Rajnath urges IMF to review Pak aid, Stalin on Presidential Reference, IPL set to return & more
From Defence Minister Rajnath Singh asking the IMF to rethink its financial assistance to Pakistan, to TN CM Stalin's reaction to the Presidential Reference, here are the top stories in this edition of The Hindu's News Wrap.
Editing: Aniket Singh Chauhan
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Amid bid to rebuild China ties, Rajnath Singh to attend SCO meet
File photo: Defence minister Rajnath Singh (PTI) NEW DELHI: Defence minister Rajnath Singh is set to visit China later this month for Shanghai Cooperation Organisation defence ministers' meet, which comes amid efforts by New Delhi and Beijing to rebuild and stabilize bilateral ties, though de-escalation between the rival armies is yet to take place along the Line of Actual Control. Singh is likely to have a bilateral meeting with his Chinese counterpart Admiral Dong Jun on the sidelines of the SCO meet on June 24-25, in what will be his first visit as defence minister to China. "The final details are still being worked out," an official said on Saturday. Pakistan defence minister Khawaja Asif is also slated to attend the SCO meet, which is taking place soon after intense cross-border military hostilities between India and Pakistan from May 7 to 10. Both India and Pakistan in 2017 became full members of the SCO, which also includes Russia, China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Iran and Belarus. Along the 3,488-km LAC with China, there are as yet no signs of de-escalation and de-induction of troops after disengagement at the two remaining face-off sites at Depsang and Demchok in eastern Ladakh last Oct, which has led to restoration of patrolling by the rival soldiers and grazing by herders as well as reduced the risk of any inadvertent escalation. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ambato: Ecuatorianos: generen un segundo ingreso con Amazon CFD. Empezar ahora Registrarse Undo China has continued to strengthen its military positions & infrastructure build-up all along LAC, with PLA troops continuing to be forward deployed with heavy weapon systems in large numbers, as earlier reported by TOI. Moreover, the deep military collusiveness between Pakistan and China was quite evident during Operation Sindoor. Pakistan used several Chinese weapons and platforms, ranging from J-10 fighters firing the PL-15 beyond visual range air-to-air missiles to HQ-9 air defence missile batteries, during the hostilities with India. Pakistan is also set to acquire at least 40 J-35A fifth-generation stealth jets and the HQ-19 long-range air defence missile systems from China.
The Hindu
6 hours ago
- The Hindu
Four Maoists, including three women, killed in ongoing encounter in M.P's Balaghat
At least four Maoists, three of them women, have been killed in an ongoing encounter between security forces and Maoists in Madhya Pradesh's Balaghat district on Saturday (June 14, 2025), the police said. Madhya Pradesh's anti-Maoists Hawk Force Commandant Shiyaz K.M. told The Hindu that the encounter was under way in the Pachamdadar and Katejhiriya areas of the Sonewani forest area. Mr. Shiyaz said a search operation was launched in multiple parts of the district's dense forest areas based on inputs from the Maoist movement. 'Combing efforts are going on in multiple areas and the encounter will continue at least till tomorrow (June 15, 2025),' he said, adding that heavy rains in the area had made the operation more challenging. Mr. Shiyaz said the operatives belonged to the Malajkhand unit of the GRB (Gondia-Rajnandgaon-Balaghat) Division of the Maoists. 'We had received input of their movement a couple of days ago after which multiple parties were deployed for a search operation. During one such search, firing started from their side and our personnel responded,' the officer said. The encounter is part of a joint operation by the Madhya Pradesh Police's Hawk Force and the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF), he said. Special Director-General (Anti-Maoist Operations) Pankaj Shrivastav told The Hindu that the four cadres were killed in two separate encounters and that a self-loading rifle (SLR), two .315 rifles, a grenade launcher and other ammunition were recovered from them. 'We cannot divulge much information, as it is an ongoing operation. The forces and officers are currently in the forest. It has also been raining heavily there today (June 14, 2025), which is adding to the challenge but we are continuing the search operation. The encounter is likely to continue till tomorrow,' he said. Chief Minister Mohan Yadav congratulated the security forces and dubbed the encounter as a major success for the campaign to end Maoism by March 2026, a deadline set by the Union Government. 'Under the guidance of Prime Minister Narendra Modi ji and Union Home Minister Amit Shah ji, the State has achieved a major success in the campaign to eradicate Maoism by March 2026,' he said on X. हम हर हाल में मार्च 2026 तक नक्सलवाद को समाप्त करेंगे। मध्यप्रदेश पुलिस सफलता के साथ इस अभियान में लगी है। नक्सल विरोधी अभियान में शामिल बहादुर पुलिसकर्मियों को पदोन्नति मिलेगी। — Dr Mohan Yadav (@DrMohanYadav51) June 14, 2025 'The search is still on, in which a large number of police officers and personnel are engaged. Hearty congratulations to our indomitable soldiers and senior police officers of the State for this success,' Mr. Yadav said.
