
What's going wrong at Kate Moss's beauty brand?
So where did it all go wrong for Cosmoss, the wellness and beauty brand fronted by supermodel Kate Moss that, according to some, was set to make her the next Gwyneth Paltrow? The range — comprising everything from herbal tea bags (£20 for 20) through cleansers (£52), moisturisers (£95) and perfume (£125) — launched in September 2022. However, records from Companies House show that the company's last accounts, for 2023, which were due at the end of December 2024, have yet to be filed, the Instagram account hasn't been updated for almost three months, and the products are being sold for a fraction of the original price — you can snap up the cleanser for £11.99 and the perfume for £39.99 — at online discount stores.
For a start, according to many, the products just didn't stand up to scrutiny.
Reviewing the range when it launched, beauty expert and founder of the Skin Rocks brand Caroline Hirons was unimpressed. Writing about the £95 face cream, she said: 'There is nothing revolutionary about this moisturiser, and the claims are designed to give the impression that it will do far more for your skin than it is scientifically capable of.' More broadly, she took umbrage, not at Moss entering the beauty arena, but at the fact that, with the overblown claims and underwhelming formulations, Moss didn't seem to be taking it seriously.
'We are an industry full of trained, qualified and quantified experts with proven track records,' she wrote. 'Feel free to join us […] but you need to meet us high up at our level, not invent your own 'whimsical' one that fuels the distrust and disregard for something that we all love so dearly.'
But even distinctly average products can sell in their millions if you get the marketing plan right, and this was Kate Moss, the face that — over the years — has sold everything from Calvin Klein jeans to St Tropez fake tan. Previous ventures in her own name have hardly flopped — her first fashion collection with Topshop was an instant hit, boosting Topshop sales by an estimated 10 per cent. So why couldn't she sell her wellness range?
Fundamentally there was a serious disjunct between what she was trying to sell and her image. After all, she's never exactly been synonymous with the wellness movement. And the fact that she'd signed to Diet Coke mere months before trying to flog us Cosmoss homeopathic teas didn't exactly help cement this as a brand that she'd poured her heart and soul into.
'Her reputation as a hardcore party girl did her no favours,' says Hirons. 'If she had bought out a make-up primer that made your face look as good as the night before the morning after, and a really sexy lip gloss or something, it would have flown. But the fact that Kate Moss brought out a wellness line just seemed to be taking the piss.'
Other industry insiders, who didn't want to be named, agree.
'She's synonymous with smokey eyes, late nights and effortlessly edgy glamour. She should have gone for make-up. You could have had the Kate Moss eye, or the 3am face that still looks good,' one said. 'But wellness? She's more well known for her hedonism than her herbalism!'
And that seems to be part of the key to the success of a celebrity brand – authenticity.
Charlotte McCarthy has been in beauty branding and communications for more than 25 years, working with founder brands including Jo Malone London, Anya Hindmarch and Bibbi Parfum.
She says: 'Celebrity brands go wrong when the individual doesn't live and breathe their product and purpose pre launch, at launch and after the launch. When you think about Gwyneth Paltrow, the Kardashians, Selena Gomez – they've built strong communities and a world you can access and feel part of. So when they launch a brand, it feels like a natural extension.
'But with Kate Moss and a wellness brand, it feels like people just didn't buy into it.'
But Moss just didn't seem to do the graft that's required. Like it or loathe it, if you've got a brand, you need to be on social media. The likes of Paltrow, Trinny Woodhall and Rihanna are on Instagram all the time — not just plugging their wares, but engaging with a community. Moss just doesn't play the game.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by COSMOSS (@cosmoss)
'The main thing that drives sales these days, especially if you're a celebrity, is community,' says Hirons. 'Think [Selena Gomez's brand] Rare Beauty, think Hailey Bieber [founder of Rhode Skin], which Kate Moss does not have. She doesn't talk to people, doesn't talk to the press, she's almost a recluse if you think about it. And fair play, she can do whatever she wants, but you can't then suddenly be surprised that you don't have this big community that come running when you release a product.'
The apparent demise of Cosmoss should be a cautionary tale for any celebs looking to cash in on the beauty industry. Not least because some believe that it won't be long before the only way that celebrities will be able to make money from beauty is through their own brands, making the stakes even higher.
