Israel's Rafael threatens to sue France over Paris Air Show shutdown
The Israeli weapons company Rafael has announced plans to sue the French government after its stand at the Paris Air Show was abruptly shut down due to Israel's campaign in Gaza.
Since Monday morning, four Israeli stands, including Rafael, Elbit Systems, Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), and UVision, have been hidden behind black wooden panels.
French authorities determined that 'offensive weapons equipment marketed by the firms could not be exhibited, given the situation in Gaza.'
Rafael, Elbit, and IAI produce guided bombs and missiles while UVision manufactures drones.
Faced with the companies' refusal to remove the equipment, the booths were fenced off during the night from Sunday to Monday.
'This morning, an official from the fair came over and told me that if I would remove some of the equipment, then he would tear down these walls. And I told him, I will not remove anything. You had enough time to make the decision, but you decided to act in the dark of night,' said Shlomo Toaff, Executive Vice President at Rafael.
Technicians were seen on Tuesday morning adding further barricades to seal off the entrance to one of the booths, as no agreement was reached between Israeli manufacturers and the show's organisers.
Meanwhile, a heavy security presence was seen patrolling the cordoned-off area on Tuesday.
'I assure you that we will sue the French government for what they have done to us,' Toaff told Euronews.
'We are going to sue them for causing financial damage, for not giving us access to the property that we had rented. We think this is an unjust decision. We're not getting equal rights like the other exhibitors," he said.
The Rafael representative told Euronews they rented the booth a year in advance and submitted blueprints months ago. Their equipment cleared French customs about a month prior to the exhibition, they claim.
'We invested a lot of money in getting this booth and a lot of effort in preparing for it. I can't tell you the exact cost, but we're talking millions of euros," said Toaff.
French authorities say the firms displayed 'offensive' weapons in violation of the pre-agreed framework with the Israeli government.
'France considers that this is a terrible situation for the Gazans, a situation from a human and humanitarian point of view, from a security point of view, extremely heavy,' French Prime Minister François Bayrou told reporters on Monday after inaugurating the show.
'France wanted to demonstrate that offensive weapons should not be present in this show.'
The Israeli Ministry of Defence condemned 'this scandalous and unprecedented decision' in a press release published on Monday.
'I was totally disappointed,' said Sasson Meshar, Senior VP for Airborne Electro-Optics Systems at Elbit. 'We invested a lot of money in the exhibition.'
'We don't understand the logic of the decision, because from our perspective, it's discrimination, because everybody around is showing the same systems. It's a defence, military system, and that's what we are showing. We are not all here for some kind of flower exhibition.'
'We will consult with legal advisors, and we will follow their advice, and we'll consider our next stages later on,' Meshar said, evading the question of whether Elbit is considering following Rafael in the lawsuit.
This isn't the first time Israeli arms manufacturers have faced restrictions at French defence shows.
After initially being banned from the Eurosatory exhibition in spring 2024, they were later allowed to attend Euronaval last fall following a court ruling.
On June 10, a Paris court rejected a request by several associations to ban Israeli companies from this year's Paris Air Show.
The 2025 edition is taking place against the backdrop of intensifying diplomatic tensions between Paris and Tel Aviv.
