World's first openly gay imam shot dead in South Africa
Muhsin Hendricks, thought to be the world's first openly gay imam, was killed in a drive-by shooting in South Africa.
The cleric, who ran a mosque intended as a safe haven for gay and other marginalised Muslims, was travelling in a car when he was ambushed on Saturday near the southern city of Gqeberha.
'Two unknown suspects with covered faces got out of the vehicle and started firing multiple shots…' the Eastern Cape force said in a statement.
'Thereafter they fled the scene, and the driver noticed that Hendricks, who was seated at the back of the vehicle was shot and killed.'
Mr Hendricks was killed after he had reportedly officiated at a lesbian wedding, although this has not been officially confirmed.
CCTV footage showed a car blocking the exit of the vehicle in which Mr Hendricks was a passenger. Two masked assailants then jumped out, and one fired multiple shots into the back seat of the other vehicle.
Police confirmed the video showed the targeted killing in Bethelsdorp near Gqeberha, formerly known as Port Elizabeth.
'The motive for the murder is unknown and forms part of the ongoing investigation,' police said, urging anybody with information to come forward.
Mr Hendricks, involved in various LGBTQ+ advocacy groups, came out as gay in 1996. He ran the al-Ghurbaah mosque at Wynberg near his birthplace Cape Town.
The mosque provides 'a safe space in which queer Muslims and marginalised women can practise Islam', its website states.
Tributes
News of his death has sent shockwaves through the LGBTQ+ community with an outpouring of tributes.
The International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association (Ilga) denounced the killing.
Julia Ehrt, its executive director, said: 'The Ilga world family is in deep shock at the news of the murder of Muhsin Hendricks, and calls on authorities to thoroughly investigate what we fear may be a hate crime.'
The Global Interfaith Network described Hendricks as 'more than just a religious leader; he was a pioneer, a visionary, and a beacon of hope for countless marginalised Muslims worldwide'.
Mr Hendricks was the subject of the 2022 documentary The Radical, in which he alluded to threats against him. 'The need to be authentic [is] greater than the fear to die,' he said.
South Africa has one of the world's highest murder rates, with some 28,000 murders in the year to February 2024, according to police data.
In 2006, it became the first country in Africa to legalise same-sex marriage.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
Sydney Muslim cleric tells court Jewish people can't be offended by him calling them ‘vile' as lectures were private
A Sydney Muslim cleric being sued for alleged racial discrimination has told the federal court no Jewish person could be offended over a series of lectures in which he described Jewish people in the seventh century as 'mischievous', 'treacherous' and 'vile' because the lectures were delivered to a private Muslim audience. Wissam Haddad – whose legal name is William but who is also known as Abu Ousayd – is being sued by two senior members of Australia's peak Jewish body, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ), over a series of lectures he gave in Bankstown in November 2023 and subsequently broadcast online, in which he is alleged to have maligned Jewish people. Haddad allegedly breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, which prohibits offensive behaviour based on race or ethnic origin. Haddad's defence argues the speeches were delivered to a known Muslim audience, in a private place, and fail the clause in 18C that the offensive act is unlawful when it is committed 'otherwise than in private'. In submissions filed before the federal court, Haddad argues four of the five speeches were delivered at his prayer centre, Al Madina Dawah Centre in Bankstown. 'The centre is a stand-alone building which is manifestly a private property – it is surrounded by high black fencing and its entrance carries a sign that says 'Private Property No Trespassing'.' Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Haddad's submissions to the court said there was no standing invitation for any non-Muslims to attend the centre. 'There will be no evidence that any of the speeches was attended or heard by anyone who was not a regular congregant of the centre and a practising Muslim.' The remaining speech was a conversation in a room between three people. Haddad was called as a witness late on Wednesday morning. He told the court uploading his speeches to social media was not part of his responsibilities. 'I'm not involved,' he told the court. But under repeated questioning from one of the applicant's barristers, Peter Braham SC, he told the court he knew his speeches would be posted online. 'Yes I did.' Haddad said the speeches were posted online by 'someone from the community'. Asked who it was, Haddad said: 'I'm not at liberty to give his name because I don't think it's relevant.' Peter Wertheim, one of the applicants in the case and ECAJ's co-chief executive, told the federal court on Tuesday that he was first alerted to the presence of Haddad's speeches online by coverage of them in mainstream media. He said Haddad's speeches used 'overtly dehumanising' language. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'Making derogatory generalisations, calling Jews a vile and treacherous people, calling them rats and cowards … are things which I think would be experienced by most Jews as dehumanising,' Wertheim said. His barrister, Braham, told the court Haddad's speeches repeated a range of offensive tropes and were designed to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate Jewish people. The court heard Haddad had sound recording and camera equipment installed to record his speeches, which Wertheim's barrister argued was for the purpose of disseminating his message far beyond his congregants. He would speak before a backdrop branded with the Al Madina Dawah Centre logo, but which also included logos of YouTube, Facebook, Instagram and other social media platforms. The applicants are seeking an injunction that Haddad's five offending sermons be removed from the internet, and an order that he refrain from publishing similar speeches in future. Wertheim and his co-applicant, Robert Goot, are also seeking publication of a 'corrective notice' on Haddad's prayer centre's social media pages, and to be awarded the legal costs of bringing their action. They have not sought damages or compensation. Haddad's barrister, Andrew Boe, argued the cleric's speeches were addressed to, and intended only for, a private Muslim congregation and that Haddad was not responsible for them being published online. Boe said it was unlikely a Jewish person would have discovered the speeches, to then be offended by them, if the recordings had not been covered and thus amplified by mainstream media. 'It would be analogous to a person of a prudish sensitivity seeking out pornography on the web and then complaining about being offended by it,' Boe told the court. Boe argued there must be room, in a democratic society, for 'the confronting, the challenging, even the shocking'. The hearing, before Justice Angus Stewart, is expected to run until the end of the week.
