At least 50 people killed in east Congo as government and Rwanda-backed rebels trade blame
GOMA, Congo (AP) — At least 50 people were killed in weekend attacks in Congo's conflict-battered east, authorities said Saturday. The government traded blame with Rwanda-backed rebels over who was responsible for the violence that quickly escalated the conflict in the region.
The renewed violence that residents reported in and around the region's largest city of Goma — which the M23 rebels control — was the biggest threat yet to ongoing peace efforts by both the Gulf Arab state of Qatar and African nations in the conflict that has raised fears of regional warfare.
Goma resident Amboma Safari recounted how his family of four spent the night under their bed as they heard gunfire and bomb blasts through Friday night. 'We saw corpses of soldiers, but we don't know which group they are from,' Safari said.
In the second city of Bukavu, which the M23 also controls, dozens of the armed Wazalendo local militia members who fight alongside Congolese forces marched for a few hours towards the local airport as they appeared to stage a challenge against the rebels.
The group, which later retreated, declared a ceasefire on Sunday to give ongoing peace talks 'a chance.' The decades-long conflict between Congo and the M23 rebels escalated in January , when the rebels made an unprecedented advance and seized the strategic eastern Congolese city of Goma, followed by the town of Bukavu in February. The latest fighting has killed some 3,000 people and worsened what was already one of the world's largest humanitarian crises, with around 7 million people displaced.
In a statement, Congo's Ministry of Interior said 52 people were killed between Friday and Saturday, including a person shot dead at Goma's Kyeshero Hospital. The ministry blamed the attack on M23.
M23 spokesperson Lawrence Kanyuka blamed Congolese forces and their allies for the attacks. Kanyuka said in a statement that Congo's joint operations with local militias and southern African troops 'directly threaten the stability and security of civilians' in the region.
The group said it has been compelled to 'reconsider its position to prioritize the security' of the people in the area, suggesting the crisis could worsen.
Christian Kalamo, a civil society leader in the North Kivu province that includes Goma, said at least one body was seen on the streets on Saturday.
'It is difficult to know if it is the Wazalendo, the FARDC (Congolese forces) or the M23" that carried out the attacks, Kalamo said. 'Now, we don't know what will happen, and we live with fear in our stomachs, thinking that the war will resume.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
5 hours ago
- Korea Herald
US, China agree on trade framework at London talks
LONDON (AP) — The US and China have agreed in principle on a framework to carry out an agreement they reached on resolving their trade disputes last month, Chinese state media said. The announcement followed Tuesday's conclusion of two days of talks in London. The earlier agreement had been shaken by a series of disputes in the ensuing weeks, leading to a phone call last week between President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping to try to calm the waters. Li Chenggang, a vice minister of commerce and China's international trade representative, said the two sides had agreed in principle on a framework for implementing the consensus reached between the two leaders and at talks in May in Geneva, the official Xinhua News Agency said. Further details, including plans for a potential next round of talks, were not immediately available. Li and Wang Wentao, China's commerce minister, were part of the delegation led by Vice Premier He Lifeng. They met with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer at Lancaster House, a 200-year-old mansion near Buckingham Palace. Lutnick said as he arrived Tuesday morning that the talks were "going well," and he expected them to continue all day. Asked late Monday how the negotiations were going, Trump told reporters: 'We are doing well with China. China's not easy.' The two sides sought to build on negotiations in Geneva last month that agreed to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100 percent-plus tariffs they had imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of recession. Since the Geneva talks, the US and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, visas for Chinese students at American universities and rare earth minerals that are vital to carmakers and other industries. Trump spoke at length with Chinese leader Xi Jinping by phone last week in an attempt to put relations back on track, then announced the trade talks would resume in London. China, the world's biggest producer of rare earths, has signaled it may ease export restrictions it placed on the elements in April, alarming automakers around the world who rely on them. Beijing, in turn, wants the US to lift restrictions on Chinese access to the technology used to make advanced semiconductors. Trump said he wants to 'open up China,' the world's dominant manufacturer, to US products. 'If we don't open up China, maybe we won't do anything,' Trump said at the White House. 'But we want to open up China.'
