UK parliament votes to decriminalise abortion, ending 19th-century law
Britain's Parliament voted on Tuesday to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales. This decision comes as police investigations into women terminating pregnancies under outdated 19th-century laws have been on the rise. For almost 60 years, abortion has been legal in England and Wales, though limited to 24 weeks 'gestation and requiring two doctors' approval. However, a Victorian-era law carried a potential life sentence for women who ended pregnancies beyond the 24-week limit.advertisementAlthough convictions under this law have been rare in Britain, prosecutions rose after the COVID-19 pandemic. This increase followed a legal change that permitted abortion pills to be taken at home for pregnancies up to 10 weeks of conception.Reuters reported that in a free parliamentary vote, where politicians were not bound by party directives, an amendment to cease all prosecutions for women terminating pregnancies received initial approval by a margin of 379 votes to 137.
Medical professionals who assist women in obtaining an abortion outside the 24-week limit could still face prosecution.The amendment is part of a larger bill moving through Parliament and could still be modified or rejected as it proceeds through the House of Commons and the House of Lords.Labour Member of Parliament Tonia Antoniazzi pointed out that the existing law had led to investigations against 100 women in the past five years. She noted these cases included women who had given birth prematurely or were coerced into abortions by abusive partners. Antoniazzi told parliament, "Each one of these cases is a travesty enabled by our outdated abortion law. This is not justice, it is cruelty and it has got to end."advertisementHowever, some politicians cautioned against rushing the proposed amendment through parliament, warning of potential unintended consequences. Conservative Member of Parliament Rebecca Paul, for instance, stated that if the amendment became law, 'fully developed babies up to term could be aborted by a woman with no consequences.'"The amendment would revoke parts of a law passed in 1861 by a then all-male parliament that made deliberately ending a pregnancy a crime and stipulated that those who carried it out could be "kept in penal servitude for life". A change to the law in 1967 permitted abortions in certain circumstances, but left the 19th century criminal prohibition in place.Between 1861 and 2022, only three women in Britain were convicted for illegal abortions, according to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, an organization dedicated to improving women's healthcare. However, since then, police have charged six women, and one has been sentenced to prison, the group reported.With inputs from Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
37 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Caste census: Pilot seeks to put government on mat, questions timing & intentions
NEW DELHI: Calling for more clarity on caste based census, the Congress on Tuesday urged the government to clarify the reasoning behind the low budget allocation, stop the delay tactics, and conduct the census with the same integrity demonstrated by Telangana. Addressing the media in the capital, senior Congress leader Sachin Pilot hit out at the union government for no official mention about the caste census on Monday's official notification announcing the delayed census. The caste census would meet the same fate as that of the Women Reservation Bill, which the government postponed even after it was passed in the Parliament, he said. 'Is the 2027 census being timed to engineer a new delimitation that benefits BJP-ruled states?' he asked. The Congress general secretary said that while India missed its scheduled census date of 2021, with the enumeration now having been pushed to 2027, there is no mention of a caste census in the notification. Citing the Telangana model, he said that the state government issued a notification that explicitly mentioned the word 'caste'. 'The state government made it clear that it would carry out a household survey to assess social, educational, economic, employment, political, and caste-related parameters,' he added.
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
Management consultant Arun Maira studies the socioeconomic evolution of India's ‘tryst with destiny'
What is India's 'tryst with destiny'? Independent India was born when Jawaharlal Nehru unfurled the country's tricolour flag and addressed the Indian Constituent Assembly in Parliament at the midnight hour on 15 August 1947. India had won its independence after a long and remarkably peaceful struggle for freedom led by Mahatma Gandhi. Gandhi had a vision of a country not divided into fragments by religious and communal walls. He envisioned a country in which every Indian, whether rich or poor, would hold their head high in dignity. India's 'tryst with destiny' was to provide 'poorna swaraj' to all its citizens The country's democratic Constitution granted political freedom to every Indian, man or woman, rich or poor, whatever their religions. It created the world's largest democracy. Sadly, some 75 years later, political liberties and freedoms of speech are being curbed in India. Social equality amongst castes has not been achieved. Lower caste citizens continue to live in great indignity. Lower caste poor women live in abject poverty in India's villages. They are amongst the most oppressed humans on the planet. The number of billionaires in India increased from 102 to 166 between 2020 and 2022, the COVID years when work on the ground was disrupted by lockdowns, and interruptions of supply chains within and across national borders. However, digital flows of money were not affected. Therefore, profit continued to be made by investors and speculators in financial markets. A very large part of the wealth of billionaires is in the form of financial instruments. Therefore, their personal wealth creation was not affected by COVID. While the number of Indian billionaires increased during the pandemic, the majority of Indian citizens suffered from increased economic insecurity. Hundreds of millions of Indians lost their incomes when the country locked down during the pandemic. They struggled to find shelter, food, and even drinking water for their families. Clearly, we have a long road ahead of us still to fulfil the destiny our founding fathers had envisioned for the nation. India at 75 is a time to reflect. A time to reflect on what is going on in the world around us; what is going on within us; and what changes we must make in our ideas of progress to create a country in which all Indians' minds are without fear: a country in which all Indians, whatever their caste or religion, will hold their heads high by 2047 when India will be 100. The idea of a free democratic India was a beacon of hope for a shattered world in 1947. The so-called 'enlightened' nations of Europe had plunged the world into two horrific World Wars within 