DC police recinds request to close Dupont Circle park during WorldPride after pushback from DC community
EDITOR'S NOTE: This story has been updated to clarify information from the Metropolitan Police Department and the status of the park.
WASHINGTON () — Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) leadership reversed its this weekend, just hours after authorities announced it would be closed during WorldPride.
On Monday night, NPS said the park would temporarily be closed due to 'a history and pattern of destructive and disorderly behavior from unpermitted activities happening in the park during past DC Pride weekends, including vandalism in 2023 that resulted in approximately $175,000 in damage to the historic Dupont Circle fountain,' according to a spokesperson.
It was a joint with the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) and U.S. Park Police (USPP), NPS noted.
RELATED COVERAGE: Dupont Circle park to be closed this weekend during WorldPride
The announcement caused immediate pushback from local leaders and D.C. residents, many of whom believe the park is a central park of the local LGBTQ+ community. Within hours, there were whispers that the park would remain open.
In a social media Tuesday morning, D.C. Councilmember Charles Allen wrote, 'This would be the wrong move. The park is an important part of DC's Pride celebrations, gatherings, and history. We're hearing this decision may be reversed by MPD, with some accommodations to protect the fountain, and Dupont Circle park will remain open this weekend. 🌈 ⛲️
Man seen tearing down Dupont Circle Pride decorations; DC police investigating
Ward 5 Councilmember Zachary Parker said he spoke with MPD Chief Pamela Smith, who said the decision to close the park would be rescinded.
'The Park is central to the lgbtq community, and neighbors will be able to enjoy it this year for World Pride,' he on social media.
On Tuesday afternoon, MPD confirmed it rescinded its request to close the park, noting how important the park is to the Pride celebration. The final decision still lies with the U.S. Park Police.
In a statement shared with DC News Now, a spokesperson said:
Chief Pamela A. Smith has heard from community members and understands how significant Dupont Circle Park is to the Pride celebration.
The following letter was sent to the U.S. Park Police, formally rescinding MPD's request to close Dupont Circle Park this weekend.
MPD stands ready to support the National Park Service and the U.S. Park Police during this weekend's events.
The Metropolitan Police Department
'Wicked' star Cynthia Erivo performing at WorldPride music festival in DC
In a letter, the department explained that there have been significant challenges in Dupont Circle Park after formal Pride events concluded, leading to the initial decision to close the park this upcoming weekend.
For example, Chief Smith said, in 2019, an individual was arrested after gunshots were heard in the park, causing people to flee, thinking there may have been an active shooter.
In 2024, a large group of juveniles entered the park and 'engaged in unpermitted and illegal activities,' she added. This included drinking alcohol, smoking marijuana and fighting. Some of them also ran into local businesses and stole items.
To prevent the recurrence of prior year's incidents, particularly with the demands of WorldPride 2025, MPD requested the closure of Dupont Circle Park and the installation of anti-scale fencing around its perimeter this upcoming weekend. However, after hearing from community leaders and residents, I am formally withdrawing MPD's request to close Dupont Circle Park and the installation of anti-scale fencing around its perimeter from Thursday, June 5, 2025, through Monday, June 9, 2025.