Korea Herald
5 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Commentary
Trump's diplomacy of the absurd Last month, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa became the first African leader to visit the White House during US President Donald Trump's second term. As he so infamously did with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in February, Trump turned his televised meeting with Ramaphosa in the Oval Office into absurdist theater. Ramaphosa and his multiracial delegation were mere props in a larger performance aimed at Trump's nativist 'Make America Great Again' cult and right-wing xenophobes around the world. Trump, perpetuating racist stereotypes, accused marauding Black savages of hunting down innocent white farmers. It was a bizarre perversion of the historical record — namely, that a white minority had stripped Black South Africans of their land and labor rights for more than three centuries. Of course, Trump is fully ignorant of that history. The 1913 Natives Land Act, enacted by South Africa's white-minority government, reserved 93 percent of the country's land for white ownership. Today, white South Africans, comprising 7 percent of the population, still own 72 percent of all private farmland. Even though Ramaphosa's administration enacted a law in 2024 allowing for land expropriation without compensation, such land is to be used only for the public good, and any confiscations are subject to judicial review. Today, 13.2 million people, or roughly one-fifth of the population in what is the world's most unequal country, still live in extreme poverty, with the vast majority being Black. In 2024, 26,232 murders were recorded in South Africa, 44 of which occurred in farming communities; only eight of those 44 victims were farmers. According to data collected by the Transvaal Agricultural Union — an Afrikaner farmers' union — only 1,363 white farmers have been killed since 1990, amounting to less than 1 percent of total murders over that period. Only two of the 18 people murdered on farms between October 2024 and March 2025 were white. Equating apartheid-era atrocities with the current plight of white South Africans, who still own most of the country's wealth, is simply preposterous. Despite this, Trump has granted refugee status to white South African farmers, 59 of whom arrived in the US days before his meeting with Ramaphosa. Opening America's doors to this group, particularly as the Trump administration launches a crusade against illegal and legal immigrants, is less about protecting an endangered minority, and more about appealing to nativist sentiment among white Americans. It is perhaps not surprising, then, that Trump ambushed Ramaphosa. After all, Trump has launched an assault on diversity programs in the US, is restoring the old names of military bases honoring Confederate generals and has taken extraordinary measures to erase America's long history of slavery. While the exchange between Ramaphosa and Trump started off friendly enough, it quickly degenerated into hectoring, with Trump repeatedly painting the perpetrators of oppression as its victims. After describing Ramaphosa as 'a little controversial,' the same president who once described Africa as full of 'shithole countries' proceeded to reinforce the trope of Black barbarism, noting: 'They say there's a lot of bad things going on in Africa.' At this point, Trump zeroed in on the egregious claim — amplified by the South African-born billionaire Elon Musk — that the Black-led African National Congress government was committing genocide against white people. Trump proceeded to screen a video of Julius Malema, a firebrand South African opposition leader who was expelled from the ANC in February 2012, chanting an apartheid-era song 'Kill the Boer,' referring to white farmers. Although South Africa's Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that the chant did not constitute incitement to violence, it is a divisive relic. The next video, which Musk had posted twice on X before the Oval Office meeting, depicted white crosses that Trump falsely claimed represented a burial site for more than 1,000 murdered white farmers. These were, however, temporary memorials, not gravesites, and were later removed. Trump also showed Ramaphosa an image, purportedly of massacred white South African farmers, that was later revealed to have been taken in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Derrick Johnson, president of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, described Trump's remarks as 'extremely biased and racist.' They were also an attempt at a power play. One could hardly imagine Ramaphosa inviting Trump to the Union Buildings in Pretoria to accuse him of committing 'Black genocide' in America, before showing him a video of white policemen brutalizing and killing innocent Black motorists. In requesting the White House meeting, Ramaphosa had naively believed that he could reason with a Mafia don wielding a loaded pistol. The South African president maintained a dignified calm, but did not do enough to refute Trump's bogus claims. His delegation, which included three prominent white South Africans, the billionaire Johann Rupert and golfers Ernie Els and Retief Goosen, at Trump's behest, did not help matters. The presence of these wealthy white South Africans reassured Trump: he enthusiastically invited them to speak, even as he failed to make eye contact with his black counterpart. Els betrayed his inadequate understanding of history when he thanked the US for having supported the murderous apartheid army's invasion of Angola in the 1980s. Goosen talked of his crime-afflicted relatives having to erect electric fences. Rupert lobbied for Musk's Starlink satellite company to equip South Africa's police stations. These responses fed into the 'white savior' complex, imploring American knights in shining armor to save South Africans from savage Black criminals. Even Zingiswa Losi, the Black trade unionist who tried to set the record straight on land expropriation, spoke of Black women being raped and murdered. All this reinforced the message that South Africa is a crime scene — far from a powerful sales pitch for a country keen to attract foreign investors and tourists. This visit was supposed to 'reset' South Africa-US relations and start trade discussions, with Ramaphosa touting his country's critical mineral deposits. But despite efforts by South African officials and some media to spin the encounter as a success, it exposed deep and damaging divisions between the two countries. The only consolation is that Ramaphosa at least made it to the official lunch. Zelenskyy was not so lucky. - - - Adekeye Adebajo, a professor and a senior research fellow at the University of Pretoria's Centre for the Advancement of Scholarship, served on UN missions in South Africa, Western Sahara and Iraq. The views expressed here are the writer's own. — Ed.