The Hindu
9 hours ago
- The Hindu
Interview Indian diplomacy didn't fail, countries work according to their own interests: Shiv Shankar Menon
In a preliminary analysis of India's response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, former National Security Advisor (NSA) and Foreign Secretary Shiv Shankar Menon, who has also been India's Ambassador to China, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Israel, told The Hindu that Indian diplomacy has not failed to convey India's position on terrorism, as speculation suggests, but countries will respond to fears of conflict with Pakistan according to their own interests. From 2008 to 2025, do you see India's responses to terror attacks as a gradual evolution, and what should one expect after the next terror attack? Right now, I think nobody knows, which is why even the Government of India describes it as a 'pause'. It's not resolved. Israelis have a phrase — 'mowing the grass'. Force is useful to mow the grass, but the grass grows again. And given Pakistan's situation and the nature of the Pakistani polity, and the role of the Pakistan Army and its use of the jihadi tanzeems (organisations) against India… this problem of having to mow the grass regularly is going to be with us for some time. Terrorism is not an engineering problem with a logical solution. Given China's role in supporting Pakistan, do you think, India's strategic challenges have shifted from disparate challenges to a two-front war? Militarily, I don't think we know enough, but we clearly have seen the Pakistan Army itself shift in terms of doctrine, in terms of tactics, and in terms of reliance on Chinese equipment, Chinese theories, Chinese ways of war. And both the Pakistanis and the Chinese have made much of this in their narrative, and their projection and their propaganda. There have been very strong Chinese statements of support for Pakistan in 1971 and 1965, and so on. But they never did anything. Question is, what did they actually do to help Pakistan? There's a level of military fusion there, which is much closer than it's ever been before, and that is something worth watching. On Operation Sindoor, the Chief of Defence Staff has not given too many details of what happened, but has given an understanding of how the conflict escalated. What is your analysis? I don't think we know enough to say conclusively what happened, because the government doesn't deny that there were losses on India's part, but don't confirm it either. No war goes according to plan. And as somebody said, the first casualty of a battle is the plan of attack. Question is, can you learn quickly enough? Can you adjust? And can you then go on moving forward towards your objective? Do you think more information should be put out? You can't have a conflict without losses. There are lessons to be drawn about strategic signalling here and about narrative control here, because I think we could have been quicker off the block with responses during Operation Sindoor. I was outside India at that time, and I could see that Pakistan's responses were at least six to 12 hours ahead of India's. They were the ones out first with their version. Militarily India did well, judging by whatever we know in terms of air defence, in terms of our own equipment, and in terms of tactics and strategy as well. Unfortunately, Indian media made us seem less credible by a lot of the stories that they were putting out, which didn't stand the test of reason. Just watching what they were saying (reports of the bombardment of Karachi, Pakistan PM's residence, military coup, etc.), were patently untrue, and that didn't help at all. The [government's] silence didn't help either. There are lessons to be drawn from any conflict, and in this case, I think the communication is certainly one of them. Did Indian diplomacy fail, as is being portrayed, given that India did not seem to receive clear messages of support for Operation Sindoor, as Pakistan did from countries like China and Turkiye, and given Mr. Trump's statements? Not at all. Countries will choose to react to an attack or a situation based on their interests, on what they can get out of it. For Turkiye, for China and so on, here was an opportunity to consolidate their ties with Pakistan, which is important to them for various reasons. And they chose to do it. India got the world's support on the terrorist attack. When it came to a conflict, however, they've seen this conflict for 80 years. You don't expect them to send you letters of support in a conflict. India didn't ask for it, and shouldn't expect it either. India maintains that it will settle its issues bilaterally. So why would we ask other countries for support or their opinion about what we do? If your self-esteem is so weak that you need other people to tell you 'well done', then frankly, you are not a serious strategic power. People will use your conflicts, for their interests, to suit their own purposes, and in this case, it serves Mr. Trump's political purposes to claim the credit to say that something's working, that is he's important, that he matters. Was there a need for the government to send the parliamentary delegations abroad… they didn't go after 2016 or 2019? I think it's useful to signal that India is united. If the government wanted to shift the narrative from the conflict being about two 'irresponsible nuclear weapon states who were on the brink' and were 'saved' by Mr. Trump from doing something silly, then it needed to go out and send a different message. I do think it's useful also domestically, if this is the beginning of an attempt to make foreign policy non-partisan. I'm not sure why the government didn't send delegations to the neighbourhood and to talk to them. They should have.
