Foreign students wary of US as Trump presses 'dehumanising' campaign
Donald Trump's expanding crackdown on elite universities is prompting some international students to abandon applications to campuses in the United States and spreading stress and anxiety among those already enrolled.
The president has damaged the country's reputation among foreign students, who number around one million, as he pursues a campaign against US universities he views as hindering his Make America Great Again populist agenda.
He has blocked Harvard from hosting international scholars in a manoeuvre being challenged legally, targeted non-citizen campus activists for deportation, and most recently, suspended student visa processing across the board.
Harvard applied mathematics and economics student Abdullah Shahid Sial, 20, said the Trump administration's campaign against US universities, which the president accused of being hotbeds of liberal bias and antisemitism, had been "dehumanising".
"It's really unfortunate that this is the case for 18, 19, and 20-year-olds who came here without any family, and in most cases, haven't been to the US before," said Sial, who is from Pakistan and hopes to be able to return to Harvard next academic year.
Sial said he advised acquaintances to have backup plans if US colleges became inaccessible, and that a friend applied to Harvard's law school, as well as Columbia's, and two less reputable British institutions, ultimately opting to go to the UK.
"He definitely liked Harvard way more (but) he doesn't want this amount of uncertainty surrounding his education," Sial said.
Karl Molden, a Harvard government and classics student from Austria, said Trump's move to block the university from hosting and enrolling foreign students meant he was unsure if he would be able to return after summer vacation.
"IN THE DARK"
While that decision - affecting some 27 per cent of the overall Harvard population - was paused by a judge pending a hearing Thursday (May 29), the move still threw student plans into chaos.
"I kind of figured I would be in the target group of Trump. I'm personally right in the middle of it, so an option for me would be to study abroad ... I have applied to study at Oxford because of all the action taken by Trump," said Molden, 21.
"It's just really hard."
Harvard academics say they have already started to feel the impact of Trump's vendetta against the school, in feedback from colleagues based outside the United States.
"I've already heard this from professors in other countries who say 'we encourage our best students to go to the United States'," Harvard professor Ryan Enos told AFP at a noisy rally against Trump's policies Tuesday, adding, "We wonder if we can tell them that anymore".
The halt to visa processing revealed this week is reportedly to allow for more stringent screening of applicants' social media and protest activity.
"International students already represent the most tracked and vetted category of nonimmigrants in the United States. It is a poor use of taxpayer dollars," said the NAFSA Association of International Educators non-profit.
Trump, meanwhile, continued his assault on Harvard, saying university leaders have "got to behave themselves.
"Harvard is treating our country with great disrespect, and all they're doing is getting in deeper and deeper," he said Wednesday in the White House.
One Spanish student of politics and statistics, who declined to be named for fear of retaliation, told AFP she would not be deterred from pursuing her planned year abroad at Columbia University.
"It's scary, because we think to ourselves that all our activity on social networks could be monitored, for example, if we like pro-Palestinian posts or anti-Trump posts. All of that could see us denied a visa," she said.
Students due to return to Harvard after the summer break are in limbo pending a ruling on Harvard's exclusion from the foreign student system.
"I'm completely in the dark," said 20-year-old Alfred Williamson, a Welsh-Danish physics and government student in his second year at Harvard.
"As for my other options, and like all other international students, I'm just clinging on to the hope that Harvard will win this battle against the White House."
Sial, the Harvard student from Pakistan, said foreign students like him were "made to fight this battle which no one signed up for."