MPD Chief Pamela A Smith in a letter shared with DC News Now
NPS officials have not confirmed whether the park will remain open.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
BarkBox CEO apologizes for leaked message exposing paused Pride ads — but they're still paused
BarkBox's CEO is "deeply sorry" for a leaked message that revealed the company's plans to forgo advertising for its LGBTQ+ Pride collection — but they appear to have followed through on those plans. Keep up with the latest in + news and politics. The dog product subscription service came under fire earlier this week after a message from an employee was shared on social media, exposing the company's intentions to "pause all paid ads and lifestyle marketing pushes for the Pride kit effective immediately." The author referred to LGBTQ+ existence as "another politically charged symbol," comparing it to being a supporter of Donald Trump. "While celebrating Pride is something we may value, we need to acknowledge that the current climate makes this promotion feel more like a political statement than a universally joyful moment for all dog people," the message reads. "If we wouldn't feel comfortable running a promotion centered around another politically charged symbol (like a MAGA-themed product), it's worth asking whether this is the right moment to run this particular campaign." "Right now, pushing this promo risks unintentionally sending the message that 'we're not for you' to a large portion of our audience," the author concluded. After backlash online — including users unsubscribing and threatening boycotts — CEO Matt Meeker posted a statement on BarkBox's Instagram apologizing for the message. He insisted that "the Pride Collection is still available" and that the company has "no plans to remove them," but did not address the advertising roll back. "I apologize. A few days go, an internal message from a BARK team member was released on social media," Meeker wrote. "The message was disrespectful and hurtful to the LGBTQIA+ community, and as the CEO of BARK, I'm responsible for that. I do not agree with the content of the message. It wasn't good, it doesn't reflect our values, and I'm deeply sorry that it happened." Meeker added that instead of donating a portion of the profits from the Pride Collection to a "worthy organization," BarkBox would donate "100 percent of the revenue" this year. As of publishing, the Pride Collection does not appear on BarkBox's home page, nor is it listed under the website's "Monthly Themes" tab. There are no posts advertising the collection on the same company Instagram page that Meeker issued his apology on. A spokesperson for BarkBox told The Advocate that the Pride Collection has been advertised on the website "in the yellow banner at the top of the page." An Internet Archive snapshot of the website from yesterday shows no banner, suggesting it was added in the past 24 hours. Collections BarkBox seemingly considers not "politically charged" include cannabis leaf merchandise for the 420 holiday, a "fleshlight" pig in a blanket toy, and a Harry Potter collection — when writer J.K. Rowling has been using her personal profits to fund legal cases tat restricted the rights of transgender people.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
WorldPride speaker says she was denied entry to US after Cuba visit
Phyll Opoku-Gyimah, a British political and LGBTQ rights activist, said she was denied entry to the U.S. over a recent trip to Cuba. Opoku-Gyimah, also known as Lady Phyll, had been scheduled to deliver opening remarks at WorldPride's human rights conference, which runs June 4-6 in Washington. Speaking over a livestream Wednesday afternoon, Opoku-Gyimah said U.S. officials revoked her visa waiver under the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA), an automated system determining whether visitors from participating countries may enter the U.S. without a visa. Travel to Cuba, which the U.S. designated a state sponsor of terrorism in 2021, is grounds for having an ESTA revoked, according to the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) website. The Caribbean nation's terror designation was briefly rescinded under former President Biden and reinstated by President Trump in January. Opoku-Gyimah said she was notified of the revocation of her travel authorization days before she was set to fly to the U.S. for WorldPride. She applied for a temporary visa, she said, but was told the earliest she could enter the country was September. 'I've called. I've written. I've pleaded,' said Opoku-Gyimah, the co-founder and CEO of UK Black Pride. 'And the answer was a cold, bureaucratic 'No.'' The DHS did not immediately return a request for comment. Opoku-Gyimah's virtual remarks Wednesday highlighted the LGBTQ community's diversity, and she encouraged WorldPride gatherers to embrace the group's intersectional identities. 'Enjoy the Pride, walk together, walk proudly and talk proudly,' she said. 'Be bold and brave in our fight for justice.' The U.K. issued a travel warning for the U.S. in March, cautioning British passport holders that 'authorities in the U.S. set and enforce entry rules strictly' and 'you may be liable to arrest or detention if you break the rules.' Other countries, including Denmark and Finland, have issued travel advisories for transgender visitors to the U.S., referencing policies instituted by the Trump administration targeting trans rights. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Bank of America dropped private-prison clients. Now it's taking them back.
