Germany's far-right party to gain ground in the west
The far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party is poised to make major gains in the country's west in Sunday's parliamentary elections, party leaders say, adding it will build on an eastern stronghold.
A YouGov poll released on Thursday backs them up. The data showed that the AfD, which is classified by Germany's domestic intelligence agency as a suspected far-right extremist group, looks set to even double the levels it reached in the west in the last national election.
In 2021, the far-right party polled between a low of five per cent in Hamburg to a high of 10 per cent in the small state of Saarland.
For Sunday's vote, YouGov sees a range of 12 per cent in both Hamburg and Bremen to 21 per cent in the south-western state of Baden-Württemberg, where just four years ago the AfD stood at 9.6 per cent.
"We could crack the 10 per cent mark," said Robert Offermann, AfD spokesman in Hamburg.
The party obtained 5.3 per cent of the vote in the northern city state in 2021.
The rise of the AfD has many Germans worried - as seen by recent mass demonstrations against working with the party.
But party leaders say they are making gains because of their focus on illegal immigration, and following a string of deadly attacks from immigrants in Magdeburg, Aschaffenburg and Munich - although in at least two of the incidents the suspects were in the country legally.
Apart from security issues, Germany's poor economy is also helping the far-right party.
"Five years ago it was mainly retirees, but now we have a lot of younger people," Kurt Kleinschmidt, the AfD chairman in Germany's most northern state of Schleswig-Holstein, told dpa.
"The economy is going down the drain," he said. People "feel they have to do something," he added, noting that AfD membership in Schleswig-Holstein rose from 743 in 2022 to 1,500 now.
NEW: Data analysis shows how @elonmusk's promotion of AfD on X ahead of Sunday's German election brought the far right party a massive new online audience (1/thread) pic.twitter.com/jaD6AgasOk
— Adam Taylor (@mradamtaylor) February 20, 2025
Conrad Ziller, a political science professor at the University of Duisburg-Essen, says the often simple solutions offered by the AfD appeal to some people in these difficult times.
"People who are insecure and emotional are receptive to simple solutions," he told dpa.
The AfD's anti-elite narrative is also appealing to people who feel they are being left behind, he says.
That's one reason why Ziller and others argue the party is so popular in the east, where the YouGov poll sees the AfD leading in all five states with vote shares ranging from 29 per cent in Brandenburg to 37 per cent in Saxony.
"The AfD is the east's revenge on the west, which is blamed for all the upheavals after 1990," retired sociology professor Detlev Claussen told Foreign Policy magazine last year following the AfD's resounding success in east German state elections in Saxony and Thuringia.
He viewed the strong showing in the east as an outcome of "resentment against the West," over the way in which unification between West and East Germany was conducted.
For many East Germans, the merging of the two Germanies in 1990 was more like an expropriation than a reunification.
It resulted in a major upheaval - not only of their economy but of social and private lives.
"In the east the AfD has successfully capitalised on the history of the former East Germany ... even among young people who have no direct experience of the former East Germany," Ziller said.
The AfD formed in February 2013 - just seven months before national elections - and its raison d'etre at the time was the euro. The party's founders were critical of the eurozone, a 20-member common currency group, especially since the European Union was in the middle of dealing with Greece's debt crisis.
"In 2013, the AfD was therefore what some call a single-issue party," said an analysis by the Munich-based ifo economics institute. The party failed, in that election, to achieve the five per cent needed to enter parliament - but only by 0.3 per cent.
After that, the AfD's priorities expanded, though its "fiscal focus remained," the institute said. In 2014 it won seven seats in the European Parliament.
The party's central focus switched to an anti-immigration platform after Germany started to take in some one million asylum seekers in 2015, according to official figures. Fears, especially among working-class males, of being overrun by immigration, helped.
In the 2017 general elections, the AfD won 12.6 per cent of the vote and became the the third biggest party in parliament. While it did very well in eastern Germany, it outperformed the national average in several western German districts, ifo noted.
"The AfD's heartland is eastern Germany," ifo wrote, but "the AfD is not only a phenomenon of the east."