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
Foreperson's complaints signal a divided jury at Harvey Weinstein's retrial
NEW YORK (AP) — The jury foreperson in Harvey Weinstein's sex crimes retrial complained Monday that some jurors were prodding others to change their minds, talking about the former studio boss' past and going beyond the charges as they deliberate. "I feel like they are attacking, talking together, fight together. I don't like it," the foreperson said, according to a transcript of his closed-door conversation with Judge Curtis Farber and the prosecution and defense teams. The foreperson said he believed the jury was tasked only with considering "what happened at the time, in the moment" of the crimes alleged by the prosecution, but others "are pushing people, talking about his past." "I feel it is not fair taking the decision about the past," the foreperson said. He added that others pushed people "to change their minds," when he thought they instead should seek to answer one another's questions and "let that person make a decision." He didn't specify what parts of Weinstein's past came up. An Oscar-winning movie producer, Weinstein was one of Hollywood's most powerful figures until a series of sexual misconduct allegations against him became public in 2017, fueling the #MeToo movement and eventually leading to criminal charges. After hearing from the juror, defense lawyer Arthur Aidala implored Farber to declare a mistrial, calling it a "tainted," "rogue" and "runaway" jury. "People are considering things that were not brought into this trial as evidence," Aidala argued in court without jurors in earshot. "It's not fair. They are talking about the past. It's not about the past." Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo argued that the juror's concerns didn't warrant a mistrial, noting that some aspects of Weinstein's past were allowed into evidence. His accusers were allowed to say they had other unwanted sexual encounters with Weinstein besides those underlying the charges, and they were permitted to mention seeing the groundswell of allegations against Weinstein in the news media in 2017. Farber denied the mistrial request but reminded jurors to weigh only evidence presented during the trial. At the jury's request, he also went over the definition of reasonable doubt and rules about conducting deliberations — requests that suggested they remained far apart on a verdict. Weinstein, 73, has pleaded not guilty to two counts of committing a criminal sex act and one count of rape. The jury of seven women and five men began deliberating on Thursday. Weinstein was originally convicted in New York in 2020 of rape and sexual assault charges involving two women. The verdict was considered a landmark in the #MeToo movement. But the conviction was subsequently overturned, leading to his retrial — with an additional accuser added last year — before a new jury and a different judge. Meanwhile, Weinstein is appealing a 2022 rape conviction in Los Angeles . Just after the New York jurors returned to court Monday, the foreperson sent a note saying he wanted to speak to the judge "about a situation that isn't very good." Farber decided to hear the foreperson's concerns in his robing room, outside the view of reporters, the public and Weinstein, who waived his right to sit in on the discussion. The judge later said he held the conversation in private "solely for purposes of enabling that juror to speak freely." A transcript of the conversation was available later. Yet before the judge and lawyers even had resolved how to address the foreperson's complaint, another juror asked to speak to the court. When brought into court, she volunteered that things were "going well," and "We're making headway." She said the "tone is very different" than on Friday, when still another juror asked to be excused because he felt other jurors were treating one member of the panel in an "unfair and unjust" way. The judge told that juror to keep deliberating and denied a defense request for a mistrial over the issue. After the third juror relayed her impressions Monday, deliberations continued. Jurors asked at one point to re-hear a psychologist's testimony about why sexual assault victims may continue to have relationships with their attackers. They left for the day with a note saying they were "making good progress" and wanted to start off Tuesday by getting copies of emails and other evidence pertaining to one of the three accusers in the case. And, they said, they'd like some coffee. Alas, Farber soon told them, the state court system doesn't provide deliberating jurors with any food or beverage except their daily lunch. "So I'll leave it to the jury to decide how to proceed on that front," he said.
