Europe wants Trump to sanction Russia. Rubio says not yet.
President Donald Trump will buck Europe's pleas to ratchet up sanctions on Russia, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Wednesday, saying the U.S. still wants room to negotiate a peace deal.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other European leaders are hoping to convince Trump later on Wednesday to add more sanctions on Moscow, particularly after Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly rebuffed American attempts to broker a ceasefire with Ukraine.
'If we did what everybody here wants us to do, and that is come in and crush them with more sanctions, we probably lose our ability to talk to them about the ceasefire and then who's talking to them?,' Rubio said in an exclusive interview with POLITICO's Dasha Burns on the sidelines of the NATO summit.
Trump will 'know the right time and place' for new economic measures and the administration is working with Congress to make sure they allow Trump the appropriate flexibility, Rubio said. But once that happens, he added, it means the window for talking with Russia is likely closed.
'If he does it, you're almost admitting that this is not going to be negotiated anytime soon,' Rubio said.
'We're going to continue to engage,' he said. 'In the sense that if there's an opportunity for us to make a difference and get them to the table, we're going to take it.'
As talks with Russia have stalled, Rubio said Moscow believes it can achieve its territorial goals on the battlefield – an assessment Washington disagrees with.
'Our sense of it is that the Russians are going to try to achieve in the battlefield what they've demanded in the negotiating table, which is certain territories [maintain] their administrative lines and the like,' he said. 'We think it's going to be a lot harder for them to achieve that than they think it's going to be.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ukraine's drone pilots are overhauling which Russian targets they think matter most, and tanks have fallen far from the top
Ukraine's drone units updated their points system earlier this month to prioritize personnel hits. Where a tank kill could earn 40 points, now it only earns up to eight per vehicle. Russian drone pilots are now the highest priority target for the bonus program. Russian tanks and rocket launchers used to be the most highly valued target for Ukrainian drones — but no longer. Ukraine's drone forces recently revamped a points system that rewards pilots for battlefield kills, and it's putting the greatest emphasis on targeting Russian drone operators. The system, created in August, previously placed the highest value on destroying artillery systems and tanks. Ukrainian units now earn 15 points for wounding a drone pilot and 25 for eliminating them, Maj. Robert "Magyar" Brovdi, the new commander of Ukraine's Unmanned Systems Forces, said in a video address on June 12. Tank kills, which previously earned 40 points, now only bring in eight points for Ukrainian units. Destroying multiple launch rocket systems, which could have earned up to 50 points, now only net Ukrainian pilots as many as 10 points. "We need to stimulate pilots to orient themselves toward destroying personnel," Brovdi, who also founded the Ukrainian marine corps UAV strike unit Magyar Birds, said in the video. Brovdi said the change came from concerns that Ukrainian drone units weren't clearing Russian infantry as quickly as needed, allowing Moscow to accumulate a surplus of troops on the frontline. Now, Ukraine's system doubles the points a drone pilot can score from eliminating a Russian soldier, from six points to 12 per kill. Brovdi said the new system shouldn't discourage drone operators from carrying out hits on Russian equipment. "I don't know a single pilot who, upon detecting a moving mechanized armored column of the enemy — tanks, BTRs —wouldn't strike them just because no bonus is paid. That's absurd," he said. Among Russian forces, the shift is being noticed by military bloggers who write about the frontline. "Bad news from the front," wrote Alexander Kharchenko, a state media war journalist who runs the Telegram channel Witnesses Bayraktar, warning of a "hunt for our drone operators." "From my own experience, I can say that the pressure on logistics has now been reduced, and all efforts have been redirected toward identifying and destroying our UAV crews," Kharchenko wrote in a Saturday post. "We need to enhance camouflage and change positions more frequently," he added. Another Russian military blogger, Laboratory of the SVO, advised Russian drone squads to spread out, urging drone pilots and operators to sit separately. "There is no need to wander all over the place," they wrote on Monday. "You are a real scout. Less movement means longer life." Ukraine initially created its rewards system to incentivize drone units to target enemy positions more efficiently. The points could be used to purchase drone equipment from the state — a boon for many units relying on both official and crowdsourced resources to continue fighting. To claim their points, units have to film and record their hits. In April, Ukraine launched an "Amazon"-style website that officials said offers over 1,000 types of equipment in exchange for points, including batteries, guns, and satellite communications devices. Brovdi said that with the new rankings, eliminating a typical squad of three drone pilots could earn a Ukrainian unit enough points to get 57 new first-person view drones. A typical 10-inch FPV drone can cost about $500. By Brovdi's account, 507 Ukrainian units report in monthly with their points tallies. In his video, the commander also said he plans to regularly invite leaders of the top 12 units on the points leaderboard, alongside representatives from other randomly selected units, to provide advice in a focus group. "That way, we'll model any situation and optimize the bonus model, and propose it to those in charge," he said. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘My son went to get flour. He came back in a coffin': As the world focuses on Iran, Palestinians are being shot dead seeking aid
