Stop AAPI Hate calls $2 million grant termination by DOJ an 'authoritarian overreach'
[Source]
The Department of Justice has terminated a $2 million grant to Stop AAPI Hate alongside funding for 33 other community organizations as part of a sweeping cutback of federal justice programs under the Trump administration.
'Lifeline' lost: In a statement on May 9, Stop AAPI Hate, which tracks anti-Asian hate incidents, condemned the termination as 'an act of authoritarian overreach' that is 'unconstitutional, unjust and targeted.' The nonprofit noted the timing during AAPI Heritage Month, connecting the decision to Trump as 'the same figure who, five years ago, ignited an unprecedented wave of anti-Asian hate and violence with his racist rhetoric during the COVID-19 pandemic.' The group emphasized that the canceled funding was 'not a luxury,' but a 'lifeline' for communities facing hate.
What the group does: Founded in March 2020 by AAPI Equity Alliance, Chinese for Affirmative Action and San Francisco State University's Asian American Studies Department, Stop AAPI Hate created an online reporting system that went viral amid rising COVID-19-related racism. Today, the coalition continues its work as the country's largest reporting center tracking anti-AAPI hate acts while advocating for 'comprehensive solutions that tackle the root causes of race-based hate.'
The big picture: The terminated grant was part of a broader purge affecting 373 DOJ grants initially valued at approximately $820 million, with an estimated $500 million in remaining balances rescinded. The cuts reportedly began in April and span 37 states, affecting both blue and red ones. The DOJ, for its part, has justified the terminations, stating the work 'no longer effectuates Department priorities,' which now focus on 'combatting violent crime, protecting American children and supporting American victims of trafficking and sexual assault.'
Trending on NextShark:
Despite the funding loss, Stop AAPI Hate says it remains committed to its mission and 'more determined than ever to fight for our communities and our democracy.'
This story is part of The Rebel Yellow Newsletter — a bold weekly newsletter from the creators of NextShark, reclaiming our stories and celebrating Asian American voices.
Trending on NextShark:
Subscribe free to join the movement. If you love what we're building, consider becoming a paid member — your support helps us grow our team, investigate impactful stories, and uplift our community.
Subscribe here now!
Trending on NextShark:
Download the NextShark App:
Want to keep up to date on Asian American News? Download the NextShark App today!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
4 minutes ago
- Politico
Supreme Court tosses Mexico's lawsuit against American gun manufacturers
The Supreme Court has made it harder to sue gun manufacturers when their weapons are frequently used in crimes. The justices ruled unanimously Thursday that claims in a lawsuit the Mexican government brought against seven major American gun makers were too tenuous to try to hold the companies liable for guns eventually being used in murders and robberies. Mexico claimed the gun manufacturers knowingly allowed large volumes of weapons to be sold to 'rogue dealers' who were lax in vetting their customers. Often, those guns were then routed to Mexican drug cartels, Mexico said. But the high court, in an opinion by Justice Elena Kagan, said Mexico could not plausibly show that the gun makers 'aided and abetted' illegal retail sales of guns because the weapons first traveled through a network of wholesalers before reaching dealers who might have knowledge that the weapons were likely to be illegally trafficked to Mexico.
CBS News
10 minutes ago
- CBS News
Trump's travel ban is set to begin Monday. Here's what to know.