Israel is facing intense criticism over its military campaign in the Gaza Strip, launched in response to the 2023 Hamas attack. The death toll in Gaza is estimated to exceed 55,000 according to the Hamas-run Gazan Health Ministry. More than 1,800 Israelis have been killed as a result of the fighting.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fashion Network
an hour ago
- Fashion Network
Luxury brands face hiring and retention challenges in retail roles
Hiring qualified sales staff has become increasingly difficult across the retail industry since the Covid‑19 crisis—and luxury brands are no exception. A joint study by Comité Colbert and consultancy MAD found that 60% of French luxury houses struggle to attract new talent to boutique and frontline roles, including hospitality positions. Recruitment challenges are even more acute in store management, with 93% of brands reporting significant difficulties. 'Retail talent tensions aren't new—but they're accelerating,' said Delphine Vitry, founder of MAD. 'These roles are becoming less desirable. Brands now face three core challenges: attracting candidates, developing their skills, and ultimately retaining them.' Turnover in luxury retail now averages 15%, rising to as much as 60% in markets such as Southeast Asia. As retail roles grow more complex and demanding, luxury brands are evolving their talent strategies. Forty‑two percent have implemented formal skills frameworks at the brand or group level to better define competencies, assess potential and guide staff development. However, a significant leadership gap persists: 77% of brands say their store managers still lack the skills to lead teams effectively and drive performance. Clienteling has become a strategic priority, as brands seek to cultivate long-term, personalized relationships through private appointments, exclusive events and tailored services. Seventy‑seven percent of luxury houses now consider it a key area for team development. 'Clienteling drives 30% of fashion luxury store revenue—and up to 50% in watchmaking,' said Chloé d'Avout, partner at MAD. This shift has made training a key investment to boost performance and strengthen the employee value proposition (EVP), or the benefits and opportunities a brand offers its staff. With younger generations more likely to change jobs, learning and career progression have become critical retention levers. 80% of brands now conduct regular internal surveys to better align with employee expectations. Salary remains the top concern, followed by career growth and work-life balance. Flexibility is also rising in importance. While remote work generally applies only to store managers, some brands are introducing options such as the four-day workweek—now in place at Hermès stores in Paris—and personalized scheduling. Compensation alone is no longer enough. Workplace culture and well-being now play equal roles. D'Avout suggests rethinking job titles—like client advisor or brand ambassador—enhancing collaboration between retail and headquarters teams, and celebrating talent more consistently through recognition initiatives. Leadership stability also affects retention. 'Frequent changes in creative direction or CEOs can lead to staff departures,' she said. 'Brand desirability also plays a significant role in attracting talent.' Finally, the study highlights a growing interest in artificial intelligence, which remains underused across the sector. While 87% of brands have yet to integrate AI into recruitment or workforce planning, 77% plan to do so within three years. 'Brands already using AI report a measurable boost—higher recruitment volume and significantly reduced turnover,' the report notes. The stakes are high with approximately 70% of luxury brand employees working in frontline roles. Comité Colbert's general delegate Bénédicte Epinay emphasized that these positions—much like those in high-end craftsmanship—'must be positioned as careers of excellence.' Conducted between April and June 2025, the study draws on input from 31 respondents—including CEOs and HR leaders at French luxury brands—who completed a structured questionnaire. It also incorporates insights from in-depth interviews with retail and regional directors, along with additional desk research.
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
Iranian and Israeli official channels broadcast fake images of the conflict
Fake images of the conflict are not only going viral on social media, but on television as well – Iranian State TV broadcast at least two images unrelated to the conflict and/or created using artificial intelligence, while the Israeli military published old footage on their official account on X. We explain in this edition of Truth or Fake.
France 24
3 hours ago
- France 24
Parliamentary report urges Paris to apologise for French Polynesia nuclear tests
Paris should apologise to French Polynesia for the fallout of nuclear tests there over three decades, which led to harmful radiation exposure, a French parliamentary report released on Tuesday said. France conducted 193 nuclear tests in French Polynesia from 1966, especially at the Pacific archipelago's Moruroa and Fangataufa atolls, to help build up its atomic weapon arsenal. These included atmospheric and underground tests which had severe health impacts. Tens of thousands of people in the French overseas territory are estimated to have been exposed to harmful levels of radiation, leading to a significant public health crisis that has been largely ignored. The tests remain a source of deep resentment in French Polynesia, where they are seen as evidence of racist colonial attitudes that disregarded the lives of islanders. "The inquiry has strengthened the committee's conviction that a request for forgiveness from France to French Polynesia is necessary," the report said. "This request is not merely a symbol, nor a request for repentance. It must be a ... fundamental step in the process of reconciliation between French Polynesia and the State," the authors said. The report said the apology must be added to a 2004 law on French Polynesia's semi-autonomous status. Residents in the south Pacific Ocean islands are hoping for compensation for radiation victims. The investigative website Disclose, citing declassified French military documents on the nearly 200 tests, reported in March that the impact from the fallout was far more extensive than authorities let on. Only a few dozen civilians have been compensated for radiation exposure since the tests ended in 1996, Disclose said.