"It's really unfortunate that it's come down to that."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Shops near Harvard brace for revenue drop as Trump suspends visas for new international students
CAMBRIDGE, Massachusetts: Small businesses near Harvard University are worried about a loss of revenue as United States President Donald Trump's tussle with the Ivy League school over international students continues. Just outside the university campus is Harvard Square, a bustling cultural and commercial hub with a lively mix of eateries, cafes, bookstores and other shops. Kari Kuelzer, owner of Grendel's Den Restaurant & Bar – a pub that has called the square home for more than 50 years – told CNA that students account for a third of her business. Kuelzer said she is unsure if her pub, which was opened by her parents, can survive if Harvard is forced to shut its doors to foreign students. 'Where are we going to get those dollars? They're not going to just magically materialise,' she said. Like Grendel's Den, many establishments in the area are locally-owned and rely heavily on students as a key source of income. IMPACT ON LOCAL BUSINESSES There are around 6,800 international students at Harvard, making up about a quarter of the university's student body. The Harvard Square Business Association, which represents more than 300 stores in the district, is worried about the impact on its members if Trump successfully restricts foreign nationals from studying at the elite school. When asked about how retailers are preparing for the possibility of fewer students, Denise Jillson, executive director of the association, said that shop owners may resort to adopting measures used during the COVID-19 pandemic, when there was less footfall. 'Reduction of staff, reduction of hours, less choices on the menu,' she said. Jillson noted, however, that there were government subsidies available during the pandemic to offset a loss of business, unlike the current situation where there is no support. 'We don't have that safeguard now,' she added. LONG-TERM, NATIONWIDE IMPACT Beyond Harvard, experts said contributions by foreign students can be felt far and wide across the nation, and often last much longer than their college years. Data from the Association of International Educators (NAFSA) revealed that more than 1.1 million international students in the US contributed nearly US$44 billion to its economy last year, including spending on tuition, housing, food and entertainment. Foreign students typically pay full tuition fees, making them a vital revenue stream for schools faced with declining domestic enrolment – which, according to the National Center for Education Statistics, fell 15 per cent between 2010 and 2021. Barnet Sherman, a corporate finance professor at Boston University, said that roughly one job is created for every three international students, making up about 350,000 jobs in the country. 'These are not just jobs in larger urban centres like Boston, but across the country, because nearly every city and town across America has a school, either a community college or a local state college, and there are a lot of international students coming,' he added. He noted that 25 per cent of the billion-dollar companies on the US stock exchanges were started by international students. '(The) implication is that it's not just the money that is potentially being lost now, but the multiplier effect of this money over time and the number of jobs and wealth that international students have created and will continue to create,' he added. WHAT'S GOING ON BETWEEN TRUMP AND HARVARD? In mid-April, the Trump administration ordered the freezing of billions of dollars in federal funding to Harvard. It accused the university of allowing anti-Semitism to flourish on campus and discriminating in its enrolment and hiring practices – claims that Harvard has strongly denied. The White House on May 22 tried to revoke the university's ability to enrol international students. A day later, a judge temporarily blocked the move. On Wednesday (Jun 4), Trump signed an executive order suspending the entry of foreign nationals seeking to study or participate in exchange programmes at Harvard. The dispute between Trump and the nation's oldest, wealthiest and most prestigious university is still ongoing. Secretary of State Marco Rubio also previously announced the federal government will 'aggressively' revoke the visas of Chinese students nationwide, especially those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Trump signs travel ban for 12 countries including Myanmar
[WASHINGTON] US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (Jun 4) signed a proclamation that bans individuals from 12 countries from entering the US, reinstating one of the most controversial and defining measures from his first term in the wake of an attack in Boulder, Colorado, that targeted a march in support of Israeli hostages. The second-term travel ban covers Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The measure also partially limits the entry of people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. Trump earlier in the week blamed the immigration policies of former president Joe Biden for the presence of the suspect in the Boulder attack, who was an Egyptian who overstayed his visa and would not have been impacted by the ban. Witnesses say they saw the suspect use a makeshift flamethrower and throw an incendiary device in the attack. 'The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas,' Trump said in a video posted on social media on Wednesday. 'We don't want them.' CBS News first reported Trump's efforts to block travellers from the 12 countries. The ban will not apply to those who already have visas, lawful permanent residents of the US, or teams travelling for the World Cup or Olympics. Those with special visas to escape persecution in Iran or for assisting the US military effort in Afghanistan are also exempted. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Impact on Harvard's foreign students Trump also signed a separate proclamation suspending the visas of foreign students seeking to participate in exchange programmes at Harvard University, which has already been a target for the administration that claims it has a liberal bias and is not doing enough to address antisemitism. In the Harvard proclamation, Trump accused the university of failing to discipline conduct violations on campus and complained the university had only turned over information about three foreign students accused of dangerous, illegal or threatening activity. 