this week, which concerns making some business tax incentives permanent. These tax deductions to businesses involve property depreciation, interest expenses, and R&D and are currently temporary in the House package. But an array of key Senators are keen to make them permanent (and more expensive). It's still a matter of some debate, with some hawks like Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin having told reporters he is looking to keep those tax breaks temporary and that Trump isn't sold. Johnson had emerged as a fierce critic of the package over spending and is also threatening to reform or break the package into different parts. He would need at least three Republican senators to join him and stand up to what is expected to be a fierce White House pressure campaign. Another key business-world change in the offing that emerged this week involves a provision that says no state may make its own law to regulate artificial intelligence in the coming decade. The need for changes there became evident when Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia acknowledged she hadn't been aware of the provision when she voted yes in the House, but that she would flip to no if it stayed in place. Those proposed revision — seen this week as part of a larger spectrum package released by the Senate Commerce Committee — would change the House plan for a 10-year outright ban to a system that blocks some federal broadband funding if a state passes certain AI laws. Tech companies will be watching those developments closely, but they're not expected to have much impact on the bill's price tag. Another possible change could actually push up the price tag, with a growing debate around changes in the House bill to Section 899 of the IRS code, focused on what Republicans call "discriminatory foreign countries." The provision would allow the president to impose new taxes to combat the practices. Removing that change could cut into future government revenues, allowing the president to levy fewer taxes as a result. Other changes could also be coming that might increase the price tag, with some senators still concerned that current cost-saving measures go too far. Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri has been outspoken on one of the key changes around limiting Medicaid benefits, writing in a recent New York Times op-ed that cuts will hurt the working class and that the core of the issue is "will Republicans be a majority party of working people or a permanent minority speaking only for the C-suite?" Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

FLASHBACK: Musk accused Trump, GOP leaders of not wanting to cut spending — here's where they said they would
FLASHBACK: Musk accused Trump, GOP leaders of not wanting to cut spending — here's where they said they would

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

FLASHBACK: Musk accused Trump, GOP leaders of not wanting to cut spending — here's where they said they would

Elon Musk's fiery feud with President Donald Trump spilled onto the top Republicans in Congress, where the tech billionaire questioned if their zeal to cut spending had disappeared. Musk launched into a social media assault this week against Trump's "big, beautiful bill," and accused Republicans of crafting a "disgusting abomination" full of wasteful spending. What started as a rant against the bill turned into pointed attacks against Trump, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. 'He's Not A Big Factor': Trump's Senate Allies Dismiss Elon Musk's Calls To 'Kill The Bill' The tech billionaire and former head of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) lamented the bill as not cutting deep enough into Washington's spending addiction. The House GOP's offering, which is now being modified in the Senate, set a goal of $1.5 trillion in spending cuts. Musk set a benchmark of finding $2 trillion in waste, fraud and abuse to slash with his DOGE initiative, but fell far short, hitting only $160 billion in his four-month stint as a special government employee. Read On The Fox News App Elon Musk Warpath Against Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Rattles House Gop Still, he came with receipts, questioning whether Trump, Thune and Johnson were actually committed to making deep cuts. Below are moments from the campaign trail and recent months compiled by Fox News Digital where the trio affirmed their commitment to putting a dent in the nation's nearly $37 trillion debt. A common theme for Trump during his 2024 presidential campaign was to go after the Biden administration, and his opponent, former Vice President Kamala Harris, for "throwing billions of dollars out the window." The then-presidential candidate vowed that should he win a second term, his incoming administration would halt wasteful spending. "We will stop wasteful spending and big government special interest giveaways, and finally stand up for the American taxpayer, which hasn't happened since I was president," he said. "We stood up. Our current massive deficits will be reduced to practically nothing. Our country will be powered by growth. Our country, will be powered by growth, will pay off our debt, will have all this income coming in." Gop Senators Express 'Concerns,' 'Skepticism' Over Trump's Spending Bill After Musk Rant Thune has agreed with his colleagues in the House GOP that the tax cut package needs to achieve steep savings, and believes that the Senate GOP could take those cuts a step further. After the bill advanced from the House last month, the top Senate Republican re-upped his vow to slash federal funding. "It does everything that we set out to do. It modernizes our military, secures our border, extends tax relief and makes permanent tax relief that will lead to economic growth and better jobs in this country, and makes America energy dominant, coupled with the biggest spending reduction in American history," he said. "So those are our agenda items, and that's what we campaigned on. That's what we're going to do." Johnson had to strike a balancing act in the House to cobble together enough support behind the legislation, and struck deals and satisfied concerned lawmakers across the spectrum of the House GOP while still setting a goal of $1.5 trillion in spending cuts. Rooting out waste, fraud and abuse has been a continued mantra of the speaker and his allies. "I said this is the beginning of a process, and what you're going to see is a continuing theme of us identifying waste, fraud and abuse in government, which is our pledge of common sense, restoring common sense and fiscal sanity," Johnson said. Original article source: FLASHBACK: Musk accused Trump, GOP leaders of not wanting to cut spending — here's where they said they would

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store