Mitsubishi Electric Acquires Irish Elevator Company Ascension Lifts
TOKYO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Apr 30, 2025--
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation (TOKYO: 6503) announced today that it has acquired all shares of Ascension Lifts Limited, an Irish elevator company based in Dublin, through its wholly owned subsidiary Motum AB, headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden, on April 29.
Mitsubishi Electric and its Tokyo-based subsidiary Mitsubishi Electric Building Solutions Corporation are expanding their worldwide business in elevator maintenance and renewal, which is expected to enjoy growing demand in the building systems sector, one of Mitsubishi Electric's priority growth businesses. In the mature European market, the demand for maintenance and renewal services is forecast to grow against the backdrop of aging elevators and escalators and heightened environmental awareness. In response, the two companies plan to create an operational structure capable of accelerating the delivery of value to customers.
Ascension Lifts, which has been operating in the Irish elevator market for many years, has excellent technical capabilities and know-how for multi-brand maintenance and renewal, as well as a strong customer network. Through this acquisition, Mitsubishi Electric and Mitsubishi Electric Building Solutions will strengthen their business base in the Irish market by expanding their business domain into maintenance and renewal, starting with the use of Ascension Lifts's maintenance stock, and promote their strategy for expanding the elevator and escalator business in the European market.
For the full text, please visit:www.MitsubishiElectric.com/news/
View source version on businesswire.com:https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250430857170/en/
CONTACT: Customer Inquiries
Global Business Development Group
Strategic Planning Office (LBS)
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
Tel: +81-3-3218-2950
www.MitsubishiElectric.com/Media Inquiries
Takeyoshi Komatsu
Public Relations Division
Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
Tel: +81-3-3218-2332
[email protected] Communications Division
Mitsubishi Electric Building Solutions Corporation
Tel: +81-3-6206-5030
[email protected]
KEYWORD: IRELAND SWEDEN UNITED KINGDOM JAPAN ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE
INDUSTRY KEYWORD: CONSTRUCTION & PROPERTY OTHER MANUFACTURING HARDWARE BUILDING SYSTEMS PUBLIC TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGY TRANSPORT MANUFACTURING
SOURCE: Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
Copyright Business Wire 2025.
PUB: 04/30/2025 03:30 AM/DISC: 04/30/2025 03:29 AM
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250430857170/en
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
37 minutes ago
- CNBC
Two aerospace stocks are deeply overbought and could be due for a pullback
GE Aerospace and Howmet Aerospace are vulnerable to pullbacks after entering deep overbought territory this week. Each stock climbed more than 3% this week, outperforming the S & P 500 's 1.5% gain in the same period. The stocks have come so far so fast that now GE Aerospace and Howmet have the two highest 14-day relative strength index, or RSI, readings in the S & P 500. CNBC Pro used its stock screener tool available for subscribers to find the most oversold stocks as measured by the 14-day RSI. Stocks that have a 14-day RSI above 70 are viewed as overbought, leaving them susceptible to a decline, while those a 14-day RSI below 30 are often thought of as oversold, suggesting they may see a bounce. GE Aerospace has now risen for nine straight weeks, while Howmet has advanced for seven. GE Aerospace is ahead more than 53% year to date, while Howmet is up more than 60%. While the typical analyst polled by LSEG has buy ratings on both companies, the consensus 12-month price target foresees more than 5% downside for each stock over the next year following these big runs. Here's the full list of S & P 500 stocks with the highest 14-day RSIs, along with what Wall Street thinks of them, according to LSEG data as of Friday morning: At the other extreme, Brown-Forman is the most oversold name in the S & P 500 with a 14-day RSI below 22. Shares of the Jack Daniel's whiskey distiller tumbled nearly 16% this week. Much of the decline came after Brown-Forman posted revenue and net income for its fiscal fourth quarter that missed analysts' consensus forecasts, according to consensus LSEG numbers. The Louisville-based company said it was operating in an "exceptionally challenging macroeconomic environment." The stocks has slumped 37% in the past six months and is on pace to record its fifth consecutive down year. Although Wall Street analysts rate Brown-Forman no more than a collective "hold," the consensus 12-month price target as compiled by LSEG suggests shares may rally 35%. Brown-Forman also has a dividend yield of 3.32%. Here are the other stocks with 14-day RSIs below 30, along with what Wall Street sees for them:
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
British holidaymakers to miss out on compensation after EU rule change