Although the party made good gains in 2017, by the time 2021 rolled around, the coronavirus and not immigration was the main focus, with the AfD campaigning on an anti-vaccine position.
"That's one of the reasons why we lost ground," Robin Classen, spokesman for the party in the western state of Rhineland-Palatinate told dpa.
But for this election - a combination of anti-immigrant sentiment, the recent attacks, a poor economy and anti-establishment attitudes is expected to more than reverse the losses seen last time around.
This does not mean that the AfD will join the government anytime soon.
With the mainstream parties - including the conservatives who are expected to win the election - all having ruled out working with the far right, the party is set to become the biggest opposition bloc.
But, as the AfD looks set to achieve the best result for a far-right party in Germany's post-Nazi era history, it has already firmly set its eyes on 2029.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Germany's CDU: Foreign medical students must work in Germany or pay
The German conservative party of Chancellor Friedrich Merz wants to charge foreign medical students for their studies if they return to their home countries immediately after graduation instead of working in Germany. "Anyone who studies here should practise in rural areas for at least five years. Those who do not wish to do so must repay the costs of this first-class education," Sepp Müller, deputy chair of the parliamentary group of the conservative CDU/CSU bloc, told the Bild newspaper in remarks published on Wednesday. Higher education, including medical school, is mainly free in Germany - to both foreign and domestic students. By contrast, in the United States both domestic and foreign students can pay some $60,000 per year - and more when housing and books are included. In the United Kingdom, annual international fees range between £43,700 ($59,232) at the Cardiff Medical School in Wales, to £67,194 at the Cambridge Medical School, according to UK testing site UKCAT The secretary of state in the German Health Ministry, Tino Sorge, also called for measures to prevent foreign medical students from returning to their home countries after completing their studies. "Our goal must be to retain such highly qualified professionals. We need to attract young doctors to work in Germany instead of watching them leave," the CDU politician told the newspaper. He added that each medical school place comes with significant costs. Florian Müller, the research policy spokesman for the CDU/CSU parliamentary group, told Bild that the federal states should independently regulate the repayment of study costs. "We need to focus much more on ensuring that international talents work in Germany after university," he said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
German Foreign Minister Wadephul heads to Rome for talks on Ukraine
German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul is expected in Rome on Thursday for an international conference focused on EU security and the war in Ukraine. Hosted by Italian Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani, the meeting is taking place within the framework of the so-called Weimar Plus format. The group is an extension of the Weimar Triangle, which is made up of Germany, France and Poland. According to the German Foreign Office, both NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha will attend the conference. They are to be joined by representatives from Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, France and the European Union. The meeting is taking place less than a month before the fourth Ukraine Recovery Conference, scheduled for July 10-11, at which some 2,000 representatives from politics, business and international organizations plan to discuss Ukraine's long-term prospects. After a bilateral meeting with Tajani, Wadephul's schedule sees him leave Rome for the Middle East on Thursday evening. Through Sunday, he plans to visit a host of countries, including Egypt, Lebanon, Jordan and Israel. The Foreign Office said the focus of the trip to the region is the catastrophic humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip and plans for a peaceful order in the territory after the end of the ongoing conflict with Israel.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Chabria: Newsom's 'Democracy is under assault' speech could turn the tables on Trump
Frame it as a call to action or a presidential campaign announcement, Gov. Gavin Newsom's address to America on Tuesday has tapped into our zeitgeist (German words feel oddly appropriate at the moment) in a way few others have. 'Democracy is under assault right before our eyes,' Newsom said during a live broadcast with a California flag and the U.S. flag in the background. 