'My son went to get some flour for his family, but came back in a coffin and a death shroud.' These are the words of father-of-six Iyad Abu Darabi describing how Israeli forces killed his 25-year-old son Mussa in southern Gaza in the first few weeks of June. Desperate and starving, the young man had snuck off against his family's wishes to collect food from a specially designated distribution site backed by Israel and run by the deeply controversial US-based non-profit Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). Almost all aid going into Gaza now runs through the American aid group, which started operations in May following a months-long Israeli blockade of nearly all food and aid. Food is handed out at overcrowded and deadly sites overseen by American private security contractors and the Israeli army. Gazans have described the sites as 'American death zones' because of the contractors who patrol them. The foundation has been shrouded in secrecy, with obscure sources of funding and several changes in leadership and management since its launch. Gaza's health ministry said that Israeli forces opening fire on crowds trying to reach the GHF food distribution points have killed nearly 400 Palestinians and wounded more than 3,000 since aid deliveries were reinstated in late May. Several videos from the sites show people cowering or running from gunfire, struggling to carry bags of food as they escape. Despite the carnage, the Trump administration is said to be considering funding the organisation to the tune of $500m (£370m) through the recently downsized US Agency for International Development (USAID). This week though, the world's focus has been on the growing clashes between Israel and Iran. The two sides have traded thousands of missiles, drones and bombs in a conflict that threatens to engulf the entire Middle East and draw in countries from around the world. It has overshadowed the desperate events in Gaza, where the two-million-strong population is trapped in a snare of famine, according to the United Nations. An unprecedented Israeli bombardment of the tiny 35-mile-long strip has killed over 55,000 people since Hamas militants' bloody attacks on southern Israel in October 2023. Mussa was just one of hundreds who have lost their lives in the desperate search for food. Witnesses and families of those killed say Israeli forces opened fire on the massive crowds gathered that day as hungry civilians scrambled for food in a desert wasteland. He was hit by tank fire, and killed instantly alongside women and children, Iyad says. 'The aid is a death trap for young people: in a barren land surrounded by fences, the gates are opened for tens of thousands to fight over supplies without any order. Israel leaves people fighting each other over food,' Iyad says in desperation. 'He went without my knowledge and because of extreme hunger. But this is not aid, it is an opportunity for more killing.' The Israeli military has admitted firing warning shots at people gathered for aid, but denies targeting civilians in Gaza or turning aid distribution sites into 'death traps'. It told The Independent that at least one incident is 'under review'. 'The IDF regrets any harm to uninvolved individuals and operates to minimise harm as much as possible to them, while maintaining the safety of our troops,' it added. The GHF said this incident did not occur at a GHF site, and in a press release on Monday claimed it had distributed more than three million meals at its four sites 'without incident'. The latest – and deadliest – incident took place on Tuesday. The health ministry said that 59 people were killed and more than 200 wounded while waiting for United Nations and commercial trucks to enter the territory with desperately needed food. Palestinian witnesses said that Israeli forces carried out an airstrike on a nearby home before opening fire towards the crowd in the southern city of Khan Younis. While the shooting did not appear to be related to the newly launched Israeli-backed GHF network — it is an indication of the deadly struggle Palestinians face every day to get food, at a time when a kilo of sugar is now $70. Randa Youssef, 42, a single mother-of-three, says her cousin Mohammed was killed on 5 June while attempting to get food from a GHF site in Rafah. She said Mohammed was due to be married just three days later. 'He was shot in the back and fell to the ground. There was no means of transport. He bled to death for three hours amid continuous gunfire,' Randa explains. 'We can't afford the basic necessities. A kilo of sugar costs $70 today. That's why we risk our lives. My son sometimes cries. I honestly don't know what to feed him. 