South Wales Argus
14 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Abergavenny mosque site vandalised by racist graffiti
Plans to turn a former Gwent library into a mosque have been met with support when the Argus went to canvas opinion, but some, including local Senedd member Laura-Anne Jones, have questioned the plan. The old Abergavenny library on Baker Street has been unused since 2015 after the library was relocated to the Town Hall. In May, Monmouthshire council agreed to grant a 30-year lease to the Monmouthshire Muslim Community Association who plan to use the building as a mosque. This would be the county's first mosque. The former Abergavenny library which could be a mosque covered in racist graffiti (Image: NQ) Sadly overnight (June 10) the site was the target of racist graffiti. Written in Arabic the word 'masjid' meaning mosque appeared next to the word 'no.' Also graffitied were crosses symbolic of the Christian faith. When the Argus spoke to locals in Abergavenny, they were upset and angered by the vandalism. Francis Buxton 83 and Caroline Lewis 81 next to the racist graffiti in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) 83-year-old local Francis Buxton is a Christian. When asked about the painted crosses Francis said the following. 'I deplore the fact there's a cross there as if it's supporting this protest and I do hope there can be some statement from the local Christian churches, to say we stand alongside the Muslims and support them in having a regular prayer place.' 32-year-old Jenny McConnel next to the racist graffiti in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) Reacting to the graffiti 32-year-old Jenny McConnel said: 'I just feel really upset and it's basically on my doorstep that people would oppose a peaceful place for people to worship it's just really upsetting.' 24-year-old Ebony Metcalf next to the racist graffiti in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) 24-year-old Ebony Metcalf is new to Abergavenny. She said: 'I only moved here in November, and I thought it was a lovely community and all this sudden hatred it's just disgusting. 'Vandalising a building. I don't understand it it's hateful for no reason.' 62-year-old Hayley Ward shared her thoughts on a new mosque in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) When asked about the idea of the mosque taking over the former library, 62-year-old Hayley Ward said: 'Well, it is different, but I think it's important to encourage and allow all sorts of diversity it's important we are all equal I think it's only fair and right that there should be access to all sorts of cultures in Abergavenny.' Catherine Evans 67 and Anne Jenkins 90 shared their thoughts on a new mosque in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) 67-year-old Catherine Evans 67 and mother 90-year-old Anne Jenkins also supported the idea of a new religious site. Catherine said: 'I think it's great I think we should be inclusive it's somewhere for the Islamic community to be able to worship instead of having to travel long distances. 'I think we should be embracing multiculturalism. That's what it's about isn't it?' Catherine commented why some people may be against the mosque. 'In this world people have got different opinions and some people are more right wing than left wing.' Joshua Jones 35 and Stephen Hopkins 54 shared their thoughts on a new mosque in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) 35-year-old Joshua Jones 54-year-old Stephen Hopkins were also in favour of a new mosque. Stephen said: 'It's brilliant I haven't heard of it but it's good.' 'Another religious site is good it's a good idea.' Joshua added: 'I think it's great to have that in the community. 'I think everyone has the right to practise their religion. What they believe in is up to them.' 43-year-old Dylan Roberts shared his thoughts on a new mosque in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) 43-year-old Dylan Roberts had the following to say: 'I've got no issue with it I think its fine people need a place to worship. 'I think there's a lot of sentiment in the country a lot of it aimed by Muslims and I think a lot of scepticism comes from that.' 65-year-old Sue Holden shared her thoughts on a new mosque in Abergavenny. (Image: NQ) 65-year-old Sue Holden said: 'It's good the building isn't standing derelict and that it's in use and there is a need for a Mosque.' 31-year-old Jordie Le Bowen shared his thoughts on a new mosque in Abergavenny (Image: NQ) 31-year-old Jordie Le Bowen said: 'Wonderful, it's more inclusive in terms of libraries going there's a hell of a lot of online resources going. 'So, we don't have to worry about that being an issue in my opinion.' The plan was given approval by Monmouthshire Council last week but the decision was called in, meaning further discussion will take place. A meeting is due to take place on Wednesday, June 11, to discuss the plans.