Six years after Bank of America fired him as a client, and 131 days after President Donald Trump publicly accused the bank's chief executive of political bias, Damon Hininger got a phone call. Upon reconsideration, Bank of America would be happy to offer his company, the second-largest operator of US prisons and detention centers, a bank account. 'Times change,' Hininger said in an interview from his office in Nashville, Tenn. His company, CoreCivic, took Bank of America up on its offer, which had been in the works for months. 'A deposit account is nice,' he said, but he's waiting for the Wall Street services — loans, stock offerings, and takeover advice — typically bestowed on favored clients. Financial firms are warming to customers they once shunned under progressive pressure, addressing conservative states lamenting the lack of 'fair access' to banks, and more recently, trying to avoid the wrath of a president bent on settling scores. Citigroup said Tuesday it would start lending to gun manufacturers again, and promised to conduct employee training to root out any political bias. Goldman Sachs and Nasdaq have both stopped requiring companies using them for an IPO to have diverse board members. This week, BlackRock's retreat from progressive stances was rewarded when Texas took it off an investment blacklist. CoreCivic operates 43 jails and prisons across the country, including several that house detainees for US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. Its longtime lender, Bank of America, dropped it as a client in 2019 during a retreat from banking private prisons, gun manufacturers, coal miners, and other industries then out of political favor. That July, Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan delivered the bad news personally in what Hininger described as an uncomfortable meeting in Boston. Alluding to activist pressure — protesters had just shown up at the bank's annual shareholder meeting — Moynihan said CoreCivic could remain a client if it canceled its contracts with ICE or agreed to fulfill them at zero profit to the company. 'Clearly we were targeted for political reasons,' said Hininger, a Republican donor who earlier this year pressed Trump in person to look into political bias in financial services. A Bank of America spokesman declined to comment on specific clients, but noted that it changed its 2019 policy 18 months ago from an outright ban to a case-by-case assessment subject to enhanced scrutiny. 'We're happy to serve anyone,' Moynihan said in February. A JPMorgan spokeswoman said the bank had not changed its policies against financing private prisons or companies that make military-grade weapons for personal use. (It does lend to contractors for the military and law enforcement.) While the tide had been turning before the president's second electoral victory, corporate behavior is shifting quickly in the Trump age. Law firms and universities are striking deals, retailers that once leaned into Pride month are treading lightly this year, and companies are scrubbing their websites of diversity policies. Super Bowl ads, which had become venues to showcase corporate values, were neutral enough this year to win faint praise from arch-conservative provocateur Matt Walsh. June 2019 was a different time. With social activism against incarcerations and Trump's policies of separating immigrant families running high, several big banks including Bank of America, JPMorgan, and Wells Fargo said they would stop lending to private prisons. Progressive activists who had shown up that spring at Bank of America's annual meeting and JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon's home celebrated. By the time Moynihan and his peers arrived in Davos for the World Economic Forum in January, the climate had changed radically. Conservative backlash had hit brands from Target to Budweiser to BlackRock, and swept Trump into office with a perceived mandate to roll back the progressive shift of the late 2010s and early 2020s. Moynihan was among a group of CEOs chosen to ask a question to Trump, who was video-conferencing in from his inauguration week in Washington. The president answered Moynihan's softball question with a sharp rebuke: 'I hope you start opening your bank to conservatives, because many conservatives complain that the banks are not allowing them to do business within the bank. What you're doing is wrong.' His comments signal-boosted a movement in conservative circles that believes banks discriminate against them by closing their accounts without warning or explanation, cutting off their access to the financial system. Among those decrying economic exile were venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, who told podcaster Joe Rogan in November that he knew 30 entrepreneurs who had been 'de-banked,' including his partner, Ben Horowitz's, dad. Andrew Torba, founder of the conservative social network Gab, posted a cancellation notice from his bank. The CEO of Anchorage Financial, a crypto outfit with sway in the Trump administration, told Congress in