Britons will miss out on compensation for delayed flights after Brussels adopted a rule change following complaints from airlines. Payouts that were previously triggered by delays exceeding three hours will now only be made after four hours of holdups, European transport ministers agreed. The new regulation, hammered out following a decade of discussions and bargaining over passenger compensation, will apply to all services from EU countries to the UK. For the time being, travellers headed from Britain to the Continent will still qualify for a refund when flight delays hit the three-hour mark, unless they are flying with an EU-registered airline. While raising the compensation threshold, ministers also agreed to increase the minimum level of payment from €250 (£210) to €300 for shorter journeys and to €500 for those above 3,500km (2,175 miles). The original regulation, known as EU261, was passed in 2004 with the aim of ensuring that passengers received money and assistance in the event of flights being cancelled at short notice. Following Brexit, the UK adopted it into law so that the rights of travellers remained unchanged. However, the Government will now have to decide whether to adopt the amendments for outbound flights or stick with the original version. Taking no action might be welcomed by consumer groups but would have consequences for UK airlines, which would be at a disadvantage to their European rivals. It could also affect fares, with Ryanair having claimed that EU261 costs passengers £7 per ticket. Airlines for Europe, an industry group, had pressed for a higher compensation threshold, arguing that extending it to five hours – as originally proposed by the European Commission – would allow 70pc of flights that are cancelled to be rescued. It argued said that airlines inevitably scrapped flights once compensation was triggered, especially since the payouts involved were often higher than the ticket prices charged. It said a five-hour threshold would have made it more practical for carriers to fly in replacement aircraft so that more flights would get away, potentially benefiting 10m passengers a year. A spokesman said: 'Getting to their destination is the primary concern of passengers, even if it means getting to bed or arriving at their holiday resort late. But with a low cancellation threshold it makes more sense to call off the flight and take that hit.' Airlines have also railed against the fact that the compensation applies whether delays are caused by a crew shortage or technical issue that might be laid at their door, or by severe weather or air traffic control issues beyond their control. A number of extraordinary circumstances are expected to be added as part of revisions to 31 different air passenger rights. The revisions must still clear the European Parliament but are expected to become law in the bloc by the end of the year. The Department for Transport said the UK did not have to amend its legislation in line with any changes from the EU, and that any potential future reforms would require careful consideration on their merits, and be subject to public consultation. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
State Thruway Authority OKs added funds for firm handling Seneca Nation lawsuit
ALBANY — New York State Thruway Authority officials have agreed to increase by $1 million the payment cap on a contract with the Buffalo-based law firm that is representing the public agency in an ongoing legal dispute with the Seneca Nation of Indians. During a meeting on Tuesday, members of the authority's board of directors unanimously authorized an amendment to an existing contract with Nixon Peabody that will raise the maximum amount payable to the law firm to $1.8 million. The authority's original 2022 agreement capped the amount to be paid to Nixon Peabody at $800,000. The resolution supporting the move notes that Nixon Peabody has provided 'substantial services' pertaining to ongoing litigation involving the Seneca Nation. Seneca leaders filed a lawsuit in 2018 claiming that the state agency failed to obtain the necessary federal approvals for an easement that has allowed the thruway to run through the tribe's Cattaraugus territory for decades. The Nation's lawsuit seeks to compel the state authority to obtain a new easement or compensate the Nation for tolls collected from motorists using the authority on reservation land. It also seeks to end toll collection along the roughly 3-mile section of the thruway, which is about 30 miles south of Buffalo. In 2023, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second District allowed the lawsuit to continue after it rejected an attempt by the state to have it dismissed. The decision upheld a 2020 U.S. District Court ruling. The resolution supporting the pay increase for Nixon Peabody notes that the law firm has provided 'substantial services' pertaining to the litigation over the easement while also serving as bond counsel for authority debt transactions that are reimbursable by the state. The resolution describes the Seneca litigation as 'complex' while indicating that there is also a 'continued need for support' with the authority's state debt transactions.