What to know about President Trump's travel ban on nationals from 12 countries What to know about Trump's new travel ban What to know about Trump's new travel ban Washington — President Trump signed a proclamation late Wednesday barring travelers and immigrants from a dozen countries and restricting the entry of nationals from seven other nations. With the move, the White House cited concerns about national security. The president said the recent attack at a march supporting Israeli hostages in Boulder, Colorado, had "underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas." "We don't want them," Mr. Trump said. Here's what to know about the travel bans: Who does the ban apply to? With some exceptions, the proclamation bans the entry of foreigners from 12 countries who are seeking to come to the U.S. permanently as legal immigrants, as well as those with temporary visas, including tourists: Afghanistan Myanmar Chad The Republic of the Congo Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Haiti Iran Libya Somalia Sudan Yemen President Trump announced that the U.S. would bar entry to nationals from these 12 countries, with few exceptions, citing national security concerns. CBS News The proclamation also partially suspends the entry of travelers and immigrants from another seven countries. This restriction applies to legal immigrants seeking to move to the U.S. and certain temporary visa holders who hail from the following countries: Burundi Cuba Laos Sierra Leone Togo Turkmenistan Venezuela When does the ban take effect? The ban is set to take effect at 12:01 a.m. on Monday, June 9. Why were the countries selected? On the first day of his second administration, Mr. Trump directed officials to perform a security review of high-risk regions and make recommendations for where immigration and travel restrictions should be imposed. The president said the factors considered were "the largescale presence of terrorists, failure to cooperate on visa security, inability to verify travelers' identities, inadequate record keeping of criminal histories and persistently high rates of illegal visa overstays, and other things." "Very simply, we cannot have open migration from any country where we cannot safely and reliably vet and screen those who seek to enter the United States," Mr. Trump said. The president cited the recent attack in Boulder, where an Egyptian national was charged, as part of the justification for the bans. Egypt is not among the countries on the White House's list. But the proclamation directed officials to assess the "adequacy" of Egypt's vetting policies "in light of recent events." Are there exceptions to the new travel ban? The president's decree contains certain exemptions, including for U.S. permanent residents and the spouses and children of U.S. citizens who have "clear and convincing evidence of identity and family relationship." The proclamation also outlines exemptions for Afghans who assisted American forces and have special visas; diplomats, athletes coming to the U.S. for the World Cup, the Olympics and other major sporting events; dual nationals with a passport from a country not listed in the president's decree; and for adoptions. Mr. Trump said the list could be revised if countries make "material improvements," and new countries could be added "as threats emerge around the world." Did Trump do this before? The president's actions follow a series of travel bans issued during his first administration that initially targeted predominantly Muslim countries. Like those orders, his latest proclamation could be subject to lawsuits, although the Supreme Court ultimately upheld the revised ban from his first term, which the White House noted in a fact sheet outlining his second-term bans. The president touted his first-term travel bans in his video statement released Wednesday. "In my first term, my powerful travel restrictions were one of our most successful policies, and they were a key part of preventing major foreign terror attacks on American soil," Mr. Trump said. In January 2017, Mr. Trump signed a travel ban restricting the entry of most citizens of Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen. The ban sparked widespread outcry, creating chaos at airports and prompting legal challenges, as opponents argued the ban was discriminatory. Then in March 2017, Mr. Trump removed Iraq from the list and added Chad, Venezuela and North Korea. The president expanded the ban in 2020, adding immigration restrictions for nationals of Nigeria, Eritrea, Sudan, Tanzania, Myanmar and Kyrgyzstan. Chad was later removed from the list. The third iteration of the president's first-term ban was upheld by the Supreme Court in the summer of 2018. At the time, conservative justices cited the president's broad authority to restrict the entry of foreigners on national security grounds. When President Joe Biden took office, he scrapped that ban.
New York Times
10 minutes ago
- New York Times
Four States Ask F.D.A. to Lift Special Restrictions on Abortion Pill
In a strategy aimed at countering efforts to further restrict the abortion pill mifepristone, attorneys general of four states that support abortion rights on Thursday asked the Food and Drug Administration to do the opposite and lift the most stringent remaining restrictions on the pill. The petition filed by Massachusetts, New York, California and New Jersey might seem surprising given the opposition to abortion expressed by Trump administration officials. But the attorneys general consider it a move that would require the F.D.A. to acknowledge extensive scientific research that has consistently found mifepristone safe and effective, said an official with the Massachusetts attorney general's office who worked on the filing and asked not to be named in order to share background information. It would also prevent the F.D.A. from changing mifepristone regulations while the petition is pending. The petition notes that at a May senate hearing, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the health and human services secretary, responded to questions by Senator Josh Hawley, Republican of Missouri, who opposes abortion, by saying he had ordered the F.D.A. to do a 'complete review' of mifepristone. 'We want to make sure that when F.D.A. is making these decisions that they have all the data in front of them, all of the really powerful data that show that mifepristone is safe' the Massachusetts official said. The F.D.A. is required to respond within 180 days by granting or denying the request, or saying it needs more time. In its responses, the agency must document its position, which could be useful in lawsuits, including one that the four states could file if their petition is denied. Mifepristone, which blocks a hormone necessary for pregnancy development, was approved for abortion in America in 2000. The F.D.A. imposed an additional regulatory framework called Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, or REMS, on mifepristone. That framework has been used for only about 300 drugs, currently covering only about 60 medications. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