Beauty marketing consultant Camilla Craven, who has worked with brands including Charlotte Tilbury and FaceGym, thinks the days of brands paying out for celebrity endorsements could be numbered.
'Brands are increasingly turning away from big-name celebrities towards micro-celebrities, who offer stronger engagement, and more targeted reach,' she says. 'They also tend to foster genuine trust within their niche communities, making their recommendations feel more authentic and persuasive.'
She adds: 'As audiences grow weary of glossy, impersonal campaigns, it's this relatability and consistent presence that can deliver better ROI and lasting brand loyalty — especially when traditional celebrity endorsements often come with high costs.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
ECB's Schnabel sees no lasting decoupling from Fed
DUBROVNIK, Croatia, June 7 (Reuters) - Ongoing trade tensions between the United States and the rest of the world are a shock to the entire global economy, meaning the Federal Reserve's and the European Central Bank's monetary policies are unlikely to diverge for long, ECB board member Isabel Schnabel said on Saturday. "I expect this trade conflict to play out as a global shock that's working through both lower demand and supply," she told a conference in Croatia. "We can discuss which of the two effects on inflation is larger because that determines the net effect. But in any case, I would not expect a sustained decoupling (between the ECB and the Fed)," she said.


Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Banking group urges customers with £10,000 in savings to move their money NOW
Customers with £10,000 in savings are being urged to move their money or risk missing out on earning hundreds of pounds a year. In the UK 8.3 million current accounts hold £10,000 or more but 80 per cent of these accounts pay no interest - meaning their money sits passively. However, Spring, a savings app, has encouraged those looking to earn money through interest to move it into a savings account instead. The company warned millions of people in the UK are 'current account coasters' - leaving their money in a main account after paying for essentials, rather than placing it in savings. Derek Sprawling, Spring's Managing Director of Savings, told The Express: 'Cumulatively, nearly £400 billion is held in current account balances in the UK. 'You would imagine that these would mainly consist of small balances, but our analysis shows that there are a significant number of accounts that contain sizeable funds, accounting for over half of the overall balance. 'Most people sensibly maintain a small current account balance to cover emergency costs and everyday expenses, but leaving thousands of pounds in your current account means you will be missing out on hundreds of pounds in interest each year. 'With nearly eight million current accounts containing significant balances, that money could work harder in a higher-paying savings account.' File image: In the UK 8.3 million current accounts hold £10,000 or more but 80 per cent of these accounts pay no interest - meaning their money sits passively He explained that many people are wary about using savings accounts because they can loose immediate access to their money. But there are alternatives, which connect savings and current accounts together. These allow money to be transferred between accounts immediately. As well as unlimited withdrawals.


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Developer partner sought for listed building in Huddersfield
A Grade II* listed building could be transferred to a housing developer after original plans to transform the site Council had earmarked Estate Buildings, near the George Hotel and railway station in Huddersfield, for cash of £1.25m was secured for enabling works and the council had entered into an agreement with Thirteen Group to deliver social housing at the the housing provider has since withdrawn from the scheme due to risk within the sector, leaving the council looking for alternatives. The council has acknowledged that it would be "very challenging" and expensive for a developer to convert the building but hoped to reduce costs and make it a "more attractive" opportunity through government Buildings dates back to the late 1800s and was designed by Huddersfield architect W.H entrance hall, staircase and first-floor waiting rooms feature wall panelling, decorative stained glass and intricately carved fireplaces. The council said many of the features would be retained through any agreement with the Thirteen Group would have also involved developing Somerset Buildings on Byram Street and, once completed, the group could have purchased the building at market council now wants to appoint a development partner who would enter into a building lease with the council and take on the freehold for Estate Buildings once construction was complete. Grant repaid The move would generate additional council tax of up to £95,000 per year and some savings by reducing the costs associated with holding the building, according to the Local Democracy Reporting 2023-24, the council spent £29,000 on gas, electric, intruder and fire alarms and rodent controls at Estate Buildings.A decision on whether to proceed with the new approach will be made by the council's cabinet on the council is not in a contract to deliver homes by 31 March 2028, some or all of the £1.25m government grant would have to be repaid. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.