February that his firm had been cut off with 30 days notice. The Trump Organization sued Capital One this spring for closing its bank accounts after the Jan. 6 riots. What critics call 'de-banking,' banks call 'de-risking.' It traces back to the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, when new regulations forced banks to stop lending to risky borrowers. Tighter rules around bribery and money laundering followed as the US sought to crack down on terrorism and corruption abroad. The Obama administration's Operation Chokepoint cut off banking access to firearm dealers, payday lenders, and pawn shops. The result was banks weighing reputational risk equally alongside traditional worries like losing money. Sometimes that means cutting off entities linked to foreign governments, especially those in dubious standing with Washington, or customers making unusual withdrawals. It also extends to crypto companies, adult entertainers, or any client whose source of income is unverified, legally gray, or unseemly. (Message boards are full of advice for OnlyFans entertainers trying to open bank accounts. The key, apparently, is checking the 'other personal services' box when asked what the business does.) It's the latter category — legitimate businesses that are unpopular with a bank's employees, shareholders, regulators, or customers — that are at the heart of the current fight over financial access. A key regulator, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, announced in March that it's no longer considering reputational risk as part of bank supervision. 'These banks should be blind to politics,' said Hininger, who started as a midnight-shift guard at the maximum-security Leavenworth, Kansas federal prison and became CoreCivic's CEO in 2009. 'The questions they get to ask are: Are we a good credit risk? Are we in good standing with the government?' For CoreCivic, getting cut off by big lenders had consequences. At the time, the company was structured as a real-estate investment trust, which required it to pass almost all of its income to shareholders. Like other REITs, it turned to banks for cash to grow. Bank of America had been the company's go-to lender over the years, arranging loans, underwriting stock offerings, and pitching takeover ideas. After being dropped by big lenders, CoreCivic cut its dividend and, in 2020, converted from a REIT into a corporation, which allowed it to conserve cash. The stock lost nearly half its value by the end of that year. 'We're in a great position now,' Hininger said. CoreCivic's stock, like those of other companies shareholders see benefitting from Trump's agenda, have soared since November. 'But that was a bad year. And it started with a decision… that I think was influenced by politics.' Hininger — who gave $1.3 million to Trump and other Republicans in 2024, filings show — pressed his case to the president at a recent event at Mar-a-Lago. 'This is a big, big issue for me personally, and we're going to be doing more work on this,' Hininger recalls him saying. Banks, like other companies, are moving rightward for the same reasons they moved leftward: They fear getting yelled at. In the late 2010s, it was pressure from progressive groups and a national reckoning with social justice and racism. In 2025, it's a public that has soured on diversity initiatives and a president convinced of anti-conservative bias and determined to root it out of American institutions. His success in getting universities and law firms to bend has sent a chill across banks, which are far more regulated and vulnerable to government pressure. When conservatives were howling about getting 'deplatformed' from social media in 2021, I was pretty unsympathetic. There's no constitutional right to post, and the argument that social networks were de facto town squares, rather than private companies, never made much sense to me. Banks are different: Anytime they want, they can go to the Federal Reserve and borrow money from you and me, essentially for free. That makes them a public good, and more accountable. Choosing whom to bank in 2019 was a choice, and perhaps a defensible one in the political climate that existed then, but the bill comes due. It always does, and it's a good reminder to companies now scrambling rightward: 2028 isn't that far away. Bank executives blame overregulation. 'Know your customer' rules and requirements to try to prevent criminals from accessing funds have heightened the risk of dealing with some customers. 'It's because [of] interpretations of anti-money-laundering [rules], the Bank Secrecy Act, KYC — know your customers,' Moynihan said in February. 'I have not heard of a single instance of anybody on the left getting de-banked,' Andreessen said on OnlyFans' CFO had his . ''Reputational risk' is a blanket term that they use.' — Financial Times When Brian Brooks was comptroller of the currency, he rolled his eyes at complaints of de-banking. Now he's a crypto executive, and converted to the cause. — The New York Times Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