'The moment we've feared has arrived.' What moment exactly is he referring to? President Trump has put Marines and National Guardsmen on the streets of Los Angeles, and granted himself the power to put them anywhere. Wednesday, a top military leader said those forces could "detain" protesters, but not outright arrest them, though — despite what you see on right wing media — most protesters have been peaceful. But every would-be authoritarian ultimately faces a decisive moment, when the fear they have generated must be enforced with action to solidify power. The danger of that moment for the would-be king is that it is also the time when rebellion is most likely, and most likely to be effective. People wake up. In using force against his own citizens, the leader risks alienating supporters and activating resistance. Read more: Mayor Karen Bass decries continuing raids, wonders if L.A. is a 'national experiment' What happens next in Los Angeles between the military and protesters — which group is perceived as the aggressors — may likely determine what happens next in our democracy. If the military is the aggressor and protesters remain largely peaceful, Trump risks losing support. If the protesters are violent, public perception could further empower Trump. The president's immigration czar Tom Homan, said on CNN that what happens next, 'It all depends on the activities of these protesters — I mean, they make the decisions.' Welcome to that fraught moment, America. Who would have thought Newsom would lead on it so effectively? "Everybody who's not a Trumpist in this society has been taken by surprise, and is still groggy from the authoritarian offensive of the last five months," said Steven Levitsky, a professor of government at the embattled Harvard University, and author of "How Democracies Die." Levitsky told me that it helps shake off that shock to have national leaders, people who others can look to and rally behind. Especially as fear nudges some into silence. "You never know who that leader sometimes is going to be, and it may be Newsom," Levitsky said. "Maybe his political ambitions end up converging with the small d, democratic opposition." Maybe. Since his address, and a coinciding and A-game funny online offensive, Newsom's reach has skyrocketed. Millions of people watched his address, and hundreds of thousands have followed him on TikTok and other social media platforms. Searches about him on Google were up 9,700%, according to CNN. Love his message or find it laughable, it had reach — partly because it was unapologetically clear and also unexpected. "Trump and his loyalist thrive on division because it allow them to take more power and exert even more control," Newsom said. I was on the ground with the protesters this week, and I can say from firsthand experience that there are a small number of agitators and a large number of peaceful protesters. But Trump has done an excellent job of creating crisis and fear by portraying events as out of the control of local and state authorities, and therefore in need of his intervention. Republicans "need that violence to corroborate their talking points," Mia Bloom told me. She's an expert on extremism and a professor at Georgia State University. Violence "like in the aftermath of George Floyd, when there was the rioting, that actually was helpful for Republicans," she said. Read more: After images of unrest comes the political spin, distorting the reality on the ground in L.A. Levitsky said authoritarians look for crises. "You need an emergency, both rhetorically and legally, to engage in authoritarian behavior," he said. So Trump has laid a trap with his immigration sweeps in a city of immigrants to create opportunity, and Newsom has called it out. And it calling it out — pointing out the danger of protesters turning violent and yet still calling for peaceful protest — Newsom has put Trump in a precarious position that the president may not have been expecting. "Repressing protest is a very risky venture," said Levitsky. "It often, not always, but often, does trigger push back." Levitsky points out that already, there is some evidence that Trump may have overreached, and is losing support. A new poll by the Public Religion Research Institute found that 76% of Americans oppose the military birthday parade Trump plans on throwing for himself in Washington, D.C. this weekend. That includes disapproval from more than half of Trump supporters. A separate poll by Quinnipiac University found that 54% of those polled disapprove of how he's handling immigration issues, and 56% disapprove of his deportations. Bloom warns that there's a danger in raising too many alarms about authoritarianism right now, because we still have some functioning guardrails. She said that stoking too much fear could backfire, for Newsom and for democracy. "We're at a moment in which the country is very polarized and that these things are being told through two very different types of narratives, and the moment we give the other side, which was a very apocalyptic, nihilistic narrative, we give them fodder, we justify the worst policies" she said. She pointed to the Iranian Revolution of 1979, when some protesters placed flowers in the barrels of soldiers' guns, and act of peaceful protest she said changed public perception. That, she said, is what's needed now. Newsom was clear in his call for peaceful protest. But also clear that it was a call to action in a historic inflection point. We can't know in the moment who or what history will remember, said Levitsky. "It's really important that the most privileged among us stand up and fight," he said. "If they don't, citizens are going to look around and say, 'Well, why should I?" Having leaders willing to be the target, when so many feel the danger of speaking out, has value, he said. Because fear may spread like a virus, but courage is contagious, too. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.