50 years. Into which they had dragged the countries they had colonised, who were 'the white man's burden', they had been enlightening, they said, while enslaving their people, and exploiting their lands and natural resources. World War I was a contest for territorial rights amongst the enlightened Europeans. After which new political forces rose within Europe that challenged ideas of liberalism and free markets: communist movements in Russia; and fascist movements in Italy and Germany. World War II was described by the Allies as a defence of liberal democracy against forces of fascism and oppression. The war ended with the US showing off the power of its nuclear technology to exterminate hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. When the global hot war ended, it morphed into a long Cold War led by the US against communism. The West and the Soviet Union competed to develop weapons of mass destruction. The Cold War ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union. Now another cold war has begun. The US, and China and Russia, are racing against each other to develop digital weapons, and in applying financial and trade weapons to harm each other. The collateral damages of their war are harming the most vulnerable people in the world the most. Sadly, the same leaders who must cooperate to solve global problems are once again dividing the world and arm-twisting other countries to take their sides. India finds itself, once again, in the difficult position of being a bridge between East and West, as it was after its independence in 1947. And once again it hopes to be a source of a new Enlightenment. However, to be a light for the rest, India must first clear up the fogs within itself. This is the historic task India's leaders must accomplish between India at 75 and India at100 (between 2022 and 2047). When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, political scientist Francis Fukuyama prematurely declared the 'end of history'. He believed that capitalism and democracy – the Washington Consensus – had finally prevailed over socialism and totalitarianism. History has returned. Ideological conflict between democracy and capitalism has not ended. In fact the two ideologies are conflicting within the Western victors of the old Cold War. Civil society movements are speaking in the West on behalf of people left behind by the 'free market' of private enterprise. Other voices on 'the Left' demand a larger role for governments in providing public services and social security. And others speak for the protection of the natural environment. Meanwhile the Right advocates for lower taxes, less regulation, and more freedom for capital to roam the world. The fundamental conflict between the core principles of capitalism and democracy – i.e. between the rights of owners of capital on one hand, and the rights of all humans on the other – continues. It is a conflict between political conservatives and political progressives. Between conservatives, who want to retain their power to fix the rules of the game from which they have benefited, and progressives who want to change the rules for the benefit of those left behind. Democracy and capitalism are founded on different conceptions of fundamental rights. Capitalism's foundation is property rights. Democracy's is human rights. Capitalist institutions run on the principle that whosoever owns something has the right to use it as he wishes, and also that whosoever owns more of a shared resource must have a greater say in how that resource is used. Therefore, whoever owns more shares in a corporation has a larger vote than those who own fewer shares. On the other hand, ownership of property does not matter while assigning voting rights in democratic institutions. Because, in democracy, every living person, whether she has a billion dollars of wealth, or no dollars at all, has an equal vote in the governance of the collective human enterprise. The clash between capitalism and democracy is a clash of fundamental principles for good governance of societies. When appliances designed to run on AC power are plugged into sockets providing DC power, there will be blow-outs. Similarly, when institutions of governance designed to run on fundamentally different principles are plugged into each other, something will blow up. Fundamental contradictions between the principles of capitalism and democracy are causing violent conflicts amongst nations and within nations. To create an equitable, sustainable, and more harmonious world in the 21st century, institutions of democracy and capitalism must evolve, from the shape in which they have been locked in with the so-called 'Washington Consensus'. Humanity must find new solutions to many societal, economic, and environmental challenges in a hurry. They are listed in the 17 Sustainable Development Goals16, all governments have signed up for. Institutions are vehicles designed by humans to realize their collective aspirations. Institutions of capitalism, as well as institutions of democracy, must be reformed to solve the existential crises of increasing inequalities and rapid climate change that are threatening all humanity.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
India's courts balance rights in a diverse nation; Justice V Ramasubramanian explains judiciary's expanding role
Justice V Ramasubramanian HYDERABAD: National Human Rights Commission chairman and former Supreme Court judge, Justice V Ramasubramanian, on Tuesday observed that courts in India are constantly striving to maintain a delicate balance between competing interests and diverse segments of society. "India is home to eight religions, over 3,600 castes, and 1,600 languages spoken by 1.4 billion people. In such a setting, expecting a uniform acceptance of a single idea is unrealistic," he said. Justice Ramasubramanian was delivering the keynote address at a seminar on 'Judiciary as a guardian of human rights' held in the city. He said that while the Constitution guarantees freedom of speech, such freedom exists only to the extent that it does not infringe on the rights and sentiments of others. "The moment speech begins to hurt or offend, the role of the judiciary becomes relevant," he noted. Constitutional rights Reflecting on the judiciary's role over the past 75 years, Justice Ramasubramanian said the Supreme Court had significantly expanded the scope of constitutional rights and made justice more accessible to the common citizen. "In the absence of legislation on specific issues, judicial pronouncements functioned as law until Parliament or state legislatures enacted relevant statutes," he explained. He highlighted the evolution of Article 21 - the right to life - through progressive judicial interpretation. "What began as a right to life has come to include the right to livelihood, travel, dignity, and even the right to die with dignity," he said. He also pointed out that several non-justiciable directive principles of state policy have, through judicial innovation, become enforceable components of Article 21.