'This American aid is deliberate chaos.' The Biden administration paid lip service to trying to convince Israel to allow aid into Gaza without achieving much in the way of results, but the Trump administration has largely taken a hands-off approach. Israel cut off the supply of most food and aid to Gaza in March, causing hunger to skyrocket across the Strip. Humanitarian groups have warned that most of Gaza's 2.2 million people are at risk of starvation unless aid deliveries are ramped up. The GHF system began in May, but aid groups have warned it is wholly insufficient to meet the needs of the population. The UN and other humanitarian organisations have also warned of the risk of friction between Israeli troops and civilians seeking supplies, and continue to call for an immediate ceasefire and unrestricted aid access. Former officials from the US state department and USAID who have worked on emergency aid delivery described the new system as 'grotesque', 'dangerous' and part of a larger plan to use aid to control the movement of Palestinians. 'What is so infuriatingly tragic about this is that it's playing out exactly as any experienced humanitarian could have predicted,' said Jeremy Konyndyk, who oversaw famine relief for three years during the Obama administration and is now president of Refugees International. 'When you have an aid distribution model that is premised on forcing huge crowds of desperately hungry people to cluster directly adjacent to IDF military installations, you're going to get massacres,' he added. Mr Konyndyk said it was 'not a coincidence' that most of the distribution sites were in the south of Gaza, at a time when the Israeli army was trying to force Palestinians out of the north of the territory. 'A basic principle of humanitarian response is you move the aid as close to you can to where the people are. They're doing the opposite of that, the diametric opposite of that, which suggests that they want to draw people to the south,' he said. 'I think that is highly suggestive of the longer-term agenda here,' he added. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced plans last month to force Palestinians to move to southern Gaza after his security cabinet approved an expanded military operation in the northern and central parts of the territory. 'There will be a movement of the population to protect them,' he said of the operation. Stacey Gilbert, who resigned from the state department in 2024 over the Biden administration's failure to hold Israel accountable for blocking aid to Gaza, called the sites 'another stunt'. 'It's a stunt like the air drops. It's a stunt like the floating pier debacle. These are all ways that both the Biden administration, now the Trump administration, are using to try to obscure the fact that they're going to these extraordinarily dangerous and extraordinarily expensive efforts because Israel is blocking aid. There's no other way to see it,' she told The Independent. 'It is so humiliating and undignified and just dangerous, straight out dangerous for everyone involved,' she added. Ms Gilbert, too, believes the sites are located primarily in the south to draw Palestinians away from the north. 'This is trying to draw them all to one area, to get them away from the area that Israel doesn't want them in,' she said. Despite hundreds of deaths at the GHF sites and an insufficient level of aid getting into Gaza, the Trump administration appears to be leaving the door open to backing it financially. A state department spokesperson told The Independent that the GHF was 'an independent organisation. It does not receive USG funding.' 'Nevertheless, we are constantly looking for creative solutions to get aid into Gaza without it being looted by Hamas,' the spokesperson added. Israel insists the new system was necessary because aid was being diverted to Hamas under the previous long-established system, managed by the United Nations, a charge denied by the UN and by Hamas. For Salwa al-Daghma, from the southern city of Khan Younis, 'this aid is a morsel of food soaked in blood'. Her brother Khaled, a father-of-five, was shot dead by a sniper earlier this month at another GHF site in Rafah when he tried to get just a kilo of flour for his children – the youngest just over two years old. Again, Israeli forces opened fire on the massive crowds when chaos broke out. 'He was hit by a bullet directly in the head. His brain came out the other side, and he was killed instantly,' she said. 'Israel closed the crossings and banned food, and they came to us with a method to kill our children and families. 'This is a death trap, not an aid point. They don't want to help us – they are actually killing us.'
CNBC
31 minutes ago
- CNBC
NATO allies agree to higher 5% defense spending target
NATO allies on Thursday agreed to more than double their defense spending target from 2% of gross domestic product to 5%, in the most decisive move from the alliance in over a decade. In a joint declaration, the alliance said it was "united in the face of profound security threats and challenges," in particular the long- term threat posed by Russia to Euro-Atlantic security and the "persistent threat" of terrorism. "Allies commit to invest 5% of GDP annually on core defence requirements as well as defence-and security-related spending by 2035 to ensure our individual and collective obligations.," it continued. The historic move comes against a backdrop of tensions in the Middle East and ongoing war between Ukraine and Russia. Allies have been pushed to this point after years of pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump, across both of his terms in office.