The Guardian
2 days ago
- The Guardian
Sydney cleric being sued for alleged antisemitism says case is an existential battle ‘between Islam and unbelievers'
A Sydney Islamic cleric being sued in the federal court for alleged racial discrimination of Jewish people has described his case as an existential battle 'between Islam and unbelievers'. Wissam Haddad, also known as Abu Ousayd, is being sued by Australia's peak Jewish body over a series of lectures he gave in November 2023, in which he is alleged to have maligned Jewish people as 'vile', 'treacherous' and cowardly. The lectures quoted ayat and hadith from the Qur'an about Jews in Medina in the 7th century and, the federal court claim alleges, made derogatory generalisations about Jewish people, including that they are 'wicked and scheming' and 'love wealth'. The claim, brought by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, alleges Haddad breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act – prohibiting offensive behaviour based on race or ethnic origin – during the sermons delivered at the Al Madina Dawah Centre (AMDC) in Bankstown in November 2023, speeches subsequently broadcast online. But, Haddad's defence case argues, his sermons were delivered in 'good faith' as religious and historical instruction. If his sermons are found to breach 18C, then, he argues, the law is unconstitutional because it restricts the free exercise of religion. On Tuesday morning, the long-running dispute, which failed to find resolution at conciliation, comes before Justice Angus Stewart in the federal court, in a case set to test the limits of religious expression and hate speech under Australian law. The court is likely to be asked to adjudicate whether Haddad's sermons, in which he quotes the Qur'an and offers interpretation of it, amount to incitement or are protected religious expression. Ahead of the trial, Haddad, argued on Instagram that the case was existential for the practice of Islam in Australia. 'What I am currently facing in the federal court is not an issue of Abu Ousayd or Al Madina Dawah Centre versus the Jewish lobby … rather, it's a battle between Islam and kuffar,' he said, using an Arabic word, usually translated as 'unbelievers'. He said the claim against him sought to criminalise Islamic scripture. 'They wish to take and make those ayat and hadith and historic accounts that speak about the Jews: to what they see as insulting, they seek to make it criminal.' Ayat are verses in the Qur'an, the Islamic holy book, while hadith are reports attributed to the Prophet Muhammad. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Two prominent members of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, Peter Wertheim and Robert Goot, have sought an injunction from the court ordering the speeches still online be removed, and banning Haddad and his centre from publishing similar content online in the future. The ECAJ claim has also asked the court to order Haddad's centre to publish a 'corrective notice' on its social media pages. It has applied for the cost of its legal action to be covered, but it has not sought damages or compensation. In a statement, Wertheim said the ECAJ had attempted 'in good faith' to resolve the matter by conciliation through the Australian Human Rights Commission, but that attempts to broker a resolution failed. He said the ECAJ took the matter to court 'to defend the honour of our community, and as a warning to deter others seeking to mobilise racism in order to promote their political views'. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'We are all free to observe our faith and traditions within the bounds of Australian law, and that should mean we do not bring the hatreds, prejudices and bigotry of overseas conflicts and societies into Australia.' In his defence documents, Haddad argues his lectures 'were not reasonably likely to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate Jewish people in Australia' given their context and audience. He said his sermons were delivered in 'good faith' and 'for the genuine purpose of … delivering religious historical and educational lectures … to congregants of the AMDC'. He said he had given some of the addresses in response to requests from the Islamic community 'to provide sermons which address the Gaza War, and engaging in political commentary on the Gaza War from a religious perspective'. However, his defence states, if the court finds his sermons have breached section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, he argues the law is unconstitutional under section 116 of the constitution, which protects the 'free exercise of any religion'. Both Haddad and the ECAJ will rely on lay witnesses and expert testimony in the week-long court case. The ECAJ has enlisted professor of theology at Notre Dame University, Gabriel Reynolds; Haddad will call Sheikh Adel Ibrahim from the Greenacre Prayers Hall in Sydney to give evidence. Haddad has never been charged with any terrorism-related offences, but has previously boasted of his friendship with Australian Islamic State fighters Khaled Sharrouf and Mohamed Elomar, and Briton Anjem Choudary, an extremist preacher jailed for life in the UK last year. A former Asio spy who infiltrated Haddad's organisation between 2016 and 2023 told the ABC's Four Corners program that young people in Haddad's prayer centre were being indoctrinated into supporting Islamic State. Section 18C is the most contested and controversial section of the Racial Discrimination Act. Several high-profile cases have seen it argued the section restricts freedom of speech and political communication in Australia.