'Harvard's actions show that it either is not fully reporting its disciplinary records for foreign students or is not seriously policing its foreign students,' Trump said. In his first term, Trump barred travellers from Cuba, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela and Yemen. The addition of Afghanistan in this order comes after the Trump administration suspended the US refugee programme and froze federal funding for assistance programmes, including those that provided travel for Afghans who had already been approved to resettle in the US. The move is the latest step in what has been a sweeping immigration agenda aimed at cracking down on undocumented migration, ramping up deportations of people from the US and completing the construction of the US-Mexico border wall Trump began in his first term. Trump pledged to secure US borders, seizing on voter concerns about crime and a surge in migrants, in his 2024 presidential campaign. Trump put in motion efforts to reinstate a travel ban quickly upon taking office, ordering the secretaries of State and Homeland Security, the attorney general and the director of National Intelligence to identify countries for which 'vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a partial or full suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries'. The travel ban is likely to face legal challenges, just as its first-term predecessor did and with many of Trump's other immigration actions during his current White House stint already being litigated in the courts. Trump has vowed to carry out an agenda that offers to test the powers of his office on immigration policy. The first-term travel ban marked a signature moment in Trump's tenure. Trump in 2017, within days of taking office, issued an order which barred people from seven countries with largely Muslim populations from entering the US for 90 days. The move sparked chaos and confusion at airports, protests across the globe and a flood of lawsuits seeking to halt the order, which critics assailed as a 'Muslim ban'. Trump defended the move as necessary for national security and, after judges struck down the initial version, moved to issue revised orders that altered the list of countries targeted and offered more specifics about the scope of the restrictions in a bid to survive further legal scrutiny. The subsequent changes to the policy eventually led to the US Supreme Court in 2018 upholding the travel ban, with the justices in a 5-4 ruling rejecting claims that it targeted Muslims and giving Trump a major legal victory that bolstered a president's broad controls over the nation's borders. Biden – in one of his first acts in office in 2021 – signed his own order ending Trump's travel ban. Trump during the 2024 campaign, though, had vowed to reinstate it and expand the measure to cover refugees from Gaza if elected and his move delivers on a key plank of his agenda. Since taking office, the president has declared a national emergency at the southern border and directed the Pentagon to deploy additional resources to address the situation. The administration has also ramped up deportations of undocumented migrants and attempted to end automatic birthright citizenship for children of people in the country illegally – the latter of which has been halted by the courts as they address legal challenges. The president has also used tariffs to pressure Mexico and Canada to do more to secure the border and directed agencies to identify federally funded programmes providing benefits to migrants in the country illegally. BLOOMBERG
CNA
5 hours ago
- CNA
Anger as US blocks Gaza ceasefire resolution at UN Security Council
UNITED NATIONS: UN Security Council members criticised the United States on Wednesday (Jun 5) after it vetoed a resolution calling for a ceasefire and unrestricted humanitarian access in Gaza, which Washington said undermined ongoing diplomacy. It was the 15-member body's first vote on the situation since November, when the US - a key Israeli ally - also blocked a text calling for an end to fighting. "Today, the United States sent a strong message by vetoing a counterproductive UN Security Council resolution on Gaza targeting Israel," Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement after Wednesday's 14 to 1 vote. He said Washington would not support any text that "draws a false equivalence between Israel and Hamas, or disregards Israel's right to defend itself. "The United States will continue to stand with Israel at the UN." The draft resolution had demanded "an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza respected by all parties". It also called for the "immediate, dignified and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas and other groups", and demanded the lifting of all restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza. Hamas, whose unprecedented attack inside Israel on Oct 7, 2023 sparked the war, condemned the "disgraceful" US veto, reiterating accusations of "genocide" in Gaza, something Israel vehemently rejects. The veto "marks a new stain on the ethical record of the United States of America," the group said in a statement, accusing Washington of "legitimising genocide, supporting aggression, and rationalising starvation, destruction, and mass killings". "MORAL STAIN" Pakistan's ambassador to the UN Asim Ahmad meanwhile said the failed resolution would "remain not only a moral stain on the conscience of this council, but a fateful moment of political application that will reverberate for generations". China's ambassador to the UN Fu Cong said "today's vote result once again exposes that the root cause of the council's inability to quell the conflict in Gaza is the repeated obstruction by the US." The veto marks Washington's first such action since US President Donald Trump took office in January. Israel has faced mounting international pressure to end its war in Gaza. That scrutiny has increased over flailing aid distribution in Gaza, which Israel blocked for more than two months before allowing a small number of UN vehicles to enter in mid-May. The United Nations, which warned last month the entire population in the besieged Palestinian territory was at risk of famine, said trickle was far from enough to meet the humanitarian needs. "JUDGED BY HISTORY" "The Council was prevented from shouldering its responsibility, despite the fact that most of us seem to be converging on one view," said France's ambassador to the UN Jerome Bonnafont. Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian ambassador to the UN, said after the Security Council vote he would now ask the General Assembly to pass a resolution calling for a ceasefire. Israel's ambassador to the UN Danny Danon however said that the Palestinian plan to put the resolution to a vote at the General Assembly, where no country can veto it, was pointless, telling countries "don't waste more of your energy". "This resolution doesn't advance humanitarian relief and undermines it. It ignores a working system in favor of political agendas," he said.
